@pssshwhatever: Agreed. Lack of link indicates press photos, indicates new item. And thanks for the correction. Read more

@pssshwhatever: Agreed. Lack of link indicates press photos, indicates new item. And thanks for the correction. Read more
@VirtuousVixen: I used the word very intentionally. It simply does not mean what you seem — against all evidence — to think it means. You learned something new today! Go in peace. Read more
@giniaginia: Why, I imagine a mere blogger (who mighta heard tell o' that guy Doo-champ) is using the name like a whaddayacall, a readymade. Or somthin'. Names are funny things. What are you doing with yours? Read more
@VirtuousVixen: I'm sorry, but your etymology is incorrect. Shyster is not and has never been an anti-Semitic Read more
@incandescent_blue: It's a contraction of "help meet," which is how God explains Eve's purpose in Genesis. She is a "help meet" to Adam, i.e. a help commensurate to his needs, a help equal to his demands. Helpmate is a corruption of the term. Read more
@Hana Maru, with or without animals: I presume you meant "its"? Read more
@OliverGadgey: We had that, but it was the sixth formers who did it. The only year they were deferential to in their characterisations, of course, would be the 7th formers. This was because the 7th formers would not stand for anything less. I remember when it was my year's turn, we wanted to play Green Day's "Time Of… Read more
@ronniedobbs: That person speaking has been Leon's friend for years; I was extremely surprised he quoted her in such a way. Read more
@Adam Taylor: I've done it in 26. Don't even try me. Read more
@hussein persepolis hussein: Are you kidding? The Bronx is the only part of this infernal city that's on the mainland. That's, like, more actual than actual. Read more
@ShrutiBorus: A natural and respectable inclination. Read more

@morninggloria: I hear Jon Favreau is a Lifehacker commenter, so this is a possibility.
@ShrutiBorus: In case it wasn't clear, that line was sarcastic. Read more
@DailyLattes: Naomi Campbell — unlike Farrow — has refused to co-operate with the prosecutors. They deem her testimony to be of value. Who are you to say otherwise? (Someone who has never read Kant, I daresay.) Read more
@amoureuse est heureuse: If she has evidence that would prove Charles Taylor was a participant in the trade of blood diamonds in 1997, then by failing to co-operate with the prosecution, she is as good as condoning Taylor's and the RUF's arming of those child soldiers. Unless you perhaps believe Taylor was spending… Read more
@DailyLattes: You should read up on the case before commenting. There are other witnesses of Campbell's receipt of the diamonds, including one eyewitness whose account is particularly damning. Read more