"Teaching women that only beautiful women are sexy."
That should be "Teaching women and men that only one type of woman is beautiful". I think it's pretty difficult to simultaneously love your body, love the sensations its capable of producing and sharing that connection with another human being in the face of a lot of overwhelming seeming "evidence" that perhaps you aren't beautiful. We can't be at war with our bodies (and adult women trying to look like the body of 10 year old boys are nothing if not at war with themselves) and simultaneously fully experience pleasure.
As an older reader who is also a mother and divorcee--I have to concur with the notion that the "problem" of low libido in women is truly pegged (no pun intended) as a woman's problem as long as there is a man within a 40 foot radius who is capable of erection.
Rarely is this framed in the context of: what's the state of the relationship? Does the man know what he is doing? Is he, perhaps, insensitive or a jerk? (That brings up a whole other issue of "Honey why are you with him?" of course.)
I'm a hard working woman, I enjoy the rewards of the fruits of my labor, and the sweeter the fruit, the more labor I will put forth. So why should we assume I'm any different with sex?
In the context of a married life, with kids, men if you want sex know this: foreplay begins at 8AM. If you want nookie that night, you'd better start planning at 8AM. Keep it going all through the day. I know, I know it's draining and all--but just as much as you are visual, I am sensual. So give me something to sense.
I do not know what my own sexuality is. I know I am bisexual/pansexual. That has never been a question for me, and also never been an identity issue. I know when I am attracted to someone, that's also not a problem.
I just never want to go any farther than just admiring. I am bothered by it only because I am afraid all my friends will leave me and I will be totally alone. I know part of why it is - being trans has its strange sexual pitfalls, since sex is often a very gendered experience, and usually involves genital contact. Lots of trans people are not comfortable with their genitals being touched, and I am one of them.
I don't know if it would change at all if I transitioned or not. But I do know that right now, I just don't give a fuck. I don't masturbate, I have no interest in it. I don't "get horny", I don't care, either. I don't want people armchair analyzing me. I don't need it.
I feel like any sexuality I do use is too performatory. I don't know how to be organically "sexy"; I don't feel it. I can't figure out a way to be sensual/attractive without relying on what the media tells me is attractive. I know that doesn't come naturally to me, but I don't know what does. It's like dancing - people just say to move your body however you like, but nothing ever comes to me. If I wait for inspiration, nothing happens. It's weird.
I hated that article. Bassons approach, desire follows arousal, completely defines female sexuality in terms of responding to male sexuality. Just have sex, and you'll get into it! Women are more than meat pockets, and women who don't want sex are not broken. If it's a problem for the women's partners, he/she should seek help.
By most studies, 5% of the population is homosexual male, while around 46% of the population is heterosexual female- but there's about 9 times as much pornography for the former than for the latter. And let's not even start with homosexual women; be a strange day when one finds lesbian porn marketed towards lesbians.
So yeah, no surprise.
@nobodyr: There IS lesbian porn marketed towards lesbians! Shine Louise Houston, Jincey Lumpkin, Courtney Trouble, Bren Ryder, Emilie Jouvet, Angela Phong, Madison Young . . . the list goes on.
I think it's a many-headed hydra, but our culture does a lot to dampen female sexual desire. Teaching women that only beautiful women are sexy. That arousal for men is looking at a hot woman and arousal for women is being looked at. That sex gives you a bad reputation if it's too casual. that you might get pregnant and then be shamed no matter what choice you make, abortion, single motherhood, working mother, etc. That it really isn't important in the long run and you should choose your mate based on him being a good provider and father. In the meantime, men are told to go get laid, be a stud, and shown images of half-dressed beautiful women everywhere they look. Is it really a surprise this might lead to a discrepancy between men and women when it comes to their libidoes?
I'm not saying that's the whole cause by any means, but I think we need to admit that female sexuality is not really encouraged or cultivated in this culture the way male sexuality is. people like talking about strippers and porn actresses or teenagers sending naked pictures, but when it comes to an ordinary-looking middle-aged woman's sexuality, the visibility goes away.
@Pantra: That is a great point. My mom once told me that she doesn't deserve to have sex because she doesn't look like "those women on Friends". God that was one of the saddest things I ever heard. Also, I am really, really sick of hearing that when it comes to sex, women just want to be desired. You know why that's true? Because it has been culturally nailed to our palms that our only value sexually (and otherwise) lies in our desireablility. Culture places no importance on our own desire. We are TAUGHT to desire being desired. We weren't born naturally not caring about our own O's, just wanting to make sure we give him his. We've been brainwashed that way.
I'm very envious of women with high sex drives. I'm bored by sex and can't even give MYSELF an orgasm. It's a huge source of tension in my relationship because we don't have sex very often, and when we do he is unhappy about my level of enthusiasm. I was never molested and I'm physically healthy, so I guess I'm just supremely unlucky. :(
I hate these stories about women and their low libido's. I understand that some women have a low libido and that's an issue for them, but treating women with a low libido as the norm (and I know that birth control pills, stress and the wax and wane of hormones can play a big part in women's sexual experience) makes women who are more sexual and have a high level of desire feel abnormal. I would like to say that ALL people have varying sexual desires. I don't think that men's low libido (I'm not talking about inability to preform, but just not wanting to have sex as much as popular culture would frame them) is allowed open discussion. I've always found that I am the partner with the higher libido and I have to deal with my partner not wanting sex as much as I do. It's a give and take on both ends and vastly different sexual desires is something that people in relationships will have to deal with but saying women are X and men are Y when it comes to sex is not helpful or true.
@Jenloveshercurves: I agree completely. Sexuality is so complex and so personal, that I feel there can't ever truly be a "norm" for everyone.
Also, men's sexuality is just as unfairly represented in the media as women's. There are silly expectations for both sides, and the misinformation...unspeakable. And those Viagra and penis pills commercials shame them for lack of boner and size, respectively.
And! I thought all through high school that erection = aroused. Turns out, that isn't true. Also, did you know that men don't always want to have sex, all the time? And that lack of desire doesn't reflect their level of attraction to their mate? Hmm.
@Mr.Gawn: I can't really see a discernible thought process in that so I'm going to guess you're affecting some sort of antic disposition , and I'll just go ahead and translate you into Shakespeare. I'm guessing what you said was:
"I am but mad north by northwest. When the wind is southerly, I know a hawk from a handsaw."
@JilliefromChile: Don't feed him. Always distrust someone who wants to come on a women's website and tell us women how we should feel because of our silly genes that make us all crazy, tehe.
@JilliefromChile: I also hate that my replying to your comment promotes his which is one of the things that I hate about this promotion, demotion thingamajig.
@Jenloveshercurves: Sorry, I didn't intend to feed him. Mostly I've been thinking about Hamlet, and I wanted to let off a zinger and leave it at that. If he tried to engage me directly I wouldn't have replied.
@Jenloveshercurves:
no one implied that your genes make you crazy...
but whatever, ive been the minority of crowds in the past... opinions are often misconstrued, misinterpreted and disregarded when your 'the other'... thats fine #tips
@Jenloveshercurves:
mmm-hmmm... and someone already said the couldnt get what i meant by that statement.. so i explained it.......
from a genetic stand point...
XX is more complicated than XY... so the (s0-s0) dichotomous relationship men and women have concerning sex COULD arguably be explained by genetics
you interpreted that as being crazy.. my apologies... only meant to illustrate that women are on a much broader spectrum...
but whatever....
@Mr.Gawn: Or the dichotomous relationship that you are describing could have nothing to do with genetics, could not be even true, but could be fed by cultural expectations, but it's easier to say men are like this because of genes and women are like this because of genes. Evolutionary gender psychology is really unreliable because social norms and societal expectations fuck things up way too much.
Also, dismissing others experience, as you have done in all of this and have been called out for, does not help your argument. I don't say that my experience (having never found a sexual partner who matches my libido) is indicative of all men or illustrates an issue that men need to address, it illustrates my experience. Believing that because you've heard from men or your experience is that women have a lower sex drive this indicates that women on a whole have different sex drives than men is faulty. People often report sexual experiences that reflect what the cultural norms and expectations proscribe for them. Hell, even Kinsey came across this. There is too much variation in either gender to draw any overarching conclusion about biological determination when it comes to sexual desire. Men and women are probably more similar in these instances than we as a society will allow talk about. You can go on believing until the cows come home that women have different libido's than men, but that doesn't make your belief helpful or correct. Now I'm done and will give you no more fuel for your desire to tell us ladies how we feel and why we feel that way.
@Jenloveshercurves: Couldn't agree with you more. That's exactly what I would like to say, and I think it's important to point out that the variation in women's desire is one of the many ways in which there is no way for us to win - we're all abnormal in one way or the other. A woman who wants sex less than a man she's having sex with is sick, a woman who wants sex more than a man she's having sex with is a desperate slut with low self-esteem, and a woman having sex with another woman is doomed to a whole other set of prejudiced misinterpretations. There isn't exactly a huge repertoire of culturally acknowledged sexual roles for men to play either. Fuck.
@Mr.Gawn: No, it wouldn't. Oh and btw- sex isn't determined by chromosomes, but by the presence of the gene SRY; there are subsequently XX males, and XY females. Therefore, the chromosome couldn't be the deciding factor.
@nobodyr: Thank you for attacking his shitty understanding of genetics and chromosomes , which offended me to the core of my Biology major, and tested my promise not to feed the troll.
@JilliefromChile:
hahaha... what i love about all this, is that this started with something small and exploded...
everyone here is obviously against me and not so much the statement anymore...
but as a biology major, you should be familiar with identical twins separated at birth, and the striking similarities found between them, even thou they have never met...
whatever, thats fine
so i get that you all are riled up that genetics is a determine factor in a person... ok... i take it back... genetics have nothing to do with a person/personality...
@Mr.Gawn: No, I am saying that the thing which determines sex is not the Y chromosome but the gene SRY.
The purpose/function of SRY is testes production. Not increased sex drive, decreased domesticity, or whatever else is stereotypically attributed to men. Testes. Balls. Cojones.
Also, you have to consider that if you are talking about genetics, you can't really use generalizations. IE, you can't say "men in general do x," because ALL men are men because of one thing regularly (SRY). The fact that asexual men who are actually men exist shows that there isn't anything connected with being a male and sex drive.
@Mr.Gawn: Trolling is what happens when you come and say some stuff that sounds off, or silly, or maybe even outright stupid, then, when called out about it, you proceed to ignore every logical and fact-based argument thrown your way, all the while insisting that the callers-out were simply misinterpreting what you were saying.
Comments like "so youre saying genetics have no factors to play in a persons development, psyche, mentality, personality? they are jus kinda there?" when that is obviously not what Nobodyr was saying clearly indicate an interest in provocation and being inflammatory, rather than listening, learning, and presenting your own coherent, well-supported opinions. Straw man argument and all that, etc., etc.
@Valkyrie607:
i feel like i have somehow offended people....
it was a small comment that was misinterpreted, but OH MY GOD this has already gotten outta hand, i think tryin to clarify only made it worst
ok, my apologies.... but i think everyone wants a victory and wants to point and 'gawk' at me... to the point where ive already ried compromising but its not even enough.
"how dare he suggest genetics..... yatta yatta yatta" ok, my mistake....
Seriously. Me and my girlfriend are super-orgasmic people (my girlfriend is, um, the luckiest woman I have ever met in that department) and a lot of low-libido women act like that means we're being shallow or somehow betraying them for advocating for good ol' orgasmic sex.
I mean, seriously...someone said orgasms are overrated? I have a serious problem with that. Orgasms are AWESOME. And while I think low libidos have a number of valid causes and are perfectly valid, part of me is like...but acting like this is a great and nifty outcome is problematic. It's like people who think nothing tastes as good as thin feels: they're entitled to their opinion and I'm not going to spend hours haranguing them, but...acting like there's something sinister or possibly ableist or anti-woman in being like, "but orgasms/cheddar grits are rad and you should have many of them if it's possible!" messes with me and I'm not quite sure why.
@jeninmotion: Saying orgasms are rad and you should have many of them is possible is one thing.
But when people talk about orgasms, it often comes off as if they think orgasmless sex is sad, or not worth it, or something.
I personally think orgasms are overrated. Sure, they're fun, but the effort it takes to get there isn't, and is not enjoyable, and I'd rather have supremely enjoyable sex- which for me, and many other women, means sex that doesn't include jumping through the hoops to get to an orgasm.
@Mr.Gawn: I don't think people here care about a victory; they care instead that you aren't clear, aren't making sense, and say things that come off as ignorant and offensive.
"Desire follows arousal" - this makes perfect sense to me right now. My libido is pretty low currently, possibly as a result of the hormonal birth control I am on(which I tried to get off of and realized the pros far outweighed the cons). I still enjoy sex when I do have it but it is very hard to get me to actually want it. When my partner tries to initiate, I'm just like, "Eh. I'd rather just put on my flannel pajamas and read my book on the couch." But, with the right coaxing, I can desire sex. It's like my brain doesn't quite catch up to my body, if that makes sense. I need to physically feel certain things and then I'm like, "Oh, right! This is nice. Yes, I do want to have sex!" But there is a total delay between "Eh. Sex. Whatever." to physical pleasure to "Yes!" I've learned to resist my initial lethargy - unless I am legitimately really not desiring sex and then I'll say no - because I know I have to get over that initial hurdle of physical sensation. So I can totally understand how "immersion in physical sensation" could be an appropriate therapy.
The problem with saying it's a syndrome for women to have periods of little or no sexual desire is that you are making the male sex drive normal, and saying the female sex drive is--I can't think of the right word right now, but saying the female sex drive is an illness, a sickness. That there is something wrong with it because it is not the male norm. Why don't we consider the female sex drive the normal one and diagnose men as overly sexually desirous? Not that that would actually be any better, but my point is, we continually diagnose there being something 'wrong' with women's libido when often the only thing 'wrong' is that they don't want to have sex every night. Why can't we just accept that as normal behavior for many people, male and female both.
@I believe in peace, bitch: I don't know that this is making the male sex drive normal-- most of my female friends have high sex drives and get horny a lot. If I were to look at my peer group of graduate level educated women in their mid 20s, the norm for female sexual desire still seems to be for sex at least once a day.
@InABook: I am referring to the stereotypes here. You're right, of course some women have high sex drives and some men have low ones. That was the point of my last sentence. But in the stereotypical dichotomy of the highly sexed male ad the lower sexed female, it's the male element we consider 'normal'. Just like with everything else--the 'female' gets compared to the 'male' ad is diagnosed as problematic.
@I believe in peace, bitch: i think the main reason for this article is the social imbalance of sexual desire, but they are using extreme cases as an example...
Sex is important in life and in a relationship, but when a partner/female is COMPLETELY un-desiring of sex, or rarely desiring of sex, I think it leads to problems in the end. I dont think the article is trying to point the finger at girls with low sex drive (but I’m sure there are not lots of women now self diagnosing), but suggesting this MAY be a problem.
Have you seen Hes just not that into you.
Remember the Jennifer Connely and random guy relationship?
IMO
@Mr.Gawn: I think with sexuality, there is only a problem if someone perceives themselves or their libido as a problem. However, women are often told that what may be just an average, normal libido that wants to do it once a week or less, is an issue because it doesn't keep pace with the Normalized Male High Sex Drive. If we keep calling it a 'syndrome' or 'sexual dysfunction' for a person to want to have sex only once in awhile, then it will become a sickness when it needn't be.
hmmm.. Jezebel is glitching.. but im sad now... i SERIOUSLY was preparing a response.... as a drove home to work...
but am i coming off creepy?
i was gonna say that... if i remember what was here...
low sex drive/no sex drive COULD BE a symptom of else....
but i would agree the problem is putting a normal standard on women's sexuality when all you have to compare it to is a males sexuality in a machismo social construction...
@Mr.Gawn: Yeah, honestly, you are coming off as creepy. You're pathologizing people on this thread and giving advice in situations that might not be the most appropriate. Sexuality is a very personal issue, so when someone that rarely comments on Jezebel suddenly pops up with a ton of comments on a post about sex, it's weird. Especially when the poster appears to be male and is telling female posters how to feel and deal with the problems in their lives.
It isn't automatically a bad thing, but it puts people on edge, especially if they don't recognize your name and BAM there's 20 posts from you.
My libido has dropped to practically zero since I went off BCP, but oddly my mental desire to masturbate is just as high as always. I don't really feel like having sex except maybe a couple times a month and my physical desire is completely gone (I'm still waiting for my progesterone to balance back out). Mentally, though, I still want frequent orgasms so I still masturbate all the damn time. There are weeks where my body is SO against the idea that I hurt myself doing it.
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: Don't know what BCP is, but I feel the same way. No real desire to have sex except for a couple of times a month, although masturbating has not changed. Hey, at least you're not alone, heh!
@kavery: Hey, I'm not the only one! I've always felt weird because having a full or full-ish bladder can make me horny- so I can either pee and have the urge just disappear completely, or hold it and masturbate.
I tried asking about in on the Talk Sex With Sue boards once, and the opinion was that possibly the full bladder was putting subtle pressure on the G-spot . . . but I still don't really know what's going on.
i think all Jezebel blog post should have a 10 minute people where people cannot post...
because by the time i find an article i like, read it, then go thru the comments, there is equivilant to a thesis of words to read....
but this is all interesting stuff...
i find that women would rather be loved than sexed.. but will "have" sex with someone they love to sorta lock them in, once the love sets in, the desire for sex dies down...
whereas men express love thru sex (in a relationship).....
i do find it weird for women to jus have no desire for sex... but i find it the same who are really shy/embarressed/ashamed of sex, their sexual desires, and their sexual organs (refer to their parts as down there, and other round about ways).. that combined with the added notion of every guy has been tryin to screw you since you hit puberty.. so i can see it being/disgusting by that point
@InABook: i would beg to differ, but have no evidence to back up the claim; however, i would disagree with that...
some people are taught to feel like sex is dirty.... as a result they are only able to have sex with someone they dont care about, which would make since one date DR (i forget his name, i wanna say Straus or somethin) say women are only able to have sex once you kinda lower their confidence...
so if you feel dirty about something, your basically only able to do it with people you dont really like, as a result have no real desire...
@Mr.Gawn: You seem to be ignoring all the Jezzies comments about there own sex drives in favor of your personal experiences and stereotypes. The problem with that is that you can only know how so many women see sex and you're always looking at it as an outsider.
I think this is particularly problematic because men seem less likely to admit things that upset the status quo. I've known women who have "used" men who wanted romantic relationships for sex (upsetting the guy) and I've known women who had much higher sex drives than their partners, but this doesn't seem to be information men share with each other. Obviously, I'm an outsider in this situation so my opinions may not be accurate, but I think they are factors.
@clevernamehere: no.. not ignoring them... HAVING A HARD!!!! TIME keeping up with them (im at work, and blogging, Jezebel feels like a encyclopedia conference...).. so its easier to express my opinion, then jus write rebuttles.. im still trying to write replies... its exhausting
but i am trying to keep up
and i make no claim to be a Dr, therapist, etc, but i think i do have a window into a women's psyche to a point... (i have a sex radio show, i feel more in tune with women than men, took several women's studies courses, even thought about minoring in women's studies, all another story for a different day)
and i was generalizing... i know people all over the spectrum, but i think if you averaged it out, yea...
clearly people are on both sides of the spectrum, but im thinkin in pie charts, and showing the biggest pie piece #tips
@Mr.Gawn: Some people are taught that sex is wrong, yes, but both men and women get taught that. There are tons and tons though, that are NOT taught that sex is wrong or dirty.
I think your understanding of things is off. A lack of desire can be linked to negative feelings about sex itself, but that isn't the issue being discussed here. Many women who lack arousal are very open discussing sex, think nothing is wrong with it, and want to want it. Many women-- even women from religious households-- are taught that sex isn't wrong. (I, for one, was taught that it's a beautiful expression of love). And many women do use sex to express their love for their partner.
I'm not entirely clear on what you're trying to say-- you aren't really expressing yourself fully-- but from what I can tell, you're dead wrong.
@InABook:
my main point was...
Women that i know with low/no sex drive (GENRALLY SPEAKING) all have a couple traits in common..
1- very religious background
2- they find sex kinda 'nasty' (and often refer to it as doing the nasty)
now.... i realize this is not the only reason why women have low sex drive.. and that a low sex drive is not abnormal or uncommon...
i was mainly trying to articulate that sexuality, sexual growth, etc, is setup so that a lot of women grow up (in western culture) feelin 'uneasy' about their sexual organs... where as male sexuality is accepted and set as the standard...
and as soon as a girl hits about... 15, all males are basically trying to get into their pants anyway so i can see women being jus TURNED OFF by the whole thing
a some women have sex solely for the sake of making their partner happy, but some are fine without having it..
to me.. its not shocking to find women who have a low sex drive...
@Mr.Gawn: It clarifies it. It clarifies that you are completely wrong, off base, have a skewed view of women, a small sample size, and aren't willing to look at the big picture, instead dealing with a stereotype that you are most comfortable with, and feel like applying to women as a whole.
1. I totally see raisins as helping have conversation. When I have small things to eat, and thereby have something physical to do with my hands and face and to look at while I talk, it's easier for me to be honest.
2. "an immersion in physical sensation" is exactly what I need to get feeling sexytimes. Luckily my partner is the most tactile person I've ever met, and the way the media talks about men being "visual creatures" is how he is, but with touch.
3. This post is an example of how to write about women's sexual desire, and the potential lack there of, without implying that women have to live up to a certain expectation of sexual drive to be "normal" or "healthy."
Things like women who "feel distressed over the absence of desire" always makes me worry. On the one hand, since being in my current relationship I've experienced a serious dive in sex drive, which is now increasing due to going of BCP. The past year has been insanely frustrating because I have not wanted to have sex, and it was affecting my relationship for a while because it was affecting my state of mind, feelings of worthiness/being a good partner, and general lack of feeling connected to him in a way I was used to. He felt kind of rejected and was tending towards a low self-esteem and feeling like I wasn't attracted to him because we didn't have sex for a few months, which kind of just happened and before I knew it it had been 3 months since we had sex. (When we talked about it, these things went away and got better.) So, I hate my low sex drive and want it to go away.
But when I was a youngin', I wasn't interested in having sex the way everyone around me was, including the people I was pseudo-involved with. It was because I wasn't in a place where I was interested in sex, and it wasn't a problem. Except I thought it was, because I thought I was weird and being abnormal. But really I wasn't. And that was ok. And rather than feeling dissatisfied with my sex drive at the time, which is what I was, I should have been feeling ok with it and should have felt dissatisfied with the expectations of those around me (which affected my own expectations). So I hope that these researchers are making a difference between "I want to have more sex because I love sex and have noticed changes or am personally unsatisfied," and "My boyfriend wants to have sex more than I do and I want to make him happy so I wish I was more into sex when we have it even when I'm not that into it."
It's a fine line, and difficult in a world in which female sexual desire is constructed so differently from male desire.
@Cimorene: Regarding your first point about the raisins, that is so insightful. At sessions with my therapist, I have this habit of folding a Kleenex up into very small triangles when I am talking about things that are difficult or make me feel emotional. I can see how the raisins could give one something to focus on and thus facilitate discussion.
Greta Christina [gretachristina.typepad.com], my favorite blogger in the whole world, argues that it's actually sort of harmful to women (and men) to imply that they need to be overcome with lustful feelings before they initiate or agree to sex. It perpetuates this idea that sex is sort of dirty and shameful and should only be done when absolutely necessary.
Greta is in a same-sex relationship, and her and her partner schedule sex on a regular basis (but that doesn't mean they don't give in to spontaneous sex as well). It can be much harder when partners are experiencing different levels of libido, but in all things, compromise.
11/25/09
That should be "Teaching women and men that only one type of woman is beautiful". I think it's pretty difficult to simultaneously love your body, love the sensations its capable of producing and sharing that connection with another human being in the face of a lot of overwhelming seeming "evidence" that perhaps you aren't beautiful. We can't be at war with our bodies (and adult women trying to look like the body of 10 year old boys are nothing if not at war with themselves) and simultaneously fully experience pleasure.
As an older reader who is also a mother and divorcee--I have to concur with the notion that the "problem" of low libido in women is truly pegged (no pun intended) as a woman's problem as long as there is a man within a 40 foot radius who is capable of erection.
Rarely is this framed in the context of: what's the state of the relationship? Does the man know what he is doing? Is he, perhaps, insensitive or a jerk? (That brings up a whole other issue of "Honey why are you with him?" of course.)
I'm a hard working woman, I enjoy the rewards of the fruits of my labor, and the sweeter the fruit, the more labor I will put forth. So why should we assume I'm any different with sex?
In the context of a married life, with kids, men if you want sex know this: foreplay begins at 8AM. If you want nookie that night, you'd better start planning at 8AM. Keep it going all through the day. I know, I know it's draining and all--but just as much as you are visual, I am sensual. So give me something to sense.
11/25/09
I just never want to go any farther than just admiring. I am bothered by it only because I am afraid all my friends will leave me and I will be totally alone. I know part of why it is - being trans has its strange sexual pitfalls, since sex is often a very gendered experience, and usually involves genital contact. Lots of trans people are not comfortable with their genitals being touched, and I am one of them.
I don't know if it would change at all if I transitioned or not. But I do know that right now, I just don't give a fuck. I don't masturbate, I have no interest in it. I don't "get horny", I don't care, either. I don't want people armchair analyzing me. I don't need it.
I feel like any sexuality I do use is too performatory. I don't know how to be organically "sexy"; I don't feel it. I can't figure out a way to be sensual/attractive without relying on what the media tells me is attractive. I know that doesn't come naturally to me, but I don't know what does. It's like dancing - people just say to move your body however you like, but nothing ever comes to me. If I wait for inspiration, nothing happens. It's weird.
11/25/09
11/25/09
So yeah, no surprise.
11/26/09
11/25/09
I'm not saying that's the whole cause by any means, but I think we need to admit that female sexuality is not really encouraged or cultivated in this culture the way male sexuality is. people like talking about strippers and porn actresses or teenagers sending naked pictures, but when it comes to an ordinary-looking middle-aged woman's sexuality, the visibility goes away.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
Also, men's sexuality is just as unfairly represented in the media as women's. There are silly expectations for both sides, and the misinformation...unspeakable. And those Viagra and penis pills commercials shame them for lack of boner and size, respectively.
And! I thought all through high school that erection = aroused. Turns out, that isn't true. Also, did you know that men don't always want to have sex, all the time? And that lack of desire doesn't reflect their level of attraction to their mate? Hmm.
*rant* *sorry*
11/25/09
11/25/09
women are X^2... GIANT CHROMOSOMES so youre (women) are all over the place..
men are Xy, so we are simplier creatures... lookin at it from a genetic standpoint
11/25/09
"I am but mad north by northwest. When the wind is southerly, I know a hawk from a handsaw."
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
no one implied that your genes make you crazy...
but whatever, ive been the minority of crowds in the past... opinions are often misconstrued, misinterpreted and disregarded when your 'the other'... thats fine
#tips
11/25/09
11/25/09
mmm-hmmm... and someone already said the couldnt get what i meant by that statement.. so i explained it.......
from a genetic stand point...
XX is more complicated than XY... so the (s0-s0) dichotomous relationship men and women have concerning sex COULD arguably be explained by genetics
you interpreted that as being crazy.. my apologies... only meant to illustrate that women are on a much broader spectrum...
but whatever....
11/25/09
Also, dismissing others experience, as you have done in all of this and have been called out for, does not help your argument. I don't say that my experience (having never found a sexual partner who matches my libido) is indicative of all men or illustrates an issue that men need to address, it illustrates my experience. Believing that because you've heard from men or your experience is that women have a lower sex drive this indicates that women on a whole have different sex drives than men is faulty. People often report sexual experiences that reflect what the cultural norms and expectations proscribe for them. Hell, even Kinsey came across this. There is too much variation in either gender to draw any overarching conclusion about biological determination when it comes to sexual desire. Men and women are probably more similar in these instances than we as a society will allow talk about. You can go on believing until the cows come home that women have different libido's than men, but that doesn't make your belief helpful or correct. Now I'm done and will give you no more fuel for your desire to tell us ladies how we feel and why we feel that way.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
Dosage compensation? Epigenetics? Lolwhut.
11/25/09
not discrediting what youre saying, but you took a statement which was more or less a joke and built a response on it...
ok...
#tips
11/25/09
whatever
#tips
11/25/09
hahaha... what i love about all this, is that this started with something small and exploded...
everyone here is obviously against me and not so much the statement anymore...
but as a biology major, you should be familiar with identical twins separated at birth, and the striking similarities found between them, even thou they have never met...
whatever, thats fine
so i get that you all are riled up that genetics is a determine factor in a person... ok... i take it back... genetics have nothing to do with a person/personality...
ok?
^_^
#tips
11/25/09
The purpose/function of SRY is testes production. Not increased sex drive, decreased domesticity, or whatever else is stereotypically attributed to men. Testes. Balls. Cojones.
Also, you have to consider that if you are talking about genetics, you can't really use generalizations. IE, you can't say "men in general do x," because ALL men are men because of one thing regularly (SRY). The fact that asexual men who are actually men exist shows that there isn't anything connected with being a male and sex drive.
11/25/09
@Mr.Gawn:
11/26/09
Comments like "so youre saying genetics have no factors to play in a persons development, psyche, mentality, personality? they are jus kinda there?" when that is obviously not what Nobodyr was saying clearly indicate an interest in provocation and being inflammatory, rather than listening, learning, and presenting your own coherent, well-supported opinions. Straw man argument and all that, etc., etc.
11/26/09
11/26/09
i feel like i have somehow offended people....
it was a small comment that was misinterpreted, but OH MY GOD this has already gotten outta hand, i think tryin to clarify only made it worst
ok, my apologies.... but i think everyone wants a victory and wants to point and 'gawk' at me... to the point where ive already ried compromising but its not even enough.
"how dare he suggest genetics..... yatta yatta yatta"
ok, my mistake....
Im sorry?
#tips
11/26/09
I mean, seriously...someone said orgasms are overrated? I have a serious problem with that. Orgasms are AWESOME. And while I think low libidos have a number of valid causes and are perfectly valid, part of me is like...but acting like this is a great and nifty outcome is problematic. It's like people who think nothing tastes as good as thin feels: they're entitled to their opinion and I'm not going to spend hours haranguing them, but...acting like there's something sinister or possibly ableist or anti-woman in being like, "but orgasms/cheddar grits are rad and you should have many of them if it's possible!" messes with me and I'm not quite sure why.
11/26/09
But when people talk about orgasms, it often comes off as if they think orgasmless sex is sad, or not worth it, or something.
I personally think orgasms are overrated. Sure, they're fun, but the effort it takes to get there isn't, and is not enjoyable, and I'd rather have supremely enjoyable sex- which for me, and many other women, means sex that doesn't include jumping through the hoops to get to an orgasm.
11/26/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
Sex is important in life and in a relationship, but when a partner/female is COMPLETELY un-desiring of sex, or rarely desiring of sex, I think it leads to problems in the end. I dont think the article is trying to point the finger at girls with low sex drive (but I’m sure there are not lots of women now self diagnosing), but suggesting this MAY be a problem.
Have you seen Hes just not that into you.
Remember the Jennifer Connely and random guy relationship?
IMO
11/25/09
I haven't seen the movie, sorry.
#tips
11/25/09
good point, definitely not a sickness, nor a syndrome...
ive often wanted to get on anti-depressants to keep pace with my low GFs libido...
the comparison to males is prolly the main issue... youre right...
but to play Devils Advocate...
blah.. i got nothing
11/25/09
11/25/09
but am i coming off creepy?
i was gonna say that... if i remember what was here...
low sex drive/no sex drive COULD BE a symptom of else....
but i would agree the problem is putting a normal standard on women's sexuality when all you have to compare it to is a males sexuality in a machismo social construction...
but i dont remember the rest...
11/26/09
It isn't automatically a bad thing, but it puts people on edge, especially if they don't recognize your name and BAM there's 20 posts from you.
11/26/09
i was blocked for awhile, im not new to this..
"WHAT BLOCKED, HOW SHOCKING" right?, naaa, i dont even know what happened ... been commenting on gawker for about 1 year or 2
i love a good forum
#tips
11/25/09
Maybe I should be worried about that.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
I do have friends who don't masturbate at all.
11/26/09
I tried asking about in on the Talk Sex With Sue boards once, and the opinion was that possibly the full bladder was putting subtle pressure on the G-spot . . . but I still don't really know what's going on.
But I like it.
11/25/09
because by the time i find an article i like, read it, then go thru the comments, there is equivilant to a thesis of words to read....
but this is all interesting stuff...
i find that women would rather be loved than sexed.. but will "have" sex with someone they love to sorta lock them in, once the love sets in, the desire for sex dies down...
whereas men express love thru sex (in a relationship).....
i do find it weird for women to jus have no desire for sex... but i find it the same who are really shy/embarressed/ashamed of sex, their sexual desires, and their sexual organs (refer to their parts as down there, and other round about ways).. that combined with the added notion of every guy has been tryin to screw you since you hit puberty.. so i can see it being/disgusting by that point
maybe females should try female extenze
11/25/09
And the urge to express love through sex is one of the many reasons that a lack of desire is troubling.
11/25/09
some people are taught to feel like sex is dirty.... as a result they are only able to have sex with someone they dont care about, which would make since one date DR (i forget his name, i wanna say Straus or somethin) say women are only able to have sex once you kinda lower their confidence...
so if you feel dirty about something, your basically only able to do it with people you dont really like, as a result have no real desire...
at least thats how i think of it
#tips
11/25/09
I think this is particularly problematic because men seem less likely to admit things that upset the status quo. I've known women who have "used" men who wanted romantic relationships for sex (upsetting the guy) and I've known women who had much higher sex drives than their partners, but this doesn't seem to be information men share with each other. Obviously, I'm an outsider in this situation so my opinions may not be accurate, but I think they are factors.
11/25/09
but i am trying to keep up
and i make no claim to be a Dr, therapist, etc, but i think i do have a window into a women's psyche to a point... (i have a sex radio show, i feel more in tune with women than men, took several women's studies courses, even thought about minoring in women's studies, all another story for a different day)
and i was generalizing... i know people all over the spectrum, but i think if you averaged it out, yea...
clearly people are on both sides of the spectrum, but im thinkin in pie charts, and showing the biggest pie piece
#tips
11/25/09
I think your understanding of things is off. A lack of desire can be linked to negative feelings about sex itself, but that isn't the issue being discussed here. Many women who lack arousal are very open discussing sex, think nothing is wrong with it, and want to want it. Many women-- even women from religious households-- are taught that sex isn't wrong. (I, for one, was taught that it's a beautiful expression of love). And many women do use sex to express their love for their partner.
I'm not entirely clear on what you're trying to say-- you aren't really expressing yourself fully-- but from what I can tell, you're dead wrong.
11/25/09
my main point was...
Women that i know with low/no sex drive (GENRALLY SPEAKING) all have a couple traits in common..
1- very religious background
2- they find sex kinda 'nasty' (and often refer to it as doing the nasty)
now.... i realize this is not the only reason why women have low sex drive.. and that a low sex drive is not abnormal or uncommon...
i was mainly trying to articulate that sexuality, sexual growth, etc, is setup so that a lot of women grow up (in western culture) feelin 'uneasy' about their sexual organs... where as male sexuality is accepted and set as the standard...
and as soon as a girl hits about... 15, all males are basically trying to get into their pants anyway so i can see women being jus TURNED OFF by the whole thing
a some women have sex solely for the sake of making their partner happy, but some are fine without having it..
to me.. its not shocking to find women who have a low sex drive...
does this at all clarify or, no?
#tips
11/25/09
You don't get it, at all.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
2. "an immersion in physical sensation" is exactly what I need to get feeling sexytimes. Luckily my partner is the most tactile person I've ever met, and the way the media talks about men being "visual creatures" is how he is, but with touch.
3. This post is an example of how to write about women's sexual desire, and the potential lack there of, without implying that women have to live up to a certain expectation of sexual drive to be "normal" or "healthy."
Things like women who "feel distressed over the absence of desire" always makes me worry. On the one hand, since being in my current relationship I've experienced a serious dive in sex drive, which is now increasing due to going of BCP. The past year has been insanely frustrating because I have not wanted to have sex, and it was affecting my relationship for a while because it was affecting my state of mind, feelings of worthiness/being a good partner, and general lack of feeling connected to him in a way I was used to. He felt kind of rejected and was tending towards a low self-esteem and feeling like I wasn't attracted to him because we didn't have sex for a few months, which kind of just happened and before I knew it it had been 3 months since we had sex. (When we talked about it, these things went away and got better.) So, I hate my low sex drive and want it to go away.
But when I was a youngin', I wasn't interested in having sex the way everyone around me was, including the people I was pseudo-involved with. It was because I wasn't in a place where I was interested in sex, and it wasn't a problem. Except I thought it was, because I thought I was weird and being abnormal. But really I wasn't. And that was ok. And rather than feeling dissatisfied with my sex drive at the time, which is what I was, I should have been feeling ok with it and should have felt dissatisfied with the expectations of those around me (which affected my own expectations). So I hope that these researchers are making a difference between "I want to have more sex because I love sex and have noticed changes or am personally unsatisfied," and "My boyfriend wants to have sex more than I do and I want to make him happy so I wish I was more into sex when we have it even when I'm not that into it."
It's a fine line, and difficult in a world in which female sexual desire is constructed so differently from male desire.
11/25/09
11/25/09
Greta is in a same-sex relationship, and her and her partner schedule sex on a regular basis (but that doesn't mean they don't give in to spontaneous sex as well). It can be much harder when partners are experiencing different levels of libido, but in all things, compromise.
11/26/09