<![CDATA[Jezebel: The End of Girlhood]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: The End of Girlhood]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/the end of girlhood http://jezebel.com/tag/the end of girlhood <![CDATA[ 'Miss Bimbo' Creators: "Take Care Of Your Bimbo, Nurture Her, Love Her" ]]> Ann Curry and company over at the Today show were just as incredulous about the internet game for burgeoning skanks, Miss Bimbo, as we were. In the clip above from this morning's broadcast, two adorable English moppets named Jasmine and Poppy enjoy Miss Bimbo's "big jugs and facelifts," and the dudes behind the game defend Miss Bimbo with straight faces. The pair of floppy haired founders say things like, "It's a morally positive, fun game..."What about loving your bimbo, taking care of your bimbo, sending her to university?"


Earlier: New Game Encourages Young Girls To Embrace Their Inner "Bimbo"

]]>
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:30:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373473&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New Game Encourages Young Girls To Embrace Their Inner "Bimbo" ]]> bimbocity32508.jpgThere's a new game in England and France for girls ages 9 to 16, and it's so raunchy it makes Bratz dolls look positively Pollyanna-ish. Called "Miss Bimbo", the game is essentially an online competition in which each registered player is given a "Bimbo" all her own to take care of — sort of like those Tamagotchi pets, but, well, not. According to Miss Bimbo rules, the goal of the game is to make your Bimbo the " the hottest of hot Bimbos," which involves dating "that famous hottie," becoming a "socialite and skyrocket[ing] to the top of fame and popularity," and even resorting "to meds or plastic surgery", because girls should "Stop at nothing to become the reigning bimbo!" According to CNN, "Breast implants sell at 11,500 bimbo dollars and net the buyer 2,000 bimbo attitudes, making her more popular on the site."

Parents are understandably up in arms over the game, which, after a launch last month, has, at the time of this writing, 204,714 "registered Bimbos." Bill Hibbard, a member of the parents' rights group ParentKind, tells the Guardian, "It is one thing if a child recognises it as a silly and stupid game. But the danger is that a nine-year-old fails to appreciate the irony and sees the bimbo as a cool role model. Then the game becomes a hazard and a menace. Children's innocence should be protected as far as possible. It depends on the background and mindset of the child but the danger is that after playing the game some will then aspire to have breast operations and take diet pills."

Miss Bimbo, at first glance, is free for registrants, but when players run out of virtual bimbo money, they are given the option to buy Bimbo text messages which cost £1.50 ($2.99) per message and give players extra dollars to spend on their Bimbos. A French man has already sued Miss Bimbo's Gallic sister site after his daughter ran up a text message bill of over £100 ($199).

As for the creators of Miss Bimbo, well, the game's 23-year-old creator Nicolas Jacquart tells the Times of London, "The game is structured in such a way that it simply mirrors real life in a tongue-in-cheek way. It is not a bad influence for young children. They learn to take care of their bimbos." He continues: "The missions and goals for the bimbos are morally sound and teach children about the real world. If they eat too much chocolate in the game, it is bad for their bimbos' bodies and their happiness levels compared to if they eat fruit and vegetables, which reinforces positive healthy eating messages.The breast operations are just one part of the game and we are not encouraging young girls to have them." Maybe we should teach Jacquart a lesson through the patented Jezebel justice system. Perhaps some time cleaning bed pans on an eating disorder ward would do the trick?

Alarm As Dolls Get Breast Implants In 'Miss Bimbo' Game [CNN]
Internet Miss Bimbo Game For Girls Attacked By Parents [Guardian]
Miss Bimbo Website Promotes Extreme Diets And Surgery To 9-Year-Olds [Times of London]

]]>
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:40:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371788&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Are Rap Videos Turning Young Girls Into Drunken, Stoner Floozies? ]]> bigpimpin.jpgResearchers studied rap videos and found that they sexualized women, placed too much emphasis on their physical appearance and treated them more as decorative objects rather than "active agents." Uh, doesn't that hold true for most of pop culture and advertising? It's so annoying how rap and hip hop are always being called out for that, when there are plenty of equally (if not more) offensive other influences in the media. Anyway, after interviewing over 500 African-American women (ages 14-18), researchers found that the young women who spent more time watching rap videos were more likely to "binge drink, have sex with multiple partners, test positive for marijuana and have a negative body image." Is it just me, or does that just sound like the life of a majority of teen girls, regardless of race or music video preference? And sure, the negative body image stuff is always bad, but the rest of it actually sounds like tons of fun to me.

The researchers say that such behavior is influenced by rap videos and that the "glamorized depictions of alcohol use often portrayed in conjunction with sexual imagery and portrayals of drug use are often depicted as normal." Well, for some of us, it is. Especially when you're a teenager interested in experimentation. I don't necessarily believe such behavior — which the researchers labeled as "risky" — is always so bad. The study concluded that there is a "need for greater awareness and education about the risks associated with this media exposure. Maybe people need to stop worrying about sheltering girls and instead focus on teaching boys to start respecting them.

Sexy Rap Videos Suspected To Be Damaging To Young Girls [Reuters, via Feministing]

]]>
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:30:00 EDT Tracie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312658&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Tramps-In-Training' Author Speaks, Dodges Tween Bullets ]]> buyitnow083107.jpgYesterday, we told you about one mom's struggle with finding appropriate clothing for her 11-year-old daughter, since so much of the fashion in stores seems to be aimed at "tramps-in-training." The Slate piece started a huge discussion on their message boards (and with our own Jezebel commenters!) Later, the writer, Emily Yoffe, went online to take readers' questions. Some highlights, from the transcript: One mother writes:
I have an almost 10 year old who has been eyeing those push-up bras. Somehow the matching bra/undie and panties set will no longer do in her mind. I have caught her in the mirror squeezing her "buds" together commenting that they are growing. We are definitely in scary territory.

Yoffe responds:

Every little girl who is developing is going to have excited/scared/thrilled reactions to what's happening. My objection is when the stores say, "Here's a push-up wonderbra for those breast buds of yours!
A mom in Wisconsin:
What is the right age to let my daughter start wearing thongs? She wants them now and she's 13. Does anyone else have this problem?
Yoffe:
Why would a 13 year old want a thong? Does she want it to be seen in her low-rise jeans? I don't know what the right age for thongs is, but I'd say 13 isn't it.
I wonder what the right age is, too. 15? 16? 18? 21? Should you be able to wear a thong before you can vote or drink legally?

Lastly, there was this:

u r such a deiscarise [ed: disgrace?] to girls maybe some girls like push up bras and want to grow up faster so y dont u get a life
Yoffe:
Another mother who buys this stuff for her daughter.
Uh, actually, we have a feeling that was the daughter.

Dresed Down [Slate]
Earlier: Young Girls Today: Tramps In Training?

]]>
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295542&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Young Girls Today: Tramps In Training? ]]> ileftmybrain083007.jpgOver on Slate, Emily Yoffe wrote a piece about trying to find appropriate clothing for her 11-year-old daughter. She went to teen-friendly store Limited Too and found padded bras, T-shirts with phrases like "I left my brain in my locker," and underwear with the slogan, "Buy It Now, Tell Dad Later!" Abercrombie and Macy's were similar minefields, and the writer made a point of avoiding Victoria's Secret: "their clothing was emblazoned with the words 'University of Pink.' (I don't want to know that school's most popular major.)" Now, there's a round up of the Slate message boards following the story.

The dialogue is mostly from moms who identify with Yoffe's plaint, saying that these days, young girls look like "tramps in training." But other posters suggest that the moms need to relax. Says one poster, "For what it's worth, I am anecdotal evidence that these shopping choices do not lead to tweenhood delinquency, promiscuity, and death."

It's a tough call. We don't have kids, but we did go to school in the 80s — in miniskirts so short we joked that they were belts; leopard print dresses that were actually vintage slips, and, uh, spandex shorts. And we turned out okay! (It helped that we were shopping with a Mom who'd worn many a micro-mini in her day.) Then again, kiddie thongs and Baby Phat duds hadn't been invented yet. Still, the other day we saw a saucy, lollipop-sucking teenager in a tiny skirt and a skin-tight red "You Know You Wish You Could Date Me" T-shirt, and we thought to ourselves, Hell yeah! Wear that crap now, while you can.

T.I.T. Wear [Slate]
Related: Lolita's Closet [Slate]

]]>
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295031&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dames Down Under Don't Like Underage Glamour Girls ]]> clarequirk081407.jpgIn this country, we're inundated with ads featuring very young women in sexualized poses, but in Australia, they're actually doing something about it. The Sydney Morning Herald reports that the country's Federal Minister for Communications, Helen Coonan, has ordered an inquiry into the sexual exploitation of children in advertising and the media. The leader of the political party known as the Australian Democrats, Lyn Allison, said that the sexualized images are damaging to young people.
"We're pushing children into being sexual beings much younger than they are ready," she said. "I find it sickening to see a 12-year-old girl with a pouty look on her face advertising sexy clothing. We're talking about children at the age of nine worrying whether they look sexy or not, and bras being targeted at four- to six-year-olds."

Claire Quirk, a 15-year-old model (pictured) was dropped from ads promoting Melbourne Fashion Week after the city council decided she was too young. What do you think they'd do if they found out about Bethany Conheeny or Sasha Bennington?
Push To Outlaw Sexy Child Ads [Sydney Morning Herald]
Earlier: Baby Babe: Jordan Spawns A CopyKitten
Little Lolitas: The UK's Narcissistic Pre-Teens

]]>
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289295&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Little Lolitas: The UK's Narcissistic Pre-Teens ]]> beautyaddict080607.jpgMost people would agree that it's cool if you feel better when you have a spray tan, or when you wax your legs and use Chanel foundation. But is it cool if you do all of these things and you are 9 years old? A report in the Daily Mail details the beauty regimens of some British girls who have decidedly adult habits. Belle, 11, gets her hair highlighted. Bethany, 9, gets pedicures and eyebrow waxes, and uses a flatiron on her hair. Sarah-Jane, 12, wore a sexy low cut black dress in a pageant last year. The bad news is that the mothers of these children are accomplices (One mom says: "I'm glad they like to look after themselves from such a young age.") The good news? Oh, there is no good news. Sorry!

Meet The Pre-Teen Beauty Addicts [DailyMail]
Earlier: Baby Babe: Jordan Spawns A CopyKitten

]]>
Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:45:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286339&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Point/Counterpoint: What's Up With Lipstick For 1st Graders? ]]> barbiemac061207.jpgEncouraged by sales of its makeup collaboration with MAC Cosmetics (left) Mattel is partnering with Bonne Bell to launch a Barbie-branded, "girl savvy" cosmetics line "aimed at girls 6 to 9" (Emphasis ours). After the jump, two Jezebel editors hash over whether Barbie-branded makeup for primary-schoolers is evil, innocent, or just a case of a company giving the kids what they want.

  • POINT Jesus Christ: Is nothing sacred anymore? Call me old-fashioned (or just the spawn of a '70s-era women's libber), but the years between 1st and 4rd grades are a time when little girls should be running around, skinning their knees and learning swear words; after all, they've got an entire lifetime in which to learn to be sex objects! But seriously, for those who believe that dolls are just child's play with negligible effects on ideals of beauty and self-worth, think again. This shit is so depressing it makes me never want to have kids.
  • COUNTERPOINT As a reporter who used to have to cover Mattel's unending struggle with what is known in the toy industry as "age compression" — in layman's terms, the reason girls' dolls look like anorexic, coke-addicted whores — I just see this as a pathetic attempt to make the Barbie brand relevant in the eyes of the Bratz demographic, which by six years old is already probably giving blow jobs anyway. But as a former kid, my thoughts are: Makeup is really, really cool. I mean, It makes you look sooooooo much prettier!
Mattel's Barbie And Bonne Bell To Push Makeup For Little Girls [MediaPost] Related: What Dolls Can Tell Us About Race In America [ABCNews] Department Of Marketing: Little Hotties [TheNewYorker] ]]>
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:15:55 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=268033&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It's A Veritable Pornapalooza ]]> girlsnextdoor.jpg
  • Porn is everywhere, and, not surprisingly, it's largely to blame for the rise in female exhibitionism and self-objectification (think MySpace, celebrity vagina shots, Paris Hilton). [CNN]
  • Black women with breast cancer have much lower survival rates than white women with the disease. [USAToday]
  • Fathers who take off their shirts before holding their babies apparently bond with them more. What's next, nursing? [Telegraph]
  • The terms "size zero" and "muffin top" have officially entered the lexicon. [Telegraph]
  • Palestinian, female TV anchors are being threatened with death unless they cover up while on camera. [Telegraph]
  • MeMe Roth, who famously called American Idol winner Jordin Sparks fat, is getting death threats now. [MSNBC]

]]>
Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:20:53 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265724&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Speechless ]]>
Best Week Ever has just posted what has to be the most disturbing video we've seen all day (other than Jenny getting harassed by the manager of Victoria's Secret, but that's a matter for tomorrow!). Taken from the new E! show Sunset Tan, the clip shows a young mother dragging her reluctant young daughter to a L.A. tanning salon and spending $1300 so that the girl "stands out" — "like Lindsay Lohan!" — for her primary-school pictures. Anyway, there's more horror within but we'll let the kids over at Best Week Ever sum up the insanity for us.

Unemployment Check: This Video Contains All The Reasons Why Our Society Is Doomed [BestWeekEver]

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 17:13:42 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264618&view=rss&microfeed=true