<![CDATA[Jezebel: toy story]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: toy story]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/toy story http://jezebel.com/tag/toy story <![CDATA[ Will The Cone Make You Moan? ]]> I've been hearing about The Cone—a futuristic-shaped vibrator that you would expect characters in Woody Allen's Sleeper to use—for well over a year now. I'm always a little wary of high-end and low-end vibes, the former because the price tag is usually indicative of a lot of hype, and the latter because the because the price tag is usually indicative of a flimsy product with an inferior mechanism. The Cone will set you back a whopping $130. But it's cool looking. And has little light on it. And it's pink. So how did The Cone shape up?


Stats: The Cone is a British sex toy that, as its website puts it, is made of "soft, squidgy plastic." (Squidgy is such a fake British word.) There is a 3000 RPM motor within, and there are 16 different built-in programs of vibration. The two controls on the device help you manage the speed, intensity and pulsing of those programs. It requires 3 C batteries. The price, as I stated above, is $130.

Pros: You're supposed to sit on this thing, inserting the tip either into your vagina or your butt hole. I don't do the butt thing when I'm just playing around alone, so I sat on it with my vadge. That lasted for maybe a minute. I was too scared to release all my weight onto that thing, because it gets rather wide at the end (7" at the base), so I was sort of holding myself up with my thighs. I don't really work out or anything, so after holding that yoga-esque pose for 60 seconds my legs turned into jelly. So instead, I sat down, placed the cone on my bed, and wedged it between my legs, and pressed it up against my crotch, Western saddle-style. I have to say that the motor was totally on par with the kind of strength I need to be worked properly. And the pulsing was really awesome. I really was partial to program 14, that had heavy, altered pulsing, with some steady vibe thrown in every few seconds for good measure. Also, it's super-duper quiet.

Cons: One of my friends at our brother site Gizmodo told me that when the editors over there review gadgets, one of the ways they rate it is by trying to use the item without reading directions, because nothing should be that difficult to use that you would need written instructions. I feel like that line of thinking particularly applies to sex toys, because when you're ready to get off, the last thing you want to do is sit down and try to have to use your brain. The Cone fails on this front. I didn't understand how to open it, and even though there are two buttons, I couldn't figure out the off and on situation. Also, I could only come while using this thing if I was sitting upright, and personally, I like to lay down and relax when I'm playing with myself.

Verdict: Great motor, good vibes, bad design. If they could make this thing as a hand-held, or even as something a little more conducive to other positions, it would be much more on point.

]]>
Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:40:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014734&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Mary Mermaid: Is This Dual-Stimulation Sex Toy Hot, Or Just A Cold Fish? ]]> I definitely have more of a "type" when it comes to sex toys than I do when it comes to men. Maybe that's because there's just this one specific need that a sex toy needs to live up to, so I tend to be unyielding in my bias toward certain kinds of toys. For instance, I've always been into clit stimulation, meaning that I don't even bother to fuck with dildos that don't also vibe. Actually, I usually stay away from penetration during a normal masturbation sesh, which means that I almost never fuck with dildos at all. But in my never-ending quest to find at least one toy that could match the utter awesomeness of the Hitachi Magic Wand, I decided to open myself up, so to speak, to a dildo (a vibrating one). After the jump, the Mary Mermaid takes a dive into my vagina.


Stats: The Mary Mermaid is a dildo in the shape of a mermaid (and also, disturbingly, the virgin Mary), with a fin that curves up for clit stimulation. It's part of manufacturer Fun Factory's "Twist 'n' Shake" line of toys, and has separate controls to adjust vibration of the fin and rotation of the dildo. It's 9.25" in total size, with 4.5" of "insertable" length. It takes 4 AA batteries, and costs $73.95. It's a little bit noisy when you have it going at full blast, but nothing out of the ordinary. Check out the way it moves and sounds here (don't worry, this is just a demonstration and my vagina does not make an appearance):

Pros: This thing looks and moves strangely and its freakishness alone kinda turned me on. Having separate controls for rotation and vibration (each of which can be completely shut off) is a plus. The sound of the mechanism isn't too loud or annoying.

Cons: I warmed up with some fin vibe before plunging the dildo in. I also put on some Xtube porn to help me along. I inserted the top of the dildo in after a few minutes, but it (or my vagina) was being stubborn and wouldn't really go in, even though I was plenty wet. I turned up the rotation to see if it could sort of twist its way in there. I could only get the bulbous head part in though. While the top portion was still inside me, I let go of the Mermaid and looked down to see what was going on. The bottom half was seriously flopping around like a fish out of water. I couldn't help but think of that Faith No More video. I couldn't get off.

Verdict: Meh. It's pretty much just The Rabbit, repackaged as a mythical creature.

Mary Mermaid [VibeReview]

Earlier: The NEA: Is This "Luxury" Vibrator Worth It?

]]>
Tue, 27 May 2008 17:00:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011199&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The NEA: Is This "Luxury" Vibrator Worth It? ]]> en-98122.jpgI'm not opposed to spending big money on sex toys, because I can't really think of anything that I value more than my orgasms. For a while now, I've found myself intrigued by companies that shill "high end" vibrators, claiming they are "as pleasing to the eye as to the touch." Now, I don't really give a crap about the way a sex toy looks because I'm not trying to impress anyone with it except my clitoris... and my clit doesn't have eyes. But I was super-excited to get a review sample of one of the fancy vibes — from Swedish company LELO (an acronym for Luxury Erotic Lifestyle Objects) — so I could discover if my opinion of the product would be as high as its price tag. After the jump, my clit and I weigh in.

Pros: The NEA is a cool looking little gadget (and I mean little— it's only about 3" in length). It almost looks like a miniature computer mouse, and it has pretty LCD lights on the two buttons that control the speed. (It doesn't require batteries, as it comes with a charger.) The purr on the vibe is super-quiet and could probably be used without roommates being any the wiser.

Cons: I could not get off with this fucking thing. At. All. The vibe is way too weak. Plus, fast and steady vibration with no variation tends to just numb my area instead of arousing it, leading me to just become frustrated.

Verdict: At $89 (almost twice the price of the incomparable Magic Wand), you'd be better off using your hands.

NEA [LELO]

Earlier: 5 Household Items That Will Help You 'Get Off' Easy
Glove Affair: Testing The Fukuoku Five Finger Vibrator
Sexual Chocolate: Testing The Clone-A-Willy Kit

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 16:30:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386287&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Plastic & Fantastic ]]> barbieface031008.jpgDid you celebrate yesterday? It was Barbie's birthday! Launched in 1959, Barbie was controversial from the beginning: She was one of the first dolls for little girls with breasts, and her proportions (36 inch bust, 18 inch waist) were rather unrealistic. (Her waist was widened in 1992.) Author Peggy Orenstein, who's written extensively about issues affecting girls, tells NPR, "You either see her as the embodiment of oppressive, Teutonic standards of beauty, or you see her as all that is good and sweet and innocent about your childhood. But you can't not have a relationship with Barbie." (Like many, we like to torture her.) Still, with Bratz and Strutz and whatnot, Barbie seems downright pretty and old-fashioned these days. And homegirl looks good for 49. [NPR, Babble]

]]>
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:45:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365786&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Oldies But Goodies ]]> dolllaundrycropped012108.jpgAh, to be a rich little girl in New York in 1939! According to this story from Popular Science, it was possible to send tiny dresses and clothes to a laundry service for cleaning. That's right, doll laundry. (Click picture for a bigger view.) [Modern Mechanix]











dollaundry470012108.jpg(Click to enlarge)

]]>
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:45:00 EST dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=347190&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Move over, MySpace: There's a new kid in ... ]]> bratzleopard072307.jpgMove over, MySpace: There's a new kid in town, and she's wearing a wholly-inappropriate, leopard-print babydoll dress! Not satisfied with cornering the toy market (and taking a stab at movies), the executives behind Bratz dolls are preparing to take their brand online. The Wall Street Journal reports that the large-headed, wide-eyed, pouty-puckered dolls are spawning a social-networking site. Aimed at girls as young as 8, we suspect it's only a matter of time until some creepy dude logs on posing as Yasmin. Maybe Bratz should partner with Dateline NBC? [WSJ ]

]]>
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:31:10 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281375&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ There's A Singing Cowgirl In All Of Us; Why Won't Steve Jobs Listen? ]]> jessie2.jpg
  • Dear writers, producers & assorted executives of Ratatouille: Please put more female protagonists in your films. Heck, give Jessie from Toy Story 2 her own film! We effing love Joan Cusack! [Salon]
  • Feministing has published an ode to NuvaRing birth control. Might have been nice if they'd also mentioned that a woman right here in NYC may have died after using it. [Feministing, NYPost]
  • More reason to booze it up: Red wine could help cure your sore throat. [DailyMail]
  • Memo to smug, yuppie moms: Your environmentally-friendly cloth diapers aren't so 'green' after all. [DailyMail]

  • Will greater power for women in Muslim countries help stem the tide of terrorism? A Muslim member of the British House of Lords thinks so. [ABCNews]
  • A doctor has admitted to using a hidden camera to record himself giving teenage girls getting what were probably their first breast/pelvic exams. [USAToday]
  • Females who suffer from endometriosis (a chronic inflammation of the uterus that is more common than you think!) could a higher risk of developing certain types of cancers, including breast, ovarian, skin, and brain. [Guardian]
]]>
Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:57:27 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=274860&view=rss&microfeed=true