I went through the exhibit and frankly found it pretty tame. I know the point is not to tell horror story after horror story (and this person's story was a bit of a horror) but the whole exhibit was basically the vanilla of sex trafficking. I'm sure it opened some people's eyes who didn't know anything about it (do they exist?) but for those that did, it was little more than a museumification of certain very stereotypical experiences which I think were probably already in the minds of all walking through.
Plus the fact that the shipping containers had huge breasted, skinny waisted, big hipped ladies painted on the side didn't do much for their cause. I'm just not quite sure if I understand the purpose of using these stereotyped and fake images to represent something that is extremely real. The only part which was great, was the last container which was lined with various legal speak about sex trafficking. That was the only part where I was like "alright, this is a very, very good point - we alienate through our legal definitions, and make people suffer trauma again and again and again."
There was no mention of children (below sixteen) of either sex in sex trafficking in the exhibit either. It was the disneyland of trafficking, I was more shocked watching "La vie on Rose" than I was by this. #sextrafficking
@rdVark: I haven't gone through it yet (may try to later today), but I agree about the outsides of the containers. I guess that helps attract a bit more attention to the exhibit (I could easily have thought the containers were there because of all the various construction going on nearby), but it attracts it in such a sleazy way. #sextrafficking
I'm writing a research paper on this very subject right now, and it's so incredibly difficult to wrap my mind around.
On the one hand, I can understand that the Japanese people today wouldn't want to be blamed for atrocities like what was done to these women, or the Nanjing massacre, or any of the other horrible crimes, any more than I would want to be blamed for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an American. But at the same time, these atrocities didn't just happen, someone did them. The USA takes responsibility for the atom bombs, although I have my doubts about the common sentiment that they were necessary to prevent a land invasion.
In order for these women to get the justice they deserve, shouldn't somebody take responsibility for it, acknowledging that their suffering occurred and it was wrong? But whose responsibility is it? I'm guessing the Japanese would argue that those who are responsible are long dead...
@maneki neko: That's what pisses me off the most. All the Japanese have to say is 'Hiroshima' and that's the end of the discussion. Hiroshima was an atrocity but as you mentioned, the US has taken responsibility for it (the more I've studied the Japanese involvement in WWII the more credence I give to the land invasion argument). Germany has taken responsibility for the Holocaust. Yet the Japanese refuse to own up to its many, many war crimes. Maybe it's because most of the victims weren't white. The UK has never hesitated to discuss what the Japanese did to white members of the Commonwealth (A Town Called Alice anyone) but ignores anything else. These women will die and never, ever, get the justice and the apology they deserve. Shame on Japan and shame on us for letting Japan get away with it.
This is really neat, and heartwarming in an odd way. I learned about the comfort women in high school, and it's such a sad story. I'm glad these women have some comfort of their own now, no pun intended.
What the fuck, Japanese government? How hard it it to apologize for something so completely heinous? Are you too busy playing RapePlay to even address this?
@mayfly: Anything to do with the Japanese actions in WWII is extremely politically contentious in Japan, for obvious reasons. The government has been criticized for decades on their behaviour after the American occupation, because in many ways the official line has been to move on and forget about it. School textbooks print lies and deliberate omissions, and as a society their ties to recent history are fuzzy and complex, I think.
It's really interesting from a history/political science point of view to compare the post-war attitude toward "war guilt" in Japan and Germany, as it's been very different in both countries.
Anyway, I think to compare an incredibly complex cultural identity issue (and I'm not saying they shouldn't apologize, because they should) with the fact that Japan happens to export a lot of weird and scary porn is way missing the point.
@gobblegirl: Very well said. There are dozens upon dozens of books that have been written about Japanese War guilt. It's an extremely contentious issue, and the answer to the question "Why don't they apologize?" is going to be a hard one to answer. (I'm actually doing research on this right now, so I'm pretty interested by this post.)
Part of it has to do with the fact that the Japanese government now doesn't see themselves of a continuation of the wartime government, based on the presence of the anti-war Article 9 in their constitution, and the general tendency of the culture to separate itself or blame everything on the military. But it's a hell of a lot more complicated than that...
I saw a group of former comfort women protesting in front of the Japanese embassy in South Korea. It makes me so sad that the Japanese government refuses to give theses women any closure or dignity. All that many of them want is just an apology. I saw signs taped up in Seoul that said "As long as Japan exists, there will never be peace." There is so much anger still, I wish Japan would try to make some amends.
I'm pretty sure the Japanese government is just waiting until these women die b/c they will never apologize for it. I think this was the first year that the president didn't visit Yasukuni to basically pay homage to dead Japanese war criminals that did horrible things in Korea and Manchuria so regret and restitution are not at the forefront of the Japanese government's collective mind.
I was reading about this in the newspaper this morning, along with some incredibly depressing story about this heinous rapist that targeted senior citizens in the 1970s and 80s who only recently got caught. Eugh. World fail.
11/11/09
Plus the fact that the shipping containers had huge breasted, skinny waisted, big hipped ladies painted on the side didn't do much for their cause. I'm just not quite sure if I understand the purpose of using these stereotyped and fake images to represent something that is extremely real. The only part which was great, was the last container which was lined with various legal speak about sex trafficking. That was the only part where I was like "alright, this is a very, very good point - we alienate through our legal definitions, and make people suffer trauma again and again and again."
There was no mention of children (below sixteen) of either sex in sex trafficking in the exhibit either. It was the disneyland of trafficking, I was more shocked watching "La vie on Rose" than I was by this. #sextrafficking
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
04/30/09
They are a fascinating, brave group of women.
04/30/09
04/30/09
On the one hand, I can understand that the Japanese people today wouldn't want to be blamed for atrocities like what was done to these women, or the Nanjing massacre, or any of the other horrible crimes, any more than I would want to be blamed for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an American. But at the same time, these atrocities didn't just happen, someone did them. The USA takes responsibility for the atom bombs, although I have my doubts about the common sentiment that they were necessary to prevent a land invasion.
In order for these women to get the justice they deserve, shouldn't somebody take responsibility for it, acknowledging that their suffering occurred and it was wrong? But whose responsibility is it? I'm guessing the Japanese would argue that those who are responsible are long dead...
04/30/09
04/30/09
They won't apologize because they feel their actions were justified. Did plantation owners who abused their female slaves apologize?
As roodles already posted: "I'm pretty sure the Japanese government is just waiting until these women die."
But h*lla yes for those women who continue to protest outside the embassy. Keep making noise, show the world you cannot be silenced.
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
It's really interesting from a history/political science point of view to compare the post-war attitude toward "war guilt" in Japan and Germany, as it's been very different in both countries.
Anyway, I think to compare an incredibly complex cultural identity issue (and I'm not saying they shouldn't apologize, because they should) with the fact that Japan happens to export a lot of weird and scary porn is way missing the point.
04/30/09
Part of it has to do with the fact that the Japanese government now doesn't see themselves of a continuation of the wartime government, based on the presence of the anti-war Article 9 in their constitution, and the general tendency of the culture to separate itself or blame everything on the military. But it's a hell of a lot more complicated than that...
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09