Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #yourcheatingheart more →
"I'm Doing It For The Children" (Cheating, That Is)
Telling You He's Cheated: Reasons Pro And Con


02/02/09
If this happens to me, I will stop at nothing to make sure that woman never sees my kids again.
Mommy: ur doing it wrong.
02/02/09
02/03/09
@mythago: Mmmkay.
Gee, I thought about it, and I don't remember saying take them away from Mom "out of spite."
Did either of you read the post, article, or any of the other comments? No matter.
Here's where I respectfully disagree: The "fucked-up attitude" is the one that says "I'm cheating for the sake of the kids."
To me, that says, "And, actually, I'm not fit to be their mother."
Because that's what the judge is going to say. That's what CPS is going to say.
Before you reply, consider what the legal and psychological ramifications of said justifications for cheating are for the children.
02/03/09
There are instances in which I can see this concept being justified - very, very dire situations, in which a mother needs to escape a marriage and perhaps, a country, because of political turmoil or economic hardship, for example.
Still, if this were the "reason" to cheat, it would be best unspoken, as the law, and outside opinions may not agree.
Originally, I was talking about a hypothetical situation in which I was married with kids. In that situation, I would hope that all avenues of reconciliation would be exhausted before this kind insanity was entertained.
To clarify: I'd much rather she say that "I love him, not you" - because at least I'd know that her moral compass (and sense of logic) was not defective - an honest statement.
I would honor and work to facilitate a reasonable request for a divorce. Why would I want to live in torment? Why would I want someone that I loved to feel trapped? Why would I want our children to live in that environment? I wouldn't want that.
My saying "never again" was more for emphasis than real explanation, as realistically, one can't truly know a situation like this until it is lived.
But I disagree that it's always necessary (or healthy) to accommodate a "crazy" parent; From my experience, if there must be a divorce, it should be quick and fair, but absolutely considering the children's welfare as the top priority.
We all know, that is easier said than done - but if you truly care about your kids you have to agree on this final thing: that you will both try not to fuck them up.
02/02/09
02/02/09
Parenting: It's not all about the parents.
02/02/09
I would bet that she will be one of those mothers that use her children as pawns to get back at the ex for whatever reason.
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
see: the effeminization of poverty. esp: divorced single moms.
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
and like she thinks her kids are just gonna accept this new guy with open arms? the most fitting ending to this story would be for the kids to demand they live with their dad instead of their mom, and the mom finds out her new guy on the side has no intention of being in an actual relationship with her.
02/03/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
DING DING DING we have a winner
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
what's especially amusing about these scenarios is that when people like your SIL hook up on the side and then dump their husbands so they can be with the new guy, lo and behold! the new guy never had any intention of a serious relationship and liked the occasional spontaneous sex just fine, thank you.
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
grow the eff up, lady, and end your marriage in a somewhat honorable way.
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
I do realize that not many people share my feelings on this, which is why I acknowledged that my views were not the norm in my first comment.