I have an honest question - especially after watching the "You are not alone" video ... How did he turn himself white? I mean, he said he had vitiligo but that would just be some spots, not his face, torso, arms and hands. I don't think it could have been surface makeup like Kabuki ... I'm really really curious.
Not even to mention that he was so cute when he was black and what a bizarre sense of self he had to have to do it, but HOW?
I think it's sweet that Time is doing a commemorative issue. I'm sad about MJ. I think he was a troubled man, and a gifted artist. I mourn the loss of the artist and I'm sad that he has lost whatever small chance he had to lay his demons to rest.
My feelings are complicated, but, I hope he has found some peace, and his music was truly amazing.
Ha, definitely. I find this all a little sick, actually. But, you know, if they don't sell a Michael Jackson issue, they'd be fools, financially speaking.
@marionette: That's kinda how I feel. It's cynical as hell, but magazines are desperate these days and they'd be idiots not to get the cash while they can.
I watched Sunset Boulevard this weekend (had it out from Netflix) after reading Vanity Fair's old articles on Michael Jacksons "odd years" and molestation trial. It was an interesting context to watch that movie in, really made me look at it a bit more deeply.
According to Roger Friedman, who has always had an inside source at the Jackson camp:
Joe Jackson is blowing smoke up everybody's ass with his complaints about not seeing the will. The executor is a long time friend and attorney who is out of town until Monday, at the earliest. Joe is just pissed that HE isn't the executor.
@heykoukla: This has always intrigued me. Like the sisters I knew with British parents but were born and raised entirely in the US. Heavy British accents on both of them. How they can keep that up in NY is beyond me...
I've heard a lot of talk on TV about the possible catalog of unheard music. If that's the case, I imagine it will make him a great deal of money. I wonder if the revenue will go to his children, or...
It will be interesting to see how his will fleshes out when all is said and done. He did have a will, didn't he? Do we know as much for sure?
@DuchessofHazards: try vanityfair.com/ They have done a series of articles about him over the years, but they certainly did not believe in innocent until proven guilty.
@DuchessofHazards: That's a bit tricky, actually. Most of the stuff that's online seems to be posted by those who either are completely convinced he was an abuser who got away with it, or those who are obsessed with the man and think he could do no wrong. So you tend to get two extremes posting their opinions and articles to back them up.
"It will be the magazine's first commemorative issue released since 9/11."
Seriously? SERIOUSLY? Time to calm down now, ladies and gents. How many times can you bear to hear fellow performers say the same five lovely things about him and how long can you bear to hear the media wax poetic about what a sad life he had while completely ignoring the fact that they had a huge part in his downfall?
@isacloud: I understand a degree of it. He was an iconic for whom many people had lots of very fond memories. But seriously, we didn't know him AT ALL, not even through his music. We knew his music, which is alive and well, so let's move on now.
@LaComtesse: Exactly. Exactly exactly exactly. The very fact that, to me, it's being put on the same level as 9/11 just blows my mind. Americans and our pop culture, I guess.
@LaComtesse: I think it seems artificial to me because, particularly in the media, he was reviled/mocked for so many years and now he's practically elevated to deity status. My friends, who I have never heard even mention him, are suddenly in mourning. I feel the same abstract sort of sadness I feel when I hear about *anyone* I don't know (an acquaintance of an acquaintance, for example) dying, so I know I don't get it at all... But it does seem weird since, as you said, there's still the music and the videos and a public life well documented.
@electricbubbles: why? His work was more than just "pop culture". He was art. He was global. He was huge. He meant so much to so many people, more than were affected by 9/11.
@cwisto moweina has got yer goat: Ok, comparing the two is not a discussion I wanted to get into. I just meant that we can't disregard important cultural phenomenons just because they aren't politically important or serious b'ness topics.
To me, it's inspiring that people can come together over something that is not a tragedy. Yes his death is sad and his later life got really weird, but what we're really coming together over is his body of work as an entertainer, which is positive and inspiring.
@BeckySharper: Yeah. It's not even that I don't expect it to get media attention, or even to obstruct actual news for a day or so. But that this is overshadowing* say, the fact that the Iranian government just arrested a whole bunch of British nationals OUT OF THE EMBASSY is gross.
*Not an indictment against this site, which is a celebrity news site after all. It's an indictment those that AREN'T.
@Vivi21: See, here is what gets me. The idea that MJ is "IT" the self-proclaimed "King of Pop" and all this public rending of garments is simply his due. Everyone is all "he was a genius". Yes, I suppose he was very talented and he was ever-present when I was a kid and a teen. I love "Billie Jean" and PYT. I hate the post 1993-MJ, though.
However, his public outpouring is, to my mind, out of proportion. I remember when Elvis died. I remember when John Lennon died. I remember when Johnny Cash died. I could go on and on and on. In my mind, Johnny Cash kicks MJ's ass on talent and impact upon pop-culture and pop music. Hell, I think George Harrison kicks MJ's ass, historically.
The MJ mourning is very MTV-centric which seems silly to me. I was there when MTV was born and I watched it die (suffocated by crap reality TV). I suspect this is a heavily generational media driven example of emotional outpouring (at least in the US and on the TV/net). Perhaps because the media/net is largely represented by people who are stunned that they are mortal b/c MJ died (sorry, but the sarcasm is intended) and this is the very first "big" celebrity death. I don't know.
Now, simply yanking out other artists as comparison doesn't diminish MJ's contributions. But, it does seem to lend a sense of proportion - to me, at least. And I am not telling anyone they can't mourn him- I don't really care. I'm just saying that the nationwide "Princess Di-fest" is too much.(Yeah, I remembered when she died, too. And let me say, her fame was not waning when she died and the world went a little crazy).
He was not the biggest star the world has ever seen. That is false. His level of fame and notoriety for the last 16 years is proof that he was seriously on the wane- at least, in America. (If you are foreign, I'm not being an egocentric American but rather I'm sick of him on my TV and in my face everyday in America. You are welcome to your own headlines and pop culture, etc.)
Finally, the objections to the media frenzy are not narcissistic nor asshattery. I object to the dismissal of the last 16 years as "issues", etc. I refuse to let him off the hook for his personal life and all the gilt-edged remembrances (from journalists -not family & Friends) failing to be evenhanded are beginning to really irritate me. The NY Times obituary even gives shortshrift to the last 16 years.
@lolacat: I get what you are saying about the media. I actually kind of hate the media in this country because they harp on pop culture stories for such a long time to the detriment of important world events, thereby contributing to the general ignorance that many people in this country have regarding what is going on in the world today. I think a few days of news stories on MJ is entirely sufficient, but I do also think that a commemorative magazine is warranted in this case. I personally put him on par with Johnny Cash and John Lennon as a musical genius who had a great impact on other performers.
As for him not being the biggest music star of all time, it is true that this is somewhat subjective. However, you can't argue with the fact that "Thriller" is (and continues to be) the best-selling album of all time and that people the world over go nuts for the guy. I could be wrong, but I don't think that another musician will come close to the numbers he put up in my lifetime.
And yeah, he became a bizarre freak-show in the 90s and up until his death, but despite that, I still think his music in the 70s and 80s was amazing. I think you can celebrate the guy's music and contributions to the entertainment industry while acknowledging the fact that he was a very sick individual (although the jury is still out on the child molestation charges in my eyes--he totally had inappropriate relationships with those young boys, but I'm not completely convinced that it crossed over to molestation and I'm not sure we'll ever really know).
In any case, I think that at least for now the media is not going to focus so much on the more lurid aspects of his life, although I wouldn't be surprised to see some things come out soon enough. But I think that if people want to mourn for him, they should. I'm moving on now, after a few days of nostalgia and bittersweet memories, but for some people, he was huge and I don't think it's right for other people to denigrate that, just as I don't think it's right for people to mock those who don't feel much one way or the other about MJ's passing.
@Vivi21: My point was- not to diminish MJ but rather put a little perspective on it. That's why I used Elvis, John Lennon and Johnny Cash. Then, for the personal opinion, I used George Harrison. You are right, superstar genius is subjective.
Time will tell if Neverland becomes a destination like Graceland or Strawberry Fields. Though, imo, I doubt it.
I think that since so much of this is about the media then I have the right (and to someone who believes as I do) the obligation to object. To my mind, this is less about MJ, as a real person, than it is is about media. This is the viewship #'s of the OJ trial and Princess Di's divorce. This is a cash cow - to the media. Since, so much of this is about money, then why shouldn't I be indignant that it is a public gilding of someone I don't think deserves it.
Public opinion can be shaped and created by the media. I don't feel it is appropriate to gild this lily. And I think calling bullshit on the media is perfectly legitimate.
Again, if you love him, good for you. If you are in mourning, it is your right. I'm not denigrating or mocking anyone BUT MJ and the media. However, I'm commenting on Jezebel. I am not standing outside his parent's house and picketing. I'm not sending e-mails to his friends. Also, I tend to threads that are critical of MJ rather than the "I love him and mourn him" threads. He isn't entitled to universal approval. No one is.
I keep saying it, but my generation has lost their Elvis.
In fact, Michael Jackson may actually be bigger than Elvis, because Jackson toured extensively world-wide, whereas Elvis never performed outside of North America. I guarantee you could go to the smallest village in the most remote part of the world, and the people there would know who Michael Jackson is.
@IAmDoingThis: Not to be obnoxious, but no, many people in the world haven't heard of him. In India, Nepal, Pakistan, Northern Thailand, mountains in Mexico, (all places ive traveled)there were entire villages/towns that had never heard any western music. i know cos it was a hobby of mine to quiz them. "not even the Beatles? madonna, michael jackson, elvis?" "no, no, no and no". Funny enough, there was one village in the himalayan mountains in nepal where somehow they had gotten ahold of that 'barbie girl' (by aqua, i think) song on cd (maybe from another tourist). so they LOVED that song, and sang it constantly yet had never heard of the beatles. the world isn't quite as small as we think, but is often much more bizarre!
Re: Michelle Pfeiffer...my personal opinion is that anything surgical or involving botulism being injected in the face is the opposite of 'letting go and aging gracefully.' But it's a personal choice that everyone has to make for themselves.
06/28/09
Not even to mention that he was so cute when he was black and what a bizarre sense of self he had to have to do it, but HOW?
06/28/09
06/28/09
My feelings are complicated, but, I hope he has found some peace, and his music was truly amazing.
06/28/09
way home through Beverly Hills, taking an old shortcut to avoid Sunset. "Don't Stop" was on my ipod because, before MJ died, that was my go-to happy
song. I turned a corner and to my complete surprise came upon the
front of MJ's house - hundreds of people in the street, police barricades,
candles, piles of roses, home-made signs stuck to the trees
and fences. It was such a haunting feeling. I was listening to this song, looking
at the place where his life ended.
06/28/09
haunted.
06/28/09
I liked what you said. That must have been a really weird feeling to see that unexpectedly :(
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
Love that movie.
06/28/09
Billy Mays (the pitchman who yells on TV) was found dead at his house.
I can has end of death, plz?!
06/28/09
06/28/09
Joe Jackson is blowing smoke up everybody's ass with his complaints about not seeing the will. The executor is a long time friend and attorney who is out of town until Monday, at the earliest. Joe is just pissed that HE isn't the executor.
[www.showbiz411.com]
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
It will be interesting to see how his will fleshes out when all is said and done. He did have a will, didn't he? Do we know as much for sure?
06/28/09
When he was alive I never wanted to read about it.
Now, that he's dead I'm curious.
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
"It will be the magazine's first commemorative issue released since 9/11."
Seriously? SERIOUSLY? Time to calm down now, ladies and gents. How many times can you bear to hear fellow performers say the same five lovely things about him and how long can you bear to hear the media wax poetic about what a sad life he had while completely ignoring the fact that they had a huge part in his downfall?
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
@electricbubbles: Yeah, that's just gross.
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09
To me, it's inspiring that people can come together over something that is not a tragedy. Yes his death is sad and his later life got really weird, but what we're really coming together over is his body of work as an entertainer, which is positive and inspiring.
06/28/09
06/28/09
*Not an indictment against this site, which is a celebrity news site after all. It's an indictment those that AREN'T.
06/28/09
However, his public outpouring is, to my mind, out of proportion. I remember when Elvis died. I remember when John Lennon died. I remember when Johnny Cash died. I could go on and on and on. In my mind, Johnny Cash kicks MJ's ass on talent and impact upon pop-culture and pop music. Hell, I think George Harrison kicks MJ's ass, historically.
The MJ mourning is very MTV-centric which seems silly to me. I was there when MTV was born and I watched it die (suffocated by crap reality TV). I suspect this is a heavily generational media driven example of emotional outpouring (at least in the US and on the TV/net). Perhaps because the media/net is largely represented by people who are stunned that they are mortal b/c MJ died (sorry, but the sarcasm is intended) and this is the very first "big" celebrity death. I don't know.
Now, simply yanking out other artists as comparison doesn't diminish MJ's contributions. But, it does seem to lend a sense of proportion - to me, at least. And I am not telling anyone they can't mourn him- I don't really care. I'm just saying that the nationwide "Princess Di-fest" is too much.(Yeah, I remembered when she died, too. And let me say, her fame was not waning when she died and the world went a little crazy).
He was not the biggest star the world has ever seen. That is false. His level of fame and notoriety for the last 16 years is proof that he was seriously on the wane- at least, in America. (If you are foreign, I'm not being an egocentric American but rather I'm sick of him on my TV and in my face everyday in America. You are welcome to your own headlines and pop culture, etc.)
Finally, the objections to the media frenzy are not narcissistic nor asshattery. I object to the dismissal of the last 16 years as "issues", etc. I refuse to let him off the hook for his personal life and all the gilt-edged remembrances (from journalists -not family & Friends) failing to be evenhanded are beginning to really irritate me. The NY Times obituary even gives shortshrift to the last 16 years.
06/28/09
As for him not being the biggest music star of all time, it is true that this is somewhat subjective. However, you can't argue with the fact that "Thriller" is (and continues to be) the best-selling album of all time and that people the world over go nuts for the guy. I could be wrong, but I don't think that another musician will come close to the numbers he put up in my lifetime.
And yeah, he became a bizarre freak-show in the 90s and up until his death, but despite that, I still think his music in the 70s and 80s was amazing. I think you can celebrate the guy's music and contributions to the entertainment industry while acknowledging the fact that he was a very sick individual (although the jury is still out on the child molestation charges in my eyes--he totally had inappropriate relationships with those young boys, but I'm not completely convinced that it crossed over to molestation and I'm not sure we'll ever really know).
In any case, I think that at least for now the media is not going to focus so much on the more lurid aspects of his life, although I wouldn't be surprised to see some things come out soon enough. But I think that if people want to mourn for him, they should. I'm moving on now, after a few days of nostalgia and bittersweet memories, but for some people, he was huge and I don't think it's right for other people to denigrate that, just as I don't think it's right for people to mock those who don't feel much one way or the other about MJ's passing.
06/28/09
Time will tell if Neverland becomes a destination like Graceland or Strawberry Fields. Though, imo, I doubt it.
I think that since so much of this is about the media then I have the right (and to someone who believes as I do) the obligation to object. To my mind, this is less about MJ, as a real person, than it is is about media. This is the viewship #'s of the OJ trial and Princess Di's divorce. This is a cash cow - to the media. Since, so much of this is about money, then why shouldn't I be indignant that it is a public gilding of someone I don't think deserves it.
Public opinion can be shaped and created by the media. I don't feel it is appropriate to gild this lily. And I think calling bullshit on the media is perfectly legitimate.
Again, if you love him, good for you. If you are in mourning, it is your right. I'm not denigrating or mocking anyone BUT MJ and the media. However, I'm commenting on Jezebel. I am not standing outside his parent's house and picketing. I'm not sending e-mails to his friends. Also, I tend to threads that are critical of MJ rather than the "I love him and mourn him" threads. He isn't entitled to universal approval. No one is.
06/28/09
In fact, Michael Jackson may actually be bigger than Elvis, because Jackson toured extensively world-wide, whereas Elvis never performed outside of North America. I guarantee you could go to the smallest village in the most remote part of the world, and the people there would know who Michael Jackson is.
06/28/09
06/28/09
06/28/09