You know, Sandra, one year my med school friend dressed up for Halloween with one of those internal-organs-hanging-out things, with the intestines everywhere...you see where I'm going with this?
i'm sorry, i have to say it... i would totally wear sandra bullock's dress. albeit not the shoes... but i like it.
i'm sick of seeing the same clothes repeated over and over... and i feel like lately the fashion has been a bit less than amazing because people are fighting to do SOMEtHING different. with great risks may come great rewards... or not.
I'm starting to think the best part of a Sandra Bullock movie is the silly pics of her and her costars at the premieres. She gives good posed "candid", I'll give her that.
And I am really depressed that I just got the joke in the title, even though it doesn't make even a little bit of sense.
And finally, I am consistently impressed on the quality of Kat Kramer's foundation. She always looks airbrushed and it always seems to make her tights when she's wearing a skirt. It's not a look I would go for, but points for consistency I guess.
You know, I could see 25 year old Sandra Bullock taking this role, but I feel like after the successful career she has had, albeit in mostly romcoms, she can do better than this.
None of which is to say that, in that suit, I wouldnt be chasing Bradley Cooper at least a few blocks. NOM.
@flamesonthesideofmyface: I really don't think she's had a decent movie since she started her own production company. Nothing has even approached the awesomeness of While You Were Sleeping.
Growing up I had one Ken doll and he was dressed in rather a casual, sloppy (once I ripped them up) outfit of shorts and a hawaiian shirt but he had these heinous black shoes. They didn't make any sense with the outfit and they looked ridiculous. I tell you all this now because Sandra Bullock snatched them out of my Barbie tupperware like a crazy, desperate man-eater.
I know this isn't about the fashions, BUT: that has to be the most heinous, god-awful movie poster I've ever seen. This is some sloppy, low-rent design. And it looks like Sandra Bullock is holding a bloody machete (which I'd like to take to that poster).
@BeckySharper: Eh, I'll let her stay, if only to get her drunk and ask her WTF she was thinking here. I have a hunch there's a good story behind it.
And on the upside, if you need this premiere scrubbed from your brain, conjure up an image of ol' RyRen naked in The Proposal. I do that with pretty much all of my problems.
But that movie was also a subtly misogynist shitshow. More subtle than this, certainly, but definitely not a good portrayal of women. I always thought Sandra Bullock seemed too smart about her career to take these roles.
@BeckySharper: Oh, agreed. I just like to look at Ryan Reynolds.
I haven't been a huge fan of Sandra's movies since... (let's see, no on Two Weeks' Notice, no on Miss Congeniality I & II, no on Forces of Nature....) Practical Magic? A Time to Kill? So "subtly misogynist shitshow" is something I've grown accustomed to in relation to Sandra Bullock.
I haven't got any harsh words for Chris Brown. I only have a certain amount of outrage and that's been saved for the fucking vampires (not that cutie Bobby Pattison but real bloodsuckers) who brought us the feel-good movie about extreme poverty in India. With music and dancing too! It seems to be okay that the greedy Slumdog producers and director used those poor children. The kids did get a trip to Disneyland after they were trotted out during the Oscars but somehow it doesn't seem enough. I wonder, are those kids able to wear their fancy clothes around the slum they lived in or were they sold to buy food? Those bastards couldn't take a few dollars from the MILLIONS they made to buy those kids a decent place to live. As it is, they waited until their hovels actually fell on their heads. Yes, I know all about the TRUST FUNDS. Well how are those children supposed to stay in school, live exemplary lives until they're 18, if their families are destitute and homeless.
09/01/09
09/01/09
I saw the clip earlier today where she was talking about him and she had trouble getting words out. Sad.
Which was then brilliantly lightened by cutting to Paula talking. Oh Paula, never change. And always refill your prescription.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
Kerri Kenney looks like she not only forgot to put her brawron, but also her knickers.
08/27/09
i'm sick of seeing the same clothes repeated over and over... and i feel like lately the fashion has been a bit less than amazing because people are fighting to do SOMEtHING different. with great risks may come great rewards... or not.
but at least they are trying.
08/27/09
And I am really depressed that I just got the joke in the title, even though it doesn't make even a little bit of sense.
And finally, I am consistently impressed on the quality of Kat Kramer's foundation. She always looks airbrushed and it always seems to make her tights when she's wearing a skirt. It's not a look I would go for, but points for consistency I guess.
08/27/09
None of which is to say that, in that suit, I wouldnt be chasing Bradley Cooper at least a few blocks. NOM.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
Where is Michael Caine when you need him!?
08/27/09
And your outfit sucks too.
08/27/09
08/27/09
And on the upside, if you need this premiere scrubbed from your brain, conjure up an image of ol' RyRen naked in The Proposal. I do that with pretty much all of my problems.
08/27/09
But that movie was also a subtly misogynist shitshow. More subtle than this, certainly, but definitely not a good portrayal of women. I always thought Sandra Bullock seemed too smart about her career to take these roles.
08/27/09
08/27/09
I haven't been a huge fan of Sandra's movies since... (let's see, no on Two Weeks' Notice, no on Miss Congeniality I & II, no on Forces of Nature....) Practical Magic? A Time to Kill? So "subtly misogynist shitshow" is something I've grown accustomed to in relation to Sandra Bullock.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
05/28/09
05/27/09