I am being really honest here so please enlighten me (nicely) on your thoughts on this.
I understand that the man that this story is about was obese because of physical injures, but I am wondering about the rest of us.
Is it really ok for us to overconsume food while other people starve? I feel like the environmental movement could be used with this...take only what you need. Shouldn't everyone (whether fat or thin) be held accountable for taking too much? If someone is overweight (not overweight) because of overconsuming resources shouldn't they correct that for the sake of the world instead of being accepting of their own behaviors?
Have we gone past ACCEPTANCE into JUSTIFICATION for our unsavory, privileged behaviors?
Who are we to start a "movement" of no restriction while so many others are without?
@SurferWomyn: Thin people in the U.S "overconsume" food too. Part of the point of the fat acceptance movement is realizing that if two different bodies eat the same amount, and do the same amount of working out, one of them may still be bigger than the other, and that's not inherently a problem. As for the U.S using more of our fair share of resources, this is a legitimate issue, but is no way limited to food or fat people. Going to the gym to work out, as many people of all sizes do, and as many people recommend that overweight people do more, uses tons of electricity, water (most people in the U.S take an extra shower at the gym), not to mention costs up to hundreds of dollars in membership fees that could be spent on helping the rest of the world.) In many places, people actually drive their cars to and from the gym, using even more resources, and creating pollution. That's just one example. Flying healthy organic foods across the country so people in cold climates can have fresh produce in the winter uses lots of resources, even if these are the healthiest things to eat, and the things least likely to cause weight gain. Using fewer resources would require across the board lifestlye and infrastructural changes in this country, so it seems pretty bizarre to make obesity a pet issue there singling out a group to shame and ignoring all the other aspects of the problem and all the ways it implicates all americans.
@samethingwedoeverynightpinky: a push towards local food and the use of bikes and walking (and making it safer for people to do that) would help a lot, too.
@regazza_di_lupo: I agree that walking and biking should be safer and seen as more natural, and that we should think more about the food we eat and where it comes from, but these are problems of privilege, and the original commenter was claiming that somehow fat people are responsible for overconsumption, moreso than, say, a thin person who drives 20 minutes each way to the gym, wearing sweatshop made workout clothes and carrying their ipod, made of metal that people get killed over mining, and then eats health food that's not local or seasonal.
A lot of this is class based, and it's not about the amount of consumption, it's about the type of consumption. I've never owned a car, and the years I've gained the most weight are the years when my public transit situation (which has always involved some element of walking to/from/between public transit) was super complicated, because when I was an hour and a half each way getting to and from work, I was much less likely to turn around and spend an hour at the gym, and spending an hour a day at the gym is pretty much the only thing that keeps weight off of me.
@samethingwedoeverynightpinky: @SurferWomyn: @regazza_di_lupo: @voteforme: @samethingwedoeverynightpinky: I love this! I feel like we're having a really good conversation about all of these issues. I am glad we are getting beyond "fat people bad" and "restrictions bad"
@samethingwedoeverynightpinky: I don't think it's just to do with priviledged. I'm not "poor" anymore, but I'm not upper middle class. I'm a 24 year old line cook with a bunch of pets (who get doctor treatment and probably better food than me, actually.) I don't buy my food at Whole Foods. I don't have a fancy hybrid car. I have a broke ass Monte Carlo with no rear view mirror. But Food is important to me, so I take the time to hit the farmer's markets and buy cheap, wholesome foods that I can use to make great tasting meals.
i feel for this woman. my mother, younger brother and both of my younger siblings are obese. i love them all so much and i don't want to do any of that fat shaming stuff but i don't know how to say i'm worried for their lives and their health. they eat a ton. they never exercise. my mother might not make it another 5 years and my siblings already have diabetes.
how does one plead with a loved one to live healthily and lose weight without laying on the guilt? like shriver, i've lost one loved one this year from complications that were most likely caused by obesity and i can't stand the thought of losing more.
i don't care what waist size or dress size they are, i just want them to be healthy and right now they aren't. =(
Obesity is not healthy. But being "fat" by fashion's standards is not the same thing as truly, medically obese.
A size 14 is not obese. It is not "fat" except by Anna Wintour standards. God forbid the entire world come to that...
However, when I have a patient with early stage lung cancer who can't receive treatment because she weighs over 300 lbs and can't fit in the radiation therapy machine, that is a bad thing from a health perspective. When you have to be on daily insulin injections because your pancreas has "given out," that is a true health issue.
It is very important that everyone recognize their own healthy weight, and fight to maintain that. Living a full life - not fitting in a size 6 - is the ultimate issue.
One thing that is never present in these articles is the underlying class tension that fat acceptance riles up. While in earlier cultures, being plump was a sign of riches and plentiful food, now many people associate that extra rotundness to poverty(inability to buy more expensive, healthier foods, inability to afford gym etc..) Anybody else ever notice that?
@Raised-byHeathens: Vegetables are cheaper than junk food. And running in the park is free. It's not just about money, it's about education.
Yes, being plump used to be considered beautiful in days gone by, and in some cultures, it still is - but I can't think of a culture that celebrates being morbidly obese.
@Lulu82: I challenge you to go to one of the small, poorly stocked "grocery" stores in lower-income areas and find enough fresh vegetables in an edible state to eat. Food deserts exist, and they are predominantly in areas where the residents don't have the money or ability to travel elsewhere to get better options.
These also coincidentally may be the neighborhoods where safe parks to run in are at a premium.
@Ratinski: There are three versions of a local food store, here. Bottom Dollar is the one that's commonly in lower income areas, doesn't provide bags to decrease overhead, doesn't have a deli for the same reason, etcetc. Food Lion is the "middle-of-the-road" version, with bags and deli. And I've only heard of, but not seen, the higher-class Reid's, which apparently offers culinary lessons and the like.
Anyway. Of the many, many Food Lions and Bottom Dollars I've been to, the Bottom Dollars always seem to have the nicest, freshest fruits and veggies for cheaper. Their selection is slightly decreased, but they still have things like mangos, pineapples, etc... just not tomatillos and other such fairly exotic stuff. Usually I end up going out of my way to shop at Bottom Dollar (( the Food Lion's closer )) whenever I need more fruits, because the Food Lion versions are more bruised and rot faster.
@Shiya: @MoonCat82: I live in a lower income neighborhood too. My local grocery store is a tiny storefront with no fresh produce, minimal frozen, and minimal canned food. It's basically a convenience store. It's the same in other lower income neighborhoods throughout my city. In order to get fresh food, I have to take the train three miles. Round trip, grocery shopping takes four hours. I can do it, because I'm privileged to only be working one job and I'm single. But it's different for a lot of my neighbors, who are working multiple jobs and caring for kids. They can't do that, and they can't afford to spend the minimum amount of money per week to get groceries delivered. ($50 + $11 "service fees")
I'm not saying that all lower-income neighborhoods are the same. I am saying that food deserts do exist, and that I happen to live in one.
I'm starting to lose hope that we will ever get to a place where thin and healthy are not synonymous, at least in terms of people's first reactions. I am a size 16 daughter of a size 0 Mom. Although I am not (I don't think) painful to look at, Mom is flat out gorgeous. I am a giant, and she is petite - such is life. Where I eat a balanced diet and am very active, Mom is a workaholic who subsists mainly on late-night meals of cheerios and licorice. And yet... many of our family members have offered her their sympathies, noting that "it must be hard for someone like you to have a daughter who is so big" and imply that she must worry daily about my health. I just don't get it. These are people who know us both and who are aware of our respective lifestyles, but still seem to feel that big is bad and thin is in. Weird. Annoying. Disheartening.
So she can accept that his compressed disc, diabetes, emphysema, and heart problems, but fat (someone else's, natch) is something she just refuses to take lying down?
@Shiya: It says in the article (I think, I only skimmed) that the injury was unrelated to his weight, and that it pre-dated his weight gain. Which is just the icing on the fucking sugar-free cake.
I'm sorry for Ms. Shriver's loss of her brother, and given her brother's poor health at the time of writing I understand her anxiety, but I can't help feeling like she only did the most superficial of research into fat acceptance before writing. I'm no expert, I've only started reading about the movement recently, but does she honestly think it's about accepting "the high-calorie habit"? Sure, some fat people eat high-calorie diets. So do some thin people. The point is that fat is NOT necessarily connected to high calorie intake or bad eating habits - people have no trouble accepting that some thin people eat a lot and don't gain weight, so is it such a stretch to believe that some fat people can eat whatever the recommended number is or even restrict calories and not lose? I don't really see much sympathy for "the obese" here, given that the only thing she seems to accept as "mitigating circumstances" (in the egregious crime of fatness) is major traumatic injury.
As for her friend recently browbeaten into a "successful" liquid-only diet by his doctor - I'd like to check in with him a few years ago and see how that's going.
I thought 'fat acceptance' meant accepting fat PEOPLE and not being a dick to them, and accepting that fat people are not necessarily unhealthy, rather than passively accepting being fat and never trying to change it when if it's causing you problems.
I feel for Ms. Shriver. Her brother died and perhaps if she had just pushed him a little more to control his eating (or whatever she tells herself late at night) he might still be alive. She doesn't like the idea of anyone taking away any tools to get people like her brother to take care of themselves, saving themselves from an unpleasant death and their loved ones from a great deal of heartache.
But fat shaming, which is the real target of the HAES movement, isn't really a good tool to help people find the path to good health.
Ms. Shriver reminds me of someone who rails against the drug legalization/decriminalization movement because she lost someone to drug abuse. Such people assume that without the legal sanction against drug use, their loved one would have died even sooner. This is not a logical conclusion to draw. Nor does it follow automatically that without the social sanction against being obese, people will abandon their diets and quit the gym. Sanctions of this sort serve to marginalize people, which makes it harder for a person who's obese or drug-addicted to talk about their health, on account of all the emotional repercussions that come with shame and judgment, etc.
I think the perceived relationship between health and weight that people have is so interesting. I'm 6'4" and I used to be around 235 lbs, which was maybe 20 pounds overweight. Then I got Crohn's disease, and I lost over 40 pounds in ten weeks. People started telling me that I looked so great, but I felt horrible. The weight has stayed off and my health has somewhat stabilized in the past three months, but I would rather be heavier and healthier than my current skinny self with a lot of pain.
@andromedeia: Celiac in the same situation. I dropped 80 lbs via malnutrition, and I have friends who say "But at least you're thin!" They really truly would rather be allergic to every food under the sun and so malnourished they bruise and pass out than be "fat."
@ilovedavelister: It is so scary. I have one friend with a hormone issue that makes her gain weight, and she kept saying things like "I wish we could switch our health issues! I want to be thin like that!" Um, no. They both suck.
A healthy at any size argument fails when the example used, as the case here, is not healthy at all and experiencing health issues which are directly caused by the excess weight. This is where I believe the fat=unhealthy and skinny=healthy argument tends to fail. Do not take a skinny person and use them as an example of how skinny can be unhealthy and then say they smoke, have back problems, or joint problems. Those are not related to their size.
Take a skinny person who is maintaining an unnatural weight FOR THEIR BODY and highlight their poor hair and nail health, their lower bone density, their low iron, or even their decreased energy levels and inability to sustain short exercise.
Take a fat person who is maintaining an unnatural weight FOR THEIR BODY and highlight the joint stress and damage from carrying their weight, their diabetes, or even their inability to walk a short distance without becoming winded.
Those are failures of healthy at any size. I don't care if you are a size 14 and you have great blood work or if you are 2 and have great blood work. Why is that even a question of an issue? I don't care if you have cancer, that isn't weight related. If we are going to talk about weight related health then people should focus on weight related issues, not the OTHER health issues that are unrelated but for the fact that are in the person being talked about.
@Zombies make the heart grow fonder: Seems like there is a lot of confusion with that phrase going on: "health at any size." I take that to mean health, first and foremost, and as a result, whatever size that means for the individual. A dumping of an "ideal" and an adoption of healthy lifestyle choices. The resulting body size --whatever that might be-- is what's to be accepted, as opposed to the blanket acceptance of any and every body size without regard to what's contributing to them.
The focus being on the choices and not the potentially misleading physical appearance. Am I making any sense?
@JerseyGrrrl: You do. I don't think we are at odds with our views here. However, other commenters and this original story posted, make the mistakes that you and I both highlighted. In fact, we here at Jezebel often have a tendency to drop the "perfect blood work" argument without ever addressing joint health. I am certain if we heard more from the skinny-who-aren't meant-to-be, we would hear their health woes. However, much like Beth Ditto who overlooks her health limitations caused by her size, none of the famous skinnies who aren't meant to be are going to come out and tell us how they have to take a million supplements to grow an inch of hair or finish 20 minutes of cardio.
At the end of the day, I don't know anyone who takes issue with a healthy fatty or a healthy skinny- and that is a good thing. However, I am unfortunate enough to know many who are quick to be terrible about an overweight person who has any weight related health issues. So that is an issue I would prefer to see addressed.
@Zombies make the heart grow fonder: I like how your rant completely ignores scientific studies. It's like you actually tried to be as intellectually dishonest as you possible could.
When 75% of the American population is expected to be overweight in 2015, you know a HUGE majority are being unhealthy at their size. This point really isn't up for debate.
And according to the American Cancer Society:
"Excess Weight is Linked to 90,000 US Cancer Deaths a Year"
You have no rant, this is senseless dribble at best.
Edited by Zombies make the heart grow fonder at 12/02/09 9:41 AM
Zombies make the heart grow fonder was starred
Zombies make the heart grow fonder was unstarred
I just hate how in public, if someone sees a skinny person eating a cheeseburger, it's like 'Oh, that's okay, s/he's skinny!' but if you see a heavier person eating a caesar salad, it's more 'Bitch, that dressing's got hundreds of calories, and you don't even need to be eating.'
I wanted to leave this as a reply to those who find HAES harmful, but there's a lot of them, and I think I can be more relevant up here.
As someone said down a ways, her brother didn't die of his fat. He died because he was unhealthy and had unhealthy habits by all accounts. Not because he was fat. While those habits may have contributed to his weight, his weight was not the main issue.
I am of what is considered normal weight, however, I am heavy for me. I gained about 20lbs in less than a year from a medical condition. And holy shit, suddenly judgy mcjudgerpants came out from everyone. My mom and dad called me chubby and fat, my co-workers told me I should eat better, and my guy friends were like "WOO HOO, BOOBS" (Some of my male friends are less than mature).
Oddly enough, HAES helped me accept the fact that my body was going through a bit of a moment. Bodies do that. You have health issues and stress and other issues. What I learned was that I shouldn't exercise because of the comments and try to lose weight, but I should exercise because it made me feel good. And you know what, I am (or will be once the doctor lets me again. Gallbladder polyps = Bitches) and it does make me feel good. And that's why I do it. I'm probably not going to lose weight until they get this health issue figured out, but who cares?
My worth isn't determined by a number on a scale or on the back of my trousers. And neither is my health. Because the number says I'm healthy, but really, that means absolutely jack squat.
yvanehtnioj promoted this comment
activearchivist is lovely, in a moist, fluffy sort of way was starred
activearchivist is lovely, in a moist, fluffy sort of way was unstarred
@activearchivist is lovely, in a moist, fluffy sort of way: People suck, even when they love you. My mother told me I should go to the doctor because I gave gained a "humondo amount of weight" (about 15 pounds, but that's a lot on someone who is 4'11").
@activearchivist is lovely, in a moist, fluffy sort of way: Agreed. She just said to me the other day, "Where did you get that photo of you on Facebook? It's AWFUL!" (On IM, so that is a direct quote, with caps and all). She later said I didn't look awful, but that the photo was awful. She could have just said that to begin with!
@chatterboxwriting:
Boo. Mothers. Best cheerleaders, worst supporters sometimes.
Eh, I've stopped telling my parents stuff. My parents aren't very supportive of anything I do that doesn't fit into their nice little picture of me. That includes gaining weight or trying to belly dance. There's a reason my FB picture looks like I'm screaming in terror. ;)
"...points out that fat characters in Disney films are always evil, and asks, 'when is fat Cinderella?'"
I'm going to have to disagree with that. There are many more thin, angular villains in Disney than there are overweight. Cindarella wasn't fat, but neither was her evil step mother, or Maleficent, or Jafaar, or Cruella DeVil, or Scar, or a majority of the well known villains Disney is known for.
The only overweight villains from Disney I can think of are Ursella, the witch in Sword and The Stone, Pete, and that Russian guy from Pinocchio (the last two of whom I'd consider more burly than fat).
Usually rotundas (or fat) characters are considered more cute and endearing, so they fill in the more lovable supporting cast. Sultan from Aladdin, Pumba the warthog, Cogsworth from Beauty and the Beast, Pacha from Emperor's New Groove. The list goes on.
I'm sure I've missed quite a few but as an animator who's been trained in the style of Disney: Angles = evil. Round = cuddly.
Yeah, it's about HEALTH at every size. The goal of healthy living -- including a healthy amount of enjoyable physical activity, and a nutritious diet -- isn't to lose a certain amount of weight, after which you will be healthy. It's about your body working better.
It sounds like Shriver's brother made a lot of unhealthy choices, but his weight was not the only measure of those choices. Had he made healthier choices, would he have weighed less? Maybe and maybe not. I have no way of knowing. But the weight loss, if any, wouldn't have been the main thing -- it would have been the healthier choices. The point of HAES is to say hey -- even if doing some exercise and eating nutritious food never got his BMI to fall into the "normal" range, it's still worth doing, because his body still would have worked better.
12/02/09
I understand that the man that this story is about was obese because of physical injures, but I am wondering about the rest of us.
Is it really ok for us to overconsume food while other people starve? I feel like the environmental movement could be used with this...take only what you need. Shouldn't everyone (whether fat or thin) be held accountable for taking too much? If someone is overweight (not overweight) because of overconsuming resources shouldn't they correct that for the sake of the world instead of being accepting of their own behaviors?
Have we gone past ACCEPTANCE into JUSTIFICATION for our unsavory, privileged behaviors?
Who are we to start a "movement" of no restriction while so many others are without?
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
A lot of this is class based, and it's not about the amount of consumption, it's about the type of consumption. I've never owned a car, and the years I've gained the most weight are the years when my public transit situation (which has always involved some element of walking to/from/between public transit) was super complicated, because when I was an hour and a half each way getting to and from work, I was much less likely to turn around and spend an hour at the gym, and spending an hour a day at the gym is pretty much the only thing that keeps weight off of me.
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/01/09
how does one plead with a loved one to live healthily and lose weight without laying on the guilt? like shriver, i've lost one loved one this year from complications that were most likely caused by obesity and i can't stand the thought of losing more.
i don't care what waist size or dress size they are, i just want them to be healthy and right now they aren't. =(
12/01/09
A size 14 is not obese. It is not "fat" except by Anna Wintour standards. God forbid the entire world come to that...
However, when I have a patient with early stage lung cancer who can't receive treatment because she weighs over 300 lbs and can't fit in the radiation therapy machine, that is a bad thing from a health perspective. When you have to be on daily insulin injections because your pancreas has "given out," that is a true health issue.
It is very important that everyone recognize their own healthy weight, and fight to maintain that. Living a full life - not fitting in a size 6 - is the ultimate issue.
12/01/09
12/02/09
Yes, being plump used to be considered beautiful in days gone by, and in some cultures, it still is - but I can't think of a culture that celebrates being morbidly obese.
12/02/09
These also coincidentally may be the neighborhoods where safe parks to run in are at a premium.
12/02/09
Anyway. Of the many, many Food Lions and Bottom Dollars I've been to, the Bottom Dollars always seem to have the nicest, freshest fruits and veggies for cheaper. Their selection is slightly decreased, but they still have things like mangos, pineapples, etc... just not tomatillos and other such fairly exotic stuff. Usually I end up going out of my way to shop at Bottom Dollar (( the Food Lion's closer )) whenever I need more fruits, because the Food Lion versions are more bruised and rot faster.
12/02/09
I'm not saying that all lower-income neighborhoods are the same. I am saying that food deserts do exist, and that I happen to live in one.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/01/09
As for her friend recently browbeaten into a "successful" liquid-only diet by his doctor - I'd like to check in with him a few years ago and see how that's going.
12/01/09
12/01/09
eta: um...just in case /sarcasm
12/01/09
12/01/09
But fat shaming, which is the real target of the HAES movement, isn't really a good tool to help people find the path to good health.
Ms. Shriver reminds me of someone who rails against the drug legalization/decriminalization movement because she lost someone to drug abuse. Such people assume that without the legal sanction against drug use, their loved one would have died even sooner. This is not a logical conclusion to draw. Nor does it follow automatically that without the social sanction against being obese, people will abandon their diets and quit the gym. Sanctions of this sort serve to marginalize people, which makes it harder for a person who's obese or drug-addicted to talk about their health, on account of all the emotional repercussions that come with shame and judgment, etc.
12/01/09
12/01/09
It blows my mind.
12/01/09
12/01/09
Take a skinny person who is maintaining an unnatural weight FOR THEIR BODY and highlight their poor hair and nail health, their lower bone density, their low iron, or even their decreased energy levels and inability to sustain short exercise.
Take a fat person who is maintaining an unnatural weight FOR THEIR BODY and highlight the joint stress and damage from carrying their weight, their diabetes, or even their inability to walk a short distance without becoming winded.
Those are failures of healthy at any size. I don't care if you are a size 14 and you have great blood work or if you are 2 and have great blood work. Why is that even a question of an issue? I don't care if you have cancer, that isn't weight related. If we are going to talk about weight related health then people should focus on weight related issues, not the OTHER health issues that are unrelated but for the fact that are in the person being talked about.
End rant.
12/01/09
The focus being on the choices and not the potentially misleading physical appearance. Am I making any sense?
12/01/09
At the end of the day, I don't know anyone who takes issue with a healthy fatty or a healthy skinny- and that is a good thing. However, I am unfortunate enough to know many who are quick to be terrible about an overweight person who has any weight related health issues. So that is an issue I would prefer to see addressed.
12/01/09
12/01/09
When 75% of the American population is expected to be overweight in 2015, you know a HUGE majority are being unhealthy at their size. This point really isn't up for debate.
And according to the American Cancer Society:
"Excess Weight is Linked to 90,000 US Cancer Deaths a Year"
You have no rant, this is senseless dribble at best.
12/02/09
12/01/09
The double standard is appalling.
12/01/09
As someone said down a ways, her brother didn't die of his fat. He died because he was unhealthy and had unhealthy habits by all accounts. Not because he was fat. While those habits may have contributed to his weight, his weight was not the main issue.
I am of what is considered normal weight, however, I am heavy for me. I gained about 20lbs in less than a year from a medical condition. And holy shit, suddenly judgy mcjudgerpants came out from everyone. My mom and dad called me chubby and fat, my co-workers told me I should eat better, and my guy friends were like "WOO HOO, BOOBS" (Some of my male friends are less than mature).
Oddly enough, HAES helped me accept the fact that my body was going through a bit of a moment. Bodies do that. You have health issues and stress and other issues. What I learned was that I shouldn't exercise because of the comments and try to lose weight, but I should exercise because it made me feel good. And you know what, I am (or will be once the doctor lets me again. Gallbladder polyps = Bitches) and it does make me feel good. And that's why I do it. I'm probably not going to lose weight until they get this health issue figured out, but who cares?
My worth isn't determined by a number on a scale or on the back of my trousers. And neither is my health. Because the number says I'm healthy, but really, that means absolutely jack squat.
/novel
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
Boo. Mothers. Best cheerleaders, worst supporters sometimes.
Eh, I've stopped telling my parents stuff. My parents aren't very supportive of anything I do that doesn't fit into their nice little picture of me. That includes gaining weight or trying to belly dance. There's a reason my FB picture looks like I'm screaming in terror. ;)
12/01/09
I'm going to have to disagree with that. There are many more thin, angular villains in Disney than there are overweight. Cindarella wasn't fat, but neither was her evil step mother, or Maleficent, or Jafaar, or Cruella DeVil, or Scar, or a majority of the well known villains Disney is known for.
The only overweight villains from Disney I can think of are Ursella, the witch in Sword and The Stone, Pete, and that Russian guy from Pinocchio (the last two of whom I'd consider more burly than fat).
Usually rotundas (or fat) characters are considered more cute and endearing, so they fill in the more lovable supporting cast. Sultan from Aladdin, Pumba the warthog, Cogsworth from Beauty and the Beast, Pacha from Emperor's New Groove. The list goes on.
I'm sure I've missed quite a few but as an animator who's been trained in the style of Disney: Angles = evil. Round = cuddly.
12/01/09
It sounds like Shriver's brother made a lot of unhealthy choices, but his weight was not the only measure of those choices. Had he made healthier choices, would he have weighed less? Maybe and maybe not. I have no way of knowing. But the weight loss, if any, wouldn't have been the main thing -- it would have been the healthier choices. The point of HAES is to say hey -- even if doing some exercise and eating nutritious food never got his BMI to fall into the "normal" range, it's still worth doing, because his body still would have worked better.