", the focus on her former lifestyle and current comeuppance sounds a bit like mockery of a black woman who tried to rise above her station — mockery that even extends, in Sneed's case, to the First Lady and her "clique.""
This, exactly this.
It's pretty gross that people are perfectly content to complain about her fucking dress, when we had a president for 8 years who was spending a shit ton more money on a fucking war that killed people and tortured people. I mean, the billions spent on blowing up brown folks' homes doesn't really compare to the price of a designer gown. Plus, also, gowns never fucking kill people*.
And remember that dude who threw a (totally justified) shoe at Bush? Why did nobody complain about how the secret service et al. fucked up when they let a hostile person into the president's presence, then didn't react until he had already throw a shoe at his head?
The mainstream media does not have the vocabulary--or the inclination to try to build one--to talk about powerful women who aren't silent and submissive to their menfolk. Michelle Obama is always either --look! sexy arms!-- or --who does she think she is wearing designer outfits to soup kitchens!!!--. It's so depressing.
I'm really over the outrage on her sartorial choices. For some, fashion is a hobby. Yes, it can be an expensive hobby, much like golf, travel, wine, etc. Can't the Salahi issue or her job performance be discussed without bringing up this woman's clothes?
To be fair, professional event planners - who one would assume to be a nonpartisan, or at least not-uniformly-anti-Obama - lot, had the same criticisms: she spent too much time at the party and not enough time managing it.
I always assumed that part of the job of the social secretary was to be at events, clipboard in hand, making sure everything went as planned - including checking off the guest list. I mean, I have planned large events as part of my job, and I spent the entire time on my feet, checking on everyone and troubleshooting. There is nothing inherently wrong with her sitting down to enjoy the party, as long as she had plenty of staff covering the bases - but apparently she didn't. I mean, bottom line, she was in charge of the event, and something went wrong. It may not be her fault alone, but it is certainly her job to be proactive in ensuring it doesn't happen again. Perhaps some see a race or class component, but to me it just seems like a clear-cut case of "You are the social secretary, so you're on-duty at social events."
@Flackette Goes Retro: I feel like that is a legitimate criticism. I just hate the tone taken in the excerpts featured above - there's so much focus on her clothes, and the "East Wing clique" comment really rubs me the wrong way. It makes it much more about Rogers as a person rather than about the job and it's duties.
Man, the hullabaloo about this is so fucking tone deaf. Was a mistake made? Yes. Did anyone die? No. Was anyone physically or emotionally injured? No. Let's move on.
@PilgrimSoul: I think its more than that. According to Roxanne Roberts, Social Secreteries should not invite themselves to the event they are supposed to be running (except, perhaps, a final event at the end of a one's career). Considering this was the first major event - and larger in scope than usual State dinners - there was no excuse for not being on the job.
@PilgrimSoul: I agree. Maybe it's naive but I don't see why this should even be a big deal. Some fame craving jackasses got in somewhere they didn't belong, it happens all the time.
@AmbivalentAlumna: I think it's a big deal because one expects that White Security would be better. If they can get in, someone who has violent reasons for wanting in could get into the dinner. I think the fact that they had cameras with them probably made the security lax with them. I don't think it was Desiree Rogers' fault, at least not from what I've heard. I place more blame on the people checking the list of attendees. If they weren't on the list, the first person should never have allowed them in.
Pff, the Desiree Rogers thing is fueled by two things
Republicans have weird class/race issues about Democrats being allowed to be in the big house at all.
Yeah, the fact that Ms Rogers is an elegant black woman probably fuels it even more, but remember how many kerfuffles they started or tried to start with the Clinton's staff? The idea that the wrong people actually can win the vote and are allowed to move in and--touch stuff freaks them out.
Claiming that a Democratic administration is doing wrong by the Secret Service (who carry guns and work in law enforcement, so must be "conservatives" who are being screwed by feckless liberals) is another favorite fantasy. In reality, the SS is made up of long-term careerists who take their work seriously, serve through numerous administrations, and don't give shit about politics* (* family member is one).
Rogers is right to sit tight. If she was out and about right now, she's be raked over the coals for that. The conservative gutter types will slobber and rage for a while, hoping to get her fired. Hopefully, she'll stand fast.
@CurtCole: Ah, that picture will never get old. And how cool for that little girl to have a story to tell for the rest of her life--about having to try and keep a straight face reading in front of the press while trying to pretend the President isn't sitting next to you holding an upside book.
Not that I bear any love for Condi Rice, but there's a definite similarity between the criticism of her fancy boots when it became obvious that the Iraq war was not going as planned and Ms. Rogers' perceived sartorial excess.
@cate3710: Yup. There's this whole idea that fashion = frivolous. Men's sartorial choices aren't picked apart nearly as much.
Also, we're damned if we do, damned if we don't. Look at the people who judge Hillary for not dressing nice enough (back in her pantsuits days). We can't be dowdy, we can't be chic. It's just their way of telling women to stay home.
@femme-bot: And when you stay home, dress your men in some damn Thom Browne or even Zegna! I defy anyone to name me a chic male politico. They all seem to wear the same ill-fitting sack of a suit always.
I read the Post article this morning, and while it clarified a lot of the night's events, it also made it *really* clear that Cathy Hargraves is Bitter McBitterson...I thought they gave her statements on how it's "supposed" to work, and what Rogers should have done a little too much weight, given that Rogers is responsible for the loss of her job. Not exactly an unbiased view of how social events should run at the White House.
I also thought it was fascinating that the Salahis suddenly claimed a family medical emergency just when it was time to go in to dinner (and presumed assigned seats and tables) and asked to be rushed out of the White House. At which point they had drinks at the Hay-Adams Hotel across the park, and then called their limo driver after an hour or so and said they were still at dinner at the White House, and could he pick them up soon. And they walked back to the White House driveway (past security) from the hotel to be picked up.
But you know, they still claim it was a misunderstanding and they thought all along they were invited.
@Maritsa: Yes! Exactly, that really disturbed me. For some balance, I'd love to hear from whoever served as Clinton's social secretary, and how things were done back then, and should have been done this time.
@cellophane: She's not the curator, but she works with the curator. The curator is one of those ongoing positions, like chef and steward, that stays with the house from administration to administration.
Also, the president can request paintings from the National Gallery! I would go for the da Vinci or a Vermeer just to fuck with them, but I'm sure Obama will stick to something more American.
I am so completely on board with updating the White House art collection. I think that being perceptive to things like that are going to be SO important in ensuring the success of this "openness" policy. Major kudos!
@kelsium: Write her a note. I was invited to the WH during the Clinton years, and it was a blast. Giant sunflowers on blue tablecloths, great food and that big house in the background of all the photos.
10:38 AM
This, exactly this.
It's pretty gross that people are perfectly content to complain about her fucking dress, when we had a president for 8 years who was spending a shit ton more money on a fucking war that killed people and tortured people. I mean, the billions spent on blowing up brown folks' homes doesn't really compare to the price of a designer gown. Plus, also, gowns never fucking kill people*.
And remember that dude who threw a (totally justified) shoe at Bush? Why did nobody complain about how the secret service et al. fucked up when they let a hostile person into the president's presence, then didn't react until he had already throw a shoe at his head?
The mainstream media does not have the vocabulary--or the inclination to try to build one--to talk about powerful women who aren't silent and submissive to their menfolk. Michelle Obama is always either --look! sexy arms!-- or --who does she think she is wearing designer outfits to soup kitchens!!!--. It's so depressing.
*Unless you live in Ancient Thebes...
10:44 AM
10:49 AM
I would say the murder was.......by design. YEAAAAAAAAAH!
10:27 AM
10:26 AM
[www.bizbash.com]
10:53 AM
10:24 AM
10:31 AM
10:09 AM
10:17 AM
10:36 AM
10:48 AM
11:10 AM
09:51 AM
Republicans have weird class/race issues about Democrats being allowed to be in the big house at all.
Yeah, the fact that Ms Rogers is an elegant black woman probably fuels it even more, but remember how many kerfuffles they started or tried to start with the Clinton's staff? The idea that the wrong people actually can win the vote and are allowed to move in and--touch stuff
freaks them out.
Claiming that a Democratic administration is doing wrong by the Secret Service (who carry guns and work in law enforcement, so must be "conservatives" who are being screwed by feckless liberals) is another favorite fantasy. In reality, the SS is made up of long-term careerists who take their work seriously, serve through numerous administrations, and don't give shit about politics* (* family member is one).
Rogers is right to sit tight. If she was out and about right now, she's be raked over the coals for that. The conservative gutter types will slobber and rage for a while, hoping to get her fired. Hopefully, she'll stand fast.
09:48 AM
09:56 AM
(NB: I don't actually have an axe to grind with Ms. Rogers, but that was too easy to pass up.)
09:57 AM
...
Like how to read?
10:04 AM
10:06 AM
10:07 AM
10:17 AM
Man, I am cranky this morning.
10:52 AM
09:42 AM
09:48 AM
09:56 AM
10:01 AM
Also, we're damned if we do, damned if we don't. Look at the people who judge Hillary for not dressing nice enough (back in her pantsuits days). We can't be dowdy, we can't be chic. It's just their way of telling women to stay home.
10:12 AM
09:40 AM
I also thought it was fascinating that the Salahis suddenly claimed a family medical emergency just when it was time to go in to dinner (and presumed assigned seats and tables) and asked to be rushed out of the White House. At which point they had drinks at the Hay-Adams Hotel across the park, and then called their limo driver after an hour or so and said they were still at dinner at the White House, and could he pick them up soon. And they walked back to the White House driveway (past security) from the hotel to be picked up.
But you know, they still claim it was a misunderstanding and they thought all along they were invited.
09:49 AM
09:51 AM
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
...Where do I apply for this position?
03/02/09
Also, the president can request paintings from the National Gallery! I would go for the da Vinci or a Vermeer just to fuck with them, but I'm sure Obama will stick to something more American.
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
Here I am being direct! INVITE ME TO THE WHITE HOUSE! (Please?)
Love,
Kelsium
03/02/09