I go to a well respected liberal arts college that's SAT optional (I'm probably outing myself here, but whatever). Roughly half of students applying submit their scores for consideration (I did, but I also come from a socioeconomic background that allowed me to take a prep class, sit the test more than once, etc). We decided to go SAT optional a decade or so ago after doing a study and finding that SAT scores did not accurately predict/correlate with students' final GPAs, though it did correlate with their first-year GPAs by less than 1/10th of a point.
Probably a little more than half of my friends did not submit their scores. This is anecdotal, but I see no difference at all in terms of academic ability.
As for affirmative action -- I don't know. I'm a peer writing tutor, so I work with a lot of different students, and obviously, since it is a liberal arts colleges, there's a fair amount of writing involved in almost every discipline. I have consistently seen (again, this is just anecdotal) that those students that are likely recipients of affirmative action based on race often have maybe 5th-6th grade writing levels, and are unprepared for the rigor of college writing. I don't know that there is an easy solution to this, since I am probably a beneficiary of affirmative action as well and it's worked out well for me.
I was really grateful for the SAT... As a smarty pants nerd girl in a small town high school in Kansas, I had almost no AP classes, advanced math, or even extracurriculars to prove my merit to colleges. My guidance counselor was shocked when I asked for information about schools out of state. "What's wrong with KU?" - direct quote.
When I did very well on the PSATs, my mailbox was suddenly flooded with application info from everywhere. My standardized test scores definitely opened realms of possibility, and made me realize I had some kind of value that wasn't yet realized.
Are they perfectly fair? Nope.
One measure of a very particular type of performance only.
The problem with all of the pressure to succeed at standardized tests (ACT, SAT, AP, etc) is that it drives students to be entirely focused in solving the problem, instead of the Socratic style discussions that actually take place in college. So many of my classmates were so focused on getting all of the answers right, instead of taking risks and looking at the big picture that whenever a professor asked us "well, what do you think?", the entire classroom would be silent.
College is a differnt animal. Just because you got straight A's/high test scores doesn't mean that you'll get them in college. I had students petition the VP in charge of Academic Affairs because they were mad a professors gave them "bs" on papers instead of "As"
Can't we just have college admissions based on wacky Cambridge style interviews?
@brokestephenswoman: Honestly? I didn't even get a lot of in college, most certainly not in lower division, and I went to a pretty good school. Only when I started taking grad-level seminars was that kind of thinking really encouraged.
I think that some people are still able to get through college tackling it as a "job," the job being to maintain the GPA and all that stuff.
I am in the midst testing and soon college applications will be surrounding me, and I have to say standardized testing is one of the worst academic things I have ever had to do. Some of us just plain suck at standardized testing.
I'm in mostly honors and APs, I'm a journalism nerd, bookish and always up for discussions and I genuinely enjoy learning. My GPA is pretty high. But when it comes to SAT and ACT, lord help me. The first time I took the SAT I did not do too well, but I had a tutor, and so I took it another time and raised it over 100 points. It still just doesn't feel good enough so I signed up to take it again in October. Same with ACT. I've taken it once and I got a 25, not too bad, but I need to bump it up a few points for the state schools.
And I hate to put pressure like this on myself, but its just, I don't know, I feel like it has to be done. I'm in Florida, and the two main state schools - University of Florida and Florida State University, get so many applications that they really only can look at numbers. And there are some kids that just have a knack for testing. And it's incredibly stressful. I just want to be done with it. But I have to take ACT and SAT again and bump up my score just a little bit. It's the most stressful and annoying and competitive thing in the world and I cannot wait to be done with it.
My school is also a private, really hard, college preparatory school and there are kids there that are more competitive than you can imagine. And these kids kill themselves trying to get the best scores on SATs. I hate it. I cannot wait to be a second semester high school senior and know where I'm going to college.
@mannequin: Hey, I totally relate (although I wasn't quite as bright as you in high school :-)), I suck suck suck at those tests. You will do just fine. I know that isn't really any help, but you will.
I'm pretty familiar with the racial issues associated with the SATs, but I think too often we focus on race while ignoring class. A lot of how well students do on the SATs are related to things like their parents' level of education which can look like a racial issue since degrees aren't uniformly distributed across racial categories.
There is one benefit to the SAT- it can point out students who are particularly strong from inner city and rural areas. It was part of what it was designed for.
I think the US college admissions process is really insane between the SATs, GPAs, extracurriculars, and all of the obsessing. But I think the US probably does a better job with diverse students than some other countries. Students in the UK pretty much know where they can get in based on their predicted A levels, which gets rid of some pressure, but they don't really control for the differences in exposure and opportunity.
I'm wondering if this guy did poorly at Princeton because everything had gone easily for him up to that point in his life that he didn't know how to actually work. When I went to college, I found that a lot of people had terrible study skills because they had never actually had to study before.
Just one thing- the SAT doesn't claim to test aptitude anymore. SAT actually doesn't stand for anything. It's seriously just SAT.
How ridiculous is that? It used to stand for things. Now it's really just the SAT Reasoning Test. That's it.
I'll admit to being sort of part of the problem- I work for one of those giant test prep companies teaching SAT classes as of this summer. It pays better than any other job I can get at this point in my life while I'm a full time student. And yes, the kids who can afford the $1000 30hr prep course we offer will definitely do better than the kids who can't afford it. I haven't quite worked out if I'm okay with working for the man like that.
@CollegeBookworm: When I was applying to astronomy grad school, I had feverish visions of burning down the ETS buildings in Princeton. Forget investment banking- go into testing and test prep for the real money!
On the topic of standard tests for graduate school: a physics professor at Berkeley did a study recently of Berkeley physics and astronomy graduate student success after the PhD, and found that a higher physics GRE score did not correlate with academic success after graduation (publication rates, etc). VINDICATION! That hellish test was my arch-nemesis. Interestingly, there was a weak correlation with the verbal GRE score as a predictor of success among physics and astronomy graduate students.
@daisen-in: It could be that native English speakers do better on the verbal and also have an easier time publishing (assuming that's what they mean by success).
I did really well on the SATs. I also misspelled my name on the booklet. Getting my nice scores back in an envelope addressed to MignihtBikeRide= mixed feelings on how much this can really say about my aptitude at life.
I have to say, I have never been more grateful for the day I found out my potential transfer school wouldn't hazard a glance at my SAT scores after I completed X-credits at my local community college. I think considering students based on aptitude is wise, in the mindset of:
- a well-rounded consideration (classes taken, grades, scores)
- consideration of where the student excels
- using said considerations to see where the student needs help to assist them in achieving their goals
@monkeyriot: I had the same measurements but then I scored Wombat on the OWLS and I've gained the Durmstrang Sixtween Lemur Kegs ever since. I'm trying really hard to get back, though.
@thesciencegirl: Sorry - I know I gave two of mine. I really wasn't trying to brag - just thought it was relevant to the thread, especially in response to the statement that standardized testing is greatly affected by test prep course. I ought to have gone to Google instead to dig up some documentation - such as this article describing study findings that prep courses have a relatively marginal effect on score:
@thesciencegirl: Sharing mine was more of a catharsis because for so many years there was SO MUCH FRIGGIN' pressure around it and I just had to set it free into the Interwebs!!
@Penny: Well, since we're sharing.... I only got a 3 on the AP Bio exam, and I didn't even shell out the money for AP Chem because I knew it was a lost cause.... and I COULD BE YOUR DOCTOR SOME DAY!
I find the questions this post asks interesting, but I'm kind of bummed there are no answers suggested. I mean of course it would be great if everyone got the same college education, but how on earth are we supposed to do that?
@scullymurphy: Perhaps it's more important to give everyone the chance to educate themselves as much as possible? I've taught college classes at quite a few different (journalistically defined) levels, and I like to think I offer the same education at each school.
According to a fairly recent study, SAT total scores still correlate at a high level (r = .47) with first year college GPA for black students. The correlation is higher for white students (r = .53) but there's not a huge discrepancy. [professionals.collegeboard.com]
Since academic performance is a big thing that colleges are typically trying to predict with standardized testing, figures like that suggest to me that we'll be using SAT/ACT for some time yet.
@thegogglesdonothing: I always find these studies interesting. I've never once given or was asked for my info once I went to college. Or at law school. Where is the college board getting this data. What schools are they pulling from? MIT (grade deflation); Harvard (inflation) or some random sampling of places where the students SATs vary across a broad based range. There are just too many variables that are left unsaid. And like I mentioned, I don't know a soul who has ever asked or given the college board data after taking the SAT or consented to their college releasing it.
AP exams, community college course, and IB exams have been, in my anecdotal experience, a better market in how one does in college. But at least I'm caveating my conclusion.
@Trulymadlyme: The document says they pulled from 110 different schools of varying selectivity and geography and that the sample size was a bit over 151,000 (which, speaking as someone who's done a fair bit of social science research, is insanely high).
I looked for informed consent information, but there doesn't seem to be any - I wonder if there's some fine print when taking the SAT that students are considered to agree to have their scores included in studies of the validity of the test automatically.
@thegogglesdonothing: Also, where is the informed consent to release the students' college grades? That would have to be a massive and well documented undertaking.
@Trulymadlyme: They might not have to do informed consent if it's anonymous... I can't remember all my ethics right now, but if the schools deidentified the information, it *might* be okay to give away without permission.
@Trulymadlyme: Unless your personal identifying information is attached to it, your college does not need your consent to release data (SAT, GPA, etc.) to the College Board.
Eliminating magnets would only intensify the problem, would it not? I think it needs to go the other way--attendance areas need to be eliminated and districts should be open attendance (within the district). Magnets create more room for specialized focuses (such as arts, sciences, social justice, whatever else you could possibly think up), versus schools done by attendance area which can't afford to be specialized. Losing magnet schools would completely reinforce geographical segregation and the poorest neighborhoods would get the worst schools.
@rhymenoceros: This seems right to me. Another bonus of specialized magnets is that it helps to keep kids engaged in school. If a child is an artist in a school with almost no focus on the arts, then she or he may very well just tune out and not get the benefit of a teacher's expertise or her or his classmates' shared experience learning. School is and ought to be about cultivating a desire to learn. Magnet schools, at their best, can carve out an environment where that kind of desire can grow--for every student, not just those with high IQs.
@rhymenoceros: We already have open enrollment in the district I teach in. However the district will not provide transportation for students on intra-district transfers. It's the responsbility of the parent to provide transportation to the school of their choice. This in turn puts additional financial strain on parents and limits the amount of students who take advantage of the open enrollment policy.
Sadly it's often the students who would most benefit from a transfer that are unable to afford to do so, and the status quo of "good" versus "bad" schools remains the same.
A better way to tell if someone can handle college material is to look at their AP exam scores, including 2's. Those tests were ten times more challenging and reflected the sort of thinking I had to do in college. Analogies? Not so much. Seriously.
@Trulymadlyme: I would like to agree with you, but in my experience, AP scores reflect how well your high school class prepared you for those tests. A high school with very little funding isn't going to produce students with the same scores as the high school in the rich town.
But yes, the tests are more like what I've taken in college. Now as far as those tests equaling college classes, I'm not really on board with that (different topic, though).
@schweppes: I remember being 15 and literally shocked when I scored a 5 in AP Euro. I had spent the entire year struggling through the course material and got a B- or C+ in the class, IIRC. Being a B/C student was sort of par for the course for me at that point in my education. I never thought I was "intelligent" or gifted or whatever, simply because I never really qualified for such during any test. I got into that class as literally a scheduling fluke.
But after being a basically average test taker, I literally realized in that moment holy shit. I might be smart. It changed the way I approached learning and my life, oddly.
@Trulymadlyme: I got a 5 on the AP English test, after struggling all year with a teacher who gave me a C because she didn't think I was "working to my fullest potential." That grade didn't change my life, but it did make me wanna swing by my old school after graduation and yell "HECK YEAH" in her face. ha
@electricbubbles: @thesciencegirl: Yeah. I actually paid the 75 bucks out of pocket, per test, by working. It sucked. And I also paid for Barron's and the other supplemental materials out of pocket, which also sucked. You all are absolutely right that the AP exams prep is insanely influenced by the money it costs to prepare and that schools (mine included) sucked at doing that. I paid by working, which saved me a year of college costs. Many other people weren't so lucky and had a hard time juggling work and school (which explains the passage issue).
But I found the exam material to actually be similar to the sort of material I studied in college. If we're going to prep kids for college, we should give our schools the resources to do that. And I've actually heard that students who even get 1s or 2s do better in college.
@Trulymadlyme: And that is why the SAT saved me. I attended a very small, woefully underfunded Catholic high school that offered no AP classes, and not much in the way of challenges. It's doubtful that the colleges which interested me would have looked twice at my application if not for my scores on the SAT and ACHs (now known as SAT II, I think). Skipped the whole test prep thing.
@electricbubbles: Definitely. while AP tests at least reflect knowing some material, you still learn to write for the test. The teachers at my HS were very aware of how to take the AP test and so the whole year, in my AP US history for example, we wrote essays and did multiple choice tests. When I finally did the actual test I felt like I'd seen every single question before.
@Trulymadlyme: I really don't think the APs are that predictive. I don't remember stressing over any of my AP classes in high school and I got at least a 4 on all of them. They really weren't considered super hard in my high school, most people got 5s.
But, back when I was in high school (late 90s), AP exams were something seniors took which gave you a lot more time to develop your critical thinking and essay writing skills. Now lots of students are starting to take them as sophmores, which I think ends up making them less meaningful.
@Trulymadlyme: @thesciencegirl: @clevernamehere: Isn't this the equivalent of discussing bust sizes or measurements? I personally love both, but I'm just saying.
/ Feeling like this is XOXO
//Top 5, as in, never scored below the 95th percentile on any standardized test.
@That-Dude: I didn't think it was like size measurements in the sense that I mentioned AP exams as an alternative to the SAT and conveyed my personal experience with it. I figured pointing out my mediocre high school grades would make it clear that this wasn't a "I'm so smart, the world should work this way" kind of thing as much as someone talking about how there are different ways to measure intelligence and my own experience. If anyone takes it in any other way, that was definitely unintended.
@trixiebee67: You're right, too. I think schools should be able to look at multiple systems in evaluating students and their potential to succeed in college.
07/07/09
Probably a little more than half of my friends did not submit their scores. This is anecdotal, but I see no difference at all in terms of academic ability.
As for affirmative action -- I don't know. I'm a peer writing tutor, so I work with a lot of different students, and obviously, since it is a liberal arts colleges, there's a fair amount of writing involved in almost every discipline. I have consistently seen (again, this is just anecdotal) that those students that are likely recipients of affirmative action based on race often have maybe 5th-6th grade writing levels, and are unprepared for the rigor of college writing. I don't know that there is an easy solution to this, since I am probably a beneficiary of affirmative action as well and it's worked out well for me.
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/07/09
When I did very well on the PSATs, my mailbox was suddenly flooded with application info from everywhere. My standardized test scores definitely opened realms of possibility, and made me realize I had some kind of value that wasn't yet realized.
Are they perfectly fair? Nope.
One measure of a very particular type of performance only.
07/07/09
07/07/09
The problem with all of the pressure to succeed at standardized tests (ACT, SAT, AP, etc) is that it drives students to be entirely focused in solving the problem, instead of the Socratic style discussions that actually take place in college. So many of my classmates were so focused on getting all of the answers right, instead of taking risks and looking at the big picture that whenever a professor asked us "well, what do you think?", the entire classroom would be silent.
College is a differnt animal. Just because you got straight A's/high test scores doesn't mean that you'll get them in college. I had students petition the VP in charge of Academic Affairs because they were mad a professors gave them "bs" on papers instead of "As"
Can't we just have college admissions based on wacky Cambridge style interviews?
07/07/09
I think that some people are still able to get through college tackling it as a "job," the job being to maintain the GPA and all that stuff.
07/07/09
I'm in mostly honors and APs, I'm a journalism nerd, bookish and always up for discussions and I genuinely enjoy learning. My GPA is pretty high. But when it comes to SAT and ACT, lord help me. The first time I took the SAT I did not do too well, but I had a tutor, and so I took it another time and raised it over 100 points. It still just doesn't feel good enough so I signed up to take it again in October. Same with ACT. I've taken it once and I got a 25, not too bad, but I need to bump it up a few points for the state schools.
And I hate to put pressure like this on myself, but its just, I don't know, I feel like it has to be done. I'm in Florida, and the two main state schools - University of Florida and Florida State University, get so many applications that they really only can look at numbers. And there are some kids that just have a knack for testing. And it's incredibly stressful. I just want to be done with it. But I have to take ACT and SAT again and bump up my score just a little bit. It's the most stressful and annoying and competitive thing in the world and I cannot wait to be done with it.
My school is also a private, really hard, college preparatory school and there are kids there that are more competitive than you can imagine. And these kids kill themselves trying to get the best scores on SATs. I hate it. I cannot wait to be a second semester high school senior and know where I'm going to college.
This turned into a whole rant. Sorry :/
07/07/09
07/07/09
There is one benefit to the SAT- it can point out students who are particularly strong from inner city and rural areas. It was part of what it was designed for.
I think the US college admissions process is really insane between the SATs, GPAs, extracurriculars, and all of the obsessing. But I think the US probably does a better job with diverse students than some other countries. Students in the UK pretty much know where they can get in based on their predicted A levels, which gets rid of some pressure, but they don't really control for the differences in exposure and opportunity.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
How ridiculous is that? It used to stand for things. Now it's really just the SAT Reasoning Test. That's it.
I'll admit to being sort of part of the problem- I work for one of those giant test prep companies teaching SAT classes as of this summer. It pays better than any other job I can get at this point in my life while I'm a full time student. And yes, the kids who can afford the $1000 30hr prep course we offer will definitely do better than the kids who can't afford it. I haven't quite worked out if I'm okay with working for the man like that.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
- a well-rounded consideration (classes taken, grades, scores)
- consideration of where the student excels
- using said considerations to see where the student needs help to assist them in achieving their goals
07/07/09
07/07/09
Also scores have changed since the 1950s.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
[online.wsj.com]
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
Wait--which numbers am I giving you again?
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
Since academic performance is a big thing that colleges are typically trying to predict with standardized testing, figures like that suggest to me that we'll be using SAT/ACT for some time yet.
07/07/09
AP exams, community college course, and IB exams have been, in my anecdotal experience, a better market in how one does in college. But at least I'm caveating my conclusion.
07/07/09
I looked for informed consent information, but there doesn't seem to be any - I wonder if there's some fine print when taking the SAT that students are considered to agree to have their scores included in studies of the validity of the test automatically.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
Sadly it's often the students who would most benefit from a transfer that are unable to afford to do so, and the status quo of "good" versus "bad" schools remains the same.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
But yes, the tests are more like what I've taken in college. Now as far as those tests equaling college classes, I'm not really on board with that (different topic, though).
07/07/09
07/07/09
But after being a basically average test taker, I literally realized in that moment holy shit. I might be smart. It changed the way I approached learning and my life, oddly.
07/07/09
07/07/09
But I found the exam material to actually be similar to the sort of material I studied in college. If we're going to prep kids for college, we should give our schools the resources to do that. And I've actually heard that students who even get 1s or 2s do better in college.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
But, back when I was in high school (late 90s), AP exams were something seniors took which gave you a lot more time to develop your critical thinking and essay writing skills. Now lots of students are starting to take them as sophmores, which I think ends up making them less meaningful.
07/07/09
/ Feeling like this is XOXO
//Top 5, as in, never scored below the 95th percentile on any standardized test.
///Tips Hat to Miss 172.
07/07/09
07/08/09