The Skin Deep website CHANGED MY LIFE! www.cosmeticsdatabase.com
You can look up individual products OR ingredients to determine whether a product is safe, AND you can use it to find better alternatives. (Type in 'shampoo' and it brings up a huge list in order from safest to most dangerous.)
They are sort of like Consumer Reports, in that they are completely unbiased. Some "natural" products rate poorly and some cheap drugstore stuff rates well. They don't care - they just want the information out there so we can make wise decisions on our own.
Everything we put ON our skin seeps into our bodies and bloodstreams, which is logical b/c we know there are "trans-dermal" medicines that work via a skin patch. (Nicotine patches, birth control patches and many more.)
Everything I use now is well-rated. And, if it's good for YOU, it's good for the environment, too. All of the horrifying chemicals from our soaps, shampoos, etc. wash down the drain and make it back to streams, rivers and oceans and are wreaking havoc on marine life, there.
@VenetiaNaslund: It is overstatement to say that everything we put on our skin "seeps into our bodies and bloodstreams." This shows a misunderstanding of the way the skin works, and the way transdermal chemicals work. For chemicals to actually have transdermal properties, they must be exceedingly tiny.
A good example I can think of off the top of my head is henna. Henna has been used for centuries by women in Northern Africa, the Middle East, and India to create temporary body art. Its tones range from brown to orange to red, and very few people are allergic, making it a good choice for body art. The dye molecules stain the skin, but do not completely penetrate, so as the skin sheds dead layers, the stain appears to fade and eventually disappears. However, if an agent like tea or coffee is mixed in to help create an initially darker stain, the caffiene does penetrate completely and can enter the bloodstream.
@Rosaxé: That's not entirely true. The 'natural' beauty industry has really expanded recently and there are both low- and high-end options available (though it might be hard to track down certain brands...this is why the internet is the savvy consumer's best friend). Aubrey Organics, Weleda and Desert Essence are just a few of the affordable brands out there that use good, non-toxic ingredients.
For some reason I can't link to the article, but I think there is another issue here, namely the environment, that will hopefully support any efforts to reduce toxic chemicals in products. A lot of the chemicals in products are man-made, or contain elements from the earth that are rare and thus often more harmful to people (since we never really had to have defenses for exposure to elements that appear in small quantities, exposure is generally more concerning). I
'm on a bit of a tangent, but human and environmental health are one and the same in my mind. Maybe human health concerns and environmental concerns will drive the adoption of better standards all around.
My uni's research program on breast cancer made videos explaining which compounds increase your risks and why. This one is about make-up, although they have others.
There might not be studies that specifically show you'll get cancer from your lotion, but lot of the chemicals in make-up and other personal care products are known carcinogens or have been linked to other conditons you'd rather avoid (e.g. reproductive and developmental problems). And since we use a lot of products everyday for many years, that's a lot of exposure.
If you want to see what's in the eyeliner, shampoo, lotion, etc. that you use & how they compare to others in terms of safety, look them up in Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep database: www.cosmeticsdatabase.com
@anteup: Oh hell, they sell video games and Christmas lights with lead in them. Have ever used one of those hand held systems that has an LED screen? If you read the warning label, it probably says that it's got lead and you should wash your hands after using and not use it if you're pregnant or breastfeeding. Those cheapo Christmas lights you get at Target for $5? Those have lead in them.
I got in trouble when I used to work at Blockbuster because we were selling a video poker set that plugged into your TV and you and 3 friends could play Texas Hold'em or something. They set them on the counters so the cashiers could see the backs and the customers saw the front. These were like, $60 sets and I noticed there was a warning label and started pointing it out to people. My manager's weren't happy, but the assistant manager with the pregnant girlfriend was thrilled that I showed him before he bought it.
Yes, yes, yes. This is all very true.
I avoid products with known endocrine disruptors (the funky chemicals that bio-accumulate, act as estrogen, and may lead to cancer in a subset of people).
Still, I haven't found something to substitute my St. Ives apricot scrub and the Neutrogena bath oil. Both have para-benzoic acid. :(
The amount of beauty products you aren't supposed to use while pregnant is astounding. My question is this- if a certain product is so harmful it can mutate your unborn fetus, why is it even on the market in the first place? And why are people comfortbale using these items?
@lovecake: A lot of the products you are advised to avoid during pregnancy contain essential oils which are known to be a problem for a fetus, but are absolutely fine when you're not pregnant and it doesn't get much more natural than that...
Obviously other things might be less natural and are advised to be avoided, but is that because they are definitely harmful to a fetus or because they haven't been tested on a fetus and it's better to be safe than sorry?
I figure that since Queen Elizabeth I made it to the ripe old age of 70 in the 17th century despite smearing actual lead on her face, I'll probably be all right. Honestly, do we really need another thing to be afraid of?
@MadameU: while I am also sick of the alarmist reports out there, this is basic science: you put chems on you, they get in you, and they cause problems. wouldn't you want to simply choose the chemical free product?
I used to care about what was in my beauty products, but the problem is that many times (not all) the "natural" products are inferior and actually irritate my skin more so than the regular stuff. And sometimes, I need all the F*$%ing help I can get.
@LC86: Huge second to this. Almost everything natural I have tried in terms of skincare/haircare/makeup has been a terrific waste of money, with a few notable exceptions. And I try a lot of products...
@LC86: Yeah, people need to realize that "natural" and "non-toxic" are not synonymous. There are plenty of natural substances that are used in cosmetics that are not good for your skin, even if they aren't carcinogens. I mean poison ivy is perfectly natural, to use a slightly ridiculous example. But even certain essential oils/plant extracts that are all over the place are just plain irritating to the toughest skin and don't do any good other than making people think, "Oooh, it's natural, must be healthy."
I have such a huge problem with pink-ribbon products. Maybe I am just cynical, but most companies donate 10% of the WHOLESALE price to BCA. Just give your money to the organizations directly.
As for chemicals in makeup.....I tend to not worry about things like that. Lead, for example, people get all worked up about lead in anything from makeup to toys, when it's really such small amounts that it doesn't make a difference. Not as much as, say, the shit air we take in every day. Ever pick your nose after a day out in London? It ain't pretty.
@Penny: Concerning lead, there's even a snopes article [www.snopes.com] and there is another interesting article here: [soap-queen.blogspot.com] debunking the candy comparison and providing some interesting information regarding tap water.
That's really the key. They have safer ingredients, they can make their products (though perhaps not as cheaply) with them, but they won't do it until they're forced to – either by a governing board like the FDA or consumer demand.
09/14/09
09/14/09
You can look up individual products OR ingredients to determine whether a product is safe, AND you can use it to find better alternatives. (Type in 'shampoo' and it brings up a huge list in order from safest to most dangerous.)
They are sort of like Consumer Reports, in that they are completely unbiased. Some "natural" products rate poorly and some cheap drugstore stuff rates well. They don't care - they just want the information out there so we can make wise decisions on our own.
Everything we put ON our skin seeps into our bodies and bloodstreams, which is logical b/c we know there are "trans-dermal" medicines that work via a skin patch. (Nicotine patches, birth control patches and many more.)
Everything I use now is well-rated. And, if it's good for YOU, it's good for the environment, too. All of the horrifying chemicals from our soaps, shampoos, etc. wash down the drain and make it back to streams, rivers and oceans and are wreaking havoc on marine life, there.
PLEASE CHECK IT OUT!!!
love, beth
09/14/09
A good example I can think of off the top of my head is henna. Henna has been used for centuries by women in Northern Africa, the Middle East, and India to create temporary body art. Its tones range from brown to orange to red, and very few people are allergic, making it a good choice for body art. The dye molecules stain the skin, but do not completely penetrate, so as the skin sheds dead layers, the stain appears to fade and eventually disappears. However, if an agent like tea or coffee is mixed in to help create an initially darker stain, the caffiene does penetrate completely and can enter the bloodstream.
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
'm on a bit of a tangent, but human and environmental health are one and the same in my mind. Maybe human health concerns and environmental concerns will drive the adoption of better standards all around.
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
If you want to see what's in the eyeliner, shampoo, lotion, etc. that you use & how they compare to others in terms of safety, look them up in Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep database: www.cosmeticsdatabase.com
09/14/09
09/14/09
(This isn't the first time I've heard this...this is just my general outrage over it)
09/14/09
I got in trouble when I used to work at Blockbuster because we were selling a video poker set that plugged into your TV and you and 3 friends could play Texas Hold'em or something. They set them on the counters so the cashiers could see the backs and the customers saw the front. These were like, $60 sets and I noticed there was a warning label and started pointing it out to people. My manager's weren't happy, but the assistant manager with the pregnant girlfriend was thrilled that I showed him before he bought it.
09/14/09
I avoid products with known endocrine disruptors (the funky chemicals that bio-accumulate, act as estrogen, and may lead to cancer in a subset of people).
Still, I haven't found something to substitute my St. Ives apricot scrub and the Neutrogena bath oil. Both have para-benzoic acid. :(
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
Obviously other things might be less natural and are advised to be avoided, but is that because they are definitely harmful to a fetus or because they haven't been tested on a fetus and it's better to be safe than sorry?
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
As for chemicals in makeup.....I tend to not worry about things like that. Lead, for example, people get all worked up about lead in anything from makeup to toys, when it's really such small amounts that it doesn't make a difference. Not as much as, say, the shit air we take in every day. Ever pick your nose after a day out in London? It ain't pretty.
09/14/09
09/14/09
That's really the key. They have safer ingredients, they can make their products (though perhaps not as cheaply) with them, but they won't do it until they're forced to – either by a governing board like the FDA or consumer demand.