<![CDATA[Jezebel: sexplanations]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: sexplanations]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/sexplanations http://jezebel.com/tag/sexplanations <![CDATA[ Dr. Betty Dodson Answers Sex Questions Orally ]]> Dr. Betty Dodson, author/sex educator and masturbation expert, as taken her advice to YouTube, in which she answers emailed questions with a friend about sex ranging from analingus to double-headed dildos. The format seems very familiar, but way more informed, scientifically, than two stoner pals could ever be about how much poop your body can ingest from rimming before you get sick.

Analingus, Double Dildos, And Lost Libido [Dodson and Ross]

]]>
Jezebel-5075279 Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:20:00 EST Tracie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5075279&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ When It Comes To Sex, What Exactly Is "Normal"? ]]> The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (or DSM) is like the bible of American psychiatry, but it's been pretty controversial, as far as what's been included about sexual behaviors. (Up until the mid 1970s, homosexuality was listed in the DSM as a mental disorder.) The last DSM was published in 1994, and it was announced recently that the American Psychiatric Association is picking members to contribute to the development of the newest edition of the DSM, which will be published in 2012. The DSM is super important, as it's the standard on what we view as deviant behavior, so certain groups want to make sure that issues like Gender Identity are handled with great care and sensitivity. (A bunch of crap also needs to be removed from the manual, particularly paraphilias like transvestism, sexual sadism and sexual masochism. Like really, who still thinks S&M is a mental disorder when it's like such a clichéd, cheesy kink? For real, S&M is like the Hot Topic in the mall of sexuality. It's trying to be different, it's trying to freak you out, it's trying to piss off parents, but in the end, it's really kind of…normal.)

A story on MSNBC today delves into the controversy erupting among members of the APA working on the development of the new DSM, reporting that "at least one petition, spearheaded by transgender activists, is being circulated to oppose the appointment of some members to the Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders work group and its chair, Kenneth Zucker, head of the Gender Identity Service at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada." With regards to the definition of normal vs. disordered sex, it seems to me that "sane" eroticism is anything that is enjoyable and consensual for all parties involved, whether it be in missionary position with a partner of the opposite sex, or hanging by nipple clamps while a group of men in panties beat off into a pair of shoes. Because while the latter may not be right, it's okay. (I can't believe I just quoted Whitney Houston and it made perfect sense.)

What's ‘Normal’ Sex? Shrinks Seek Definition [MSNBC]

]]>
Jezebel-5010592 Thu, 22 May 2008 18:00:00 EDT Tracie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Legality Of "Road Head" (Or, 13 States In Which We've Broken The Law By Giving A Beej) ]]> With a bunch of states finally getting around to banning text messaging while driving, I began to wonder what other bad-idea auto activities are illegal. Actually, the only one I really care about — or engage in — is "road head" (when the driver of a car receives oral sex, for those prudes/pedestrians out there). It's kinda mainstream, since it's been featured in movies like Crash and friggin' Parenthood, but I was thinking that since it is kinda dangerous, and potentially deadly, it must be moving violation. Right?

I couldn't find any specific written laws (by state, that is) that says that road head is a no-no. But that's actually because in so many states, regular, plain ol' BJs are totally illegal, no matter where you're giving or receiving them. Many states have ye olde tyme-y anti-gay rules that outlaw any sex that isn't penis/vagina. Here are a list that I was able to put together.

Alabama (not surprising, given their laws on sex toys) Penalty = 1 year/$2,000
Florida Penalty = 60 days/$500
Idaho Penalty = 5 years to life…life!
Kansas Penalty = 6 months/$1,000, (only applies to same-sex acts)
Louisiana Penalty = 5 years/$2,000
Michigan Penalty = up to 15 years imprisonment, repeat offenders get life
Mississippi Penalty = 10 years
North Carolina Penalty = 10 years/discretionary fine
Oklahoma Penalty = 10 years (only applies to same-sex acts)
South Carolina Penalty = 5 years/$500
Texas Penalty = $500 (only applies to same-sex acts)
Utah Penalty = 6 months/$1,000
Virginia Penalty = 1-5 years

It's good to know that of the three states (that I can remember, at least) I've given and received road head — Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York — I wasn't technically breaking the law. But it is kinda dangerous to do. I haven't done it in about a year or two, but that's just because I don't have a car and I haven't dated anyone with one since then.

]]>
Jezebel-5009772 Mon, 19 May 2008 16:20:00 EDT Tracie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009772&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 5 Mistakes That "Sexperts" Make When Giving Advice ]]> yvonne51208.jpgWe know that the only expectation we can count on Fox News to meet is one of disappointment — if not utter, hair-pulling frustration — but its reliable inanity doesn't mean that its immune to critique, particularly when doling out "fair and balanced" sex advice. Today, "sexpert" (if words could be killed off, that would be the first on our hit list) Yvonne K. Fulbright enumerated the "10 Sex Mistakes That Women Make." While Fulbright did provide two tips that we can get on-board with — "the occasional potty mouth can be a passion-inducer" and "don't use sex manipulatively" — the rest is really off the mark. So after the jump, we've compiled the 5 Mistakes That Sexperts Make When Giving Advice!


1. Photographic Representation
Why is it that sexperts are always photographed coyly chewing on the stem of their glasses and showing cleavage? Real writers need their glasses on at all times, and usually type without even wearing a bra. (Or at least, that's been my experience in life.)

2. Employing the term "hot mama."
Telling mothers to not neglect their sexual sides and referring to them as "hot mamas" is the "literary" equivalent of scraping one's nails across a blackboard.

3. Sending Mixed Messages About Body Image
In her 10 Mistakes, Fulbright tells women to embrace their bodies, saying, "Walk around naked. Have sex with the lights on." And that's fine, but within the same article she says, "Strive to stay trim and look your best."

4. Advising Women To Act "Feminine" By Pretending That They Aren't Human
Fulbright says, "Between major weight gain, bodily functions, and divulging daily care habits, a lot of women fail to remain branded in their men's brains as sexy. While self-care and what we do in the loo is nothing to be ashamed of, keep it in the bathroom. Don't talk about shaving, your period, your last bowel movement, etc."

5. Neglecting To Give Women The Most Crucial Piece Of Sex Advice
Nowhere in her 10 Mistakes does Fulbright recommend that every woman own a vibrator. Nor does she say that women should discover their bodies and learn what they like and dislike. Lastly, she completely fails to mention that the biggest mistake a woman can make in bed is ignoring her own desires.

FOXSexpert: 10 Sex Mistakes Women Make [Fox News]

]]>
Jezebel-390149 Tue, 13 May 2008 17:00:00 EDT Tracie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390149&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Sexist Business Of Sex Writing ]]> sexwriginb.jpgI'm pissed. It's an anger that's been on a slow boil that's beginning to bubble over, and at this point, there's no putting a lid on it. I've been writing about sex on a pretty public platform for some time now, at first anonymously, and then under my real name. I've had to endure ignorant assumptions and cheap shots made about my looks, my weight, my vagina, my tits, my sexual health, my mental health, my morality, my character — and all for what? Being honest? For liking sex? I've poured my guts out all over my keyboard, and I'm well aware that that invites criticism, particularly on the internet, where people think they can say whatever the fuck they please — in the most offensive manner possible that they would never employ in real life — with impunity because they're protected behind a shroud of anonymity. It's frustrating. And lemme tell you, I am so sick of people telling me, "You write about sex and personal issues. You have to accept that people will sling insults." Fuck. That. Shit. I don't have to accept it. I refuse to accept it. Mostly because I know that this wouldn't happen if I were a man.



I'm pissed because people so frequently try to take women down a peg by attacking their sexuality, automatically throwing out names like "whore" and "slut." And that shit happens to me, even though I own my promiscuity. It's even more hurtful when it comes from other women.

Sexual double standards are still annoyingly prevalent, and tearing them down has been my personal crusade as a feminist. Accepting insults cast upon my sex life would be undoing everything I've set out to accomplish. I hate when people say that I fuck so much because I have a low self-esteem, or that I'm lonely, or that I just want attention. In fact, in my first ever post on my personal blog, I stated that the only void I'm trying to fill is the one between my legs. And I know that I'm not the only one. There are tons of other women out there just like me (you're probably reading this right now!), who engage in casual sex purely for the physical merits of it. And I think that we all find comfort or solidarity in sharing our stories with each other, because as women, that's how we do: Bitches love talking.

I feel defeated sometimes knowing that people aren't able to fathom that women don't need a reason to have sex other than just wanting to fuck. It's like, if we aren't in a relationship or prostituting, then there must something wrong with us. By saying that sex is only useful to single women as a commodity devalues our existence.

What's more is that I've never tried to be sexy in my writing. If anything, I like to explore the more unpleasant aspects of sex, because they're more interesting to me (like herpes or queefing). And you know, I don't have any delusions about being completely altruistic. I get plenty of benefits from writing about sex, like this job, for example.

I know I can tend to be all TMI, but I think that's because I place a lot of emphasis on I, and if people think that's TM, then TS. That's much more of a reflection on them than me. I've noticed that the shit I tend to write is like a literary Rorschach test.

And I'm probably preaching to the choir here, since this isn't a common problem I encounter on Jezebel (which actually proves my point that I'm not the only unabashed slut out there). But from here on out, I'm putting my foot down. I'm not taking any shit anymore, because like it or not, it's not gonna keep me from spreading my legs, my anecdotes, or my opinions. Real talk.

Earlier: Queefs: What's The Etiquette For Dealing With Air Up There?
Contrary To Popular Belief, Herpes Is So Whatevs
Last Night I Boned An AVN Award Nominee

]]>
Jezebel-388202 Wed, 07 May 2008 17:00:00 EDT Tracie http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388202&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Scientists have discovered fossils suggesting ... ]]> longoria080907.jpgScientists have discovered fossils suggesting that early female humans (hominids) were significantly smaller than their male counterparts. What does this mean? According to Reuters, this means that "mankind's upright ancestors may have been physiologically closer to modern gorillas and chimpanzees, which also exhibit big differences in size between males and females, than had been supposed." And! "This could also mean the sexual behavior of Homo erectus was more like that of apes, where individuals, especially males, mate with several partners, sometimes in a few hours, than that of its more monogamous human successors." [Reuters]

]]>
Jezebel-287951 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:00:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=287951&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why We Have Sex, Reasons 238-252 ]]> nickvanessa.jpgBreaking news! According to the Ivory Tower, "all the most inane, minimally-researched studies get the maximum media exposure" wing, there are 237 reaons humans have sex that pretty much all boil down to "why not?" Shockingly, they're somewhat redundant: "I had no self control" and "It was a romantic setting" are just different ways of saying "I was drunk," in our experience, and "The person's physical appearance turned me on" and "The person had a desirable body" could, depending on the level of alcohol imbibed, mean the same thing as "I was slumming." And yeah we're taking New York Times resident sexologist John Tierney's bait and adding our own, most of which boil down to "I am poor," if not quite as poor as Tierney's fourth commenter, who suggests "So I could bum a cigarette afterwards." Classy!
  • The um, news? Was somehow inspiring?
  • You were locked out of the house.
  • The person really needed to get laid and you like to think of yourself as a Good Samaritan. (Sexaritan?)
  • To avoid being groped by someone even uglier after the inevitable loss of consciousness on the subway ride home.
  • Because you were feeling fat, but he was actually fat, thereby making you feel small, and in any case ridding you of some much-maligned water weight.
  • He played "Range Life" on the jukebox.
  • You'd had good luck with that astrological sign before.

  • You'd never fucked someone of that ethnic origin before.
  • Because you had a close girlfriend who'd fucked him once and if you're not the type of girl to gay out on your girlfriends, being a degree of sexaration from them is almost as much of a bonding experience as, like, sharing breast milk. More if you think about how much easier it is to expose yourself to each other's diseases with the help of a dude!
  • They had achieved a somewhat absurd, ideally niche and/or D-list brand of fame and it was a good story.
  • Like, for instance, Steve Aoki.
  • Um, the Starr report had just come out and it dawned on you that you were pathetic.
  • The surliest guy at the office became decidedly less surly at happy hour.
  • The person played the Dead Milkmen on the jukebox.
  • The masturbation is maybe giving you carpal tunnel?

Okay, now have fun and add your own, etc. etc.

]]>
Jezebel-284302 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:07:16 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=284302&view=rss&microfeed=true