<![CDATA[Jezebel: sex and health]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: sex and health]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/sexandhealth http://jezebel.com/tag/sexandhealth <![CDATA[Do Spirituality & Prayer Make Women More Promiscuous?]]> A new study found that sexually satisfied women had better "wellbeing" and "vitality" then less satisfied ones. But another study showed that women's spirituality was linked with having lots of unprotected sex.

The first study, conducted on 295 Australian women between the ages of 20 and 65, found "that women who were sexually dissatisfied had lower wellbeing and lower vitality," according to lead study author Dr. Sonia Davison. Davison says, "This finding highlights the importance of addressing these areas as an essential part of women's health care, because women may be uncomfortable discussing these issues with their doctor." Interestingly, the women who were dissatisfied with their sex lives weren't necessarily having less sex than satisfied ones. According to the study's EurekAlert press release,

The most commonly reported sexual problems in the area of consensual sexuality in women relate to sexual desire and interest, pleasure and satisfaction, and for most women these are part of the overall sexual experience, and are inextricably related. In contrast to studies of interventions for male erectile dysfunction, benefit of treatment in women with sexual dysfunction cannot be measured simply by the frequency of sexual events, as women frequently continue to be sexually active despite a high level of sexual dissatisfaction.

"Sexual events" makes sex sound like the Olympics, and it's not a big surprise that women's "vitality" isn't boosted by having a bunch of sex they're not into. The study did make me curious about men, though. Although maybe "frequency of sexual events" is a good measure of erectile function, I doubt it's a perfect measure of male sexual satisfaction. We already know that the stereotype of men wanting sex all the time isn't necessarily based in fact — might it also be true that men care about "sexual desire and interest, pleasure and satisfaction," and not just how often they can stick it in something? Just a thought.

The second study, meanwhile, looked at 353 undergraduates and found that women who were spiritual had more sex with more partners, and were less likely to use condoms. Researchers measured spirituality using something called the Spiritual Transcendence Scale, which measures qualities like prayer fulfillment, universality, and connectedness. Connectedness appeared to have the biggest effect on sex. Researcher Jessica Burris says,

Believing one is intimately tied to other human beings and that interconnectedness and harmony are indispensible may lead one to believe sexual intimacy possesses a divine or transcendent quality in itself. In fact, ascribing sacred qualities to sex has been positively associated with positive affective reactions to sex, frequency of sex, and number of sexual partners among university students.

Being spiritual apparently had a greater effect on sexual behavior than alcohol use, impulsivity, or even religion. And researchers felt that the effects were independent of other personality traits, like openness. While an earlier study showed that spiritual practices like mindfulness and yoga could improve women's sex lives, this study implies that spirituality's influence on number of partners and condom use might promote the spread of STDs. Burris says, "Spirituality, at least for women, could be considered a risk factor."

Men who were spiritual, by contrast, tended to have less sex. According to Sally Law's LiveScience writeup of the study, "The researchers figure men might not view spirituality as sexual because they biologically don't think of sex as a gateway to emotional intimacy." I'm not sure if this confusing language ("they biologically don't think?") owes more to Law or to Burris and her co-authors, but it would be nice if coverage of sex research didn't paint men as emotionless thrusting machines. The male orgasm may not be elusive, but it would still be interesting to see more research into men's sexual satisfaction and, yes, feelings. Without it, we just keep getting the same message — that women are weird and complicated, while dudes just want their dicks sucked. Or, you know, accessorized with neckties.

Better Sex Linked To Good Health For Women [Telegraph]
Sexually Satisfied Women Have Better General Well-Being And More Vitality [EurekAlert]
Spiritual Women Have More Sex [LiveScience]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5371093&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dry Spells: Bad For Your Health, Good For His 'Gasm]]> I am not a fan of dry spells. I know they're supposed to give you time to think, or to grieve the end of a relationship, but all I ever do is think about how I'm not getting laid and how the loss of the relationship means the loss of access to regular sex, which means I'm not getting laid and how much of a pain in the ass it is to try to get laid when I could just, mere days before, say, "Hey, wanna go screw now?" and get laid. In other words, I get a little preoccupied and crabby about it and masturbation is a poor substitute and I really do start to feel as though not getting laid is affecting my body more than it reasonably ought to be. But now there's scientific proof that getting laid does a body good (other than the orgasms and the oxytocin and whatever).

When you get stressed out or freaked out, your blood pressure generally goes up, which, for people with high blood pressure, can be a very bad thing. A 2006 study in Scotland shows that (heterosexual) people who've had recent vaginal intercourse react better to stress than people who had a two week dry spell (including masturbation). Masturbation, oral sex and anal sex improved the body's response to stress, but not by as much as good old vaginal penetrative sex. So, really, having sex is just protecting your heart from damage — not, as some chastity advocates might say, setting yourself up for some damage to it.

In slightly more obvious news, a 2001 study of 10 Germany guys who abstained from sex for three weeks had really intense orgasms when jerking off to porn in a laboratory. Supposedly, it didn't make them come any quicker, but I've broken a couple of guys' dry spells in my time, so I ain't buying that last part in the slightest. But in a bit of news I'm happy to help someone use, scientists are reporting that men that have consistent sex tend to have fewer ED problems as they age than men that don't, as long as they don't orgasm too quickly. Scientists hypothesize that having sustained erections (which tends to happen with intercourse but not masturbation) increase the uptake of oxygen to penile tissue, keeping the peen and all its blood vessels healthier in men that keep getting it on as they get older. So, regular sex: good for everyone! Now if only I could work it out for me in particular.

Sexual Dry Spells Hurt Blood Pressure, Intensify Orgasms [LA Times]
Use It Or Lose It: Yes It's True [LA Times]
Photo via Ehsan Khakbaz

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038386&view=rss&microfeed=true