While I think the women themselves look good and it's a nice twist to feature more natural, minimalist styling on the covers, I'm really not wowed by this particular set.
Mostly because I can't say the "no makeup" claim looks genuine in those photos. The women clearly look like they're wearing minimalist makeup. Lips don't sheen like that on their own, nor are they naturally pearlized. Eye lids aren't naturally shaded like that. To Elle's credit it doesn't look like they used a lot of hair products (both Monica and Sophie's hair are kinda soft and fly away instead of shellacked to hell).
I'm also kinda disappointed at the styling (or maybe it's direction) on Sophie. Compared to the other two she looks like she just rolled out of bed, and not in that "sexy bed head" way. Like they were going for intimate casual, and ended up with We're Out Of Time, Just Lean On The Wall. Maybe it's also because the other two women have a very distinct expression, while Sophie's pic looks kinda like they were going for dreamy but ended up with I'm Waiting For The Elevator. It doesn't seem like a cover-worthy image, which I'm guessing is more a fault of the art director than the model.
While the no-makeup thing seems like a hoax, I can accept that they all probably look good naturally. I remember one ad exec saying if you know what you're doing you can light a woman who is not wearing makeup and still make her look very beautiful. So there's probably a lot of very careful lighting, which I think is totally acceptable -- good fashion photography is supposed to be flattering. Of course there's been some photoshopping to the images themselves to balance things like hue and contrast, but if they've done some 'shopping to the women I'll grant Elle that at least it's not overt.
I think this is great, and I will go out of my way to find a way to buy it out here in the Middle West (ideas anyone? How can someone in Chicago get her hands on a news stand copy of French Elle?)
But: That backdrop? Being sans fards doesn't mean that you have to do everything in your power to drain all color from your Causasian face. Yikes. Even a warm oatmeal shade would have been better!
@ellaesther: I've seen French Vogue at the newsstands at Oglivie and Union Stations and I've seen French ladymags at some Borders locations... maybe Europa Books on 832 N. State?
@RocktheDebit: Thank you thank you! I'm heavily into "if you liked it, you shoulda paid some money to let the editors and advertisers know" right now, and showing women in their natural state is something I TOTALLY want to support.
Also: You're in Chicago? I think because of your avatar, I kind of thought you were - I don't know, European? In the court of a French king, and typing via time machine? Clearly I haven't been keeping up!
Monica Bellucci is so fucking beautiful it hurts. They could've chosen a more flattering shot of Sophie, imho, one in which she doesn't resemble a fatigued Juliette Binoche.
Sophie Marceau and Monica Bellucci without makeup? I has died and gone to heaven. I think they are both so beautiful and talented and have loved them both for years. YAYYYY!
Damn, if this were Gawker, I could get away with a fard joke (who farded? nobody!) but in keeping with the greater levels of sincerity and respect here, I will say this: WOW. They are beautiful; this is a great thing. I hope they could get Ségo to do a shot too.
I'm calling merde on this, because those women probably have dyed eyelashes and brows, not to mention a subtle lip gloss and tinted moisturizers. Other than that, they be mighty pretty.
@CassetteLove: So you'd only be impressed if they had what would conventionally be considered unattractive women on their cover? Would that really accomplish anything? In the end, they are after all "beauty" mags, and while I agree the definition of beauty has become far too narrow in a lot of cases, I'm not sure how far it would have to go to be "impressive".
Wow, Monica Belluci looks like an entirely different person without her slap on! Incredible the difference make-up makes! She's still pretty, but not the out-of-this-world beauty she normally is with the help of cosmetics.
Eva, however, barely looks different. I suppose there is a reason she is a model!
Good grief. Some people are born looking this good without make-up or plastic surgery. Some of the remarks on here seem jealous or nasty. I don't get it. The same way that there are folks that are born to be staggeringly ugly, there are those who have the genes to be genetically beautiful. I can't be the only one who went through high school & college with stunners. More than one woman I grew up with look like real live Barbie dolls to this day (one has a brother that looks like Robert Redford), & they've looked like that from little girls. It's not make- up or the knife. I don't get being hateful towards people because you're pissed they got something that you didn't. Their good fortune is not a strike against you....Hell, I wish I looked like a grown- up without make-up, but I don't- and I won't begrudge the ones who turned out luckier than I did.
@oh.geez.: Yes, it's one thing to frame it like we're skeptical that fashion magazines could actually be truthful and another thing to imply that a woman couldn't possibly be that beautiful without any "help" from makeup/surgery. The first point would be a potentially useful critique, whereas I don't think the second one is.
05/18/09
05/16/09
05/16/09
Sophie: QUOI?
Monica: hehe, oui.
05/16/09
04/14/09
I will love forever anyone else who gets that reference.
04/14/09
Mostly because I can't say the "no makeup" claim looks genuine in those photos. The women clearly look like they're wearing minimalist makeup. Lips don't sheen like that on their own, nor are they naturally pearlized. Eye lids aren't naturally shaded like that. To Elle's credit it doesn't look like they used a lot of hair products (both Monica and Sophie's hair are kinda soft and fly away instead of shellacked to hell).
I'm also kinda disappointed at the styling (or maybe it's direction) on Sophie. Compared to the other two she looks like she just rolled out of bed, and not in that "sexy bed head" way. Like they were going for intimate casual, and ended up with We're Out Of Time, Just Lean On The Wall. Maybe it's also because the other two women have a very distinct expression, while Sophie's pic looks kinda like they were going for dreamy but ended up with I'm Waiting For The Elevator. It doesn't seem like a cover-worthy image, which I'm guessing is more a fault of the art director than the model.
While the no-makeup thing seems like a hoax, I can accept that they all probably look good naturally. I remember one ad exec saying if you know what you're doing you can light a woman who is not wearing makeup and still make her look very beautiful. So there's probably a lot of very careful lighting, which I think is totally acceptable -- good fashion photography is supposed to be flattering. Of course there's been some photoshopping to the images themselves to balance things like hue and contrast, but if they've done some 'shopping to the women I'll grant Elle that at least it's not overt.
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
But: That backdrop? Being sans fards doesn't mean that you have to do everything in your power to drain all color from your Causasian face. Yikes. Even a warm oatmeal shade would have been better!
04/14/09
04/14/09
Also: You're in Chicago? I think because of your avatar, I kind of thought you were - I don't know, European? In the court of a French king, and typing via time machine? Clearly I haven't been keeping up!
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
Eva, however, barely looks different. I suppose there is a reason she is a model!
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09
04/14/09