<![CDATA[Jezebel: the politics of style]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: the politics of style]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/thepoliticsofstyle http://jezebel.com/tag/thepoliticsofstyle <![CDATA[One McCain Campaign Disaster That Wasn't Sarah Palin's Fault]]> That would be the so-called "$150,000 shopping spree" for Sarah Palin's convention rollout that spawned a thousand charges of hypocrisy. The stylist who dressed Palin and her family has broken her silence to defend both herself and the candidate.

When news broke a year ago that Palin and her family's wardrobe cost $150,000, they were portrayed as white trash overreaching on the Republican National Committee's dime, touting their folksy values while spending an amount that even the fashion folk found excessive. After the McCain-Palin ticket lost, an anonymous McCain aide told Newsweek that the Palins were ""Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast."

Palin writes in her book, Going Rogue, that she "never asked the New York stylists to purchase clothes, many of the items were never worn, many others were intended for the use of other people, and in the end the wardrobe items were all returned. It certainly wasn't true that I or my family had been on any kind of ‘big-time shopping trips.'"

Now, speaking to the New York Times and in a new book, New York-based stylist Lisa A. Kline backs the former Alaska governor up, saying Palin wasn't involved in any of the shopping, and a still-foggy "breakdown in communications" between Kline and the campaign staff led to the charges being racked up.

Those include Klein's purchases for Palin at Barneys and Saks Fifth Avenue in New York (at retail, since it was so last-minute), a frenzied run at Neiman Marcus to the tune of $75,062 once Kline realized she needed to dress the whole family, plus her own fee of $54,900, which included an assistant, a seamstress, and round-the-clock labor on a holiday weekend.

Kline says she's still proud of her work, which also included removing gold buttons and "a big swoop of fabric" from the front of a $2,500 Valentino jacket, worn by Palin with a pencil skirt for her convention speech. And even if it wasn't at all worth the headache to the Republicans, you can't deny that Palin and her family looked great that night — the night that was probably the peak of her glory.

Stylist in Palin's Fashion Makeover Steps Into View [New York Times]

Earlier: Sarah Palin and the (Continued) Case of the $150,000 Wardrobe

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5408346&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Drag We Can Believe In]]> RuPaul believes that Obama's presidency will help bring drag back: "It's huge, the hope thing. Most people think of hope as an intangible concept, but hope is really, really big." [Details]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5147374&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Should The Obama Daughters Be Dressed?]]> Fashion-wise, American girls are careening between Meth Belly Pirate Slutoween costumes, bedazzled jean jackets worn with heels and blush and tramps-in-training T-shirts. Since Sasha and Maila Obama are about to become the most visible American girls in the world, WWD wonders, what should they wear?

The style bible asked several children's wear designers to imagine inauguration ensembles for the First Daughters. The styles range between colorful skirts and classic, full-skirted dresses — there's even a black velvet pinafore of sorts — but all of the sketches (except for the Bonnie Young evening gowns) seem rather old-fashioned.

(At left, a design by Lucy Sykes; center, a dress by Olive Juice; right, coats by Best & Co.)

Sasha, 7, and Malia, 10, are modern young ladies, not porcelain dolls. Yes, they should look classic, yes, they should look appropriate. But isn't there something antiquated or passé about a little girl in a dress with a Sound Of Music bow at the waist? Clearly, velour pants with "Juicy" emblazoned across the ass would not be appropriate. But. If their father is running on a platform of change, couldn't that be represented in Sasha and Malia's style?

Inauguration '09: And for the Girls..., Obama Girls Influence Style [WWD]
Earlier: The Politics Of Style: An Obama-Inspired Shopping Spree At J. Crew
Imagine: A Project Runway Inauguration Dress For Michelle Obama

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5101929&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[NY Times Discovers That Women Like Hollywood And Washington Heavyweights]]> Today's New York Times 'Thursday Styles' section takes a minute to note that other, less high-brow publications have suddenly gotten interested in politics. In fact, they report that everyone from People to US Weekly to TMZ to Inside Edition are covering the race alongside less important stories like Britney's recent weight loss and Lauren Conrad's supposed sex tape. What gives? As the one Jezebel contributor who knows too much about politics, nothing about fashion and writes for Glamour magazine's relatively new political blog, Glamocracy (which should have been a case-in-point for the New York Times, but bygones), I have some thoughts that boil down to: women are complex and interesting creatures with varying interests and politics are important!

The Times' Julie Bosman thinks it's amusing that the same magazines and televisions that cover the ins and outs of celebrity breeding, fighting, sexing and weight-loss are also covering (some) of the ins and outs of the campaign — and not just where it intersects with celebrity, as was the case in 2004. What's even more interesting is that the editors are all doing it not as a public-service but because its what readers actually want!

It is also because having a woman and a young, photogenic man in the race hits the right notes, demographically speaking — the vast majority of readers of magazines like US Weekly are women. Many of those readers are, for the first time, paying close attention to the presidential primaries, and turning politics into dinner-party conversation.
Oh, and, in addition, the editors all agree that covering politics actually drives ratings and readership numbers up. Who knew anything short of rehab and crotch shots could do that?

Anyway, as a woman who writes for two women's sites and almost exclusively about politics, I have to say, I'm not really surprised that women are interested in politics and I don't think it's just because Barack is cute or Hillary's a woman. (Maybe it has something to do with old adage about Washington, D.C. and the town being like Hollywood for ugly people.) I might have approached Anna when I was let go from a certain political website and asked to keep doing Crappy Hour and other stuff, but, interestingly Glamour also approached me talk about writing for Glamocracy. Both of these places pay me to write about politics because both Jezebel readers and Glamour readers want to read about politics and talk about issues and rally for candidates and generally act like responsible citizens of this democracy while they also talk about Rock of Love or Heidi Montag's bad attitude. Many women, in fact, enjoy walking, chewing gum and thoughtfully debating the merits of health care policy and the problems with race in America today while cooing over cute shoes. I just hope it continues after the election because I'll still have bills to pay come December.

Sex? Yawn. Politics? That's Hot! [New York Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388591&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Memo To Hillary: Here's How To Dress For Success]]> The Guardian's scrappy fashion writer, Hadley Freeman, is fielding questions from readers today, one of whom asks: "Why does Hillary Clinton wear such bad clothes? With a budget that big, surely she can afford a stylist? And does it matter?" In response, Freeman argues that it's really hard to be Senator Clinton since the Christian right is trying to nail her for being a demonic, sexualized, dictatorial vagina and, compared to stylish opponent Barack Obama, "Clinton has to hide herself in garishly coloured squares going under the name of 'jackets', or else risk being dismissed as so vain that she would be too busy putting on her lipstick to respond to an international terror threat." Freeman, however, has issues with Clinton's now-ubiquitous yellow pantsuits, arguing that the Senator "is doing what she thinks she should as opposed to having a splinter of courage and being true to herself. Which kinda makes you wonder what sort of leader she would be." Agree? Disagree? Regardless, I decided to offer Senator Clinton a tutorial on some of the major American designers with some suggestions for what to wear on the campaign trail.

AP070908047445.jpgDoes it get more all-American than Ralph Lauren? I think not. So why doesn't Senator Clinton take a page out of the Ellen DeGeneres handbook and go for some men's tailored pieces? That should erase any doubts about answering that damn phone at three in the morning. AP080208031981.jpgAnd yet, it's important for Hillary to prove she's not too square: Which is why she needs the rebel of American fashion, Marc Jacobs, who also happens to be a vocal Hillary supporter. And who, conveniently enough, designed his fall collection around the idea of Paul Revere. Viva la revolution, Hills. AP080206026090.jpgOh hell, why not just give in and forget the menswear-inspired womenswear and wear menswear itself? Can't you see this Michael Kors look on Nantucket? AP071203021473.jpgNo? Not so much? Well, this Oscar de la Renta ensemble is perfect for both a beach weekend, and a ladies' luncheon on the campaign trail. Casual is accessible. Yellow pantsuits are not. AP070909021878.jpgAnd if H-Rod does ever feel like wearing a skirt for a change, this Peter Som look is feminine and strong and not, y'know, menstrual. hils.jpgWhat commander-in-chief doesn't have a leather frock coat? Thanks, Derek Lam. AP070910015349.jpgAnd if she does win, I say she should wear this Carolina Herrera to the inaugural ball. It screams 'I'm ready on Day One!'.

[Images via AP.]

Earlier: Future First Ladies Should Be Judged Solely On Fashion

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368851&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hillary Clinton's Hair Part (Sorta) Matches Her Politics]]> Eight years ago in weird, possibly bullshit "studies", anthropologists came to the conclusion that a left-handed part in the hair is both more common on men and a way to call attention, subconsciously, to the left (rational, analytical, supposedly manly) side of the brain. (Their findings follow that women who part their hair on the left are so-called "tough" chicks, often battling it out in male-dominated industries.) A part on the right of a man's head however, signals both eccentricity and a need to show off. (A right-handed part on a woman is a sign of femininity, caring, and nurturing.) As for those with no part? "Balanced, trustworthy, and wise." In the interest of political "science" (and as a way to combat boredom on a slow, Friday afternoon) we decided to take a page from our sister site Wonkette and put the country's current presidential candidates and their spouses to the test, to see who, uh, parts which way. Join us, won't you, in the gallery which begins below?

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334119&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[J.Crew Vs. George W: Preppy Style Never Seemed So Subversive]]> Republican prepsters/Alex P. Keaton wannabes will rue the day they bought their seersucker suits, brushed-cotton blazers and striped belts from J. Crew. Dr. Peggy Drexler, wife of the company's CEO Mickey Drexler? Not such an enormous fan of the Bush administration! See, Dr. Drexler (a noted psychiatrist and psychologist) is a little unhappy about Jenna Bush's impending nuptials. Because she's just positive that George W. (and, by extension, Jenna) will not wait until after he's out of office to hold the wedding.

[A] White House Wedding will be great politics. It could be a terrific way to hook women — who are the angriest about the war, and one of the biggest problems for Republicans going into the election. Women — even the angry ones — are going to eat this up...The father of the bride is responsible for the loss close to 4,000 American lives, the lives of uncounted Iraqis, and many thousands of injured and maimed... But on this day... eyes will grow moist, and approval ratings will rise.

It is sad to say, but Drexler is pretty much on the money. Because if the TheKnot.com message boards are any indication, people looooove them a wedding. Even when there is a war going on. (Especially when there's a war going on!) We'd make a joke that the whole thing is something so sick only Karl Rove could have dreamed it up but then we remembered that little Jenna's fiance is none other than Rove's former intern.

Here's To The Happy Couple — And A 10-Point Bump [Huffington Post]
Related: Afghan Weddings Bring Limos And Bling

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292184&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who Wore It Best: Republican NH Debate Edition]]> We were super excited to try our hand at critiquing the presidential candidates in last night's Republican debate in New Hampshire after giving their Dem counterparts the once-over on Monday. After all, these pols are all white Christian dudes! And as such, they just love telling us exactly what we should not be doing with our bodies, our taxes, our military resources... we could go on forever! So we decided to turn the tables and give them a few things to mull over.

mccain.jpgJohn McCain: The Arizona senator screams Politician 101, with his blue shirt with a red and blue striped tie. The quintessential white guy running for office uniform.

giuliani.jpgRudy Giuliani: Rudy's red tie also says he's a white guy running for office. It's also a visual clue that he's a Republican for any of those other Republicans worried that all that crazy NYC liberalism might've rubbed-off on him during that unfortunate mayoral stint. Also, red tie = Christian white dude.

romney.jpgMitt Romney: Funny, but the former governor of Massachusetts is also a... white Christian dude. But he's a Mormon, mind you, and distinguishes this by going with slightly-alt politician blue as opposed to slightly-conservative red. But it's still one of the two go-to politician tie colors, so we can rest assured that he still doesn't want us to have an abortion.

huckabee.jpgSam Brownback: Whoa, Brownback almost threw us for a loop there. The senator from Kansas' tie is neither red nor blue! Thank goodness he's Christian and white or else that green-hued tie might have misled us to believe he's one of those wacky, God-hating, Negro environmentalists!

brownback.jpgTommy Thompson: White shirt, red tie, angry hands: The former governor of Wisconsin is also definitely (just want to hammer this home one more time!) a Christian white dude running for the Republican nomination. The suit and tie alone, we know, just say plain ol' politician, but the angry hands screaming about why we have to rid out country of the evils of gay marriage (you know, as opposed to dependence on foreign oil) totes says "I [Heart] The GOP" even more than an "I [Heart] The GOP" t-shirt would.

huckabeedebate.jpgMike Huckabee: The former governor of Arkansas also sports classic blue — but in a subtle pattern! We'd worry that 'pattern' might equate 'Democrat' (if not also, possibly, 'homo' — the gays like patterns, don't they?), but, thankfully, he's a guy who hates Darwin. Sleep safely tonight, Republicans — this man's no fashion fag.

tancredo.jpgTom Tancredo: Also known as poor man's Giuliani, the representative from Colorado whose last name (tread lightly, friend, tread lightly) also belies an ethnic heritage is wearing (yawn) a white shirt with (yawn) a red tie and (yawn) a dark suit.

gilmore.jpgJim Gilmore: He's the former governor of Virginia. White shirt. Red tie. Dark suit. Christian. White. Male. Gilmore bores us, and we'd like to stop trying to think of something that sets him apart from his fellow candidates (he's even sporting the Republican angry hands, damnit!), but we just can't and would rather go back to watching the Kathy Griffin marathon we TiVo'd. (No, you people don't want to watch with us. Kathy likes gays and hates the war.)

duncan.jpgDuncan Hunter: Duncan, Duncan, Duncan; What's with that ambiguously dark tie? If this guy wasn't a [insert obviousness here], that whole "I'm from California" thing + the die would totally yield some major Republican mud-slinging. But whatever, almost no one's ever heard of him anyway.

ronpaul.jpgRon Paul: Uh, oh, Ron's wearing blue. And he's got some sorta funny pin on his jacket. This can't be helping his fellow Republicans' suspicions that he's actually...a Communist spy. Thank god he didn't wear pink!

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=266620&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who Wore It Best? New Hampshire Debate Edition]]> As we face a grueling six months before primary season for the 2008 presidential election begins, it's time to start hunkering down and examining the sad facts that help us pick our candidate. Sure, there's immigration, and social security, and the whole who opposed the Iraq war first/loudest question, but what we've always known was most important was CLOTHES. Well, clothes and grooming! Lest you think they are all dressed the same, our guide to the subtleties of the campaign sartorial code, after the jump.

johnedwards0603.jpgJohn Edwards: Classic high-low, the former North Carolina senator accessorizes the $400 haircut with a $10 Livestrong bracelet. Perhaps a subtle nod to "Two Americas"? The red tie indicates: "I am a political candidate."

joebiden0603.jpgJoe Biden: Gets the whole "black suit" thing right, but the New England homespun-tie thing (are those little whales?) makes him look like a carpetbagger in N.H. since he's from, ahem, Delaware.

billrichardson0603.jpgApparently Bills who become president — you know, like Taft! — are men of appetites, and we bet that if we look a little closer New Mexico governor Bill Richardson's tie might have some stains on it. We hear he likes ladies, and we sense he also likes chalupas, and with the black suit sealing the deal we'd vote for him on the basis of sloppy Clinton nostalgia. Or wait a minute, on the basis of sound immigration policies?

mikegravel0603.jpgMike Gravel: Did someone forget to tell former Alaskan senator Gravel that a grumpy face doesn't go with a bright red tie? But still, nice suit! So Alaska elected a Democrat once?

chrisdodd0603.jpgChris Dodd: Setting himself apart from his fellow candidates, Dodd forgoes the classic politician blue-and-red color scheme for a black suit, white shirt, and black tie. How Lagerfeld! But wait, if we don't know who Chris Dodd is, should he really be spending his money on clothing?

kucinich0603.jpgDennis Kucinich does not have a chance, but he does have a really hot underage wife, who clearly accessorized him for this debate. Still, something about that suit screams "You could vote for me."

hillaryobama0603.jpgObama goes with the shiny, wide-ish baby blue tie that was a fave of Clinton before being co-opted by Bush II, which is sort of like if Sienna Miller started wearing Burberry plaid again a la circa-1997 Kate Moss. Message: Here is a candidate so "clean" and "bright" he can restore dignity not only to the Democratic Party but to the shiny blue tie! Also: The black suit says "Oval Office Material." Hillary's black suit, incidentally, also says "Oval Office Material" — even if her spruced-up makeup and highlights aren't quite enough to say "getting some in the Oval Office material."

[Images via AP]

Earlier: Liveblogging Letterman: All Mulatto Edition!]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265763&view=rss&microfeed=true