I go to a well respected liberal arts college that's SAT optional (I'm probably outing myself here, but whatever). Roughly half of students applying submit their scores for consideration (I did, but I also come from a socioeconomic background that allowed me to take a prep class, sit the test more than once, etc). We decided to go SAT optional a decade or so ago after doing a study and finding that SAT scores did not accurately predict/correlate with students' final GPAs, though it did correlate with their first-year GPAs by less than 1/10th of a point.
Probably a little more than half of my friends did not submit their scores. This is anecdotal, but I see no difference at all in terms of academic ability.
As for affirmative action -- I don't know. I'm a peer writing tutor, so I work with a lot of different students, and obviously, since it is a liberal arts colleges, there's a fair amount of writing involved in almost every discipline. I have consistently seen (again, this is just anecdotal) that those students that are likely recipients of affirmative action based on race often have maybe 5th-6th grade writing levels, and are unprepared for the rigor of college writing. I don't know that there is an easy solution to this, since I am probably a beneficiary of affirmative action as well and it's worked out well for me.
I was really grateful for the SAT... As a smarty pants nerd girl in a small town high school in Kansas, I had almost no AP classes, advanced math, or even extracurriculars to prove my merit to colleges. My guidance counselor was shocked when I asked for information about schools out of state. "What's wrong with KU?" - direct quote.
When I did very well on the PSATs, my mailbox was suddenly flooded with application info from everywhere. My standardized test scores definitely opened realms of possibility, and made me realize I had some kind of value that wasn't yet realized.
Are they perfectly fair? Nope.
One measure of a very particular type of performance only.
The problem with all of the pressure to succeed at standardized tests (ACT, SAT, AP, etc) is that it drives students to be entirely focused in solving the problem, instead of the Socratic style discussions that actually take place in college. So many of my classmates were so focused on getting all of the answers right, instead of taking risks and looking at the big picture that whenever a professor asked us "well, what do you think?", the entire classroom would be silent.
College is a differnt animal. Just because you got straight A's/high test scores doesn't mean that you'll get them in college. I had students petition the VP in charge of Academic Affairs because they were mad a professors gave them "bs" on papers instead of "As"
Can't we just have college admissions based on wacky Cambridge style interviews?
@brokestephenswoman: Honestly? I didn't even get a lot of in college, most certainly not in lower division, and I went to a pretty good school. Only when I started taking grad-level seminars was that kind of thinking really encouraged.
I think that some people are still able to get through college tackling it as a "job," the job being to maintain the GPA and all that stuff.
I am in the midst testing and soon college applications will be surrounding me, and I have to say standardized testing is one of the worst academic things I have ever had to do. Some of us just plain suck at standardized testing.
I'm in mostly honors and APs, I'm a journalism nerd, bookish and always up for discussions and I genuinely enjoy learning. My GPA is pretty high. But when it comes to SAT and ACT, lord help me. The first time I took the SAT I did not do too well, but I had a tutor, and so I took it another time and raised it over 100 points. It still just doesn't feel good enough so I signed up to take it again in October. Same with ACT. I've taken it once and I got a 25, not too bad, but I need to bump it up a few points for the state schools.
And I hate to put pressure like this on myself, but its just, I don't know, I feel like it has to be done. I'm in Florida, and the two main state schools - University of Florida and Florida State University, get so many applications that they really only can look at numbers. And there are some kids that just have a knack for testing. And it's incredibly stressful. I just want to be done with it. But I have to take ACT and SAT again and bump up my score just a little bit. It's the most stressful and annoying and competitive thing in the world and I cannot wait to be done with it.
My school is also a private, really hard, college preparatory school and there are kids there that are more competitive than you can imagine. And these kids kill themselves trying to get the best scores on SATs. I hate it. I cannot wait to be a second semester high school senior and know where I'm going to college.
@mannequin: Hey, I totally relate (although I wasn't quite as bright as you in high school :-)), I suck suck suck at those tests. You will do just fine. I know that isn't really any help, but you will.
I'm pretty familiar with the racial issues associated with the SATs, but I think too often we focus on race while ignoring class. A lot of how well students do on the SATs are related to things like their parents' level of education which can look like a racial issue since degrees aren't uniformly distributed across racial categories.
There is one benefit to the SAT- it can point out students who are particularly strong from inner city and rural areas. It was part of what it was designed for.
I think the US college admissions process is really insane between the SATs, GPAs, extracurriculars, and all of the obsessing. But I think the US probably does a better job with diverse students than some other countries. Students in the UK pretty much know where they can get in based on their predicted A levels, which gets rid of some pressure, but they don't really control for the differences in exposure and opportunity.
I'm wondering if this guy did poorly at Princeton because everything had gone easily for him up to that point in his life that he didn't know how to actually work. When I went to college, I found that a lot of people had terrible study skills because they had never actually had to study before.
Just one thing- the SAT doesn't claim to test aptitude anymore. SAT actually doesn't stand for anything. It's seriously just SAT.
How ridiculous is that? It used to stand for things. Now it's really just the SAT Reasoning Test. That's it.
I'll admit to being sort of part of the problem- I work for one of those giant test prep companies teaching SAT classes as of this summer. It pays better than any other job I can get at this point in my life while I'm a full time student. And yes, the kids who can afford the $1000 30hr prep course we offer will definitely do better than the kids who can't afford it. I haven't quite worked out if I'm okay with working for the man like that.
@CollegeBookworm: When I was applying to astronomy grad school, I had feverish visions of burning down the ETS buildings in Princeton. Forget investment banking- go into testing and test prep for the real money!
On the topic of standard tests for graduate school: a physics professor at Berkeley did a study recently of Berkeley physics and astronomy graduate student success after the PhD, and found that a higher physics GRE score did not correlate with academic success after graduation (publication rates, etc). VINDICATION! That hellish test was my arch-nemesis. Interestingly, there was a weak correlation with the verbal GRE score as a predictor of success among physics and astronomy graduate students.
@daisen-in: It could be that native English speakers do better on the verbal and also have an easier time publishing (assuming that's what they mean by success).
I did really well on the SATs. I also misspelled my name on the booklet. Getting my nice scores back in an envelope addressed to MignihtBikeRide= mixed feelings on how much this can really say about my aptitude at life.
I have to say, I have never been more grateful for the day I found out my potential transfer school wouldn't hazard a glance at my SAT scores after I completed X-credits at my local community college. I think considering students based on aptitude is wise, in the mindset of:
- a well-rounded consideration (classes taken, grades, scores)
- consideration of where the student excels
- using said considerations to see where the student needs help to assist them in achieving their goals
@monkeyriot: I had the same measurements but then I scored Wombat on the OWLS and I've gained the Durmstrang Sixtween Lemur Kegs ever since. I'm trying really hard to get back, though.
@thesciencegirl: Sorry - I know I gave two of mine. I really wasn't trying to brag - just thought it was relevant to the thread, especially in response to the statement that standardized testing is greatly affected by test prep course. I ought to have gone to Google instead to dig up some documentation - such as this article describing study findings that prep courses have a relatively marginal effect on score:
@thesciencegirl: Sharing mine was more of a catharsis because for so many years there was SO MUCH FRIGGIN' pressure around it and I just had to set it free into the Interwebs!!
@Penny: Well, since we're sharing.... I only got a 3 on the AP Bio exam, and I didn't even shell out the money for AP Chem because I knew it was a lost cause.... and I COULD BE YOUR DOCTOR SOME DAY!
I find the questions this post asks interesting, but I'm kind of bummed there are no answers suggested. I mean of course it would be great if everyone got the same college education, but how on earth are we supposed to do that?
@scullymurphy: Perhaps it's more important to give everyone the chance to educate themselves as much as possible? I've taught college classes at quite a few different (journalistically defined) levels, and I like to think I offer the same education at each school.
According to a fairly recent study, SAT total scores still correlate at a high level (r = .47) with first year college GPA for black students. The correlation is higher for white students (r = .53) but there's not a huge discrepancy. [professionals.collegeboard.com]
Since academic performance is a big thing that colleges are typically trying to predict with standardized testing, figures like that suggest to me that we'll be using SAT/ACT for some time yet.
@thegogglesdonothing: I always find these studies interesting. I've never once given or was asked for my info once I went to college. Or at law school. Where is the college board getting this data. What schools are they pulling from? MIT (grade deflation); Harvard (inflation) or some random sampling of places where the students SATs vary across a broad based range. There are just too many variables that are left unsaid. And like I mentioned, I don't know a soul who has ever asked or given the college board data after taking the SAT or consented to their college releasing it.
AP exams, community college course, and IB exams have been, in my anecdotal experience, a better market in how one does in college. But at least I'm caveating my conclusion.
@Trulymadlyme: The document says they pulled from 110 different schools of varying selectivity and geography and that the sample size was a bit over 151,000 (which, speaking as someone who's done a fair bit of social science research, is insanely high).
I looked for informed consent information, but there doesn't seem to be any - I wonder if there's some fine print when taking the SAT that students are considered to agree to have their scores included in studies of the validity of the test automatically.
@thegogglesdonothing: Also, where is the informed consent to release the students' college grades? That would have to be a massive and well documented undertaking.
@Trulymadlyme: They might not have to do informed consent if it's anonymous... I can't remember all my ethics right now, but if the schools deidentified the information, it *might* be okay to give away without permission.
@Trulymadlyme: Unless your personal identifying information is attached to it, your college does not need your consent to release data (SAT, GPA, etc.) to the College Board.
10/25/09
#testing
10/25/09
#testing
07/07/09
Probably a little more than half of my friends did not submit their scores. This is anecdotal, but I see no difference at all in terms of academic ability.
As for affirmative action -- I don't know. I'm a peer writing tutor, so I work with a lot of different students, and obviously, since it is a liberal arts colleges, there's a fair amount of writing involved in almost every discipline. I have consistently seen (again, this is just anecdotal) that those students that are likely recipients of affirmative action based on race often have maybe 5th-6th grade writing levels, and are unprepared for the rigor of college writing. I don't know that there is an easy solution to this, since I am probably a beneficiary of affirmative action as well and it's worked out well for me.
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/07/09
When I did very well on the PSATs, my mailbox was suddenly flooded with application info from everywhere. My standardized test scores definitely opened realms of possibility, and made me realize I had some kind of value that wasn't yet realized.
Are they perfectly fair? Nope.
One measure of a very particular type of performance only.
07/07/09
07/07/09
The problem with all of the pressure to succeed at standardized tests (ACT, SAT, AP, etc) is that it drives students to be entirely focused in solving the problem, instead of the Socratic style discussions that actually take place in college. So many of my classmates were so focused on getting all of the answers right, instead of taking risks and looking at the big picture that whenever a professor asked us "well, what do you think?", the entire classroom would be silent.
College is a differnt animal. Just because you got straight A's/high test scores doesn't mean that you'll get them in college. I had students petition the VP in charge of Academic Affairs because they were mad a professors gave them "bs" on papers instead of "As"
Can't we just have college admissions based on wacky Cambridge style interviews?
07/07/09
I think that some people are still able to get through college tackling it as a "job," the job being to maintain the GPA and all that stuff.
07/07/09
I'm in mostly honors and APs, I'm a journalism nerd, bookish and always up for discussions and I genuinely enjoy learning. My GPA is pretty high. But when it comes to SAT and ACT, lord help me. The first time I took the SAT I did not do too well, but I had a tutor, and so I took it another time and raised it over 100 points. It still just doesn't feel good enough so I signed up to take it again in October. Same with ACT. I've taken it once and I got a 25, not too bad, but I need to bump it up a few points for the state schools.
And I hate to put pressure like this on myself, but its just, I don't know, I feel like it has to be done. I'm in Florida, and the two main state schools - University of Florida and Florida State University, get so many applications that they really only can look at numbers. And there are some kids that just have a knack for testing. And it's incredibly stressful. I just want to be done with it. But I have to take ACT and SAT again and bump up my score just a little bit. It's the most stressful and annoying and competitive thing in the world and I cannot wait to be done with it.
My school is also a private, really hard, college preparatory school and there are kids there that are more competitive than you can imagine. And these kids kill themselves trying to get the best scores on SATs. I hate it. I cannot wait to be a second semester high school senior and know where I'm going to college.
This turned into a whole rant. Sorry :/
07/07/09
07/07/09
There is one benefit to the SAT- it can point out students who are particularly strong from inner city and rural areas. It was part of what it was designed for.
I think the US college admissions process is really insane between the SATs, GPAs, extracurriculars, and all of the obsessing. But I think the US probably does a better job with diverse students than some other countries. Students in the UK pretty much know where they can get in based on their predicted A levels, which gets rid of some pressure, but they don't really control for the differences in exposure and opportunity.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
How ridiculous is that? It used to stand for things. Now it's really just the SAT Reasoning Test. That's it.
I'll admit to being sort of part of the problem- I work for one of those giant test prep companies teaching SAT classes as of this summer. It pays better than any other job I can get at this point in my life while I'm a full time student. And yes, the kids who can afford the $1000 30hr prep course we offer will definitely do better than the kids who can't afford it. I haven't quite worked out if I'm okay with working for the man like that.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
- a well-rounded consideration (classes taken, grades, scores)
- consideration of where the student excels
- using said considerations to see where the student needs help to assist them in achieving their goals
07/07/09
07/07/09
Also scores have changed since the 1950s.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
[online.wsj.com]
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
Wait--which numbers am I giving you again?
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
Since academic performance is a big thing that colleges are typically trying to predict with standardized testing, figures like that suggest to me that we'll be using SAT/ACT for some time yet.
07/07/09
AP exams, community college course, and IB exams have been, in my anecdotal experience, a better market in how one does in college. But at least I'm caveating my conclusion.
07/07/09
I looked for informed consent information, but there doesn't seem to be any - I wonder if there's some fine print when taking the SAT that students are considered to agree to have their scores included in studies of the validity of the test automatically.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09