Also, I hope nobody who is attending the "Obama=socialist" rallies is driving to them on our COMMUNAL ROADS. Woops I guess this means they can't take the dreaded PUBLIC transportation either! GET OFF OUR SOCIALIST ROADS, COMMIE LOVERS!
It seems as if "socialist" and "Hitler" is the GOP's form of "lol." They only say it when they have nothing useful to contribute to the actual conversation. By the way, I'm sixteen. This whole "permission slip" thing outrages me. We got a little form saying that you could have your parents sign it if they didn't want you to watch the speech. I'm sorry, but my parents aren't going to stop me. I think I can decide for myself if I want to watch a speech or not. Coming from a conservative little town in the middle of a bunch of cornfields, I have a lot of people at school saying that they don't want to watch it or that Obama needs shot, which I think is just...stupid, for lack of a better word. I can say that I WILL be watching the speech, and I will continue to be a proud supporter of our president. Being ignorant is not something to be proud of.
I think that these presidential speeches should be aired at schools. We have a right to know what's going on in the world, regardless or whether we like the president or not. Back in third grade, we were shown footage of the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground. If we can handle that in THIRD GRADE, we can handle a little speech in eleventh.
-SIGH- Done now. Sorry for the slightly long comment. (By the way, this is my first time commenting. I've been a long, long time reader of the site. I've never had the courage to comment until now.)
Ugh, the GOP is the Idiocracy party. Words can not adequately express how fucking disgusted I am with these people.
I was talking to my mom who grew up in CT at a time when it was a quintessential Republican stronghold, but it was like Rockefeller Republicans, not this miasma of stupidity like it is today. Her dad was REALLY conservative (my mom's liberal) and she said that even he would be completely disgusted with the GOP today. I think even before he died she said that he was not a fan of Bush, because Bush is stupid and my grandfather was anything but stupid.
Well of course now the GOP has lost the northeast just about completely and for the forseeable future, because the people for whom the republicans actually work for (rich people) got turned off by Nixon's southern strategy and focus on demented "debates" and bullshit social issues.
It's a coalition of borderline mentally ill idiots and I would say it should be marginalized as much as possible. Do they not realize that they're being "indoctrinated" by Fox news and the like? Seriously, my inner Marxist is screaming FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS at these asswads.
Fuck, if I had kids and there was going to be a Bush speech at school, I'd still let them go and then have a "teachable moment" at home. Nice parenting, jackasses. ARGHHHHHHWTFFFFHULK SMASH
I'm in Denmark for the semester, and I was trying yesterday to explain our crazy right-wingers to my new Danish friend. He couldn't even comprehend the idiocy. See, in Denmark, everyone has health care and paid maternity/paternity leave for a year, free daycare, and if you're fired you'll make the same amount of money as you did at your job just through unemployment. And the minimum wage is really high, and required for all jobs.
Sounds absolutely horrific, doesn't it? So bad that we MUST lash out every time our president opens his mouth. For Chrissakes.
All of these assholes that think that SOCIALISM is creeping up their ass, public education is a theological problem, medicare is communist, insurance companies (the largest of whom, we just bailed out ) will go under due to competition from the Fed - THIS IS A FANTASY!
Go ahead, put your kids and your health in the care of for-profit entities - but know that your taxes WILL pay for those who can't afford private-sector service. It's that fucking simple. You have a choice, good luck affording it. We are where we are now because the private sector, given free reign, WILL EAT ITS' HOST.
BUSH told you to invest your retirement in the markets and the markets FUCKED you. How does someone like Madoff become so successful? BECAUSE THE MARKET DOES NOT POLICE ITSELF. Merrill Lynch, Lehmann Bros, they all knew better than to be involved with the guy, they all knew the housing market was driving them toward a cliff, yet none of them had the restraint to avoid CANNIBALIZING the economy.
am i the only one who thinks Brett Curtis, an engineer from Pearland, Tex, ought not to send his kids to public schools if he's so concerned about socialism and socialist messages? did he totally not realize the absolute irony of his statement that he DOESN'T want a socialist message being sent to his children while they sit at their taxpayer funded desks in their taxpayer funded schools, taught by men and women who are employees of the government?
Indoctrinating students to liberal beliefs? I agree that is totally inappropriate. We should never push any sort of belief system on young school children, especially one that espouses liberal ideas. Anything you tell them at a young age is going to push the idea that certain leaders, people or forms of government are better than others.
Now, I'd like everyone to stand up, face the flag at the front of the room, put their hand on their heart and say it with me:
"I pledge ALLEGIANCE to the flag
of the United States of America.
and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands:
one nation, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, with liberty and justice for all."
@Katxyz: Do you know who wrote the pledge...A SOCIALIST. Whose cousin wrote the shitty nationalist-socialist utopian novel, "Looking Backward." And that is just one of the reasons why I do not understand the Right's support of the Pledge. SUCH a creepy-ass loyalty oath lite.
And the original protocol, before a flag code was established, was a salute to the flag, which was abandoned during WWII because it was strikingly similar to the Nazi salute and, well, we don't want anyone thinking the U.S. is nationalist.
I'll keep my opinion to myself on this issue since lately that's all I feel like doing during these discussions, but I hope this provides a thought exercise for both sides.
I know! Right about the same time we wanted to prove we were different from Godless socialists... so many coincidences in the history of the pledge. If I didn't know better, I would think someone was actively changing it in order to influence the values and beliefs of the country and teach them to children.
Can't we just ignore conservatives already? I mean they have nothing to contribute to logical discussions. When the basis of an argument is inherently flawed, there is no opportunity for progress. I mean these people think dinosaurs and humans coexisted at one time. Let's just not bother with them, as a whole.
@sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell: Well, I like the conservative concept of a free market, respect for individual rights, and a small federal gov't. Taking a look at the liberal solution (large and intrusive gov't and a regulated market) and what it did to this country in the past, I'll stick with the conservative side despite Glen Beck being a douche-bag.
@sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell: Ignoring them only means that whoever organizes their discontent will gain power. Ignorance and power are the constituents of evil, and it is a crime not to keep the two, aligned, in check.
@Gessho: What about what the Republicans have done to this country... have you been living outside the states for the past eight years? And I think it goes a lot deeper than Glenn Beck being a douchebag.
Edited by sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell at 09/04/09 3:06 PM
sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell was starred
sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell was unstarred
@Jack_Burton: My point is that these people are going to cringe and complain at anything the President does, regardless of how logical or bipartisan it is. I think we should spend our time furthering our agenda rather than addressing their emotional, irrational concerns.
@sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell: I do not disagree. Still, their zealotry needs to be addressed by debunking the lies and hypocrisy. Otherwise, they'll become inflamed to the point of (perhaps innocent) people being hurt or killed. History confirms this.
@Gessho: Check your history books, dude. The conservatives haven't been for a free market, individual rights, and a small gov't since Eisenhower.
Also that "large and intrusive gov't bailout" was engineered by "conservative" Dubya. Then again the economic collapse that brought about the bailout was mostly engineered by GOP corporate policies w/r/t taxation - so there's a cause and effect. You can't cherry pick and claim that Republicans are true conservatives. They just like power and dupe a bunch of mo-rans into voting against their economic self-interest.
Furthermore the FDR big-gov't policies following Keynesian economics fucking, um, worked, so I don't see your point there.
FURTHERMORE furthermore nobody is arguing for a command market, but EVERYBODY (even Adam Smith, the GOP's professed god) argues for a regulated market. This nonsense that somehow the Democrats want to end capitalism is completely unfounded.
I don't mind true conservatives - they tend to have a misanthropic distrust of utopian schemes and favor evolution over revolution, as do I - but there aren't any left in the Republican party.
@Kendrajayne: Modern conservatism is not anything like classical liberalism, nor is it anything like classical conservatism. The GOP is a party without a philosophy, but they love power. They are intellectually dishonest (who are they the heirs of? Burke or Locke?) and that is evident in their continuous attempt to frame the debate in any terms other than rational thought. The real shame is that the Democrats let them do it.
Your statement that modern conservatism is to thank for "near every right and privilege" is baffling and doesn't do much to refute your point that conservatives are uneducated morons. There has been a broad expansion over what we as a society considers rights and privileges and if we're "keeping score" I'd say it's split evenly over both sides of the ideological spectrum over the history of the country; although conservatives haven't done a great deal for the past 100 years.
@Gessho: And if the conservative party actually represented those things any more, people would be less frustrated with them. That party, much like liberals, Dems, and Repubs, has shifted hugely in terms of what they represent. The people currently calling themselves Conservatives, and who represent that party, are mainly parroting nasty rhetoric, fear mongering, and conservative moral values.
FYI, Liberals don't want a large and intrusive government in your personal life. They just want the government to take care of things like healthcare. Which, to me, is way less big government the major talking points of the conservatives...which is apparently making sure those less fortunate get screwed every which way possible, Christian morality as law, and all kinds of social influence the government shouldn't have. That's not respect for individual rights.
Also, I think the "free market" idea as some kind of nebulous that doesn't need any oversight is, at best, problematic. It clearly does.
Glenn Beck isn't a Conservative, by the way. He's someone who has come unhinged and spouts uneducated lies.
@meritxell: Thank you. Every time these posts come up I wonder what Conservative party folks are talking about. The party may have once been about these things, but that's not currently what's represented. At all.
@Gessho: how do you reconcile the conservative concept of respect for individual rights when conservatives want to wage a holy war against women's autonomy over their uteruses and gay marriage?
My conservative, home-schooling sister-in-law just posted on her facebook account that she has voted against this speech (even though her children, home-schooled, would not be "forced" to watch this.) It's the comments on her posting that frighten me. So many of her conservative Christian friends in Virginia saying things like, "I'm glad I'm going to be homeschooling my young ones, goodness knows what they'd hear in public schools."
I am truly appalled at an entire class of people who reject the public school option because their children might hear something that the parents disagree with. It's bad enough that my brother brags that his children have no idea who Britney Spears is because their access to the "outside" world is so tightly controlled. How are these children supposed to actually live in the world with the rest of us? Are they so weak that the merest exposure to Britney's abs will cause them to throw off their clothing and become prostitutes?
I am the opposite. I expose my son to whatever the world has to offer, and do it while I'm with him so that we can talk about it. It makes him stronger in himself and he can talk about the kids who smoke pot, drink, and have sex, without needing to be one of them. Of course, I am not a member of the cult of Christianity so I am not threatened by my son having knowledge. Perhaps that is the difference.
@leftyleftylou: I wish I could promote this but I'll have to settle for replying. This whole cult of people who home school their children out of some "religious" reason are like people who didn't want their kids in desegregated schools in. They're only doing their children the disservice of making them more susceptible to ignorance.
@leftyleftylou: I would have thought you were talking about my sister, except she lives in Michigan. We had a very liberal Catholic upbringing, but we ended up moving in drastically different directions once we got older.
@leftyleftylou: I was homeschooled because my parents think public schools are minimum security prisons that stifle creativity. No religious training, my sister ran wild as a teenager, and I was told by my parents that marijuana wasn't a terrible thing at a time when my entire thought process on the subject was, "drugs are baaaaad, mommy!"
My boyfriend & I talked about this. He had seen online one of the lesson plans the White House had sent out. He described some of the wording as "disturbing".
I was like WTF? Disturbing. That the President is addressing the nation's school children & the teachers are supposed to talk about it. They were lesson plans, asking questions examining the content of the speech & it's importance.
It really upset me as I generally regard him as a pretty smart dude but I felt he really missed the mark. I felt it was no different than how we generally talk about past speeches by past presidents.
Talking to children does not automatically make a speech propaganda!
Let's just not teach civics at all. We're giving up on science, why not toss out government while we're at it. Next up: math. Some nut job is going to claim 3 + 3 = 6 is some liberal indoctrination formula and insist the answer be changed to 7. Reading's out, too, some parents don't want their kids reading the commie word 'we' so nobody's kids get to read the word 'we'. Soon schoolchildren all over the country will spend their days tracing the phrase "cute shoes!" and randomly answering teacher inquiries with "first!"
@Chamalla, now gainfully employed: This made me laugh really hard, but now I am quietly disturbed because of how easily this sort of 1984 crazy can take/has taken over.
@the_fraulein: Humor is the only thing that keeps me from going full-fetal under my desk or knocking myself senseless by banging my head on the surface.
I love that these are the same people who smugly told me back in the Bush days: "If you don't like the way the country is being run, get the fuck out of America."
Is it my turn to tell them off the same way? Hopefully with a big smarmy grin?
I hated every minute of Bush's presidency when I was a student, but I paid attention to what he was doing and saying. I didn't respect any of it, but I wanted to be informed. I couldn't rely on my republican parents or our conservative leaning local newspaper for the true facts. I wanted to hear him speak and then make up my own mind. And so I could break down the crazy piece by piece and have something to argue with my parents about over dinner.
But why is a speech telling kids about the benefits of education even controversial? I don't want to blindly hate republicans. But I'm surrounded by republicans who, while maybe not spewing the crazy themselves, buy into all this shit enough to not take back their party and act a little more logical when dealing with political disagreements. You don't like Obama? Great, tell me why, we can discuss it! We can debate it! There was little I enjoyed more than talking about how much I didn't like Dubya. But your circular logic (or typical lack of logic all together) is making rational discussions impossible.
Stop the name calling and do some fucking research. Get your questions and objections in order and then go about projecting them in a reasonably not crazy fashion. When I wanted to be taken seriously that's what I did. Don't accept anything the news says at face value. Please stop being offended by or scared of educated people. Stop throwing around words you clearly don't understand.
And for the sake of puppies and unicorns, stop comparing Obama to Hitler, you racist, ignorant, assholes.
09/05/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
I think that these presidential speeches should be aired at schools. We have a right to know what's going on in the world, regardless or whether we like the president or not. Back in third grade, we were shown footage of the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground. If we can handle that in THIRD GRADE, we can handle a little speech in eleventh.
-SIGH- Done now. Sorry for the slightly long comment. (By the way, this is my first time commenting. I've been a long, long time reader of the site. I've never had the courage to comment until now.)
09/04/09
09/04/09
I was talking to my mom who grew up in CT at a time when it was a quintessential Republican stronghold, but it was like Rockefeller Republicans, not this miasma of stupidity like it is today. Her dad was REALLY conservative (my mom's liberal) and she said that even he would be completely disgusted with the GOP today. I think even before he died she said that he was not a fan of Bush, because Bush is stupid and my grandfather was anything but stupid.
Well of course now the GOP has lost the northeast just about completely and for the forseeable future, because the people for whom the republicans actually work for (rich people) got turned off by Nixon's southern strategy and focus on demented "debates" and bullshit social issues.
It's a coalition of borderline mentally ill idiots and I would say it should be marginalized as much as possible. Do they not realize that they're being "indoctrinated" by Fox news and the like? Seriously, my inner Marxist is screaming FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS at these asswads.
Fuck, if I had kids and there was going to be a Bush speech at school, I'd still let them go and then have a "teachable moment" at home. Nice parenting, jackasses. ARGHHHHHHWTFFFFHULK SMASH
09/04/09
Sounds absolutely horrific, doesn't it? So bad that we MUST lash out every time our president opens his mouth. For Chrissakes.
09/04/09
Go ahead, put your kids and your health in the care of for-profit entities - but know that your taxes WILL pay for those who can't afford private-sector service. It's that fucking simple. You have a choice, good luck affording it. We are where we are now because the private sector, given free reign, WILL EAT ITS' HOST.
BUSH told you to invest your retirement in the markets and the markets FUCKED you. How does someone like Madoff become so successful? BECAUSE THE MARKET DOES NOT POLICE ITSELF. Merrill Lynch, Lehmann Bros, they all knew better than to be involved with the guy, they all knew the housing market was driving them toward a cliff, yet none of them had the restraint to avoid CANNIBALIZING the economy.
GAHHHH!!!
/rant
09/04/09
civics 101, my friends.
09/04/09
09/04/09
Now, I'd like everyone to stand up, face the flag at the front of the room, put their hand on their heart and say it with me:
"I pledge ALLEGIANCE to the flag
of the United States of America.
and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands:
one nation, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, with liberty and justice for all."
09/04/09
09/04/09
And the original protocol, before a flag code was established, was a salute to the flag, which was abandoned during WWII because it was strikingly similar to the Nazi salute and, well, we don't want anyone thinking the U.S. is nationalist.
I'll keep my opinion to myself on this issue since lately that's all I feel like doing during these discussions, but I hope this provides a thought exercise for both sides.
09/04/09
"I Pledge Allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."
09/04/09
I know! Right about the same time we wanted to prove we were different from Godless socialists... so many coincidences in the history of the pledge. If I didn't know better, I would think someone was actively changing it in order to influence the values and beliefs of the country and teach them to children.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
Also that "large and intrusive gov't bailout" was engineered by "conservative" Dubya. Then again the economic collapse that brought about the bailout was mostly engineered by GOP corporate policies w/r/t taxation - so there's a cause and effect. You can't cherry pick and claim that Republicans are true conservatives. They just like power and dupe a bunch of mo-rans into voting against their economic self-interest.
Furthermore the FDR big-gov't policies following Keynesian economics fucking, um, worked, so I don't see your point there.
FURTHERMORE furthermore nobody is arguing for a command market, but EVERYBODY (even Adam Smith, the GOP's professed god) argues for a regulated market. This nonsense that somehow the Democrats want to end capitalism is completely unfounded.
I don't mind true conservatives - they tend to have a misanthropic distrust of utopian schemes and favor evolution over revolution, as do I - but there aren't any left in the Republican party.
09/04/09
Your statement that modern conservatism is to thank for "near every right and privilege" is baffling and doesn't do much to refute your point that conservatives are uneducated morons. There has been a broad expansion over what we as a society considers rights and privileges and if we're "keeping score" I'd say it's split evenly over both sides of the ideological spectrum over the history of the country; although conservatives haven't done a great deal for the past 100 years.
09/04/09
FYI, Liberals don't want a large and intrusive government in your personal life. They just want the government to take care of things like healthcare. Which, to me, is way less big government the major talking points of the conservatives...which is apparently making sure those less fortunate get screwed every which way possible, Christian morality as law, and all kinds of social influence the government shouldn't have. That's not respect for individual rights.
Also, I think the "free market" idea as some kind of nebulous that doesn't need any oversight is, at best, problematic. It clearly does.
Glenn Beck isn't a Conservative, by the way. He's someone who has come unhinged and spouts uneducated lies.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/05/09
09/04/09
I am truly appalled at an entire class of people who reject the public school option because their children might hear something that the parents disagree with. It's bad enough that my brother brags that his children have no idea who Britney Spears is because their access to the "outside" world is so tightly controlled. How are these children supposed to actually live in the world with the rest of us? Are they so weak that the merest exposure to Britney's abs will cause them to throw off their clothing and become prostitutes?
I am the opposite. I expose my son to whatever the world has to offer, and do it while I'm with him so that we can talk about it. It makes him stronger in himself and he can talk about the kids who smoke pot, drink, and have sex, without needing to be one of them. Of course, I am not a member of the cult of Christianity so I am not threatened by my son having knowledge. Perhaps that is the difference.
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
I was like WTF? Disturbing. That the President is addressing the nation's school children & the teachers are supposed to talk about it. They were lesson plans, asking questions examining the content of the speech & it's importance.
It really upset me as I generally regard him as a pretty smart dude but I felt he really missed the mark. I felt it was no different than how we generally talk about past speeches by past presidents.
Talking to children does not automatically make a speech propaganda!
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
Is it my turn to tell them off the same way? Hopefully with a big smarmy grin?
I hated every minute of Bush's presidency when I was a student, but I paid attention to what he was doing and saying. I didn't respect any of it, but I wanted to be informed. I couldn't rely on my republican parents or our conservative leaning local newspaper for the true facts. I wanted to hear him speak and then make up my own mind. And so I could break down the crazy piece by piece and have something to argue with my parents about over dinner.
But why is a speech telling kids about the benefits of education even controversial? I don't want to blindly hate republicans. But I'm surrounded by republicans who, while maybe not spewing the crazy themselves, buy into all this shit enough to not take back their party and act a little more logical when dealing with political disagreements. You don't like Obama? Great, tell me why, we can discuss it! We can debate it! There was little I enjoyed more than talking about how much I didn't like Dubya. But your circular logic (or typical lack of logic all together) is making rational discussions impossible.
Stop the name calling and do some fucking research. Get your questions and objections in order and then go about projecting them in a reasonably not crazy fashion. When I wanted to be taken seriously that's what I did. Don't accept anything the news says at face value. Please stop being offended by or scared of educated people. Stop throwing around words you clearly don't understand.
And for the sake of puppies and unicorns, stop comparing Obama to Hitler, you racist, ignorant, assholes.