Enter your username and password.
New York, 4:56 PM
Fri Nov 27
15 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:
tips@jezebel.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
Email | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
Email | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
Email | Twitter
Sadie Stein
Email | Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
Email | Twitter
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
Email | Twitter
Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Latoya Peterson
Email
Jenna Sauers
Email
Lizzie Skurnick
Email
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
10/16/09
10/16/09
I think their style is much closer to that of Bebe, actually. I couldn't think of a better match...but I don't anyone is going to be stretching their creative muscles. #kimkardashianclothingline
10/16/09
10/16/09
Haha. Oh, Bebe is a big fan of rhinestones on the boobs and butt for advertising as well. #kimkardashianclothingline
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
07/06/09
Also, I can't believe that with all the picture-taking going on at my brother's July 4th BBQ, I completely forgot to strike the 'clavicle-pushing couture pose.'
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
If it works (big if) I will have a lot of attitude.
"Hat or daisy?"
Hee. If you have the chutzpah (and the cash, from whatever source) to wear it, does it matter?
07/06/09
07/06/09
Galliano can get too costumey, so I am loving this return to Dior roots.
07/06/09
Jackets beautiful. Chapeaux beautiful. Colors gorgeous. Makeup stunning.
Why no pants?!?
Lady Gaga, for the most part, your style mentor Madonna has worn her pants this whole past season. I blame you.
07/06/09
07/06/09
Merely beautiful as opposed to fashion-as-art? And, fashion-as-art accessible only to the very wealthy who can toss tens of thousands of $$ at this "artist"? Hmm. I am distrustful of those two ideas -- namely, that art is so because it is impractical and that beauty does not challenge. There isn't anything wrong with straight up beautiful and there isn't anything inherently regressive or "safe" in citing classic work, imo.
07/06/09
07/06/09
Shame though, because I would have NOWHERE to wear them.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09