<![CDATA[Jezebel: tress test]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: tress test]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/tresstest http://jezebel.com/tag/tresstest <![CDATA[Keeping Michelle's Hair In Perspective]]> Jenee Desmond-Harris wrote a piece for Time titled "Why Michelle's Hair Matters." It's both refreshing and sad that black hair keeps making the news.

On the one hand: Black hair is complicated. Loaded with meaning. Writes Desmond-Harris, "When the New Yorker set out last summer to satirize Michelle as a militant, country-hating black radical, it was no coincidence that the illustrator portrayed her with an Afro." Going natural — or not — can end up classifying a black woman. Straight hair makes some people think you're more "professional"; others might think you are selling out or tying to "be white." Natural, ultra-culry hair — worn in twists — means you might be berated by Free Republic, as Malia Obama was. Desmond-Harris notes that Don Imus infamously called the Rutgers women's basketball team "nappy-headed hos," making a connection between hair and promiscuity (see also: Her hair is wild, unruly, she needs to "tame" that frizz, etc.) With Chris Rock's documentary set to hit theaters at the same time we have many black women in the White House (Michelle, Sasha, Malia, Desirée Rogers, etc.) it is important to examine the stereotypes, hangups and issues surrounding women and black hair, and not treat the messages and codes surrounding black hair as trivial. Desmond-Harris writes:

One might think having a black First Lady who is widely praised as sophisticated and stylish would represent a happy ending to the story of black female beauty and acceptance. Alas, our hair still simultaneously bonds and divides us."There is no hair choice you can make that is simple," says Melissa Harris Lacewell, an associate professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton. "Any choice carries tremendous personal and political valence." Even though I'm biracial and should theoretically have half a share of hair angst, I've sacrificed endless Saturdays to the salon. It is unfathomable that I might ever leave my apartment with my hair in its truly natural state, unmoderated by heat or products. I once broke down at the airport when my gel was confiscated for exceeding the 3-oz. limit. I'm neither high maintenance nor superficial: I'm a black woman.

On the other hand: Much like attention to Michelle Obama's clothes, arms and bottom, attention to her hair feels, well, disrespectful. And plain old sad. It's not like black women are newly arrived creatures from outer space — so why is the way we deal with our hair "news"? It's been over 100 years since Madame C.J. Walker and Garrett A. Morgan. Michelle's hair matters, but surely not as much as a whole lotta other stuff she's working on.

Why Michelle's Hair Matters [Time]
Earlier: Combing Through The Deeply Rooted Politics Of Black Hair Issues
Weaves, Extensions & "Creamy Crack": Chris Rock's Good Hair Trailer
Chris Rock's New Documentary Explores "Good" Hair
Solange Chops Hair, Is Called "Insane"
The Flesh-Eating Phonies Also Known As Lace-Front Wigs
Why Is Straight Hair The Epitome Of 'Style'?
Michelle Obama Spurs A "New Arms Race"

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5352094&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Modern Beauty Shop: Winning The War, One Curl At A Time]]> Recently, a reader sent us a link to this ShopBop "trend" story called Wartime. "Fashion is war," reads the copy. No. It isn't. But in the pages of 1942's Modern Beauty Shop, war was a major theme. War… and hair!


Since when does Clairol advertise using illustrations of enemy aircrafts in the midst of being destroyed? Can you imagine the brand trying to do this in 2009? The copy reads: "There is no room in America for anything but the best."


The war effort hinged on hairpins.


Also, to help win the war, they had to stop making perm rollers. Sacrifices!


"Scoldy Lox" brand: "Help win the war by preventing wastage of hair pins!" Please note her sailor collar.


"A war can teach a girl a lot of things… " Like making do without manicure stuff. "You and I will be giving up our 'home front' tools for the man on the battle front… and we'll be doing it cheerfully, gladly, without grumbling."


A world war cannot stop a girl from getting married. Wartime brides! "The service bride moves fast and packs light, and her beauty program must be geared accordingly… You must show her that an easy-to care for hairstyle requires a short feather cut and a lovely permanent wave."


Honestly, I absolutely adore this hairstyle. Curls! Off the face! And flowers! And check out that no-fuss bouquet.


Two words: Victory cuts! Short, neat curls are obviously a winning formula. (Click "full size" to enlarge.)


The "tucked under" shortie looks almost like an origami project.


All of the "selections for summer nights" are extremely elegant… and extremely precise! The war will not be won with bedhead!


Should you dare to attempt and recreate some of these 'dos at home, instructions are provided. The text is really quite a treat: "Here is a banged feather bob that is sure to win the hearts of level-headed youngsters who know the secret of combining good looks and hard work, with no dire effect on either… The criss-crossed back is as gay as any young head could wish and it is formed so simply that it can easily be recombed. Sleek side wings are an effective foil for the fluffy bangs. For more frivolous moments, this style will lend itself particularly well to the addition of perky little bows or flower ornaments."


This is the Feather Halo, "just a little different from its feathery cousins."


Since our country is indeed at war, you must ask yourself: "Does Your Appearance Promote Morale?" (Click "full size" to enlarge.) Here's how this story begins: "You, a beautician in wartime, are telling your patrons that beauty is a duty today… and that good grooming gives confidence, increases efficiency and fosters a buoyant spirit. And right you are!" When it comes to your hair, check and see: "Is it smartly dressed… becoming… and short? Or does it straggle about your shoulders…?" Your bedraggled, snarled locks mean the terrorists have already won, people!

Earlier: Bangs, Curls, Swingers & Swirls: 1965 Modern Beauty Shop

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5329084&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sarah Haskins Untangles The Swinging World Of Hair Care Ads]]> From a deserted shampoo temple to words like "hydrolicious" and "prismatic," hair product commercials elevate beautiful hair to something to die for, Sarah Haskins finds.

Hair care commercials are super serious! Or filled with questions we would ask, if we weren't so "hair-stupid." By the way, you spend your time flipping and swirling your tresses under a spotlight, don't you? Of course you do. Check out the hare-brained ads in the clip, below:





Sarah Haskins in Target Women: Hair [Current]
Earlier: Sarah Haskins posts
Condoms, Cleaning Supplies & Crap: A Q&A With Sarah Haskins

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5308543&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hair Today]]> Paul LeBlanc, a stylist with a salon in New Brunswick, Canada, is the man responsible for the odd '70s hairdo worn by Oscar-winner Javier Bardem in No Country For Old Men. During his acceptance speech, Bardem acknowledged the tricky tresses: "I want to thank the Coens for being crazy enough to think that I could do that and put one of the most horrible haircuts in history on my head," he said. LeBlanc is thrilled. It's very good for [the Coen brothers] and for me," he says. He's worked with the Coens for years. "It's a film that will have a long life and it's nice to know that my art will live on as well." Leblanc also claims that fashionable people in L.A. are asking for a "Bardem cut." Um, sure, dude. Sure. [International Herald Tribune]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361080&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can An Older Woman Get Away With Long Hair?]]> Jerry Hall, 51, has the same flowing locks she had 30 years ago. Two women, Esther Rantzen and Marcell D'Argy Smith, debate whether it works when a woman of a certain age has long hair in today's Daily Mail. Rantzen argues, "only Jerry Hall looks like Jerry Hall. The rest of us risk looking like Ozzy Osbourne." She acknowledges the reason why women hate to cut their hair as they get older, but reminds us, "there's the unattractive truth that when most people get older, their hair changes texture and becomes coarse and difficult to tame. Think of all those elderly hippies with their brindled hair flying in the wind: not a good look." Hair length and vitality are linked, she says, but women need to be realistic.

We are determined to stay feminine and alluring, and that means, we think, keeping the luscious tresses of our youth. Though, in truth, those tresses may not be luscious any more, they may be thin and wispy, and they are certainly not youthful.

On the other hand, D'Argy Smith asserts that in the past, it was sophisticated and groomed for a woman over 25 to cut her hair short, "so you didn't have it falling around your neck and shoulders like a little girl." But these days, she writes, "there is no real cut-off point. Some women never cut their hair short." She swears:

Every time my hair has been cut shorter (never really stylishly short), I vow to never do that again. I feel so ordinary and I lose any vestige of glamour, so I tell myself long hair is easier to manage.
And before you start thinking, wait a minute, short hair isn't devoid of glamor! Short hair can be hip, sassy and youthful! Take a look at the Golden Girls coiffs of Winona Ryder, Paris Hilton and Diane Lane. While it's true that we're living in modern times, where a woman can do as she wishes, is it just plain tacky when a woman keeps her hair as long as it was when she was younger? Does it smack of wishful thinking, of literally not being able to let go of the past? Or, once you become a certain age, is one of the benefits of being older that you can do as you damn well please without caring what anyone thinks?

So Can An Older Woman Carry Off Long Hair? [Daily Mail]
Related: This Trend Must End: Grandma Hair [Glamour]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312454&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fashion Week: If You Think The Clothes Are A Waste Of Time, Wait 'Til You Hear About The Hair]]> The New York Times sent one of its writers, Natasha Singer, to stand in as a hair assistant backstage at the Réyes runway show during fashion week. Singer, who admits, "I don't know how to properly handle my own hair," was faced with the daunting task of styling Rapunzel-locked models' hair in a "fresh and modern" look. "The idea is to make it look natural, only better," a Bumble and Bumble stylist told Singer. "But a natural look is one of the most difficult to do well." This particular "natural look" was achieved by brushing the hair, applying styling product, kneading the hair, crimping it with the hands and blow-drying it halfway, a process that took about an hour.

When Singer was finished, she says, another stylist informed her that "the result looked too perfect. So she deliberately messed it up to create a more lived-in look." The models arrived at 8 a.m. and all of the hair was done by 10:30, at which point the designer's stylist announced it needed to look more polished. Since the show was supposed to start at 11:00, a frenzy to smooth each model's hair — with flat irons, curling irons and hands — was suddenly underway. Of course, many of the models were wearing hats. And twenty minutes later, the show was over — and the models headed out, "ruining in two minutes the hair that had taken hours of artifice to make natural looking." What we find amusing is that somewhere in the subtext, Singer seems to know that this enormous waste of time and effort is kind of silly, but never just comes out and says so. Also: Using a curling iron to get a "natural" look boggles the mind.

A Spritz Here, a Jitter or Two There [NY Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299471&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Are You Woman Enough To Go Gray?]]> In today's New York Times, Natasha Singer writes about Anne Kreamer, an author who stopped coloring her hair three years ago. Kreamer's new book, Going Gray, chronicles her dramatic change of hair color, from dyed mahogany to "salt and pebble."

At a time when more than half of American women ages 13 to 69 color their hair, Ms. Kreamer argues that hair dye is the great divide that separates those who are in denial about aging from those who embrace it. Dyed hair looks as artificial as a toupee, she concludes, whereas gray suggests candor. "We have been brainwashed to think hair dye looks good," Ms. Kreamer said.
And you know what? She's right.

In this country, we're obsessed with youth — and the "anti-aging" business is flourishing. But no one thinks silver foxes like Anderson Cooper and George Clooney look elderly. As any good women's studies major will tell you, the patriarchy is to blame (as usual). There was a time when our civilization revered gray haired women. They were thought to be older, wiser, and often knew how to use plants and natural elements to cure the sick. The advent of Christianity turned these medicine women into witches and hags, cackling over cauldrons, up to no good.

But maybe it's time for a shift? "If we had more role models like Helen Mirren and Emmylou Harris out there, more women would want gray hair," says Ms. Kreamer. Unfortunately, it would take more than Emmylou Harris to create a culture in which "embracing authenticity," as Ms. Kreamer calls it, is not only acceptable but rewarded with respect and admiration. Obviously it's a woman's prerogative to do as she wishes with her mane, but seeing as how Ms. Kreamer spent an estimated $65,000 on hair coloring over 24 years, doesn't going gray seem particularly sage?

Bottled Blondes, You Too Can Break Free [NYTimes]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295181&view=rss&microfeed=true