<![CDATA[Vive La Difference! - Jezebel Comments]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference! - Jezebel Comments]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> And it doesn't look like anything that could qualify for Photoshop of Horrors, either. Good job?

Beebs

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @thatonegirlsays: Too funny! I agree! Even been grossed out by "Where in the world is Matt Lauer" this week cause he's been wearing the teabagging pants! UGH!!!!

JazzednJersey

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @BAngieB: Hey, how do ya think I feel? I turned 47 last week!!!! FUCK!!!!!!! Always love to see ya Bangie!!!

JazzednJersey

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @bilsemon:
I am not afraid of genitalia, I just have no desire to see it. And I don't enjoy seeing men with their legs spread wide open, fiddling with their junk. I don't need to see babymaking/producing/urinating machinery.


thatonegirlsays

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Why oh why are Americans so afraid of a woman's genitals? American women can't even sit without crossing their legs or ankles. Men sprawl all over their chairs - genitalia be damned. But women have to cover it up, even in clothes. Can you say REPRESSED?

bilsemon

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @jennilyn: I am so with you on that.I'd actually consider removing any part of my body to be in the same vicinity as David Duchovny.Although at that stage I have to admit I'm not sure if I'd care.
Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....

Calraigh

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I just saw another, larger version of the Vogue cover (at Go Fug Yourself, if anyone cares) and her shirt IS wet. Her entire torso is drenched; no wonder she looks pissed off.

pot_kettle

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> "Or would Americans rather not see the crotch of an Academy Award-nominated, Emmy- and Golden Globe-winning actress on their magazine covers?"

Guess if it's good enough for Robert Altman (see: nudity during confrontation with husband) then the shot is OK for FV. Obvs Julianne doesn't have a problem with it.

I want to be like her, only to have hot husband and be buddies with David Duchovny.

jennilyn

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> "Or would Americans rather not see the crotch of an Academy Award-nominated, Emmy- and Golden Globe-winning actress on their magazine covers?"

If it's inappropriate to pose for photos revealing in this way because you're respected and successful, that might imply something about how we feel about respectability and sexuality in women: in the eyes of this culture, they're mutually exclusive.

Because, of course, there is no sexuality for women other than the sexuality of being objectified for the purposes of others.

The Scarlet Pervygirl

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She's a gorgeous full-grown woman and the French seem to appreciate woman more as they age. In America the pedo-fantasy teen culture with fake boobs and fake hair just doesn't fly in France and woman are thought of as sexy at every age, there is no cut-off age for sexy. Vive La France!!

cumenichi

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Holy shit! I hope I look that hot at that age. Viva le firecrotch!

vulvateen

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She looks great but the Vogue cover is photoshopped to high heaven.Her face is barely human looking.Wonderful!Lets put a talented, beautiful and lauded 47yr old actor on the cover of our mag.But!Just as long as she looks 25.
Same ol', same ol'.

Calraigh

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She's so hot.

onwarddouchebagsoldiers

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> she was in my dream last night! weird

PopCultureSavant

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @hamburgerhotdog: God, I love leaving heel marks on my tomboy. Carry on.

Skinny Bone Jones

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> this makes me want to read French, but I can start with French Vogue, since it's probably mostly pictures anyways.

HoneyLush

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I think this shows her range. She can be the dream girl next-door or the dominatrix you wish was next-door.

I just wish my red-hair and freckles looked so good.

sassyredhead

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Scoregasm: the phrase "some walmart in the bible belt" puts the fear of "god" in me, and makes me want to cling to my Brooklyn rent-stabilized apartment for life.

@shananigans: definitely the French Vogue, hands down. Everything works here, while Bazaar is just boring.

richcreamerybutter

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @heatherink:

I don't see how the cover is "Puritanical." It's a head shot, and she's smiling and looks very natural. It's not like they pulled her hair back in a bun, took off all her make up, and had her sit straight up in her chair and look sternly and disapprovingly at the camera.

Katxyz

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I don't think you necessarily have to show more of someone's body to prove you see their sex appeal. I think both pics are sexy, except for the reddish faux tan she has on the left and the fact that it looks like she's backing away in fear on the right. So, she's sexy, but I don't like either cover much.

Katxyz

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I think the American cover looks too Puritanical. Why are women broken down in to two categories - porn star or wholesome housewife?

heatherink

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @sequined: Erm Germany does not equal France in the sexiness stakes... InfactI think nowhere equals France in the sexiness stakes.

Plum-Pie

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @cautionarywhale: Ha, not everything is sexier in Europe. We have Justin Timberlake; Germany has these dudes. So, the "sexier in Europe" ideal is a myth, as you can see.

sequined

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> her facial expression on the french vogue cover is "hurry up and take the picture, a**hole, because I have a stiletto heel in my thigh!" i wouldn't have a problem with the shot if she didn't look angry or in pain.

alexela

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I like the French Vogue. It's edgy and doesn't look like it's been Photoshopped from here to eternity.

shananigans

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Unless I am buying a nudie magazine, I don't want to see ANYONE'S crotch as a cover centerpiece, especially this ealier in the morning. I still think Julianne looks fabulous though.

VegasDarling

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Entonces is suffering from allergies: I believe the Vogue cover is an outtake from the Domino shoot.

And, o hai!!

LipstickLibrarian

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @minesbigger:You see that is the beauty of the French they see beauty and sex appeal at any age. My favorite model posed nude for French Elle at age 16 and now French Vogue has Jullianne Moore at age 47. In the good ole' USofA feminists say be proud of your body girls "love the skin your in" but don't ever take off your clothes or be provocative because then you are being objectified and victimized. It has more to do with the mid set of the culture more than anything else and our mindset of sex here in America sucks especially when it comes to young girls. Why is it that girls should inhibit their sexuality until they are over 18, innocence can be sexy too. The only difference between Julianne and Miley is that Julianne knows that she should not be ashamed of her body or sexuality, Miley does not understand that yet (maybe she did) but we have only reinforced that nudity=sex, sex is for adults particularly men who in return will only take advantage of you.

lavalove

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> she's made for edgy. i'd pick her being a hardass, rather than the smarmy 'we could be besties!' covers anyday.

OSallyTheAlleyCat

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> i just love that her thighs dont look photoshopped down to twigs.

bellasarah

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @sassymoniker: her boobs probably don't look that good either. Photoshop, honey!

She looks boring in the first one, ridiculous in the second.

What's up with all these crotch shots? Put it away, ladies!

Lulu82

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Charlotte Corday, Miss Stabby Stabby 1793: I love French women's magazines. Which reminds me, I should go invest in a new one...

bowleserised

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Sparker_Pants: Got mine at Ross for $3. The Boy goes ga-ga over 'em.

Le Kangourou de Kataroo

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> You see that is the beauty of the French they see beauty and sex appeal at any age. My favorite model posed nude for French Elle at age 16 and now French Vogue has Jullianne Moore at age 47. We hear in the good ole' USofA (especially feminists) say be proud of your body girls "love the skin your in" but don't ever take off your clothes or be provocative because then you are being objectified and victimized. It has more to do with the mid set of the culture more than anything else and our mindset of sex here in America sucks especially when it comes to young girls.

The clothes in the Vogue cover are great but her face and pose look weird. Her face on Bazar looks great.

lavalove

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She is sooo hot. Love her.

Le Kangourou de Kataroo

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @optical_allusion:

oh hey she looks amazing in those shots!

Bianca_Cheri

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> It's the continued world domination of Madonna's Crotch. Today, The Crotch takes over Julianne Moore; tomorrow, the world!

chelsea g summers

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @fauxpas: Way to live up to your name.

wednesdaywolf

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> the term 'firecrotch' comes to mind

fauxpas

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> wow she looks amazing on that Vogue cover. she is rocking those panties and I don't find the crotch shot offensive.

I don't know maybe it's because I respect her so much as a really good actress and it's cool to see her vamp it up a little sometimes, especially when she looks as killer as she does on that cover.

Bianca_Cheri

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]>

The Bazaar subscriber cover was a lot better: [cgi.ebay.com]

Also, the fashion spread inside was pretty good - she posed as famous paintings.
[myitthings.com]


optical_allusion

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @and Begorrah: Awesome!
I think that "When I am an Old Woman" should be required reading for 13-year-old girls, so that they know that all the pressure to conform they feel at that time is going to fade, and that they should rock out at any age.
*sigh*
I love that poem/book.




wednesdaywolf

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Oh sweet baby Jesus, she has beautiful hair. I could care less if someone's crotch is on the cover of a magazine when they have hair that great.

aubonpam

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I really don't enjoy the Vogue cover and it has nothing to do with her vadge...her face doesn't look sexy, it looks hard and angular. Her bod is killer though!

thatonegirlsays

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @wednesdaywolf: I gave my mom (no! wait! listen, it gets better!) a card on her 50th that said, "Your youth and vigor doesn't stand a chance against my age and cunning." She didn't laugh at first but that may be 'cause she was a little drunk.

andBegorrah

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I'm perfectly happy with Julianne Moore's crotch, as an American who is not generally satisfied with crotches of that nature. She's earned the right to be risque by being adequately talented and proving it before doing a cover like this. That said, Oooh la la...

Lady Skittlehattington

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @beastybeatsy: Yeah, she looks a little pissed off.

Really, she's beautiful, but I don't want to see anyone's crotch on the cover of a mainstream magazine.

And I absolutely don't want to see Madonna's. Ever. Please?

petunia942

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> It's so weird, how now, in the media, it's "OK" for women to be sexy beyond the age of 18. Is this really such a big deal, that women can and do age well, or even better, than their male counterparts?

Anyway, neither photo is that interesting, except in the sense that they both are of a beautiful woman.

brassinpocket

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Thumbs up to both. I love her.

@N i s t h a: I'm not sure I understand your comment. If she were underage, then yes, the provocative cover would be a problem. However, she is not underage. She is a beautiful adult who has shown herself to be comfortable with her body. It IS okay to be sexy, you know.

minesbigger

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She kind of looks like a red-headed Meryl streep in the Bazaar cover.

mepo

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Older woman my ass. I'm 24, and would so go lezebel for Julianne Moore.

goldberry83

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Whether or not she has the bod to carry it off, which she does, I don't see why an elegant, intelligent, talented woman of Julianne Moore's calibre should need to stoop to polyester leopard granny panties to "look hot". That entire outfit says "cheap'n'desperate cougar" to me, and I don't care whether it is in fact designer gear that would cost more than my yearly rent.

@braak -- yeah. Uber-generico, the Bazaar.

pot_kettle

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She's on the cover of Domino too. OBVIOUSLY THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE.

[www.dominomag.com]

Entonces is ironing your dumb ass

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> This is not a question of whether French women are more likely to see sex appeal of an "older" woman.

It's simply a fact that American mags put a giant headshot on their covers and French mags usually use a full body shot.

And the American mags are usually fresh and pretty while the French ones are dirty sexy.

not.a.clever.name

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Patsy_Stone: Certainly makes me pull that face.

beastybeatsy

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @BAngieB: You know, I sort of think we should own and rock "older woman". I mean, yeah, the lady is 40... she's OLDER than most ladies (if, you know, average liefspan is 78 or whatever)... I love it. Older women, rock on! Own it, love it.

Think TOWANDA!! ("...and I have more insurance.")

wednesdaywolf

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Fuck matching your belt to your shoes, from now on I'm matching my belt to my underwear just like Ms.Moore there.

I think she's all around gorgeous but the Harper's cover looks like an ad for hair dye.

RustyHeadedGirl

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @and Begorrah: Ha!

BiBiVirtue

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I like the outfit and pose on the French one, but dislike the hair. She has such lovely locks, why hide them away? Also she looks sort of terrified.

scribbles

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I love her. Love, love, love her.

"Did you think this was all fun and games?"

"Now you must really shut the fuck up!"

Love. Her.

Love French Vogue, too. The Bazaar cover, not so much... doesn't let enough awesomeness shine through!!

wednesdaywolf

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @tashatakeadive: Is that what the kids are calling "breasts" now?

LipstickLibrarian

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> While she is in fact beautiful- and look stunning on the French cover- she looks as though she is in the midst of a coke-fueled nightmare.

Philthyist

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Is her shirt wet or is it some sort of tie-die effect?

mepo

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> All she needs is knee high tube socks and the French Vogue cover is an American Apparel ad. Thick black glasses wouldn't hurt, either.

clyderambutt

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @ferociacoutura: julianne or emmaunuelle? i's confoosed.

Charlotte Corday

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> It's very sexy the way the heal of her shoe indents her thigh. Those French sure no how to sell it.

mepo

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Charlotte Corday, Miss Stabby Stabby 1793: I mean... to be fair, she was pretty skinny. I guess she has a curvy butt on her, but it's nice, and her arms are tiny and her boobies are perky. I'm an average sized person and I would kill to have that body.

ferociacoutura

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> OMG HEEL POKING THIGH. OWIE OWIE. OW.

That's ALL I can see.

Sometimes I forget I'm wearing heels and I slouch around and cross my legs like that to sit down on my bed or whatever. And I invariably scrape myself or give myself puncture wounds.

QUEL DOMMAGE. Ow.

tscheese

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @beastybeatsy: Yeah, it looks as if she sat on something sharp. Like the heel of her left shoe.

Patsy_Stone

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Dear Blond Diary...: i'm looking for the emmanuelle beart cover as we speak!

Charlotte Corday

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @tashatakeadive: sorry, but that comment just seems a touch infantile. or is it puritan?

Charlotte Corday

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @Charlotte Corday, Miss Stabby Stabby 1793: See, I just thought the french like the skinny, uber fashionable, cigarette look

Dear Blond Diary...

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Mon complexe de la vergin et la whore -- laizzeh-moi show u eet.

andBegorrah

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> she is both beautiful and fierce and on of the biggest reasons i constantly flirt with the idea of dying my hair red.

lermanzo

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Ah, what a great way to wake up. A shot of Julianne Moore's eggs.

tashatakeadive

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Well American mags, even Vogue, are much more in the business of celebrity, and promoting movies/albums, while French Vogue is definitely more about fashion. Also, Ms. Roitfeld likes everyone to be thin, smoking (literally and metaphorically) and somehow "edgy."

magiciannamedgob

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> The Vogue cover to me is complete over-the-top vamp: hence I love it. Also, if the covers of FHM and MAXIM regularly pass muster, why wouldn't this?

Devonna

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I'm just going to be mad for the rest of the day because Julianne Moore is now an "older woman."
Such as.

BAngieB

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @femminista: What's H.B. like compared to Vogue in the US? In the UK French Vogue always seems sexier, that might just be me.

I can get hold of European magazines more easily than US ones (importing them seems to make the price quadruple)

beastybeatsy

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I really wish that American magazines would stop advertising their innards on the cover. I mean, I know I want to know what's inside before a I buy it, but can't you just flip through it in the check-out or something? I feel like it makes the magazine look so cheap.

madbain

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> That French Vogue cover... my mouth's hanging open and I might be drooling. White hot.

CorreLola

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I think her flowing red hair and smirky half smile on the Bazaar cover is pretty sexy. I wish I could pull that off now-- and I'm 15 years younger than the stunning Ms.Moore.

PhillyLass

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> hmmm...i just got my bazaar (subscription)and it is all blue....a full length pic of her in a long blue armani prive gown---fantastic shot.

blackrockcitygal

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Also, I feel like I've seen that Harper's Bazaar cover ten thousand times.

I mean, I used to work in a bookstore stocking magazines, so I've seen my fair share of magazine covers. But seeing that one gives me crazy deja vu.

braak

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> The Vogue cover is very "Bowie's In Space".

Jessi Ramsey

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Americans like to deny the existence of blatant crotch on our esteemed womens magazine covers. Besides this week would have been a bad week after all the Miley stuff how much can the soccer moms take??

angryblackgurl

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> well, if we consider it to be sensual in the first place, that is***

N i s t h a

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Hn. If it was a youngyoungyoung girl, we'd say that on the left, she is being sexualized entirely too early, and we would also consider the cover to be, well, kind of sexist.

However, because of her age, we consider the picture to be...sensual.

I'm not sure if that sort of thinking is right or wrong...

N i s t h a

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> That Paris cover is pretty much the 15 year-old's view of sexy. She looks like a 9th grader trying to seduce her dumbass boyfriend using "sexy" ideas she picked up from Rock of Love 2.

hortense

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I'd rather not see anyone's crotch regardless of age thanks.

BiBiVirtue

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Rowrrr French Vogue...Looks like Julianne should be holding court in "The Cougar's Den"

KathrynwithaY loves Joan Collins

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Maybe the French just like pictures of scantily clad women who look like they are about to spring out of that chair and stab you with the pointy heel of their shoe.

lucyjae

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I think it may have more to do with Harper's Bazaar vs. Vogue in general...Isn't Harper's Bazar less racy? And especially less racy than French Vogue?

femminista

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I'm kinda in love with Julianne Moore. And by "in love" I mean, I want to be/look like her. I think she is one of the most naturally gorgeous women on the planet. And I also think we'd be best friends. Oh, and her kids are gorge...blah blah blah - I love her.

JinxyMcDeath

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> jezebel posted about the french elle cover of emmanuelle beart (she was 40, nude and no skinny minnie) and according to wiki: "as of 2007, it is still the magazine's biggest-selling issue ever."

i don't know, there's just a difference aethestic in french fashion mags. you don't necessarily have to be perfect teeth, size zero body, and have plastic boobies to be hott.

also, i love that EVERYBODY hits on you there. it's certainly good for my ego! ok, sometimes the guys are crazy and smell, but whatevs.

Charlotte Corday

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> She is a sexy, sexy woman... but I don't need to see her done up like a 15-year-old Bulgarian model. Not that I find her Andie McDowellization very interesting, either.

HeatherNumber1

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Almost the exact same pose as Madonna's Hard Candy, yet without that same hard-edged cougarishness. Ms. Moore is The Queen.

Kazzah

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> MAI COUGR DEN. LET ME SHOW U IT.

AthertonMerriweather

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I'm 25 and my boobs don't look that good without a bra.

sassymoniker

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> The French Vogue is so awkward and umcomfortable looking--like she's scared and about to leap out of the chair but is still cross legged. I don't know if they posed her like that to make her look thinner but her arms and legs just look odd.

hamburgerhotdog

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> That Vogue cover is AMAZING...that choker she's wearing...or whatever it is...MUST. HAVE.

I think everything is sexier in Europe. There's not that subversive puritanical streak that underlies everything in the States.

cautionarywhale

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I don't like either, frankly. A happy medium would be nice.

Also, I agree that the French cover would not fly here. Some Walmart in the Bible Belt would refuse to stock it or put it in opaque covers like Playboys...or maybe just stock them all backwards on their shelves.

Scoregasm

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Damn, French Vogue, FTW. Sersly, why is American Vogue always a suckfest, cover wise, and FV nailed it with Kate Moss last month, and now this.

Dear Blond Diary...

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> The blue cover would not go over well in the States.

Her freckles would have to be digitally removed first.

LipstickLibrarian

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> All I know is that my life is the poorer for not owning leopard-print underwear.

Sparker_Pants

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Or do the French have more sense than to put partially-clad pics of underage tween sensations on their magazine covers?
I do however think she looks amazing on both covers.


Cuteasabutton

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Well, goddamn, Julianne. I like that you can see her arm freckles in the second picture, even if her face is bleached out.

What's with the double nose and chin smudges? I thought it was my filthy computer screen but they stay fixed to her face as I scroll.

tailfeather

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> @beastybeatsy: Agreed. Looks more scared and a little angry

FourInchHeels

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> The sexy one doesn't seem that sexy, maybe it's the face...

beastybeatsy

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I think she looks lovely in both. But I'm not sure that French Vogue cover would fly over here... it's just too trashy-looking for mainstream US magazines.

lollygagger

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I for one think the Vogue cover is wayyy more interesting than the Bazaar cover, regardless of the crotch shot.

DeathBySexy

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> That heel's gonna leave a mark!

hamburgerhotdog

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> Mama looks good in the v-neck!

But I kinda don't like seeing anyone's Vadge shots on magazine covers.

dangerslut

]]> <![CDATA[Vive La Difference!]]> I think the French just need everything to be sexy. Doesn't matter who or what.

braak

]]>