Speaking of baseball/softball, I AM SO GLAD that baseball season is over! And I'm so ready for December, when we've got pro football and college basketball going on at the same time. LOVE IT. #reesewitherspoon
This must be an oversight. A post using a Madonna picture, and no one is talking about how she's too strong-looking? Maybe cause she's wearing sleeves.
I've been of the belief that there are some sports that would work smashingly well unsegregated (baseball, for real, it needs to happen), but with other sports, even if they were to allow women in, there would be very few that could make it to a professional level, due solely to the physical types they are looking for, which tend to be the product of having a good hunk of testosterone in the system (height, muscle mass/strength output). Heck, even most normal men can't compete in a lot of these sports, just because they're not that 6'5" adonis. Other than Muggsy Bogues, when's the last time you saw a basketball player under 6-foot come anywhere close to being a star player? And yet, the majority of men are not as tall as NBA players, or NFL players for that matter.
It's hard to say if there's a clear answer for those sports that require a certain physique, but I say if a woman comes along that meets the physical requirements or even just has a desire to try out, then they shouldn't keep her from playing with the men just for the fact that she is in possession of a uterus. But, again, I think sports where many different types of athletes can compete and compete well, such as baseball, should allow women asap. Enough with segregating them to softball from around high school on through the rest of their careers.
I just had an interesting thought in regards to this. Pairs skating has been co-ed since, well, since it started I assume. And both the men and the women use their natural strengths in the sport to each their strengths, compete together well and there is no weirdness to it. I'm not the biggest ice skating fan but it is interesting to note.
This is why I stick to watching equestrian sports – in show jumping, eventing and dressage the old "women are too fragile" debates were done and dusted years ago.
Women didn't let a side-saddle hold them back, and once those had been packed away into the attic, there was no holding them.
Can I just say this? The whole platform from which we judge athletic prowess is determined by a male-dominated athletic sport structure. Sports, in their origination, were designed to show off 'manly' abilities. It's so hard now to separate our understand of strength, speed, power from the mechanisms of measurement that are dictated by the particular abilities of male bodies.
@JerkoftheMonth: That was exactly what I thought when I read the post. Women are better gymnasts and ice skaters why is it always assumed that men are better since they are stronger and allegedly faster [I'm sure a female diver, gymnast or ice skater would differ with that].
@veronykah: I'm not sure women are "better gymnasts and ice skaters". The criteria by which male and female gymnasts are judged is different. Same with ice skating and the whole "artistic" component. Also, male ice skaters are able to do tricks that females can't.
I think that women's gymnastics and skating are more popular than men's, which makes you think the women are better, when that's probably not really true. I guess it depends on what you call "better" though.
I'm very confuzzled by this demand of girl's baseball- but this stems mostly from my belief that softball is the vastly superior sport. Not only is it less harsh on the body (the pitch alone is insanely more natural for the pitcher's arm) the whole game just runs more smoother and lends to some less show boating. I've never been a fan of team sports that just end up being single players outdoing themselves.
Also, as one of the first girls ever in our little league (we didn't go co-ed until '95) I can say this: nobody warmed the bench more than I. I played the league minimum in every game, and when I DID get up at bat the pitcher would let me walk. I know that they did because I overheard their coach telling the boy pitching to do that for me and the other girl on the team. I guess he thought "we'd get hurt" or something if the kid really pitched... but it was really lame. The other girl on our team was actually REALLY talented and went to college on a softball scholership... but still, in LL she was riding the bench with me. It was really tough. I got to the point where I wanted to quit. Thankfully my mom made me tough it out and I think I really learned something from it... mainly that playing baseball with boys was no fun. When I started on the middle school's girl softball team in the 7th grade I couldn't believe the difference. It was still competitive but I TOTALLY didn't feel the exclusion anymore and the game was so much better.
I recently passed by the school I went to and saw the little league playing a game- it's nice to now that nearly 15 years later the girls/boys are a LOT more even and they looked like they were playing pretty equally.
@Sunshineyness: Your experience with baseball seems like it totally sucks, so I completely understand why you think softball is better. I played baseball too, but not Little League (our local league is BCC Baseball). I was on the only all-girls team in the league, though there were girls who played on co-ed teams as well. We lost every single game, but we didn't care, because we were doing it for fun, not for the competition. And everyone got to play, we only were benched one inning each on average. Some girls actually left their co-ed teams to join ours because they liked the atmosphere better.
Besides the ball and the pitching style, I don't really know of any differences between baseball and softball, but I think the fact that my baseball team was not co-ed is why I still love the sport.
@lollapulizer: The pitch really makes a difference in the physical health of the pitchers. Throwing a baseball will lead to a lifetime of arm problems that any baseball pitcher can attest to. Softball pitchers have more longevity to their careers because of the natural motion of the pitch. (BTW, ever notice when playing softball with the boys they will ALWAYS lob the ball over and will NEVER try windmilling it for power? Just something I've noticed.)
Due to the ball size it leads to less "out of the park home runs" like you get in baseball. I think this lends itself to being more "team oriented" like I said above: show boating in sports drives me mad. If I wanted to see that I'd watch a solitary sport. I get more enjoyment from sports where a team has to work together.
I second your point about single-sex sports being something of a refuge. Up until middle school, I played soccer in an all-girls league and I loved it. In middle school, my family moved to Puerto Rico and my only option was a coed league. It was 6th grade: not the height of maturity for my male teammates (or myself, for that matter). They would never pass the ball to me, or even really interact with me. I felt awful about myself, bored, and pissed off. I quit pretty damn quickly.
Unfortunately I haven't played sports then. I didn't do much of anything physical throughout high school and was way out of shape when I got to college. I work out and do yoga now, but I miss the camaraderie of my lil girls soccer team.
and let's not forget about college scholarships. if everything were forced to be co-ed, what gender do you think would now be screwed out of athletic educational scholarships? hint: they don't have a penis.
this is not to say that woman aren't already on the ass end of the deal in terms of money given towards athletic scholarships. i haven't done any real research but a quick and dirty google search reveals that more dollars and more scholarships are given to men than women. but it would be devastating to women looking to be awarded scholarships for sports based on strength and speed.
i'd be curious to know how much input women have had historically in creating many of what we call "sports." if men are creating physical stakes that they're best at, that'd be no surprise that women perform less well. "strongest" and "fastest" are not the only superlatives we can apply to physical feats, but many sports are structured around these qualities.
does anyone know what sports women have (primarily) invented?
@madcater: I can't answer your question, but I think it's one of the most interesting angles to this – few people question the sports themselves. It's a given that men are better than women at, say, boxing, and it's a given that this is something desirable. As if each sport and its rules for being the best were handed down from the heavens.
Hmm, the only sport I ever played where it seemed liked sex (or is gender the right word here?) was moot was fencing. Tournaments that didn't qualify your for the nationals or whatever tended to have a mixed category on top of the men's and women's. And the top of the mixed events tended to be pretty even, if you took into account ratios and general skill level among the participants.
And I've spent 10 minutes trying to think of sport where that would be common. Ping-pong? Or on the serious side, tennis? Certainly not running or basketball.
@greengrey: Oooh, only if they split it into categories based on body weight and proven tolerance to alcohol. Which would make it fair within as well as across gender lines.
@Goodbye.Kitty: True. And yet while riding I did notice a few oddities when it came to male riders, who were definitely in the minority. Even the lower level male riders were given more attention and allowed on tougher horses early on, in part because of their perceived superior strength but also because they pestered their teachers a lot.
@choufleur: Ultimate Frisbee has a co-ed division that requires at least three women from each team to be on the field at all times, but otherwise treats players identically. It's probably the most genuinely co-ed team sport out there.
@RainbowBrite: Height is an advantage for two, maybe three positions on the court. For setters, height can be a disadvantage. If both teams are co-ed, though, I don't see the problem. If we're talking about an all male team vs. an all female team, the males being significantly taller is not a given, but even if they are, I don't think the advantage is huge. Height only helps right at the net, and there is a lot more to volleyball than that. Actually, I think volleyball is one of the few sports that comes easier to women than men. When we would play in gym in high school, all the super jock guys who are amazing at everything were horrible at, because they would hit the ball as hard as they could and it would go out of bounds. There's a certain restraint and precision about it that sort of contradicts the values that help you excel in more male-centric sports.
@la.donna.pietra: Right on, but the thing that makes it so equal is that women usually defend women. I play with men all the time and it's sad to say, but most are faster than me (and the other women playing).
@missouragirl: You can be slower than the guys and still dust them if your throws are good. I have a good friend who is in her early 40s and slow as dirt, but she has an amazing fake and can huck it at least as well as most men.
Lawson’s proposal is breathtakingly stupid, and Berman’s piece is filled with hedge words. Men do not "seem" to be superior athletes -- they ARE superior athletes, by a vast margin. If women competed against men, "exceptional women" would not "rise to the occasion" or give men "a run for their money." Female medalists would not become "rare" -- they would disappear entirely. There is nothing misogynist about this, and it is not a social construction. It is biological fact, and it is why men and women compete separately.
Some commenters have noted that the gap between the men’s and women’s world records in the marathon has shrunk over the last few decades. This is true, but it is a result of the ever-improving depth of competition in women’s athletics, and it is not an indicator that women’s performance will ever converge with men’s (as the quality of women’s athletic competition improves, their performances will improve more slowly). As of now the men’s marathon WR stands at 2:03:59, the women’s at 2:15:25. That is a difference of MORE THAN ELEVEN MINUTES -- more than two miles! Barring a drastic change in human physiology, women will never eliminate this gap. Not to mention that there is not a single woman to be found among the top 1,000 athletes in any of the major team sports such as basketball, football, baseball, hockey, soccer, etc.
(Disclaimer: women have occasionally succeeded against men in some sports. Women have won the prestigious, ultra-grueling Badwater 150-mile footrace, as well as the Iditarod dogsled race. And possibly they could compete equally in sports that don’t require strength, speed, or size, such as target shooting or billiards.)
Of course we should keep the women’s divisions. Just because there are a few fuzzy cases doesn’t mean we should implement a cure that’s worse than the disease.
@1.1.1.: Perfectly stated. To his point, I don't know why women and men don't compete together in sports like archery, billiards, curling, etc. I can't imagine there'd really be difference between the sexes in those sports...
I also think it's sooo interesting how women have won Badwater. I've heard some theories like women's thresholds for pain are on average higher than men's, or that women's higher body fat percentages makes them better-suited for ultra-endurance events. Very interesting!
@RainbowBrite: Yes, I thought he laid it out well, too. I agree, I don't see why there can't be dual sex competition in fields where the sexes are sufficiently matched for there to be a contest. It's also unfortunate that there isn't as much interest in some sports that women excel at; it's probably because they're not very dramatic. (I'm excluding gymnastics and ice skating.).
@1.1.1.: This also misunderstands women vs. men's sports: we don't play them the same way. We use our gender's strengths and fit them into the game. Ever watch men's sports and women's sports next to each other? Totally different animals, especially in sports like basketball and soccer. Women also have a tendency to utilize their whole team more than men do which tend to have a more emphasis on the individual player.
Of course it's difficult to compete against one another, they're playing the games completely differently. It doesn't mean the game isn't as demanding or awe-inspiring... it's just different. And naturally if men and women were to integrate the "norm" would become the men's version of the game and OF COURSE women won't be able to compete like that.
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
It's hard to say if there's a clear answer for those sports that require a certain physique, but I say if a woman comes along that meets the physical requirements or even just has a desire to try out, then they shouldn't keep her from playing with the men just for the fact that she is in possession of a uterus. But, again, I think sports where many different types of athletes can compete and compete well, such as baseball, should allow women asap. Enough with segregating them to softball from around high school on through the rest of their careers.
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
Women didn't let a side-saddle hold them back, and once those had been packed away into the attic, there was no holding them.
08/26/09
@bowleserised: The URL image thing didn't work.
08/25/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
I think that women's gymnastics and skating are more popular than men's, which makes you think the women are better, when that's probably not really true. I guess it depends on what you call "better" though.
08/26/09
08/25/09
Also, as one of the first girls ever in our little league (we didn't go co-ed until '95) I can say this: nobody warmed the bench more than I. I played the league minimum in every game, and when I DID get up at bat the pitcher would let me walk. I know that they did because I overheard their coach telling the boy pitching to do that for me and the other girl on the team. I guess he thought "we'd get hurt" or something if the kid really pitched... but it was really lame. The other girl on our team was actually REALLY talented and went to college on a softball scholership... but still, in LL she was riding the bench with me. It was really tough. I got to the point where I wanted to quit. Thankfully my mom made me tough it out and I think I really learned something from it... mainly that playing baseball with boys was no fun. When I started on the middle school's girl softball team in the 7th grade I couldn't believe the difference. It was still competitive but I TOTALLY didn't feel the exclusion anymore and the game was so much better.
I recently passed by the school I went to and saw the little league playing a game- it's nice to now that nearly 15 years later the girls/boys are a LOT more even and they looked like they were playing pretty equally.
08/25/09
Besides the ball and the pitching style, I don't really know of any differences between baseball and softball, but I think the fact that my baseball team was not co-ed is why I still love the sport.
08/26/09
Due to the ball size it leads to less "out of the park home runs" like you get in baseball. I think this lends itself to being more "team oriented" like I said above: show boating in sports drives me mad. If I wanted to see that I'd watch a solitary sport. I get more enjoyment from sports where a team has to work together.
08/25/09
Unfortunately I haven't played sports then. I didn't do much of anything physical throughout high school and was way out of shape when I got to college. I work out and do yoga now, but I miss the camaraderie of my lil girls soccer team.
08/25/09
this is not to say that woman aren't already on the ass end of the deal in terms of money given towards athletic scholarships. i haven't done any real research but a quick and dirty google search reveals that more dollars and more scholarships are given to men than women. but it would be devastating to women looking to be awarded scholarships for sports based on strength and speed.
08/25/09
does anyone know what sports women have (primarily) invented?
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
And I've spent 10 minutes trying to think of sport where that would be common. Ping-pong? Or on the serious side, tennis? Certainly not running or basketball.
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
OMG
Lawson’s proposal is breathtakingly stupid, and Berman’s piece is filled with hedge words. Men do not "seem" to be superior athletes -- they ARE superior athletes, by a vast margin. If women competed against men, "exceptional women" would not "rise to the occasion" or give men "a run for their money." Female medalists would not become "rare" -- they would disappear entirely. There is nothing misogynist about this, and it is not a social construction. It is biological fact, and it is why men and women compete separately.
Some commenters have noted that the gap between the men’s and women’s world records in the marathon has shrunk over the last few decades. This is true, but it is a result of the ever-improving depth of competition in women’s athletics, and it is not an indicator that women’s performance will ever converge with men’s (as the quality of women’s athletic competition improves, their performances will improve more slowly). As of now the men’s marathon WR stands at 2:03:59, the women’s at 2:15:25. That is a difference of MORE THAN ELEVEN MINUTES -- more than two miles! Barring a drastic change in human physiology, women will never eliminate this gap. Not to mention that there is not a single woman to be found among the top 1,000 athletes in any of the major team sports such as basketball, football, baseball, hockey, soccer, etc.
(Disclaimer: women have occasionally succeeded against men in some sports. Women have won the prestigious, ultra-grueling Badwater 150-mile footrace, as well as the Iditarod dogsled race. And possibly they could compete equally in sports that don’t require strength, speed, or size, such as target shooting or billiards.)
Of course we should keep the women’s divisions. Just because there are a few fuzzy cases doesn’t mean we should implement a cure that’s worse than the disease.
-- Lawrence Pelo
[letters.salon.com]
08/25/09
I also think it's sooo interesting how women have won Badwater. I've heard some theories like women's thresholds for pain are on average higher than men's, or that women's higher body fat percentages makes them better-suited for ultra-endurance events. Very interesting!
08/25/09
08/25/09
Of course it's difficult to compete against one another, they're playing the games completely differently. It doesn't mean the game isn't as demanding or awe-inspiring... it's just different. And naturally if men and women were to integrate the "norm" would become the men's version of the game and OF COURSE women won't be able to compete like that.
08/26/09
Exactly.