Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

​Vile Journo Releases Unconfirmed Name of UVA Victim "Jackie"

Illustration for article titled ​Vile Journo Releases Unconfirmed Name of UVA Victim Jackie

Charles C. Johnson, a former Daily Caller writer and founder of GotNews (a conservative site rife with racist and Islamophobic content parading as "Independent, Unbiased & Unafraid") has claimed that multiple sources have confirmed to him the identity of "Jackie," the woman whose alleged gang rape at the University of Virginia was recounted in the Rolling Stone piece "A Rape on Campus." So, in an absolutely disgusting move, Johnson has published her name, or what he thinks her name is.

Advertisement

Last Friday, the already incendiary piece became even more controversial when, Rolling Stone released a statement admitting in light of new information they found discrepancies in the story and declaring their trust in Jackie, the subject of the piece, was "misplaced." (Interestingly enough, Rolling Stone has quietly edited their statement, removing the bit about their misplaced trust.)

Advertisement

Given that unverified details ended up fracturing the story, it's completely irresponsible of Johnson to do the exact same thing and publish an unconfirmed name while the story is still being investigated. It is also incredibly unfair to ignore Rolling Stone's role in publishing the story in the interest of placing all the blame on Jackie. The only purpose releasing her name could possibly serve is justifying the already prominent and twisted desire to doggedly discredit victims of sexual assault. It only encourages those who define sexual assault as "crying rape."

Most importantly, publishing the real name is fucking dangerous. If Johnson is correct, he has put a young woman who has already been subjected to hatred and threats at even more risk.

Image via Getty.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

ibelieveinsnorkacks
ibelieveinsnorkacks

Jesus. Not only will this make things so much more scary and horrible for the woman if he did get the name right, but if he got it wrong then he's also endangering a completely unrelated woman! There is absolutely no justification for this, and it's irresponsible journalism *at best* if not willfully malicious.