In May of this year, Texas passed HB 3994, a law making it nearly impossible for pregnant minors to obtain abortions without parental consent. For good measure, the Texas Supreme Court has now released an additional set of rules that could land those pregnant minors in legal limbo pretty much forever, or at least—as it probably the intention—until it’s too late in the pregnancy to matter.

Advertisement

The new rules govern the judicial bypass procedure, which abused or neglected minors can use to ask a judge for permission to get an abortion without parental consent. But they completely remove a section of the current law that requires a judge to rule on a bypass request within two days. Judges now have five days to rule. And where a bypass was once automatically granted if the judge didn’t respond, the case will now be “deemed denied” if they don’t issue a ruling.

Jane’s Due Process, an organization that helps pregnant minors find lawyers and obtain bypasses, calls the new rules “more extreme” than the law that was already passed. They warn that it has the potential to put pregnant teenagers in an impossible situation, and point out that judicial bypasses exist for a reason:

Advertisement

“Judicial bypass protects vulnerable pregnant teens who cannot find or safely turn to a parent,” said Tina Hester, executive director of Jane’s Due Process. “But the legislature and Governor Abbott decided to go after abused and neglected pregnant teens by amending this law.” HB 3994 passed the state legislature and was signed by Governor Greg Abbott on June 12, 2015.

The new law imposes far-reaching restrictions. Most significantly by removing the enforcement of deadlines for the judge to rule, effectively allowing a judge to stall out a minor until she can no longer obtain a legal abortion. “When a minor cannot even get a hearing or a court ruling in time, the state is then making her decision for her. Such abuse of state power amounts to an “absolute veto” of her decision and is under U.S. Supreme Court precedent unconstitutional.” Hays said.

Even if a pregnant minor is somehow lucky enough to end up in front of a judge willing to grant her request, she might not get that far. Jane’s Due Process released a survey earlier this year that found that at many Texas courthouses, court staff was unable or unwilling to help pregnant teens get access to the necessary paperwork. Many didn’t know what a judicial bypass was, or said their office had nothing to do with it. And a few even offered religious advice or referrals to crisis pregnancy centers:

A mere 26% of counties provided the caller with factually correct information. Even more frightening, 37% of counties denied entirely their office’s involvement with judicial bypass filings, and a vast 81% of counties had no immediate knowledge of the existence of judicial bypass. A stunning 43% of counties provided the caller with blatant misinformation. Several district clerks went a step further and provided the caller with personal, religious advice, referencing “God’s plan” for the minor. One clerk announced she was an “advocate for Crisis Pregnancy Centers” and wanted to meet with the minor in person after work. Other clerks simply told the caller to “pick up the phone and call a lawyer” with one abruptly hanging up the phone.

You’d be hard-pressed to create a worse situation for vulnerable pregnant teenagers, but knowing Texas, they will find a way.


Contact the author at anna.merlan@jezebel.com.
Public PGP key
PGP fingerprint: 67B5 5767 9D6F 652E 8EFD 76F5 3CF0 DAF2 79E5 1FB6

Advertisement

Sponsored

Activists tie on hospital gowns as they prepare to protest House Bill 3994 in the rotunda of the Texas Capitol, Friday, May 22, 2015, in Austin, Texas. Image via AP.