Would I tell a client that her understanding of god is wrong? Not in those words, exactly. Re-examining faith is part of being faithful- I would argue that a stagnant and unchanging understanding of a deity is more harmful in the long term.
Or, you know, that Unitarianism is another option.
Here here. Any gay I have ever discussed it with said they felt that they had always been that way, that they had been born that way. If they were born that way, and God creates everything, doesn't that mean that questioning gayness means I am questioning God?
@VegardHalomiosis:
Words from my 15 year old cousin, upon his mother explaining homosexuality and the (Catholic) church: "But if we're all in God's image, does that mean God's gay?"
From the mouth of babes...
It's also bull to say that religious beliefs are more fundamental than sexuality, because you do not choose to be gay or straight, but religious views are completely socialized. Babies don't come flying out of the womb crying "Save me Jesus!!"
According to my gay buddies, reparative therapy group meetings are a great place to find new boyfriends. What could be better? Relgious repression = hot sex.
"attraction is something we can't control, is something perhaps mutable but not "reparable." Therapists shouldn't reinforce an untenable status quo that regards people's natural desires as sinful and in need of fixing."
Statements like this make me nervous because the right throws this argument in our face by bringing up pedophilia. Of course gays and criminals shouldn't be compared, and the situations are completely different, but the right doesn't see it that way.
@judgingnora: Pedophiles cannot control their attractions anymore than gays lesbians or anyone else. They can, however, control whether or not they impose those attractions on children who are, by definition, non-consenting parties. Therein lies the difference
@colormeroutine: I hear you, and agree with you, but allow me to play devil's advocate for a moment: Doesn't keeping pedophiles away from children imply that their attractions are sinful? Doesn't keeping them away from children create some sort of a fix? Because if you hear pedophiles talk, many express that they can't control their actions (which I totally don't buy, but still, they do say that).
@judgingnora: colormeroutine's point still stands, it's less about sin and more about the law. We are dealing with consenting adults and non-consenting children in these two situations. They really can't be compared, no matter how hard the right will try.
In the early 80s, my uncle told my grandparents he was in love with a man (a frat brother no less). He "wasn't gay," he just loved this man. My grandparents and uncle went to a therapist who told them that the object of my uncle’s affection was like Eve, trying to tempt my uncle. But my uncle couldn’t really be blamed because, according to this therapist, my grandmother had potty trained him too early and so he was stuck in the anal stage of psycho-sexual development, deriving all pleasure from that.
27 years later, my uncles are married with three children and three grandchildren.
@ShanaElmsford: @fauxfruit: Dreadful man, he.
@goldengirl11: Yes. My uncle married his first boyfriend. I've called said "boyfriend" "Uncle Jon" my whole life.
I always feel sorry for the straight people these "fixed" gays end up marrying. I've been with gay men and straight women (not bi) and while some of it was nice, it was definitely not as hot and fulfilling as being with someone whose basic orientation is toward women. Lots of people can perform with someone of their non-preferred gender but that doesn't mean their true nature has changed. This bigoted crap just causes a lot of misled people and unhappy relationships.
Ex-gay therapy is absolutely horrifying to me. The cycle of unbearable guilt, remorse, suppression, lapse, and more guilt has to be unbelievably psychologically damaging. I'm glad to hear the tide is changing, but in the meantimes there's a few resources that everyone should have on hand, especially if you live in the Bible Belt like me.
Truth Wins Out (www.truthwinsout.org) is dedicated to busting the whole Ex-Gay movement, and it has a lot of great videos, testimonials, and other information.
@VirginiaDentata: There was a beautiful documentary I watched a few years back about gay marriage. I do not remember the name, but I do remember that at one point a lesbian found her parents protesting against gay marriage while she was protesting for it. When recounting it to the camera, she said "God made me, too."
That always stuck with me.
The APA has actually stated numerous times in the past that "conversion therapy" is unethical and ineffective. If people aren't aware that there's likely a large biological component to homosexuality at this stage in history, I honestly don't know what would convince them.
"Both sides have to educate themselves better. The religious psychotherapists have to open up their eyes to the potential positive aspects of being gay or lesbian. Secular therapists have to recognize that some people will choose their faith over their sexuality."
How unusual that one side might acknowledge the other side as not being crazy. While I do NOT condone religions that shun homosexuals and believe they can change, I think it's important that the APA recognized that for some people, those connections they have with their religion are so important they would deny another part of themselves. And that rather than ridiculing those people, support them as well. The #1 thing I've learned from all of my therapists/physchologists/psychiatrists is that you can only change your own behavior, not those of other people. So props to them for following their own advice.
I think the APA is still concerned about this, because the idea is still so prevalent, even though they do not consider homosexuality a valid pathology.
There are undoubtedly people who may have homosexual leanings, who are confused by their desires, but that's where simple counseling would help. They don't need to be "re-educated" or "repaired." This is the kind of mentality that led to women being tied to poles and set on fire, because they were "witches."
Even when I was a kid, still believed in God and surrounded by my mother's wonderfully kind and generous gay friends, it made more sense for me to come to the conclusion on my own that God made these people too, just the way they are, so how could that be evil or wrong? I don't think I was exposed to overt homophobia until I was older (thank goodness). Even though I am an atheist now, it still boggles my mind to think that they still teach that God made everyone, yet turn around and say that gay people are born broken sinners.
Does that mean God is wrong and mistaken? I never got an answer to that question, oddly enough.
@hydrogen_jukebox: God is not wrong or mistaken. some of His followers choose to interpret certain elements of scripture to serve their fear. God loves each of His creations with a love that passes anything we thought we knew about love. we aren't perfect, and we often substitute our will for God's.
Jesus never said anything about homosexuals. He never condemned prostitutes. He didn't condemn tax collectors. the only people He ever came down on were hypocrites.
know what Jesus did say? love your neighbor as yourself. love your neighbor as i have loved you.
if the biggoted behavior of the evangelical conservative Christian base is a reflection of God's love for them, i, for one, feel sad for them. i consider myself to be a faithful Christian, and my God has loved me much more than that. and He loves my lesbian sister, too, with every ounce of love He gives me.
@lermanzo: I don't usually go here, but how do you know you are right and the evangelicals are wrong? Jesus may never have said anything negative about homosexuality, but certainly many parts of the Bible have.
Different religions are comprised by and sustained by the people who follow them, and their beliefs. It's not made from some inherent truths about doctrine, even if the followers cite their sources as divine.
Evangelicals are just as convinced as you are that their interpretation of the Bible is correct- and this is a religious belief that they do not feel they have come to by choice. And I think this is what the APA is getting at. They have no desire to revisit the tired old, "should we rehab teh gays" question, but they do recognize that some people think their religious beliefs are not a product of choice. I strongly disagree that religion is not a product of choice, and I think you exercised an element of choice when deciding which scriptures to follow, and how to interpret them. I think it's a good reflection of your character, but I don't necessarily think it means you have been more divinely inspired, or have a better means of interpretation than the evangelicals.
The APA is throwing in the towel and recognizing that many religious people will never admit their beliefs come by choice, and therefore there must be a way to help gay people who also think they are sinners.
What I am curious about, is why they didn't have a study examining how "reparative therapy" for getting the evangelical out of a gay would work.
@goldengirl11: i didn't say they were wrong. i said they have chosen a different interpretation than i have. and they have that right. just as anyone of any faith has that right. to choose their own spiritual path. i never said i was right, either. i just explained my beliefs on the matter. i am no more divinely inspired than anyone else and don't purport to be.
it's hard to explain to someone not religious that, sometimes, it really isn't a choice. you are led to certain things, certain conclusions. i think that reparative therapy is an awful idea, but if one wants to subject themselves to it by choice, that's their choice. my problem lies more with the forced therapy and "lose the gay" camps for kids and teens. i think the idea that religious fervor and homosexuality can coexist in the same person is also perfectly reasonable, and i think the APA is more trying to say that than say to someone religion is a choice. because it isn't necessarily.
I heard a bit about this on Studio360 last weekend, during an interview with author James Hannaham, who was discussing his new book, God Says No, about a gay African-American evangelical Christian who struggles to reconcile his identity with his beliefs. It was fascinating.
08/06/09
Or, you know, that Unitarianism is another option.
08/06/09
08/06/09
Words from my 15 year old cousin, upon his mother explaining homosexuality and the (Catholic) church: "But if we're all in God's image, does that mean God's gay?"
From the mouth of babes...
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
Statements like this make me nervous because the right throws this argument in our face by bringing up pedophilia. Of course gays and criminals shouldn't be compared, and the situations are completely different, but the right doesn't see it that way.
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
Well, I think it can be contained by drawing the line at harm to others and restricting acts between consenting adults.
08/06/09
27 years later, my uncles are married with three children and three grandchildren.
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
@goldengirl11: Yes. My uncle married his first boyfriend. I've called said "boyfriend" "Uncle Jon" my whole life.
08/06/09
I don't understand the point of the story.
08/06/09
@1.1.1.: ... to point out the crazy shit some therapists believe/d and the efficacy of their treatment.
08/06/09
08/06/09
Truth Wins Out (www.truthwinsout.org) is dedicated to busting the whole Ex-Gay movement, and it has a lot of great videos, testimonials, and other information.
08/06/09
08/06/09
MADE
FAGS!!!
Enough said.
08/06/09
08/06/09
That always stuck with me.
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
How unusual that one side might acknowledge the other side as not being crazy. While I do NOT condone religions that shun homosexuals and believe they can change, I think it's important that the APA recognized that for some people, those connections they have with their religion are so important they would deny another part of themselves. And that rather than ridiculing those people, support them as well. The #1 thing I've learned from all of my therapists/physchologists/psychiatrists is that you can only change your own behavior, not those of other people. So props to them for following their own advice.
08/06/09
There are undoubtedly people who may have homosexual leanings, who are confused by their desires, but that's where simple counseling would help. They don't need to be "re-educated" or "repaired." This is the kind of mentality that led to women being tied to poles and set on fire, because they were "witches."
08/06/09
Does that mean God is wrong and mistaken? I never got an answer to that question, oddly enough.
08/06/09
Jesus never said anything about homosexuals. He never condemned prostitutes. He didn't condemn tax collectors. the only people He ever came down on were hypocrites.
know what Jesus did say? love your neighbor as yourself. love your neighbor as i have loved you.
if the biggoted behavior of the evangelical conservative Christian base is a reflection of God's love for them, i, for one, feel sad for them. i consider myself to be a faithful Christian, and my God has loved me much more than that. and He loves my lesbian sister, too, with every ounce of love He gives me.
08/06/09
Different religions are comprised by and sustained by the people who follow them, and their beliefs. It's not made from some inherent truths about doctrine, even if the followers cite their sources as divine.
Evangelicals are just as convinced as you are that their interpretation of the Bible is correct- and this is a religious belief that they do not feel they have come to by choice. And I think this is what the APA is getting at. They have no desire to revisit the tired old, "should we rehab teh gays" question, but they do recognize that some people think their religious beliefs are not a product of choice. I strongly disagree that religion is not a product of choice, and I think you exercised an element of choice when deciding which scriptures to follow, and how to interpret them. I think it's a good reflection of your character, but I don't necessarily think it means you have been more divinely inspired, or have a better means of interpretation than the evangelicals.
The APA is throwing in the towel and recognizing that many religious people will never admit their beliefs come by choice, and therefore there must be a way to help gay people who also think they are sinners.
What I am curious about, is why they didn't have a study examining how "reparative therapy" for getting the evangelical out of a gay would work.
08/06/09
it's hard to explain to someone not religious that, sometimes, it really isn't a choice. you are led to certain things, certain conclusions. i think that reparative therapy is an awful idea, but if one wants to subject themselves to it by choice, that's their choice. my problem lies more with the forced therapy and "lose the gay" camps for kids and teens. i think the idea that religious fervor and homosexuality can coexist in the same person is also perfectly reasonable, and i think the APA is more trying to say that than say to someone religion is a choice. because it isn't necessarily.
08/06/09