I just read "Babylon by Bus" over the weekend, and I HIGHLY recommend it - its about two guys who kind of wandered into Iraq in 2004 and wound up working for US Gov. Its completely true (apparently), and provides a really disturbing view into how badly things were managed then. Also, its an incredibly easy read, if, like me, your head is imploding from textbooks. They don't get into women's rights, at all, but it was still a really interesting view into the incompetence of the entire situation.
And let's not forget the issue that underscores the trafficking problem, which is that it flourishes in places where there are military bases and installations. This is the horrible lesson that we had to (and haven't) learn after Bosnia, Korea and Vietnam.
I'm sure that it's just me being naive or under-informed, but if the U.S. State Department knows about the sex trafficking and acknowledges that the Iraqi government is ignoring it, why are we not doing anything to prevent it? If the war really is about rooting out terrorism, why isn't our country actively trying to improve the lives of Iraqis, thereby improving our image?
@sequinsandgin: Rape and sexual slavery are consistently present to military invasions and states of war. the fucking UN had to "try" to stop their own staff from helping themselves to the underage prostitutes who set up camps in occupied areas in Africa.
I'm sure there is a stigma there about mental illness so I would assume that people aren't completely honest in surveys like this and the number is actually higher. It must be so difficult to be in an area where treatment isn't available and that can make you even more depressed.
@Miss Scarlett in the Hall with a Revolver.: Also I would like to say there is stigma in most places about mental illness (even in the US) so I'm not picking on Iraq specifically.
On Saturday, Time also reported that women's rights in Iraq have actually regressed since the fall of Saddam Hussein and sex trafficking is now rampant in the country.
Strange but true. Though he was an evil dictator, Saddam's regime was one of the most secular in the Middle East. This article is interesting.
@VivianDarkbloom: I always appreciated the irony that we made the one 'safest' places in regards to Al Qaeda and the Taliban into an extremist hotbed. Because there was absolutely no advantage to having a psycho secular dictator immediately adjacent to the most psycho of extremist Muslim dictators.
@battleaxonista: I remember a precious few voices trying to be heard on that point before the war started. Far too many people just couldn't comprehend what was being said. It was so obvious that too many people in positions of power just couldn't quite grasp the fact that there are actually differences among the people in the region.
This happens in every country where any foreign government is stationed for a long period of time going all the way back to the Crusades. I am less surprised by the idea that troops are having sex with local prostitutes than by the idea that the South Korean government was so complicit in supplying them.
On the one hand, it is without a doubt horrible to be forced into prostitution (no one questions that). Nevertheless, whether the two governments wanted to stop the spread of std's for the health of the troops or of the women, if the end result is that condom use is more wide-spread and the women are receiving proper treatment for stds they may find themselves carrying, then I don't have a problem with the intervention as it benefits both parties in the longterm (albeit a small benefit perhaps, it is better than having a massive HIV outbreak)
@LaFemme: As a part of Asian history, though, the US looks pretty bad... We liberate the Korean women from the Japanese as WWII sex-slaves, only to turn them into a "product" during the Korean War.
Ok, prostitutes are not "recreation" - I don't care how long you've been in your barracks whacking it yourself. And I'm sure these women weren't living in luxury, receiving real health care, or given a way to report abuse or mistreatment at the hands of the men. But I can't be outraged on behalf of someone who intentionally moved to a town to become a prostitute at the age of 18.
@BlondeGrlz is having a BlondeBoyz!: My mom's friend ended up as a prostitute because she was married off to a guy who was already married and it came to light. Since they had already consummated the marriage, she was viewed as damaged goods despite her basically being tricked in to the marriage. Her family wouldn't have her back and she lost her whole support system and while it might have been a stupid decision to make, she really didn't have a lot of options on how to stay clothed and fed. In the end, she married one of the American military men and moved to America.
@clonie: I doubt those exact circumstances apply very many other women. And although it's true when your only option to not starve or freeze to death is selling your body it doesn't feel much like a choice, we aren't talking about sex trafficking or slavery. I think this really boils down to a pro- or anti-legalized prostitution argument, and I happen to fall on the pro- side.
@BlondeGrlz is having a BlondeBoyz!: I'm just having a gut reaction to not feeling outrage over her situation because she choose to move there since I personally grew up with quite a few women who were prostitutes in Korea after the war. They were/are my aunties and from hearing their stories from my mom, they didn't end up selling their bodies because they were oh so happy to do so, but that it was one of the only options available to them to support themselves for whatever the circumstances were in their lives. So while my example was probably more of an outlier, I know a few others that were probably more typical.
@clonie: Since I was referring to the one specific woman quoted above, I don't know what your reaction is about. If you want to discuss how and why women become prostitutes we're going to need a few hours- but since I've already said I support legalized prostitution (in theory, in practice it's never going to be perfect) read "clevernamehere"'s thread above. She and the other commenters in thread have covered most of it.
Quite a few of mom's Korean friends in America were former prostitutes that ended up marrying one of the men that they serviced and while most of them don't really talk too much about it, she has one friend that is really open about her situation and how she ended up there and it's all really crazy. I wouldn't feel comfortable enough to ask them about their experiences, so everything I've heard has come from my mom (who is incredibly non-judgmental considering her uberChristian leanings).
There is a stereotype in the older Korean community that if you are within a certain age range and married to an American, that you were more likely than not a prostitute.
@clonie: I read your response further down in another thread, and this has me thinking: Can you imagine starting a marriage to someone who was initially your "client"? There would be no pretense of equality or respect as many of us would hope to have in our marriages...
...Plus, as much as I want to think romantically, like my beloved opera, I doubt these American men married for love so much as for a move adventurous sex life than they thought they could get from the girl next door at home. Or am I just completely glass half empty...
@clonie: My grandma knew an awful lot of Korean "war brides" when my grandpa was an Army officer. According to her, they were frequently treated very poorly by their husbands. After she passed away, I found out that she had quietly gone to the commanding officers of the husbands in question and brought the situation to their collective attention. Turns out guys in the military are a lot less likely to beat the crap out of the wives if their commanding officers are keeping an eye out for bruises.
How do those are you who are pro-legalized prositution feel about it? I don't find it to be that far from legalized prositution. Mandatory testing is all about stopping prositutes from spreading disease, not protecting the women. Women who test positive are banned from working, though I can't think of any that have been locked up. The Netherlands has also considered special sex work visas to meet demand- Eastern European women would have the option for a fast tracked work visa that would only allow them to work in the sex trade.
@clevernamehere: In Germany, prostitution is legal. Prostitutes, however, also get health benefits and insurance. So if they contract HIV, they get disability pay because they can no longer work that job. I also think there might be retirement pay in it, but I'm not sure.
I think legalized prostitution in this form protects women. There's also a lot of raids to break up human trafficking. I'm a little torn on the issue - if it's done the way it is in Germany, I have no problem with it. Fact is, prostitution is probably the oldest human trade out there and it's not going away.
@clevernamehere: i am for legalized prostitution to eliminate pimps and the abuse they often dole out to the prostitutes and if the women's health is regulated for their benefit (ie - disease testing, safe sex education, providing them with contraceptives, self defense training, abortion services, etc.). basically, i'm for it if the system of regulation is setup to benefit and protect the workers, not the johns. oh and it would also need to include legislation that would heavily prosecute johns who attempt any rape or unwanted violent act on the woman.
@musicpup is worth twenty camels: Barney: [To Ted] Do you have some puritanical hang up on prostitution? Dude, it's the world's oldest profession. Marshall: Do you really think that's true? Barney: Oh yeah, I bet even Cro-Magnons used to give cave hookers an extra fish for putting out. Marshall: Ah ha, so the oldest profession would be fishermen. Kaboom! You've been lawyered!
@musicpup is worth twenty camels: @junkyardarts: I agree with the two of you. Being for legalized prostitution doesn't mean supporting this shit arrangement. But you raise a good point, clevername, that in reality, that's essentially what this turning a blind eye was allowed to become.
@musicpup is worth twenty camels: I don't have a problem with legalized prostitution for the sake of devaluing and hopefully dissolving the exploitation- making it so the prostitutes are women who really want to do this for their work and not women who feel they have no other options and nowhere to go for help. So the German model seems a good one. The problem with the South Korean model is that the government, instead of dissolving exploitation, became complicit in it, which magnified the problem because the ones doing the exploiting were now the ones who didn't even have to hide from police.
@JerseyGrrrl: The thing is, I don't even think it is a blind eye. When you say sex work is just a job its is very tricky to then turn around and say but we won't give specialized sex visas to way we give specialized computer programming visas. Sure you can say it is coersive and feeds on dire economic straits, but the sex workers in both the Netherlands and Germany are 70+% foriegn so how different is there position than the women who might be offered a sex visa in Belarus?
If the concern was protecting the women, the johns would have to submit a recent STD test before visiting a brothel. They don't because those laws were designed around the idea that sex workers are the vectors of disease, even thoigh the receptive sex partner is always far more at risk.
@RisaPlata: I don't think sex work will ever becoming something only women who really want to do it are involved it. Demand is greater when it is legalized and there will always be poor people who are truly desperate for money.
03/09/09
Also, its an incredibly easy read, if, like me, your head is imploding from textbooks.
They don't get into women's rights, at all, but it was still a really interesting view into the incompetence of the entire situation.
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
What point are you trying to make? At first glance, this comment is disgusting.
03/09/09
03/09/09
03/09/09
Strange but true. Though he was an evil dictator, Saddam's regime was one of the most secular in the Middle East. This article is interesting.
[www.hrw.org]
03/09/09
03/09/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
On the one hand, it is without a doubt horrible to be forced into prostitution (no one questions that). Nevertheless, whether the two governments wanted to stop the spread of std's for the health of the troops or of the women, if the end result is that condom use is more wide-spread and the women are receiving proper treatment for stds they may find themselves carrying, then I don't have a problem with the intervention as it benefits both parties in the longterm (albeit a small benefit perhaps, it is better than having a massive HIV outbreak)
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
There is a stereotype in the older Korean community that if you are within a certain age range and married to an American, that you were more likely than not a prostitute.
01/08/09
...Plus, as much as I want to think romantically, like my beloved opera, I doubt these American men married for love so much as for a move adventurous sex life than they thought they could get from the girl next door at home. Or am I just completely glass half empty...
01/08/09
01/08/09
My grandma kicked ass.
01/08/09
But then, I'm anti-legalized prositution.
How do those are you who are pro-legalized prositution feel about it? I don't find it to be that far from legalized prositution. Mandatory testing is all about stopping prositutes from spreading disease, not protecting the women. Women who test positive are banned from working, though I can't think of any that have been locked up. The Netherlands has also considered special sex work visas to meet demand- Eastern European women would have the option for a fast tracked work visa that would only allow them to work in the sex trade.
01/08/09
I think legalized prostitution in this form protects women. There's also a lot of raids to break up human trafficking. I'm a little torn on the issue - if it's done the way it is in Germany, I have no problem with it. Fact is, prostitution is probably the oldest human trade out there and it's not going away.
01/08/09
that is my prostitution utopia
01/08/09
@musicpup is worth twenty camels: Barney: [To Ted] Do you have some puritanical hang up on prostitution? Dude, it's the world's oldest profession.
Marshall: Do you really think that's true?
Barney: Oh yeah, I bet even Cro-Magnons used to give cave hookers an extra fish for putting out.
Marshall: Ah ha, so the oldest profession would be fishermen. Kaboom! You've been lawyered!
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
If the concern was protecting the women, the johns would have to submit a recent STD test before visiting a brothel. They don't because those laws were designed around the idea that sex workers are the vectors of disease, even thoigh the receptive sex partner is always far more at risk.
@RisaPlata: I don't think sex work will ever becoming something only women who really want to do it are involved it. Demand is greater when it is legalized and there will always be poor people who are truly desperate for money.
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
D'OH.