Oh, PETA. Not all of us have a body worth of a lettuce bikini or nude subway ad for you to exploit.
Why not let government agencies and non-profit organizations specifically designated for obesity education and prevention handle dietary recommendations? You can spend all that saved time on actually helping animals.
@hortense: I believe you're right. I'm vaguely remembering something about soy being used to alleviate symptoms of menopause, maybe? I can't say for sure, but yeah, it does.
@hortense: I know it does wonky stuff to your thyroid levels, too, which can cause weight gain. If you have hypothyroidism it can aggravate it. They tell you to avoid it. Screw soy!
@hortense: yes - in large doses it has an estrogenic effect. I know oncologists who tell breast cancer patients to not eat soy or take soy supplements.
@hortense: From what I've read (and just re-confirmed), soy has a kind of psuedo-estrogen that's something like 10K weaker than human estrogen but can still bind to estrogen receptors: so it actually results in any estrogen your body may have been less activated/used by your body, because the weaker "estrogen" is taking up the receptors.
@hortense: Yes, it does. If you're pregnant (or trying to be), doctors now tell you to avoid or limit your soy intake. So vegetarian men are much likely to have a lovely rack like the one pictured above.
@schweppes: Soy isoflavones bind preferentially to ESR beta, which actually inhibits growth, while ESR alpha promotes growth. Same receptors, different receptor subtype.
@Breamworthy: Vegetarianism is not about eating soy. Lotsa vegetarians eat the same amount of soy as the general population, since there is a ton of soy in all types of food. I personally only have soy in my coffee and the occasional tofu, which means I probably ingest less soy than my nephews who love fast food burgers and movie theater popcorn with "butter."
Additionally, most of the soy grown in this country goes to feeding livestock. I don't know enough about biology to tell you whether the estrogen receptors in that soy would then be passed on to anyone eating the muscles of that livestock, but it doesn't seem that far fetched. They must at least be passed into the milk from the dairy cows, sort of how a nursing mother passes along anything she's eating to the infant. Though maybe pasteurization would kill them.
@slowpoke.r: Uh... first of all, receptors aren't the thing we're talking about. And while pasteurization would denature proteins (such as those that compose receptors), it would not have the same effect on hormones, which are not proteins, which is what is being discussed.
@pesematology: See, I told you I know nothing about biology. Turns out I also know nothing about proper terminology.
So- and forgive my ignorance- it sounds like hormones will pass from the cow to the human through the milk. But since the phytoestrogen in soy is not like the estrogen found in humans, it does not have deleterious effects as far as we know, at least in terms of increasing hormonal levels in people. Is that correct?
@hortense: Soy does contain plant estrogens. Some people speculate that it could be used to treat menopause as it mimics the estrogens in the female body.
@slowpoke.r: rBST isn't found in milk, whether you give it to cows or not. Don't worry about hormones in your milk.
I know you aren't talking about growth hormones, and instead are talking about soy, but there are plenty of people under the assumption that it is healthier for you and the cow to stay away from rBST cows. So when they read "it sounds like hormones will pass from the cow to the human through the milk," their first thought will be rBST, and they'll be wrong.
@Flackette Goes Retro: That's interesting. My mom is menopausal right now, and her doctor has put a strict cap on her soy intake. She also has some other digestive and endocrine issues which may be factors her in her doctor's decision, as well.
@Conrad: I'm vegan and have been vegan since before rBST was invented (in 1995, from what I understand) so I am very, deeply unconcerned with hormones in my (homemade nut) milk.
My concerns about rBST have to do with the cows themselves and therefore have zero place on this thread. But thank you for weighing in with your off-topic comment that seems to be promoting some sort of personal agenda.
I'm now positive that PETA is fun by a group of teenagers. It's the only way I can justify their ads. Nudity...check. Making fun of people...check. Throwing things when they're mad...check. What's next, PETA? Are you going to get a grass wheat nose ring?
@GirlFailer: Apparently their mommies never taught them it isn't nice to make fun of people who are different and it causes people to dislike you (something my 4 and 6 year old kids have already mastered).
And it's probably not obesity causing man-boobs so much as the hormones in the cattle. Maybe a campaign to have ethically raised non-hornmone and anitbiotic full meat? No, that's not our agenda!
@boobookitteh: Dude, all those groups, I tell you. I am a huge supporter/activist for humane raised and killed meat, promoting the new tag that has standards set, hoping it will become a hit like organic food. Peta? Farm Sanctuary? ZERO interest in improving the meat industry, and just encouraging less meat. They won't be happy until everyone is vegan.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: Is that a bad thing? Some people are simply of the opinion that promoting veganism is a more effective way to help animals than is campaigning to make their cages slightly larger. One might see things somewhat differently, but surely it's a legitimate approach for those who hold that point of view?
(I personally hate PETA, but I am an abolitionist. Gary Francione is far, far closer to my point of view than is PETA (and Francione also criticises PETA's sexist ads).)
@FormicaLinoleum: The problem is there is NO middle ground that can be reached, which shuts off any chance of improvement. You'd be surprised how many people tell me I can't campaign for better treatment of animals because I am an omnivore, and I imagine this is what turns many omnivores off to thinking about the issue altogether. Many people would not, or could not, ever be vegetarian or vegan. But if there was some dialogue and compromise, maybe they could learn that some vegan food is delish (mine especially), there are great ways to make meatless meals, and so on.
I have gotten farther (further?) than many of my vegan/veg acquaintances in this way. Cutting down still helps. Eating humane raised, grass fed beef actually has some positive effects for the environment. There are things one can do without going "We are here for your ice cream, evil omnivore!" devaluing omnivorous allies makes people want to eat more cheeseburgers out of spite.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: That's not true AT ALL. PETA has been working on KFC for years to buy chickens from farms that use more humane methods of living and killing conditions, as well as with numerous other fast food chains. They also work to expose terrible conditions for the animals in actual factory farm situations.
They use the sexeh to get noticed and employ other objectionable techniques, etc., but they certainly do work to help lessen the suffering of farm animals, too.
McDonald's Stops Worst Abuse of Chickens and Other Farmed Animals
In 1997, PETA called on McDonald's to make improvements for animals before they become Big Macs and McNuggets, holding news conferences and demonstrations around the country. After a 'Day of Action' in October generated dozens of protests around the country, McDonald's invited PETA into negotiations. Negotiations proved fruitless, so PETA launched a campaign against McDonald's in 1999 that lasted 11 months and included more than 400 demonstrations at McDonald's restaurants in more than 23 countries, as well as advertising and celebrity involvement. In September 2000, McDonald's agreed to make basic but important animal-welfare improvements, which are the only protection for chickens in factory farms because the Animal Welfare and Humane Slaughter acts do not cover birds.
For more information and a complete campaign chronology, please visit McCruelty.com.
Yes, they do want everyone to be vegan, and yes, I too despise some of their methods. But to say that they have "ZERO interest in improving the meat industry" is simply not true. They do a lot of campaigning for better conditions for farm animals.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: Um, I don't know who you're hanging with, but the vegans I know appreciate any efforts to improve the welfare of animals, even from omnivores. And if omnivores are turned off from campaigning about something they believe in by some random person telling them that they must not really mean it, then I'm guessing they didn't feel very strongly about it in the first place.
There is SO MUCH dialogue about this. Most vegans were omnis at some point and understand that not everyone is ready and/ or willing to be vegan. And frankly someone who would eat a cheeseburger "out of spite" is not someone who has any interest in having a rational conversation or trying to understand the various viewpoints.
As far as the environment is concerned, yes, eating less meat than you did previously does help, as does getting that meat locally, etc. But, as the great Ailanthus-altissima once said on this site:
The point remains that adding another trophic link always increases the amount of energy needed in the system and the amount of energy lost due to lack of efficiency. Eating plants directly is more energy efficient than eating something that ate plants.
So I'm not sure where or how you've gotten farther, or in regards to what, but veganism is, generally speaking, going to be more environmentally friendly than eating meat.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: I think that is a totally different issue. One can steadfastly believe that all animal use is wrong and be an abolitionist vegan, yet not be hostile to non-vegans or discourage people from taking small steps. On the other hand, one can be a vegetarian welfarist who is judgemental and exclusionary.
I do believe that if one truly does care about animals, the best thing one can do to act on that belief is to go vegan. That's why I did it. However, that does not mean that I think that anything less than that is not worth doing. Of course it is of benefit to animals for people to cut down on meat consumption. The fact that I see veganism as the ultimate end goal doesn't mean that I can't support small steps in that direction.
In other words, seeing different end goals doesn't dictate how we see small steps towards those respective goals.
@FormicaLinoleum: I guess 90% percent of my interactions with activist vegans have been number 2, including my experiences with emailing several animal groups. Perhaps I've gotten a skewed sample, but I've usually gotten my ass jumped, and so have my omni friends. I'm sure there are plenty of kindly people, I know some myself, but trying to get things done here, I have had really negative experiences and reactions.
But thank you at least for not jumping down my throat.
@Hippopotame: Sorry. I take it back. When I emailed them about what I was doing, and asking for some sort of way to get the humane label to be important to people, they were very, very discouraging and rude to me.
@slowpoke.r: Have re-read: I think what you meant was that you got further with convincing people to eat less meat than vegans you know have, not about environmental issues, so sorry to go off-topic there.
Again, there are so many ways to talk to people about this. I've made a lot of people aware of the greatness of vegan food by simply making if for them, as you have; very seldom do I choose to speak to people about animal issues or my personal choices. (I had one co-worker who asked me, "are these vegan?" every time I brought in cookies. After eight years (!) he finally got it- yes, they are awesome, and yes, they are always vegan. Vegan does not equal bad.) I don't know if I've opened more people's eyes than you have, or than my omni-mostly-eats-vegan partner, or than my parents who eat veggie 5 nights a week, but I do know that it's great that you are out there, fighting the good fight however you choose to do so.
Lastly, I find that a lot of people judge all veg*ns by the few vocal ones they've met or "heard about", rather than on actual veg*ns. I certainly don't judge omnis by the few jerks who have given me a really, really hard time about veganism and I hope others won't judge veg*ns by a random sampling. An example: last winter my mother told me she was so glad I wasn't one of those "preachy" vegans. I asked her how many vegans she knows, aside from me? Her answer: "Good point."
@slowpoke.r: I only knew nice vegans that were very chill about my personal choices until I actually got involved with trying to help change things. I think the breakdown comes because the nasty people sometimes end up running the show, since they are the loud ones. And then omnivores hate vegans and treat them terribly, so vegans hate omnivores, and pretty soon, we don't have to eat anything, because we're all fed on our rage over someone's food.
And yes, I was talking about getting people to eat less meat. :) I actually made a little vegan cookbook for my work buddies last Hanukkah called "Trust me, I'm an omnivore". My sister's a completely eco-vegetarian...she could care less about animals, truly, but she's a crazy environmentalist. Between her and my small handful of vegan friends, I've learned to cook things that make everyone happy. And no soy! Mainly because I hate it.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: I have to say that if someone asked me to be involved in a campaign related to 'humane' labeling for meat, I would decline, simply because my own belief is that there is no such thing as humanely keeping animals captive or killing them. So I would defend others who similarly decline.
I would, however, be polite and respectful while declining, and would not defend anyone who was rude about it.
@FormicaLinoleum: I understand that, but I wasn't asking to participate, I was asking for some reasonable ideas, because I thought that was what they did, you know?
And yeah, it wasn't the decline so much as the fact that the guy who emailed me back was a cockweasel to me.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: I'm so sorry. It's ridiculous for anyone to judge what someone's contribution might be and then refuse help based on a personal decision. Very upsetting and not at all in line with what I feel are the basic principles of veganism. Those people are indeed doing veg*nism a real disservice by alienating people who are interested and wanting to help. I hope you can find some better groups to work with!
BTW, there's been an ongoing argument in the letters column of VegNews about vegans saying vegetarians are lesser. I can't find a link on their site but the new issue should be out soon and I anticipate some very interesting letters from both sides. You should check it out, I think it touches on some of the points we're discussing (ie, discounting someone's contribution because they don't "measure up.")
And I would love a copy of your book, BTW, if you're into sharing! Some of the best recipes I have are from omnis. And I agree, the less soy the better. One of my top five vegan cookbooks has no faux meat, soy, or faux dairy, just veggies, fruits and grains. It's awesome and a great gift for vegan-curious omnis.
@GirlyQ ain't a-marchin' anymore: No, I understood that. I mean, if I worked for an organization that had founding principles based on the abolition of all animal use, and someone contacted me and asked if I or my organization could help, give ideas for, or support a 'humane meat' campaign, I'd say no. In saying no, I wouldn't mean any harm or insult. It would just be because it wouldn't be compatible with the organization's mission.
Again, there's no excuse for being rude about it, though.
(And this doesn't apply to PETA and organizations who do indeed take part in welfarist campaigns and therefore wouldn't have any compelling reason not to help.)
@audioblitz13: Yeah, meat can actually be pretty lean depending on the cut, ad normally also is pretty good at keeping you "sated", so that makes no sense at all.
I am sure the man boobs have nothing to do with the fried vegetarian snickers bars someone mentioned in yesterdays weight post. Nothing at all. Must be all those chicken cutlets.
Yeah, school meals need to be healthier, but even if they were (based on what I saw on my own time and now with my younger brother) I doubt many of the kids would eat them. Good eating habits begin at HOME.
I switched off reading the moment I realised she was Montel William's daughter. This has daddy's fingerprints all over it. I wonder whether the Physicians rep would be interested in the girl if her father was some ordinary joe.
@Rare Affinity: I knew she looked (and sounded) familar... I doubt they would pay any attention to her if she was just Winter Grace Williams from Indiana.
@Rare Affinity: FWIW, when I knew her, she had almost no contact with Montel Williams. He is her father biologically, but that doesn't mean he has anything to do with her.
I last saw her two years ago, so maybe things have changed, but I doubt it. Her parents weren't together.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Why not let government agencies and non-profit organizations specifically designated for obesity education and prevention handle dietary recommendations? You can spend all that saved time on actually helping animals.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Additionally, most of the soy grown in this country goes to feeding livestock. I don't know enough about biology to tell you whether the estrogen receptors in that soy would then be passed on to anyone eating the muscles of that livestock, but it doesn't seem that far fetched. They must at least be passed into the milk from the dairy cows, sort of how a nursing mother passes along anything she's eating to the infant. Though maybe pasteurization would kill them.
09/11/09
09/11/09
So- and forgive my ignorance- it sounds like hormones will pass from the cow to the human through the milk. But since the phytoestrogen in soy is not like the estrogen found in humans, it does not have deleterious effects as far as we know, at least in terms of increasing hormonal levels in people. Is that correct?
09/11/09
09/11/09
I know you aren't talking about growth hormones, and instead are talking about soy, but there are plenty of people under the assumption that it is healthier for you and the cow to stay away from rBST cows. So when they read "it sounds like hormones will pass from the cow to the human through the milk," their first thought will be rBST, and they'll be wrong.
09/11/09
09/11/09
My concerns about rBST have to do with the cows themselves and therefore have zero place on this thread. But thank you for weighing in with your off-topic comment that seems to be promoting some sort of personal agenda.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
(I personally hate PETA, but I am an abolitionist. Gary Francione is far, far closer to my point of view than is PETA (and Francione also criticises PETA's sexist ads).)
09/11/09
I have gotten farther (further?) than many of my vegan/veg acquaintances in this way. Cutting down still helps. Eating humane raised, grass fed beef actually has some positive effects for the environment. There are things one can do without going "We are here for your ice cream, evil omnivore!" devaluing omnivorous allies makes people want to eat more cheeseburgers out of spite.
09/11/09
They use the sexeh to get noticed and employ other objectionable techniques, etc., but they certainly do work to help lessen the suffering of farm animals, too.
09/11/09
McDonald's Stops Worst Abuse of Chickens and Other Farmed Animals
In 1997, PETA called on McDonald's to make improvements for animals before they become Big Macs and McNuggets, holding news conferences and demonstrations around the country. After a 'Day of Action' in October generated dozens of protests around the country, McDonald's invited PETA into negotiations. Negotiations proved fruitless, so PETA launched a campaign against McDonald's in 1999 that lasted 11 months and included more than 400 demonstrations at McDonald's restaurants in more than 23 countries, as well as advertising and celebrity involvement. In September 2000, McDonald's agreed to make basic but important animal-welfare improvements, which are the only protection for chickens in factory farms because the Animal Welfare and Humane Slaughter acts do not cover birds.
For more information and a complete campaign chronology, please visit McCruelty.com.
Yes, they do want everyone to be vegan, and yes, I too despise some of their methods. But to say that they have "ZERO interest in improving the meat industry" is simply not true. They do a lot of campaigning for better conditions for farm animals.
09/11/09
There is SO MUCH dialogue about this. Most vegans were omnis at some point and understand that not everyone is ready and/ or willing to be vegan. And frankly someone who would eat a cheeseburger "out of spite" is not someone who has any interest in having a rational conversation or trying to understand the various viewpoints.
As far as the environment is concerned, yes, eating less meat than you did previously does help, as does getting that meat locally, etc. But, as the great Ailanthus-altissima once said on this site:
The point remains that adding another trophic link always increases the amount of energy needed in the system and the amount of energy lost due to lack of efficiency. Eating plants directly is more energy efficient than eating something that ate plants.
So I'm not sure where or how you've gotten farther, or in regards to what, but veganism is, generally speaking, going to be more environmentally friendly than eating meat.
09/11/09
I do believe that if one truly does care about animals, the best thing one can do to act on that belief is to go vegan. That's why I did it. However, that does not mean that I think that anything less than that is not worth doing. Of course it is of benefit to animals for people to cut down on meat consumption. The fact that I see veganism as the ultimate end goal doesn't mean that I can't support small steps in that direction.
In other words, seeing different end goals doesn't dictate how we see small steps towards those respective goals.
09/11/09
But thank you at least for not jumping down my throat.
09/11/09
09/11/09
Again, there are so many ways to talk to people about this. I've made a lot of people aware of the greatness of vegan food by simply making if for them, as you have; very seldom do I choose to speak to people about animal issues or my personal choices. (I had one co-worker who asked me, "are these vegan?" every time I brought in cookies. After eight years (!) he finally got it- yes, they are awesome, and yes, they are always vegan. Vegan does not equal bad.) I don't know if I've opened more people's eyes than you have, or than my omni-mostly-eats-vegan partner, or than my parents who eat veggie 5 nights a week, but I do know that it's great that you are out there, fighting the good fight however you choose to do so.
Lastly, I find that a lot of people judge all veg*ns by the few vocal ones they've met or "heard about", rather than on actual veg*ns. I certainly don't judge omnis by the few jerks who have given me a really, really hard time about veganism and I hope others won't judge veg*ns by a random sampling. An example: last winter my mother told me she was so glad I wasn't one of those "preachy" vegans. I asked her how many vegans she knows, aside from me? Her answer: "Good point."
09/11/09
And yes, I was talking about getting people to eat less meat. :) I actually made a little vegan cookbook for my work buddies last Hanukkah called "Trust me, I'm an omnivore". My sister's a completely eco-vegetarian...she could care less about animals, truly, but she's a crazy environmentalist. Between her and my small handful of vegan friends, I've learned to cook things that make everyone happy. And no soy! Mainly because I hate it.
09/11/09
I would, however, be polite and respectful while declining, and would not defend anyone who was rude about it.
09/11/09
And yeah, it wasn't the decline so much as the fact that the guy who emailed me back was a cockweasel to me.
09/11/09
BTW, there's been an ongoing argument in the letters column of VegNews about vegans saying vegetarians are lesser. I can't find a link on their site but the new issue should be out soon and I anticipate some very interesting letters from both sides. You should check it out, I think it touches on some of the points we're discussing (ie, discounting someone's contribution because they don't "measure up.")
And I would love a copy of your book, BTW, if you're into sharing! Some of the best recipes I have are from omnis. And I agree, the less soy the better. One of my top five vegan cookbooks has no faux meat, soy, or faux dairy, just veggies, fruits and grains. It's awesome and a great gift for vegan-curious omnis.
09/11/09
Again, there's no excuse for being rude about it, though.
(And this doesn't apply to PETA and organizations who do indeed take part in welfarist campaigns and therefore wouldn't have any compelling reason not to help.)
09/11/09
09/11/09
I am sure the man boobs have nothing to do with the fried vegetarian snickers bars someone mentioned in yesterdays weight post. Nothing at all. Must be all those chicken cutlets.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
That is so so true.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
I last saw her two years ago, so maybe things have changed, but I doubt it. Her parents weren't together.