<![CDATA[Jezebel: sibling rivalry]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: sibling rivalry]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/siblingrivalry http://jezebel.com/tag/siblingrivalry <![CDATA[Keeping Up With The Kardashians: Khloe Getting Married]]> Last night's two-hour-long season premiere featured the planning and execution of Khloe Kardashian and Lamar Odom's wedding. Khloe's sister Kim seemed to take the news of the engagement the hardest, mostly because she was sad she wasn't getting married.



Khloe's mom Kris took on the planning of the event and, in the process, tried to influence Khloe to opt for a color scheme that was more flattering to herself; decided that the meal would be steak (which Khloe doesn't eat); and dominated the wedding registry with her own selections, including silverware priced at $750 per setting, which, Khloe pointed out, her friends would never be able to afford.


Bruce Jenner, Khloe's stepdad, wasn't very enthusiastic about the engagement when he first learned about it (on the evening news), but came around eventually. He gave a really touching toast at the rehearsal dinner, and teared up when discussing the promise he made to Khloe's late father.


Kim managed to get over herself and decided that she was going to support Khloe, but there still seemed to be a bit of tension there.


All was forgiven, though, when Khloe basically handed the bouquet toss to Kim.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400708&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Does Birth Order Really Matter?]]> Are first-borns really smarter — or more stubborn — than their siblings? A piece in the London Times questions whether birth order really affect IQ or personality as much as some have said.

Several studies show small differences among siblings based on birth order. First-borns tend to have slightly higher IQ than second-borns, who score slightly higher than third-borns. First-borns are also slightly taller at the age of 10 than their siblings, meaning they may be better nourished. And parents may have higher expectations for their oldest children: one survey found that 35% of moms thought their oldest would do the best in school,while only 15% thought the youngest would.

Findings like these have led some scientists (including, creepily, eugenicist Francis Galton) to conclude that first-borns are predisposed to run the world. Galton and others have found a high percentage of first-borns in influential political and scientific positions. However, some say younger siblings are the real stars. In his book Born to Rebel, Frank Sulloway uses Darwin and Copernicus as examples of later-borns whose birth order allowed them to take risks and be creative, rather than pleasing parents and other authority figures. The idea that first-borns are high-achieving but law-abiding, while their younger siblings are less conventionally successful but more adventurous, has at this point reached the status of conventional wisdom.

But is it true? Psychology professor Ginger Moore says no. She tells the Times,

There is no doubt that parents treat children differently, and some of that difference may be related to birth order. [...] However, the way that parents interact with their children, the expectations they have of them and the opportunities they give them, most likely have less to do with birth order and more to do with many other factors, such as the child's personality, gender, the number of children in the family, the spacing between siblings and parental age.

The average IQ differences among siblings may be too small to mean much (and IQ test are suspect anyway), and according to Moore, the reason birth order is such a popular explanation for variation among families may be that it's easy to measure. It's also easy to amass anecdotal evidence about. Neil Bush and the famously coked-out Roger Clinton are popular examples of underachieving younger sibs, although to call George W. Bush "more successful" than his brothers is to use an interesting definition of success. But it's just as easy to find examples of later-borns who outshone their siblings. And perhaps most common of all is the family where differences between children transcend birth order.

I'm five years older than my brother, and I remember discovering that most of my friends in college were older or only children. Growing up, I cared a lot about my parents' approval and always did my homework — my brother had to be nagged. I was nerdy while my brother was well-adjusted and popular — supposedly common traits of later-borns. As we get older, however, the picture gets more complicated. I'm probably more of a risk-taker than my brother; he cares more about traditions. He's become more academic than he ever was as a kid; I gave up computer science to pursue creative writing. And some of the closest friends I've made in the last few years have been later-borns. There's pretty much only one way my brother and I currently fulfill birth order stereotypes. We're both at our parents' house right now, and while I'm working, he's sleeping.

Are Eldest Children Really A Cut Above? [TimesOnline]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5309200&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Khloe And Kourtney Make A Stink About Kim's Fragrance Line]]> On last night's Keeping Up With the Kardashians, Kim inked a deal for her fragrance "Dashing," which she trademarked two years ago. When her sisters found out, they kinda threatened to sue.

Kim co-owns the boutique Dash with her sisters Khloe and Kourtney, and the girls had plans to eventually launch clothing, makeup and fragrance lines within that brand. Khloe and Kourtney were pissed that Kim and her mother secretly signed a perfume deal behind their backs, because they felt like they were entitled to a portion of the money, because of the name she picked.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5200667&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Putting The Fun In Dysfunctional]]> Did you, like me, always feel that your parents were so much easier on your younger siblings than they were on you? Guess what: It's not just in your head. Researchers at Johns Hopkins have found that, indeed, parents are a waaaaay more strict with their older children than the younger siblings. Apparently, these academic-types have found a motherfucking mathematical formula with which they are able to show the ratios between severity of how older children were disciplined and the prevention of seeing "bad behavior" in younger children. So yeah: Don't hate your parents. It's science. [Science Daily]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381109&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Daniel Huffman says his buddies asked him...]]> Daniel Huffman says his buddies asked him to run for mayor in Montezuma, Ohio, and he just couldn't refuse. The small problem with that plan? His sister, Charlotte Garman, told reporters that he never attended a single council meeting and doesn't really keep up on the issues facing Montezuma. She should know, I guess, since she's the current mayor. She spanked him last night, getting 43 votes to his 24 in her race for re-election (there are only 138 registered voters in town). Older siblings always kick ass! [Columbus Dispatch, CBS News]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320146&view=rss&microfeed=true