Since the world learned that hypocritical hockey mom heroine Sarah Palin has spent $150 grand of RNC cash at high-end department stores for herself and her family at a crucial point in the campaign — to say nothing of an economic recession — an overwhelming amount of ink, thought and Texas Instruments battery power has been spilled on reporting, analyzing, deconstructing, undressing, calculating, replicating and critiquing what's come to be known, in the unavoidable parlance of our times, as "Fashiongate." Well, here's our guide to the Spree of the Century:How do you like your coverage? We've got everything from the straight to the analytical to the gleeful to the disgusted to predictably defensive statements by the McCain campaign. We've got commentary from other women in the public eye, stylists and prize-winning fashion writers. And then of course there are all the servicey pieces! From high end — replicating Palin's spree at Saks and Neiman's (several times), attempting to spend $150k, to low end — creating her looks at Loehmann's and Wal-Mart! HuffPo helpfully puts the expenditures in terms of the average plumber's salary, ratio of clothes to Edwards-haircuts, typical American clothing budgets and "the cost of health care for 15 or so people." There are also polls and analyses of how much this would undercut her image, and photo essays of her ensembles. For all this, the funny part is that there's really not that much to say. Here's the gist. Palin spent a ton on clothes, more than anyone can justify, even given arguments for the increased scrutiny on female politicians. She seems to have done so at a deliberate moment post-convention, once her Real American credentials had been established. She looks pretty good. But the timing could not be worse (global economic crisis, anyone?) and it flies directly in the face of her average Joe Six pack, hockey mom appeal just when the McCain campaign was trying to push a common touch agenda. Consensus? Republicans are pissed at the stupidity, McCain is pissed at having to talk about it, and whatever the eventual fallout, it's not good for them. So, was it worth it? No. Obviously not. She doesn't look that different, she's undercut her sole selling point, and made herself look even more ridiculous. What was the RNC thinking? Having beaten the $400 haircut drum and played the elitism card with such enthusiasm, who could possibly have green-lighted this kind of excess, even were the economy not in free fall? Were they trying to make the most of her looks? Sure. Were they hoping to make her look like a politician? Probably. Was this shopping spree some kind of grotesque hail mary, a kind of attempt to bolster a crappy show with lavish sets and costumes? (And yes I know that's like five metaphors.) What's ironic about this is that in the past, Republicans have successfully marketed rich men of privilege like Reagan and George W. Bush as simple men of the people. And yet, they've taken a Sarah Palin and dressed her like a rich person! I keep thinking about Stylista, the new show where magazine sophisticates whip kids into stylish shape. "Wearing the right label doesn't make something right," they say at one point to the designated villain. Meanwhile, the girl showing too much cleavage wails that she "loves her clothes" and "loves the way she looks in them," while the others pressure her into wearing something more tasteful and appropriate. They send the contestants to H&M and have them put looks together to show they have real style. Obviously the RNC didn't have that kind of confidence in their VP nominee. And sure enough, they'll pay through the nose. Sarah Palin's $150,000 Makeover [BBC] Sarah Palin's RNC-Funded Makeover: A Fashion Do Or Don't? [LA Times] Palin's Fashion-Gate [WWD] Republicans Disgusted By RNC Spending On Palin [Marc Ambinder] For Women In The Public Eye, Looks Matter [CNN] Stylist: Palin Fashion Buys Worth It [Politico] After A $150,000 Makeover, Sarah Palin Has An Image Problem [Washington Post] How To Spend $150,000 At Saks And Neiman Marcus [NY Mag] The Saks Girls On Sarah Palin [Newsweek] How To Spend $150,000 Just Like Sarah Palin [Slate] If Sarah Palin Shopped For Her Campaign Clothes At Walmart… [The Frisky] Palin Clothes Spending Has Dems Salivating, Republicans Disgusted [HuffPo] Poll: Is Sarah Palin Elitist? [Guardian] Look Is The Same; The Labels Have Changed [NY Times] Sarah Palin's RNC-Funded Makeover: A Fashion Do Or Don't? [LA Times] McCain Responds To Palin Shopping Bill [Time]
Y'all crack me up. I am not a Republican, and I don't care for Palin's politics, to say the least. However, a few thoughts before you sharpen your claws yet again:
1. How much did Michelle Obama spend on her outfits? Do you think she shops at Wal-Mart or for her ensembles (like the designer faves she wore in her Vogue photo shoot, for example). I freaking L-O-V-E Michelle O, and I ask you this.
2. How much do Joe Biden, John McCain, & Barack Obama pay for their suits, ties, and dress shirts? Hmmmmmm?
The Republican & Democratic parties have spent TENS OF MILLIONS getting ready for these campaigns.
$150,000 to dress their most photographed representative is CHUMP CHANGE, percentage-wise for their advertising budge. Also, if Palin is not properly dressed, she'd be criticized to the ends of the Earth.
Perhaps the real issue is that the election campaigns hve become so expensive that a candidate could consider $150,000 chump-change for their advertising dollar.
Anyone out there who thinks the Dems are dressing on a cheap-o budget needs to wake up and smell the Armani. BTW, they could at least all wear only American designers and support the garment industry.
P.S. I'm a Democrat-I just don't live with the illusion that any rich politician gives a fuck about me or is as freakin' poor as I am right now.