Out of curiosity, why would we not mock or judge her, a woman of faith, equally? We (collective Jezebel, it seems sometimes must be Atheist) happily judge fundie Christians, right?
Why do we give a pass to Muslimas?
-----
ETA/Rework the wording a little.
If you are out and about and see the Duggars, in their dowdy skirts and crowning glory hairstyles, do you judge them as other? I do. Pentecostals of any stripe earn my liberal derision, because I'm a pagan bitch that way.
Hasidic Jews, for some reason, get a pass. The Amish are borderline, but they get a pass. And Muslimas get a pass. Old Catholic women? Check, they get one too.
@labeled: I'm just hazarding a guess here, but I think it's because veils and hijabs are not particularly "extreme" Muslim wear. In that way, I wouldn't equate it to dowdy Duggar-style wear; I think I would equate it with perhaps to a Christian wearing a cross necklace or cross earrings. However, I think Westerners are prone to think of them as extreme because we have been conditioned to think that they are through the media, controversies in Europe, etc. Moreover, I think people might tend to think of veils and hijabs as being a bigger deal because they are, well, physically larger than a cross necklace or earrings would be. Either way, the Muslim women who I know don't think that wearing the veil/hijab is a big deal, much in the way that a Christan woman wouldn't think much of wearing cross jewelry.
And I think fundamentalists might be derided against more on Jezebel than other types/sects of religion b/c of their extremism, which affects our daily lives (for example, pro-lifers wanting to get rid of Roe vs. Wade). I think Hasidic Jews and the Amish get a past because they don't do anything that affects the majority in a palpable, vocal way. Same with Muslims wearing veils--that doesn't affect me. And of course, I am speaking from the perspective of an American... this may be different from Jezzies who are more familiar with these lifestyles or who live in other countries...
@bumblebeetuna.is.new.tie.wearing: That's about as well-thought-out a reason as I suppose could exist. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
My thought is that as "liberals" we bend over backwards sometimes to prove that we're "better" than the Real Ammurrica who would castigate Muslims in particular because of their 9/11 prejudices.
@labeled: I definitely think that you have an interesting point though! I agree with you that perhaps our own liberal bents (I'm about as liberal as you can get) probably make us more prone to ridicule or dismiss fundamentalist views. In that way, your comment definitely gave me pause. Sometimes I do wonder--am I being unfair? Should I actually consider the viewpoint instead of immediately poking holes in the argument or shaking my head at the arguer, as I am wont to do?
@bumblebeetuna.is.new.tie.wearing: I think you sort of nailed it with the line about the hijab being physically bigger than a cross or something similar. You might not even notice that a person is wearing a cross necklace, but you can't really miss a hijab. I'm sure it's not meant to, but I could see where someone wearing one could easily be seen as being like, "HI! I'M MUSLIM. DID YOU CATCH THAT? AND I'M BEING DEGRADED AND FORCED TO WEAR THIS HEAD SCARF."
It constantly irritates me how women who wear the hijab are automatically judged as the ultimate "other". So many just assume that this is not only a display of faith, but of personality. Because she wears the hijab, she is instantly stereotyped as an oppressed, subservient woman who is interested only in her own culture, which she of course will indoctrinate us all into. They are so often judged as being un-American, as if because they wear the veil they can't possibly want to listen to the popular music channel or watch trashy TV about rich teenagers or you know, have a life.
This pains me because of how the many Muslim friends I've had over the years have been judged for wearing the veil. Even just seeing how shocked some people are when they realize one hijab-wearing friend of mine listens to metal and wears combat boots under her long skirt fills me with disappointment. It's like they don't realize she is a person simply because of how she displays her faith.
Ok, I'm done.
@JessIsElf-ity: As I stated above, I actually disagree with you - on this site, or in liberal communities, an obviously Pentecostal woman would receive a more harsh critique.
So if it's good for the (Christmas?) goose, why isn't it good for the gander?
@labeled: I read your comment and I think you have a very valid point. We do give others a pass depending on our own personal politics, which is probably something that needs further examination. As it stands, though, I do not live in a liberal community, and I think most people I know would be more likely to give Christians or even Jews a pass no matter how strict their beliefs (probably because they are abkle to view them as "American").
Does she mean to say this "little piece of fabric" doesn't symbolize something much bigger, say, her BELIEFS? And that by wearing this symbol she really doesn't separate herself at all from others who don't share this particular belief?
It is indeed a very big whoop that she chooses to subjugate herself to a misogynistic religion. That veil she wears announces to the world that she is less worthy of respect than Muslim men.
Ok. But let's say that tomorrow this little piece of fabric became really mainstream trendy, and everyone on the street was wearing one. How would the Hijab-wearing population react?
I think that Mrs. Sobh has to acknowledge that the Hijab is also a symbol. Presented under this angle, I wonder if Mrs Sobh would reiterate her "Big whoop".
Touchy subject though. But interesting nonetheless.
I do agree with her point though, all women are infinitely different and infinitely similar. Big whoops all around.
@bibomaco: Western designers consistently appropriate styles, cuts and fabrics from other cultures, without regard to culturally-specific meaning. See, e.g., the popularity of Keffiyeh a few years ago ([en.wikipedia.org])
or the 'Chinoiserie' of the mid-late 19th Century.
I used to have a very different view about Hijabs. However, my freshmen year of college, the honors program I was in took a trip to a local mosque and a girl there (who was about my age) talked a lot about Muslim religion and culture to us. She presented a lot of the rules that I thought were always oppressive to women in a way that made me view it all differently.
First she addressed how women had to be in the back to pray. Coming from a Christian background, I thought "well women should be able to pray wherever they want". She made the joke, "We're here to pray. When we pray we get on our hands and knees and bend over. I honestly don't want some dirty old man staring at my butt."
Then she talked about the hijabs. Many of the mosques in the US are relatively liberal and women are only required to wear them when they are are there. However, women still choose to wear them here to express their cultural identity. I don't think of it any different than my Jewish friends who would wear a yarmulke around on holidays. You can't always say the same is true around the world, but around here 90% of Muslims I've met have had more liberal in the role of women.
@psychgirl1221: I don't think of it any different than my Jewish friends who would wear a yarmulke around on holidays.
Or more than that, the Orthodox Jewish women who are out there being perfectly normal members of the working world while wearing wigs, scarves, hats, or other head coverings.
@psychgirl1221: the problem is that the girl you're speaking of wasn't giving the actual reasons the things are done. For example, while she may not want men to ogle her butt, that's not why she was being forced to pray in the back. She had no choice about the matter. She was retroactively justifying her oppression. It's no different than if blacks in America during the 1940s had said "Who would want to be in the front of the bus? If we're in a head-on collision, I'm safer back here."
@Etoiles: I feel complicated about that, too, though. The one-sidedness of the restrictions is what concerns me. I do not pretend to have a deep understanding of religion, but what little I do see seems to apply these restrictions to diminish women's sexuality because men somehow can't trust themselves if they see a woman's hair. This means the restrictions have nothing to do with the values or needs of women, but instead with the stance of men. I am fine with not extrapolating political views from the fact of wearing the hijab or a wig, but the underpinnings of the restriction do carry on a world view that defines everything in terms of the male gaze.
@pmarble: frankly, I don't see how you can NOT extract political implications of wearing religious garb that, by definition, affects one group in a discriminatory fashion as compared to other groups. So, yes, I think its oppressive for any religion to force one group (e.g. women) to cover their head, whether its jewish or muslim. However, whereas Judaism does very little to systematically oppress women in any other way (excluding the issues with education in some Orthodox communities), many sects of Islam have the coverings as only one part of a large-scale oppression (e.g. Saudi Arabia having a legal presumption that a woman cannot testify unless she is deemed sane and whatnot).
@mattharvest: Yes and no. The fact is, no one is forcing her to wear it here. She was and adult and free to make her own decisions. She chose to because of pride and acceptance of her religious/cultural values.
I have to look at things in context. Its not my beliefs or values, but it is hers. If she feels empowered to wear it, then so be it. Its only oppression if it is being forced. I went to a women's college and there were a number of Muslim students who chose to wear it and others who didn't. There certainly wasn't anyone at a Methodist women's college forcing them to. Their parents weren't forcing them to. Yet they made the decision to because they wanted to.
And personally, I don't think that there is anything oppressive about modesty if you want to go that route. As long as personal choice is involved and you're not being forced by some external force, then I don't think it counts.
@psychgirl1221: your statement "it's only oppression if it is being forced" seems to completely misunderstand the problem. It's not that someone is holding a gun to their head (though, in places like Saudia Arabia and increasingly Egypt, they are). It's that they've been so heavily indoctrinated that they cannot meaningfully decide. They are brainwashed in childhood long before they can develop the reasoning required. Then, it reaches the point where the woman is incapable of actually considering the issue.
@psychgirl1221: "I honestly don't want some dirty old man staring at my butt."
Really? I think I'd get pretty distracted if I was presented with a row of men bending over. I've heard similar justifications for covering only women, and restricting the movement and action of only women, and it has never sat well with me. It makes women responsible for mens behavior, on top of their own, and it erases female sexual desire. In a patriarchal religious culture, men would never stand for impositions similar to those placed upon women.
"Wolf's description of herself here is weirdly sensual — it sounds like she's saying, 'thank God for this veil to hide my lush hotness.'"
Yeah, Wolf enjoys being a sensual creature. One of the things I find very irritating about many nominally sex-positive women is that if another woman does declare, however mildly, that she is a sexual being, the nominally sex-positive woman will bash her for being either a) a tool of the patriarchy or b) smug, as above.
I don't know what this supposedly feminist world that some women want looks like... it's apparently one where we're all comfortable in our own skin, we all love our own skin, but we're disallowed from discussing that skin. That's not what freedom looks like.
We don't have the external motivation that non-Muslim women have. There is no little black dress to fit into, no bathing suit. When you pass through a mirror or glass you're not looking to see ‘Is my tummy tucked in? Do I look good in these jeans?' You're looking to see if you're covered.
Um, no. I'm a Muslim woman who wears LBDs and bathing suits and jeans and I pass mirrors and reflective surfaces and make sure my paunch isn't too obvious.
It seriously is starting to piss me off when Muslim women don't realize that not all of us dress in burkas and wear hijab.
And PS: Burka or not, there is still pressure to be thin.
@LadyFabulous: WHAT??? You can't really be a Muslim and not cover!!! There's no such thing as moderate Islam! It's bikini or burka, lady!
Seriously, hardcore Judaism and Christianity have rules about covering too, and no one is surprised to see me in a tank top, or a Christian in a bikini. This either/or this is so strange.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: I once had a class with a couple of Shia Muslims (I'm Sunni) who actually asked me why I was so "normal" because they thought all Sunni's were covered head-to-toe.
Modesty has always been sexual in the muslim community.
Both men and womyn are told that the female figure is soooo sexy that it must be covered. If not, promiscuous sex will occur. This is nothing new.
Much in the same way that church's tell girls to not wear tight clothing in order to not make their "brothers in Christ stumble," Muslim womyn are told that their bodies are inherently sexual.
The more I read about Burkinis the more I sympathize with the women who wear them.
If people scrutinized what I wore so closely I don't think I could handle it. Many a time have I broken down over comments regarding my limited wardrobe, usually my finances are the topic of scorn. I can't imagine how hard it must be to have my religious beliefs constantly monitored and questioned.
I don't agree with those who wish to ban burkas or impose them. Women should be allowed to wear whatever they want (so long as their genitals are covered when in public).
@Erinthebitch: Oh man, we went to the water park over the weekend and at one point, my mom and step-dad saw two girls wearing long athletic pants, t-shirts, and hats in the pool and just kept STARING at them and making comments about how they were dressed. I finally said "they're probably Muslim" and she just went "Oh." and turned around and dropped the subject.
I gotta say, I live in Orlando and there is a Muslim lady who exercises at our Y--and I do feel bad for her just because she looks SO WARM. She wears her scarf but also several layers of workout clothes that cover her up to her wrists and everything, and every time I see her on the elliptical I just start sympathy-sweating.
Maybe she's used to it, but temperature is one big reason I wouldn't get on board with this kind of dress even if I did feel like it prevented me from being judged (which I don't, but that's a whole other issue).
Even if you wear a burqa, you should be bikini-ready.
oh for fuck's sake. You know how many women who are wearing a burqa are more worried about feeding their families and not starving to death than whether their bodies are bikini ready? Yes, there is a huge middle and upper class of Muslim women throughout the world, and that they keep modest and wear hijab or chador or whatever else, and this is who she's talking about, but seriously? Most of them aren't in burqas. We throw that word around like its interchangeable with non-restrictive modest clothing. It isn't.
The culture clash here is making my brain explode.
I mean, Christ. What is this, 1860? The notion that covering up more of our bodies is somehow "freeing" because now we're not as much under the scrutiny of the male gaze is so many kinds of wrong I don't even know where to begin. The problem is NOT what kind of clothing we wear, whether we're covered from head to toe or buck naked. The problem IS the expectation -- which apparently PERSISTS even for women who wear a burqa -- the women's bodies are for OTHERS' visual pleasure and enjoyment. THEY ARE FUCKING NOT. ONLY WHEN WE GET OVER THIS MYTH WILL WOMEN *ACTUALLY* BE "FREE" FROM WORRYING ABOUT OUR BODIES.
Do you get it, Naomi Wolf????? It's not about anything WE do to make ourselves look a certain way (thin, fat, "average," fit, ripped, flabby, covered, uncovered, etc.) It's about what society will accept from us. And the bottom line is, it doesn't completely accept fully fleshed out women as people in our own right. It ONLY accepts us in relation to what we provide for others -- as mothers, as lovers, as eye candy, as "modest" prizes to "win," etc. The problem is that women as a concept STILL exist for other people and not for ourselves. It has nothing, FUCKING NOTHING, to do with what kind of clothing we wear, because we are STILL FETISHIZED.
This whole thing makes me so angry I can barely see straight.
@LawFairy: the sad thing is, i can certainly see how freeing it must be to not be "under the male gaze". i don't think the idea of wanting to be free from that is wrong at all.
the truth is, it exists and always will. living in NYC, i get my fair share of cat calls; whispers as some guy passes a little too close (the worst.); and the obvious look up and down. and this is every day. It's so unfair that just for wearing something like a sundress (not even something revealing) its like you have a giant sign on your body that says "please feel free to comment"
@LawFairy: Naomi Wolf wrote The Beauty Myth. She gets it. She also gets that there is freedom in being invisible.
Maybe this is something where you have to be conventionally pretty and live in an urban area to truly internalize her perspective. The male gaze is palpable here in the warm months. You're never free of it. Every time you leave your building, strange men approach you and speak to you. My feminist enlightenment does not stop them from speaking to me, as it does not extend outside my own head. It does not stop me from being intimidated by them, because often in the past my saying, "No," has led to my being the target of obscene, disparaging remarks. I often wish I could be unseen on the street, since I lack the power to close predatory men's eyes and mouths. I know that age will eventually do that job for me, but in the interim, I can see the appeal of veiling.
@cirocco: I'm conventionally attractive and have lived in LA for years (and, before that, Chicago). I'm well acquainted with catcalls (got one just this morning, oh joy) and the male gaze -- and the warm months here are YEAR ROUND.
I know exactly what you mean about being a feminist not stopping them, or how trying to put them in their place only seems to encourage them. I've lived it. I'm not sure I see your point -- surely you aren't suggesting that because we haven't mastered mind control we should just live with the "fact" that men are going to objectify us?
Being invisible or feeling invisible doesn't put an end to the marginalization of women. Covering myself up doesn't mean men stop leering at me -- it just means, perhaps, different men leer, and/or for different reasons. And if I did wear a burqa and still had to deal with someone telling me I need to be careful about my body so my husband won't leave me, I really don't see how I'd have been freed from anything.
Being invisible isn't the answer. Being allowed to be completely visible, and not having my visibility have to have some kind of male-oriented meaning attached to it is the answer. Pretending that covering ourselves up will solve the problem does all women a disservice.
@LawFairy: Thank you! Also the whole channeling sexuality into marriage thing made me want to vomit. Especially when marriage remains primarily a patriarchal institution which keeps women tethered to a man. I could rant but I'm tired.
@LawFairy: You seem to be operating from the false premise that Wolf is advocating veiling as an "answer" to the problem of street harassment. That's fallacious; she isn't. She's illuminating, to a Western audience, why a woman might choose veiling even when it isn't mandated by government or religion. I think it's a valuable perspective that shouldn't be dismissed with an all-caps hissyfit that kicks off with "ugh ugh ugh."
@cirocco: Okay, for you to call it a "hissyfit" is really demeaning, even if you find my point as frustrating as I found Wolf's. My point, in case you missed it, was that positing that covering oneself is somehow "freeing" is just another way of pretending that women can solve the problems of the patriarchy if we would only just dress differently. I don't care if a woman covers herself or if she doesn't, and she should have the choice to dress how she wants. But to come out and say "hey, this is a freeing thing," as though CHANGING THE WAY YOU DRESS is some kind of solution to the patriarchy is as old and tired as advice comes, no matter how it's dressed up.
Anyway, clearly you're not interested in having a real discussion, given you've resorted to pettiness.
I don't know if I agree with the statement "As much as Westerners like to talk about the oppressive Middle East, much of the same sexism is visible here." As a western woman who is living in a Muslim country, I find the sexism is much worse in the Muslim countries. It's not necessarily an inherently Muslim problem; much of the developing world shares these problems (for instance see the preference for baby boys in China and India). I miss all of the freedom that comes with being a woman in the west. Sure, some of the same underlying problems are there, but to lump the problems facing women in Muslim countries with those faced by women in the West in the same category seems misguided at best. I'm not held in nearly the same regard as a man in this country. My questions are not answered first, I am not served first, when I drive down the street people literally laugh and point.
I would also like to add that I have no problem with Muslim women dressing conservatively out of choice. Where I do have a problem is with any society trying to force me to dress a certain way.
09/28/09
Why do we give a pass to Muslimas?
-----
ETA/Rework the wording a little.
If you are out and about and see the Duggars, in their dowdy skirts and crowning glory hairstyles, do you judge them as other? I do. Pentecostals of any stripe earn my liberal derision, because I'm a pagan bitch that way.
Hasidic Jews, for some reason, get a pass. The Amish are borderline, but they get a pass. And Muslimas get a pass. Old Catholic women? Check, they get one too.
You have to admit it's somewhat interesting, no?
09/28/09
And I think fundamentalists might be derided against more on Jezebel than other types/sects of religion b/c of their extremism, which affects our daily lives (for example, pro-lifers wanting to get rid of Roe vs. Wade). I think Hasidic Jews and the Amish get a past because they don't do anything that affects the majority in a palpable, vocal way. Same with Muslims wearing veils--that doesn't affect me. And of course, I am speaking from the perspective of an American... this may be different from Jezzies who are more familiar with these lifestyles or who live in other countries...
09/28/09
I truly appreciate your intellectual honesty.
Thank-you for that.
09/28/09
My thought is that as "liberals" we bend over backwards sometimes to prove that we're "better" than the Real Ammurrica who would castigate Muslims in particular because of their 9/11 prejudices.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
This pains me because of how the many Muslim friends I've had over the years have been judged for wearing the veil. Even just seeing how shocked some people are when they realize one hijab-wearing friend of mine listens to metal and wears combat boots under her long skirt fills me with disappointment. It's like they don't realize she is a person simply because of how she displays her faith.
Ok, I'm done.
09/28/09
So if it's good for the (Christmas?) goose, why isn't it good for the gander?
09/28/09
09/28/09
hmmmm
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
I think that Mrs. Sobh has to acknowledge that the Hijab is also a symbol. Presented under this angle, I wonder if Mrs Sobh would reiterate her "Big whoop".
Touchy subject though. But interesting nonetheless.
I do agree with her point though, all women are infinitely different and infinitely similar. Big whoops all around.
09/28/09
or the 'Chinoiserie' of the mid-late 19th Century.
09/28/09
First she addressed how women had to be in the back to pray. Coming from a Christian background, I thought "well women should be able to pray wherever they want". She made the joke, "We're here to pray. When we pray we get on our hands and knees and bend over. I honestly don't want some dirty old man staring at my butt."
Then she talked about the hijabs. Many of the mosques in the US are relatively liberal and women are only required to wear them when they are are there. However, women still choose to wear them here to express their cultural identity. I don't think of it any different than my Jewish friends who would wear a yarmulke around on holidays. You can't always say the same is true around the world, but around here 90% of Muslims I've met have had more liberal in the role of women.
09/28/09
Or more than that, the Orthodox Jewish women who are out there being perfectly normal members of the working world while wearing wigs, scarves, hats, or other head coverings.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
I have to look at things in context. Its not my beliefs or values, but it is hers. If she feels empowered to wear it, then so be it. Its only oppression if it is being forced. I went to a women's college and there were a number of Muslim students who chose to wear it and others who didn't. There certainly wasn't anyone at a Methodist women's college forcing them to. Their parents weren't forcing them to. Yet they made the decision to because they wanted to.
And personally, I don't think that there is anything oppressive about modesty if you want to go that route. As long as personal choice is involved and you're not being forced by some external force, then I don't think it counts.
09/28/09
09/28/09
Really? I think I'd get pretty distracted if I was presented with a row of men bending over. I've heard similar justifications for covering only women, and restricting the movement and action of only women, and it has never sat well with me. It makes women responsible for mens behavior, on top of their own, and it erases female sexual desire. In a patriarchal religious culture, men would never stand for impositions similar to those placed upon women.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/10/09
Yeah, Wolf enjoys being a sensual creature. One of the things I find very irritating about many nominally sex-positive women is that if another woman does declare, however mildly, that she is a sexual being, the nominally sex-positive woman will bash her for being either a) a tool of the patriarchy or b) smug, as above.
I don't know what this supposedly feminist world that some women want looks like... it's apparently one where we're all comfortable in our own skin, we all love our own skin, but we're disallowed from discussing that skin. That's not what freedom looks like.
09/10/09
Um, no. I'm a Muslim woman who wears LBDs and bathing suits and jeans and I pass mirrors and reflective surfaces and make sure my paunch isn't too obvious.
It seriously is starting to piss me off when Muslim women don't realize that not all of us dress in burkas and wear hijab.
And PS: Burka or not, there is still pressure to be thin.
09/10/09
Seriously, hardcore Judaism and Christianity have rules about covering too, and no one is surprised to see me in a tank top, or a Christian in a bikini. This either/or this is so strange.
09/10/09
All the eye rolling makes my head hurt.
09/10/09
Both men and womyn are told that the female figure is soooo sexy that it must be covered. If not, promiscuous sex will occur. This is nothing new.
Much in the same way that church's tell girls to not wear tight clothing in order to not make their "brothers in Christ stumble," Muslim womyn are told that their bodies are inherently sexual.
09/10/09
If people scrutinized what I wore so closely I don't think I could handle it. Many a time have I broken down over comments regarding my limited wardrobe, usually my finances are the topic of scorn. I can't imagine how hard it must be to have my religious beliefs constantly monitored and questioned.
I don't agree with those who wish to ban burkas or impose them. Women should be allowed to wear whatever they want (so long as their genitals are covered when in public).
09/10/09
Why is this so ridiculously fascinating?
09/10/09
Maybe she's used to it, but temperature is one big reason I wouldn't get on board with this kind of dress even if I did feel like it prevented me from being judged (which I don't, but that's a whole other issue).
09/10/09
oh for fuck's sake. You know how many women who are wearing a burqa are more worried about feeding their families and not starving to death than whether their bodies are bikini ready? Yes, there is a huge middle and upper class of Muslim women throughout the world, and that they keep modest and wear hijab or chador or whatever else, and this is who she's talking about, but seriously? Most of them aren't in burqas. We throw that word around like its interchangeable with non-restrictive modest clothing. It isn't.
The culture clash here is making my brain explode.
09/10/09
I mean, Christ. What is this, 1860? The notion that covering up more of our bodies is somehow "freeing" because now we're not as much under the scrutiny of the male gaze is so many kinds of wrong I don't even know where to begin. The problem is NOT what kind of clothing we wear, whether we're covered from head to toe or buck naked. The problem IS the expectation -- which apparently PERSISTS even for women who wear a burqa -- the women's bodies are for OTHERS' visual pleasure and enjoyment. THEY ARE FUCKING NOT. ONLY WHEN WE GET OVER THIS MYTH WILL WOMEN *ACTUALLY* BE "FREE" FROM WORRYING ABOUT OUR BODIES.
Do you get it, Naomi Wolf????? It's not about anything WE do to make ourselves look a certain way (thin, fat, "average," fit, ripped, flabby, covered, uncovered, etc.) It's about what society will accept from us. And the bottom line is, it doesn't completely accept fully fleshed out women as people in our own right. It ONLY accepts us in relation to what we provide for others -- as mothers, as lovers, as eye candy, as "modest" prizes to "win," etc. The problem is that women as a concept STILL exist for other people and not for ourselves. It has nothing, FUCKING NOTHING, to do with what kind of clothing we wear, because we are STILL FETISHIZED.
This whole thing makes me so angry I can barely see straight.
09/10/09
the truth is, it exists and always will. living in NYC, i get my fair share of cat calls; whispers as some guy passes a little too close (the worst.); and the obvious look up and down. and this is every day. It's so unfair that just for wearing something like a sundress (not even something revealing) its like you have a giant sign on your body that says "please feel free to comment"
09/10/09
Maybe this is something where you have to be conventionally pretty and live in an urban area to truly internalize her perspective. The male gaze is palpable here in the warm months. You're never free of it. Every time you leave your building, strange men approach you and speak to you. My feminist enlightenment does not stop them from speaking to me, as it does not extend outside my own head. It does not stop me from being intimidated by them, because often in the past my saying, "No," has led to my being the target of obscene, disparaging remarks. I often wish I could be unseen on the street, since I lack the power to close predatory men's eyes and mouths. I know that age will eventually do that job for me, but in the interim, I can see the appeal of veiling.
09/10/09
I know exactly what you mean about being a feminist not stopping them, or how trying to put them in their place only seems to encourage them. I've lived it. I'm not sure I see your point -- surely you aren't suggesting that because we haven't mastered mind control we should just live with the "fact" that men are going to objectify us?
Being invisible or feeling invisible doesn't put an end to the marginalization of women. Covering myself up doesn't mean men stop leering at me -- it just means, perhaps, different men leer, and/or for different reasons. And if I did wear a burqa and still had to deal with someone telling me I need to be careful about my body so my husband won't leave me, I really don't see how I'd have been freed from anything.
Being invisible isn't the answer. Being allowed to be completely visible, and not having my visibility have to have some kind of male-oriented meaning attached to it is the answer. Pretending that covering ourselves up will solve the problem does all women a disservice.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
Anyway, clearly you're not interested in having a real discussion, given you've resorted to pettiness.
09/10/09
I would also like to add that I have no problem with Muslim women dressing conservatively out of choice. Where I do have a problem is with any society trying to force me to dress a certain way.