<![CDATA[Jezebel: teen magazines]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: teen magazines]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/teenmagazines http://jezebel.com/tag/teenmagazines <![CDATA[Indigo Magazine Reaches Out To "Real Girls"]]> At a time when magazines are struggling all over, a bit of good news comes to us from Australia, where a new teen magazine, Indigo has found an audience by focusing on real young women.

The magazine was founded by a group of women who were tired of seeing the sexed up, airbrushed covers that were being marketed to young girls: Indigo has a strict no-airbrushing policy and uses non-celebrity girls for its covers, celebrating the "everyday" girl who reads the magazine instead of some 25 year old actress who somehow ends up on the cover of a teen magazine because she plays a 15 year old on TV.

Several other teen magazines in Australia are following Indigo's lead: Sarah Cornish, editor of Girlfriend says that her magazine now documents fashion shoots in order to show all of the work that goes in to making one perfect picture. "We try to be explicit in every way we can now about what's behind a fashion shoot," Cornish admits, "Even one photograph on a cover can take an entire day and we don't want our readers to ever think they could just look like that any day." Of course, part of this movement is involuntary: Australia requires magazines to label airbrushing, a result of the "National Media and Industry Code of Conduct on Body Image, which demands labelling of airbrushed images in women's magazines and the diversification of models' size and shape."

The fact that magazines like Indigo are realizing that young girls don't necessarily want to read about Britney's exploits or Paris' makeup habits is encouraging, and filling a void that has been left open for years. Those of us who grew up in the Sassy era still cling to memories of that magazine with a fierce fondness: it was the only magazine that really captured the teenage voice of the time, unlike its competitors, who insisted upon printing such things as "So like, I totally dropped trou in front of the rents! I was so totally bugged out! I could have died like for sure!" which they seemingly pulled from a book entitled How No Teenage Girl In The World Has Ever Talked, EVER or some such.

And so, by focusing more on everyday life and less on "OMG What Does V. Hudg Have In Her Closet?!," Indigo has found a dedicated audience of young readers, who are drawn to the magazines messages of self-respect, personal beauty, and positive body image. The magazine has also been endorsed by the Butterfly Foundation, an eating disorders awareness group. "When girls flick through the pages of the mag, they can see themselves," Indigo editor Freya Holland says. And what a beautiful thing that is: flaws and all.

Teens Turn A New Page [TheAge]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5133668&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why The Fuck Won't Teen Magazines Put Models On The Cover?]]> Here's a quote that gets under our skin: "I wish we could get a gorgeous model [on the cover] and make someone's career, but I can't risk that." That's courtesy of CosmoGirl! editor-in-chief Susan Schulz, via today's WWD. Here's the problem: The era of celebrities on the cover of magazines has got to end sometime. These things are cyclical, and the way to end one cycle and begin a new one is to have the balls — or the ovaries — it takes to make a change. The readers may be slow to catch on, but eventually they'll see: When there's a model on the cover of a teen magazine, suddenly the focus changes from the superficial Hollywood ideal to a truer, more realistic one.

Using a great model creates a mirror, or an aspirational figure: The great teen magazine covers of the past used models as representatives of the everygirl, smiling happily and jumping for joy — pretty, but somehow normal — so that the reader could project herself into that lifestyle, those clothes, that attitude. A girl should be able to recognize herself in the model. Because a model isn't supposed to be a role model. She's supposed to be a canvas on which an idea is painted. She's supposed to be someone a girl can look at and think, "I could be that girl." Past CosmoGirl! covers include those with questionable qualifications, such as Ashlee Simpson (post nose job!), Lindsay Lohan, Nicole Richie and Kristin Cavallari.

Obviously publishing a teen magazine is running a business. The bottom line is all about sales. But the "business" also happens to have a hand in shaping young womens' lives. I remember old issues of Seventeen and YM (and Sassy) vividly. Not the covers, mostly. But the invaluable things on the interior pages: Tales of real girls, with lives so different from my own, and yet with common bonds: period stain trauma! Cool eyeshadow! Unattainable crushes! Stupid babysitting jobs! Readers today may pick up a magazine because of the big name celeb on the cover, but surely it's the actual content they keep coming back for: Cosmogirl! has great makeup tips, love advice, fashion ideas, crush quizzes, insider info on choosing a college. Why wait for Vogue or some other adult publication to turn the tide? As the song says, kids are the future. Magazines are one of the tools girls equip themselves with in order to survive in this crazy world. How can Heidi Montag be of any help? Believing your product only has value when packaged in a celebrity wrapper is a tragedy, and actually underestimates the girls whose dollars you gladly take.

Memo Pad [WWD]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302395&view=rss&microfeed=true