<![CDATA[Jezebel: tempests in teapots]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: tempests in teapots]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/tempestsinteapots http://jezebel.com/tag/tempestsinteapots <![CDATA[Breaking: The New Dora Has Been Spotted, Described]]> Despite the fact that no one's even seen it, a new, tween Dora the Explorer doll is panicking parents who worry. Mattel won't "reveal" the actual doll, but luckily CNN has a full description.



Not since the discovery of Tutankhamun's tomb has man relied so heavily on a reporter's descriptive powers. Luckily, CNN's Carol Costello is gifted with the art of painting with words, and she was one of the chosen few allowed to see a doll so far only viewed in enigmatic silhouette.

The tweenage dora is about twelve inches high, she does have long brown hair with bangs and a headband, she is thin, she is tastefully and fashionably dressed. I would not say she's sexy...but she is attractive, she's a cute doll, but she's not wearing a little miniskirt or anything like that, and her hair is not as flowing as it was in that silhouette.

"So she's not going to be wearing a skirt?" asks Costello's colleague. "She's wearing shorts?"

"Well, she's wearing a tunic with leggings and platform heels."

And The Mothers wait.

'Boy Crazy' Dora? [CNN]
Dora Grows Up-Stops Exploring, Starts Shopping [Babble]
Dora The Explorer No More? [Washington Post]

Earlier: Doll Makeovers Are Not Child's Play

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5165704&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bright Lights, Big Tears]]> The model caught weeping on the Jil Sander runway denies it was due to a foot injury or killer heels, saying, "my eyes are very sensitive thats why i was crying." [Jossip, WSJ]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5163469&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Is Sarah Palin's $180,000 Wardrobe Sitting In Garbarge Bags?]]> So you know how Sarah Palin spent so much on clothes that the RNC had to say, "Hey, it's okay, they're all going to be donated"? Yeah, apparently it hasn't happened.

Remember "Fashiongate" or whatever everyone was calling it? Good times. If so, you'll probably recall that when Palin was raked over the coals for spending (jointly withe the RNC) the price of a small house on duds during a global recession, her sheepish spokeswoman was moved to say, "It was always the intent that the clothing go to a charitable purpose after the campaign," and make clear that anything Palin didn't end up wearing would be returned.

Yet! Some sources, apparently lurking at RNC headquarters in D.C., have spied the bags of clothing sitting around collecting dust. RNC types will only say that the glad rags have been duly inventories and are "in the process" of being donated. While this hardly qualifies as a major scandal, if it turns out they're not making good on their promise it could prove embarrassing to the big spenders whose money helped finance the wardrobe, many of whom were already disposed to think of it as a rather frivolous allocation of resources. Guys: the SalvA does pickup!

Palin's "Donated" Clothes Stashed in Trash Bags at RNC [The New Majority]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5138045&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Crap Blog Post From A Dude]]> Oh dear, it seems we've really, really upset the "Blogn***er", who's furious that "these mcCarthyistic Jezebel cunts" have "pressured" I Saw Your Nanny into taking down a banner graphic that we found a wee bit gratuitous. (Btw: the I Saw Your Nanny banner headline was, like, a banner. That's why when we posted on it last week, we only showed a little segment. Got it?) Well, this rawther angry gentleman has mounted a somewhat — dare we say it? — intemperate critique of the fracas, an impassioned defense of I Saw Your Nanny, and quite a slap on the wrist for what he terms us "PC Jezedroids." I'm sure we're all duly contrite. [New York via BlogN***er]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051175&view=rss&microfeed=true