I lived with female roommates for years and never saw them naked or in the shower. Do these women have some kind of communal locker-room type shower in Berlin? This comment is disgusting. That coach must also believe that every night, the ladies have a pillow fight in their underwear and then practice kissing on each other.
@1.1.1.: And even LESS self-conscious outside the US. There is a big difference between the way women and girls change in US locker rooms and the way they do elsewhere in the world. I've been in both places and the difference is almost comical.
this is so upsetting! she's done us (south africans) so proud, and is getting zero press for her amazing achievements! i am irritated as all hell about this -for someone to come out of rural south africa and make it this far is a serious feat, and we should really be supporting her!!! i'm very unimpressed with the south african press on this matter. the ONLY thing i've heard is some idiot dj on a youth radio station making light about this 'she looks like a man' debacle.... *annoyed*
She just won the 800m! 1:55.45. 2 seconds ahead of the nearest competitor. Cue shitshow on letsrun.com and various other crappy websites. I feel so sorry for her. On what should be one of the best days of her life, she has to deal with speculation and innuendo. The South African Athletics Federation should have handled this a LONG time ago.
While there is precedent for men competing as women (google Stella Walsh, among others), there are also documented instances of careers being ruined for what may have been no good reason (google Santhi Soundarajan). If this is indeed a case of a man competing as a woman, clearly...that's not right. But from what I've read, I tend to doubt that's the case.
We're talking about an 18 year old from a rural village in South Africa who apparently has TRIED to contact the South African athletics federation (ASA) to get them to comment...but they hadn't as recently as a couple weeks ago. She happens to run an exceptionally fast time and suddenly ends up in the spotlight. A lot of the commentary on the track boards includes people wondering why she wouldn't try and do more to "pass" as a woman if she is in fact, a teenage boy as theorized. Which makes me wonder, as I've noted a couple other people point out, if these people realize she may not even REALIZE that she doesn't "look" female. Someone from rural south africa is probably does not think about Western standards of beauty on a day to day basis. lets-run.com has an interview up with her where she says she might not stick with running. As the interviewer noted on a message board, you'd wonder why she'd walk away with her talent...but if people all over the world was questioning my gender, I might not want to stick around either.
ETA: she just won worlds...pretty easily (1:55.45 !!!), and not far of the world junior record. So this situation isn't going to go away in the press.
@tankearae: I definitely don't think she's a teenage boy trying to "pass" as a female just to have the athletic advantage, but it sounds like it is possibly she is intersex (especially if she is from a rural area, which I don't know enough about her to state categorically).
I think it is a really, really tough conundrum. If she has a chromosomal condition where she is genetically male but has the body of a female (this exists), then athletically I don't think she'd have any advantage and should be able to compete as a female.
But what if she is genetically female, but has male physical traits? She *would* have advantages over females athletically, and what do we do then? If she's always identified as female, it seems so wrong to not let her compete as one, but it also doesn't seem entirely fair to other competitors either if she does...
@formergr: I agree with you. Its part of the reason why the IAAF couldn't just pull her out of the finals due to suspicious: the testing they do is apparently pretty rigorous, but I can't find out what it is exactly they are testing.
@formergr: From watching House (a credible medical source I know) wouldn't a intersexed person with male sex organs and female genitalia be more likely to have strongly feminine characteristics? (i.e. condition blocks testosterone) I may just be completely misinformed here.
Another wrinkle in the broader story here is that female athletes have in the past, less so now because of better technology, failed doping tests arguably because of their hormonal birth control sending their sex hormones to abnormal levels - particularly testosterone, which spikes with some steroid use and is severely depressed with others (because the steroid mimics it). Women's hormonal make-up have been problematic since the outset of drug testing.
Of course, that's just a sub-text to this story. She's never (that I know of) had a positive drug test.
A. She might be intersexed, which is more common than people realize, and thus presents the issue with clinging to a binary system of gender classification.
B. If she has been training vigorously since a very young age, she probably has never had a regular period and thus her body hasn't been exposed to the same amount of estrogen as other women her age.
Neither of these things make it okay to open her up to ridicule and publicize very private questions. If the ruling commissions are skeptical, they should test and interview her discretely. This is not a public matter and it's disgusting that they are being so blase and public about it.
@Beets.Go.On is the Fat Yogini: Exactly. If there is a concern, and if there is cause for that concern, this should be a matter handled privately. What is sickening about these claims it's not the doubt cast on her gender, it's the media circus and speculations around it.
The 18-year-old Semenya is slated to run the 800m for South Africa in tonight's World Championships
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but why on earth would it matter if she's male or female?
@ferociacoutura: women run against women, men (at the elite level) are noticeably faster than women. So a man racing against women at this level is an unfair advantage.
@bluebears, @Antrack, @ferociacoutura: Thanks! I didn't realize it was a women's race - I'm not familiar with the rules of running so I didn't know they were always separate.
Did anyone else read this and get reminded of the Obama Birthers? That instead of beating her fair and square in normalized competition, her opponents would rather just make things up and lob ridiculous accusations based on her perceived "otherness?"
@pssshwhatever: Honestly, no, because it matters here - it would not be a fair and square competition if she is not entirely female. On the other hand, this should not have been made public.
@Antrack: I'm not sure I follow you here - so it's legitimate to subject someone to invasive, humiliating testing because they don't conform to traditional ideals of gender appearance?
Even by your logic, it would "matter" if Obama wasn't born in the US - his presidency would be illegal. In either case, that doesn't make the accusations less ridiculous and insulting.
@pssshwhatever: No, in fact I said that testing should not be public and thus not humiliating. Athletes at her level are tested all of the time for drugs, doping, etc. This should have been handled discreetly as part of that testing.
I suppose I meant that this issue "matters" because the IAAF does not yet have an answer yet. We affirmatively know that Obama was born in Hawaii, so I don't think the Birthers' accusations "matter," but I see how that wasn't the clearest word to use. I should have said that her gender is relevant to the fairness of the competition. My point was that the IAAF has a duty to the other competitors to ensure that Semenya is chromosomally female. The women she is racing against have worked very hard to get to where they are, and they deserve a fair and square competition (as you put it). I think the IAAF also has a duty to create a workable definition of female for its purposes and to handle any disputes on the matter discreetly and confidentially.
I'm curious to see how exactly they define "male" and "female" because there are combinations other than XX and XY that would render one's appearance to still be either visually male or visually female.
the South African's physique and powerful style have sparked speculation in recent months that she might not be entirely female. IAAF rules state that competitors must be entirely female to compete in women's races but some people are born with a mixture of chromosomes and display both male and female characteristics.
I have no idea if she's a male or female (whatever that means to the IAAF) however I don't think this is RIDICULOUS per se. What about the chinese gymnasts who (most likely) lied about their ages in the last olympics. This sort of thing does happen.
ETA: Plus there has been a problem in the running community about runners lying about ages in the past as well in order to dominate in a certain age bracket.
Yes, I was coming here to say this. And while I understand that it's upsetting to be testing her based on her appearance, appearance DOES matter. With the Chinese gymnasts, most of the suspicions about them being underage came from the fact that they looked far too young. So how far do we go in terms of being sensitive and politically correct, when there is a concern about cheating?
@laureltreedaphne: Yes. I agree with Anna, what her coach said is horrible and I do feel badly for this woman. However, if she is not a "woman" (again whatever that means) then its not fair to her other competitors. There are huge stakes involved here, we're talking about peoples careers and livelihoods.
@bluebears: While your comparison is apt, it oversimplifies the issue a bit too much. I think the speculation about Semenya's appearance is more insidious because it implies an unspoken model for how women athletes should look, that she clearly does not fulfill.
However, the debate over the chinese gymnasts was sparked because they looked so young in a field dominated by already young women. So the problem was actually the opposite, in that the women fit the bill of youthful athletes too well.
@Maggita: Well they looked noticeably younger. That was the problem. Incidentally the concerns aren't based on appearance alone as she has been setting new time records since she hit the scene which ALWAYS exposes athletes to suspicion, usually doping suspicion. Not that I don't agree and think for one minute that her appearance didn't play a role here. She has not been the first female sprinter "suspected" of this and I think our societies ideas about what a women "should" look like play a huge part.
@bluebears: I hadn't taken her time records into account, and I see why sports officials would speculate in order to maintain the integrity of the event. What bothers me, I realized, is the way they're handling it with such blatant double standards and twisted expectations of women's athleticism.
@Maggita: totally agreed. Its gross. The way female athletes are treated by the media in general is so troubling. They're either over sexualized (Maxim photo shoots) or basically constantly denigrated for looking too masculine. Easy punchline (see any and all "jokes" about the WNBA)
Wait, she didn't drop out of the sky yesterday. She's lived a life that includes, presumably, running. So you're telling me they're basically accusing her of living as a woman since childhood so that she could one day run in international competition as the wrong gender?
@mama_t: I think they're not accusing her of cheating, but rather being "not female" in some way even she couldn't detect. Which, again, brings up the need for a reasonable and fair definition of "female."
@mama_t: A big part of the problem is that determinations of doping and steroid usage are tied to testosterone levels occurring in the body. Also, since men and women compete separately, which is tied to inherent hormonal and genetic differences, those who linger in between clear genetic gender delineations cause problems, for lack of a better word, in creating a fair competitive environment. It's one thing to be naturally gifted as an athlete, it's another to be outside the scope of what is considered "normal range" for hormones, etc. and therefore able to win.
FWIW: I don't think there are easy answers, I don't think someone should be not allowed to compete because of their hormones or sexual characteristics, but sports are based on rules and an appearance of fair play so anything that disrupts that should be addressed.
08/19/09
08/20/09
They are athletes. In my experience, athletes tend to be less self-conscious.
08/25/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
Well done, Caster.
08/19/09
08/19/09
A couple things:
While there is precedent for men competing as women (google Stella Walsh, among others), there are also documented instances of careers being ruined for what may have been no good reason (google Santhi Soundarajan). If this is indeed a case of a man competing as a woman, clearly...that's not right. But from what I've read, I tend to doubt that's the case.
We're talking about an 18 year old from a rural village in South Africa who apparently has TRIED to contact the South African athletics federation (ASA) to get them to comment...but they hadn't as recently as a couple weeks ago. She happens to run an exceptionally fast time and suddenly ends up in the spotlight. A lot of the commentary on the track boards includes people wondering why she wouldn't try and do more to "pass" as a woman if she is in fact, a teenage boy as theorized. Which makes me wonder, as I've noted a couple other people point out, if these people realize she may not even REALIZE that she doesn't "look" female. Someone from rural south africa is probably does not think about Western standards of beauty on a day to day basis. lets-run.com has an interview up with her where she says she might not stick with running. As the interviewer noted on a message board, you'd wonder why she'd walk away with her talent...but if people all over the world was questioning my gender, I might not want to stick around either.
ETA: she just won worlds...pretty easily (1:55.45 !!!), and not far of the world junior record. So this situation isn't going to go away in the press.
08/19/09
I think it is a really, really tough conundrum. If she has a chromosomal condition where she is genetically male but has the body of a female (this exists), then athletically I don't think she'd have any advantage and should be able to compete as a female.
But what if she is genetically female, but has male physical traits? She *would* have advantages over females athletically, and what do we do then? If she's always identified as female, it seems so wrong to not let her compete as one, but it also doesn't seem entirely fair to other competitors either if she does...
08/19/09
It'll be interesting.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
Of course, that's just a sub-text to this story. She's never (that I know of) had a positive drug test.
08/19/09
B. If she has been training vigorously since a very young age, she probably has never had a regular period and thus her body hasn't been exposed to the same amount of estrogen as other women her age.
Neither of these things make it okay to open her up to ridicule and publicize very private questions. If the ruling commissions are skeptical, they should test and interview her discretely. This is not a public matter and it's disgusting that they are being so blase and public about it.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but why on earth would it matter if she's male or female?
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/20/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
Even by your logic, it would "matter" if Obama wasn't born in the US - his presidency would be illegal. In either case, that doesn't make the accusations less ridiculous and insulting.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
I suppose I meant that this issue "matters" because the IAAF does not yet have an answer yet. We affirmatively know that Obama was born in Hawaii, so I don't think the Birthers' accusations "matter," but I see how that wasn't the clearest word to use. I should have said that her gender is relevant to the fairness of the competition. My point was that the IAAF has a duty to the other competitors to ensure that Semenya is chromosomally female. The women she is racing against have worked very hard to get to where they are, and they deserve a fair and square competition (as you put it). I think the IAAF also has a duty to create a workable definition of female for its purposes and to handle any disputes on the matter discreetly and confidentially.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
the South African's physique and powerful style have sparked speculation in recent months that she might not be entirely female. IAAF rules state that competitors must be entirely female to compete in women's races but some people are born with a mixture of chromosomes and display both male and female characteristics.
08/19/09
ETA: Plus there has been a problem in the running community about runners lying about ages in the past as well in order to dominate in a certain age bracket.
08/19/09
Yes, I was coming here to say this. And while I understand that it's upsetting to be testing her based on her appearance, appearance DOES matter. With the Chinese gymnasts, most of the suspicions about them being underage came from the fact that they looked far too young. So how far do we go in terms of being sensitive and politically correct, when there is a concern about cheating?
08/19/09
08/19/09
However, the debate over the chinese gymnasts was sparked because they looked so young in a field dominated by already young women. So the problem was actually the opposite, in that the women fit the bill of youthful athletes too well.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
This is bullshit.
08/19/09
08/19/09
FWIW: I don't think there are easy answers, I don't think someone should be not allowed to compete because of their hormones or sexual characteristics, but sports are based on rules and an appearance of fair play so anything that disrupts that should be addressed.