<![CDATA[Jezebel: sexual healing]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: sexual healing]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/sexualhealing http://jezebel.com/tag/sexualhealing <![CDATA[Do You Suffer From Restless Vagina Syndrome?]]> The brilliant headline "Restless Vagina Syndrome" had me primed to giggle at whatever Terry J. Allen wrote underneath it, but instead, I ended up fuming at Big Pharma and the patriarchy. So, you know, must be Tuesday.

In the article, Allen traces the marketing of "Female Sexual Dysfunction" (FSD) — yes, the affliction itself, since you can't start marketing a cure until enough people are convinced they have the disease — which might more accurately (if less amusingly) be described as "Listless Vagina Syndrome". "The FDA's evolving definition of FSD includes decreased desire or arousal, sexual pain and orgasm difficulties — but only if the woman feels 'personal distress' about it. So, convincing women to feel distress is a key component of the drug company strategy to market a multi-billion-dollar pill that will cure billions of women of what may not ail them."

And even though the FDA has not yet approved a treatment for Listless Vagina Syndrome, the campaign to inform women that our sex lives are inadequate — but treatable! — is already working. Doctors have written 1.4 million off-label prescriptions for Viagra and 2 million off-label prescriptions for testosterone in an effort to alleviate FSD. And they have done this despite absolutely no evidence that either one will help a flagging female libido! Not to mention, "as filmmaker Liz Canner shows in her excellent new documentary Orgasm, Inc., testosterone is usually teamed with estrogen, which increases risks for stroke, cancers and dementia." Fantastic! Not only will your non-existent illness not be cured, but you might get a whole new one!

I should pause here to point out that there are doubtless plenty of women who wish their libidos were more active, or who otherwise suffer from something that could rightly be termed "sexual dysfunction." And as someone whose life was changed very much for the better by an ADHD diagnosis, I am wary of making any "It's all a plot by Big Pharma!" arguments that erase people who have real problems supposedly invented by greedy drug manufacturers. Nevertheless, the genuine existence of a disorder doesn't mean that aggressive marketing can't lead to an epidemic of overprescription and — especially when it comes to female sexuality — self-recrimination. And it's no coincidence that "experts" in FSD often have ties to pharmaceutical giants. Increased awareness of Female Sexual Dysfunction might be helpful to some women, but it's important that we're at least equally aware of a far more widespread sickness. As Allen puts it:

The companies and clinics that narrow the range of sexual normality to porn industry standards suffer their own disease. Symptoms include: a compulsion to concoct illnesses and then develop drugs to treat them, and vice versa. Either way, the syndrome is typically accompanied by a rash of conflicts of interest.

Restless Vagina Syndrome [In These Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5391166&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["My Job Is So Fulfilling And Enjoyable"]]> We didn't know this was a job option: Mare Simone is a "sex-surrogate." "I earn my living by sleeping with other women's husbands or boyfriends," she explains. Send her your bad-in-bed boyfriend and get back a whole new man! [Sun]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5359684&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dry Spells: Bad For Your Health, Good For His 'Gasm]]> I am not a fan of dry spells. I know they're supposed to give you time to think, or to grieve the end of a relationship, but all I ever do is think about how I'm not getting laid and how the loss of the relationship means the loss of access to regular sex, which means I'm not getting laid and how much of a pain in the ass it is to try to get laid when I could just, mere days before, say, "Hey, wanna go screw now?" and get laid. In other words, I get a little preoccupied and crabby about it and masturbation is a poor substitute and I really do start to feel as though not getting laid is affecting my body more than it reasonably ought to be. But now there's scientific proof that getting laid does a body good (other than the orgasms and the oxytocin and whatever).

When you get stressed out or freaked out, your blood pressure generally goes up, which, for people with high blood pressure, can be a very bad thing. A 2006 study in Scotland shows that (heterosexual) people who've had recent vaginal intercourse react better to stress than people who had a two week dry spell (including masturbation). Masturbation, oral sex and anal sex improved the body's response to stress, but not by as much as good old vaginal penetrative sex. So, really, having sex is just protecting your heart from damage — not, as some chastity advocates might say, setting yourself up for some damage to it.

In slightly more obvious news, a 2001 study of 10 Germany guys who abstained from sex for three weeks had really intense orgasms when jerking off to porn in a laboratory. Supposedly, it didn't make them come any quicker, but I've broken a couple of guys' dry spells in my time, so I ain't buying that last part in the slightest. But in a bit of news I'm happy to help someone use, scientists are reporting that men that have consistent sex tend to have fewer ED problems as they age than men that don't, as long as they don't orgasm too quickly. Scientists hypothesize that having sustained erections (which tends to happen with intercourse but not masturbation) increase the uptake of oxygen to penile tissue, keeping the peen and all its blood vessels healthier in men that keep getting it on as they get older. So, regular sex: good for everyone! Now if only I could work it out for me in particular.

Sexual Dry Spells Hurt Blood Pressure, Intensify Orgasms [LA Times]
Use It Or Lose It: Yes It's True [LA Times]
Photo via Ehsan Khakbaz

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038386&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]> That's it: We're moving to Finland. A bill is being proposed in their parliament to add an extra week to the already government-guaranteed 25 days of vacation a year plus 10 days of government holidays. The extra week is to be used for "love vacations" to reduce the divorce rate and to get the Finns to bond with their mates "on an erotic as well as an emotional level." One question: Can a person take him or herself only on a "love vacation"? Also an idea: Breakup vacations. [NYT]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381117&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Prostitutes Are The New Therapists]]> Hookers are everywhere these days: on the cover of the cover of the Post, in a special Diane Sawyer boasts, you find prostitutes here and there, you can find prostitutes anywhere! But seriously, folks, the nerds over at the New York Times' Freakonomics blog have an interview with two sex workers, Mindy and Dorothy, who answer readers' burning questions about what it's really like to be a prostitute. High or low end, they're all in cahoots with the coppers and they think legalization is ultimately bad for prostitutes because "they will just get exploited. They'll get paid a lot less and be forced to do a lot more." But the most interesting part is that both Mindy and Dorothy think "much of prostitution work is about therapy."

Mindy continues, "These men who paid me thousands of dollars control their worlds. Everyone listens to them. And, at the same time, they are incredibly insecure people. Every man I've had as a regular client went through a period of several months where he just cried — and I still got paid."

Over at the Village Voice, anal sex enthusiast and noted sex writer Tristan Taormino only partially agrees with Mindy. In her "Pucker Up" column, Taormino interviews sex workers rights advocate and journalist Melissa Gira Grant, who says "Some men go to sex workers for closeness and intimacy—they want to cuddle, and that's what they are not getting at home. But for others, it's not emotionally therapeutic at all, it's the same as getting a deep sports massage."

Um, I don't want my boyfriend getting any "deep sports massages!!" Taormino argues that we "need to see sex workers as people performing needed sexual services in our society." Theoretically, I agree with her (and so do many others) — that a consenting adult who wants to sell their sexual services should be allowed to. But in practice prostitution seems like the ultimate in objectification, and most of the women who do it seem to be using it as a last monetary resort, not as a fulfillment of their own kinks. Should sexual healing be one of the benefits covered by your health insurance?

Your Sex Industry Questions Answered [New York Times]
In (Partial) Defense of Eliot Spitzer [Village Voice]

Earlier: Really, Eliot? You Interfaced With This?
Young Beauty Sells Her Body, Breaks Our Hearts
Tristan Taormino: Porn Is As Cerebral As It Is Visceral

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373392&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can't Come From Vaginal Penetration Alone? It's Probably The "Rule Of Thumb!"]]> How many times have you been in flagrante with some dude, having a perfectly nice time, when he begins a series of inquiries as to whether you've come. Then after he's done, he looks up (or down!) at you with a look of confusion and asks, "Why didn't you finish?" Sure, many men don't know that as few as 7% of women can reliably come from vaginal penetration alone — in which case, do you really want to sleep with them? — but for those who do, now they can just look at our vaginas for clues! New research might explain why some women are able to come from vaginal intercourse alone, and most women aren't. According to the Los Angeles Times, it's something called "the rule of thumb": "Clitoris-vagina distances less than 2.5 cm — that's roughly from the tip of your thumb to your first knuckle — tend to yield reliable orgasms during sex."

Basically, if your clit is close to your vagina (C-V distance), you can come from sex. If not, you're S.O.L. Kim Wallen, a professor of psychology and behavioral neuroendocrinology at Emory University, is the one studying the C-V distance theory, but he isn't the first to notice a correlation. According to the L.A. Times:

In the 1920s, Princess Marie Bonaparte, a French psychoanalyst and close friend of Sigmund Freud, grew fed up with her own lack of orgasmic response. In her professional practice, she saw plenty of patients with the same complaint ("frigidity," in the parlance of the day). She blamed physiology, not psyche. Bonaparte collected C-V and orgasm data from her patients and in 1924 delicately published her observations under a pseudonym. (She also persuaded an Austrian surgeon to experiment on her, by cutting around her clitoris and stretching it closer to her vagina — with disappointing results.)
Yikes! If your C-V distance is the size of an end zone, don't fret. Wallen thinks the difficulty of achieving easy female orgasm during intercourse can inspire couples to be more inventive in the sack, though he is concerned that women might feel that a small C-V distance is just another standard women might feel inadequate about, like breast size. "People would ask, 'Is your distance really small?'" Wallen suspects. "Suspects"? Cosmopolitan will certainly find a way!

Female Orgasms And A 'Rule Of Thumb' [Los Angeles Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=355085&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Frisky Marie Claire Writer Tries Not To Have Sex; Fails]]> Writer Colleen Oakley did a stunt for the new issue of Marie Claire magazine that involved not having sex with her fiance for one month. Oakley, you see, was trying to follow the rules set down by Ian Kerner, Ph.D., as outlined in his book, Sex Detox. Kerner recommends a celibacy program to help couples break out of sexual ruts and make sure that they're connecting on an intimate level without sex. The thing is, after starting her detox, Ms. Oakley found that she and Fred, her fiance, couldn't keep their hands off each other: They lasted about four days. Then they tried again and lasted 12 days. (Yeah, he's black, don't start!) And if it wasn't enough that Ms. Oakley wrote about her sex life with Fred in detail for the magazine, the couple appeared on the Today show this morning to talk about it too.

As the clip above shows, Fred had the decency to look vaguely embarrassed and Al Roker seemed to sympathize. In her article, Ms. Oakley admits that she uses "sex as a security blanket" to confirm that she's "attractive and loved." But if a detox was supposed to help her from making everything about sex, didn't it backfire? How is talking about shagging on national TV with a weatherman solving anything? It's cool if you're a frisky kitty, just don't pretend you want to reform. Also: please note the two feet of space between Fred and Colleen on the Today Show couch.

I Swore Off Sex for a Month [Marie Claire]
Related: To Have Better Sex, Give It Up For A Month [NBC News]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349792&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A new study out of Cambridge University...]]> A new study out of Cambridge University reveals why we did so well in college: The more sexual partners students have, the worse they perform in school. Also, students who have had more sexual partners tend to go to worse schools than those who have done less sleeping around. And oddly enough, the survey also found the following: "Students studying medicine are among those who have the most sexual partners compared to mathematicians, who had the fewest..[Veterinary students] come near the bottom of the table, with fewer than two average sexual partners per student." We watch Grey's Anatomy: Everyone knows doctors are big whores. And to all our readers in the U.K.? We suggest you see a vet if you want trustworthy care. [Daily Mail]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349096&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sex Toys: Your Tools To A Healthier Life]]> So, by now most of you have heard the news that on Tuesday, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging Alabama's ban on the sale of vibrators or "any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs for anything of pecuniary value." Today, Slate brings up an interesting point about the wording of the law — which makes exception for sex toy sales concerning a "bona fide medical, scientific, educational, legislative, judicial, or law enforcement purpose" — reminding us that "vibrators were invented as medical equipment for treating female hysteria and other pelvic disorders." But vibrators and dildos are still medically beneficial to both women and men, for a variety of reasons:



Women
Problem: Incontinence or a prolapsed uterus
Treatment: Kegel exercises using weighted barbells, balls, or spring-loaded devices.

Problem: Recovery from Cesarean section
Treatment: Increase blood flow with use of vibrating massager

Problem: Loss of clitoral sensation after hormonal changes from menopause
Treatment: Clitoris pumps or vibrating massager to increase blood flow and feeling

Men
Problem: Prostate disorder
Treatment: Dildo or prostate tickler to massage area and drain built-up fluid

Problem: Erectile dysfunction
Treatment:Penis pump

A Sex Toy A Day Keeps the Doctor Away? [Slate]
Related: A Slide-Show History Of The Vibrator [Slate]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307524&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Sex But Were Afraid To Ask]]> Something about my wide-eyed, fair-skinned appearance and hushed voice and demure demeanor has convinced everyone I know that I know nothing about doing the nasty. (I have been called the "Sandra Dee of Gawker Media" and Anna herself will not accept I am not a virgin.) So last night, I hit up the party marking the 5th Anniversary of NYC's Museum of Sex to learn a little bit more about getting off and getting off good. In addition to photographer Nikola Tamindzic, Jezebel's own resident Slut Machine and Fleshbot's dashing Dashiell came along for good measure, and I learned more than I ever thought I could know about things that have nothing to do with where babies come from. From S&M to foot fetishes to dildos in mail boxes, my and others' sexual education — a story in pictures — below.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307235&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[You know pheromones? Those elusive sorta...]]> You know pheromones? Those elusive sorta smells that cosmetics companies are always trying to bottle and sell to help us find romance through beauty products? Turns out they're the very thing that make girls have sex, well, like girls. It's pheromones, researchers have just discovered, that suppress male sexual behaviors in females. (Or at least that's what happened with a bunch of mice — who started humping like it was nobody's business when their pheromones were suppressed.) Conclusion? That deep down, we chicks are nasty knee-humpers too. [MSNBC]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286597&view=rss&microfeed=true