Ugh, I am so tired of this. The Italian justice system makes me want to tear my hair out, and the media coverage in both the States and Europe isn't much better. Just fucking deliberate, and leave the devil-fueled sex games out of it. I'm tired of Amanda Knox being UW's ambassador to the world.
I'm not sure that I understand why the prosecution decided "lurid sex games" was the angle to use. It just seems so...bizarre. Am I missing something? I've been following the case and still don't understand that part of it.
@Tchotchke: You should read "Monser of Florence" by Douglas Preston. I just finished it this weekend and it's a disturbing look at the Italian justice system. It also paints a damning picture of the way some devastating serial killings were investigated, and how many innocent lives were ruined. In the edition I read, the afterword focuses on Amanda Knox and how this bizarre sex game theory seems to be based on no evidence, and was in fact started by the same people who completely botched the Monster case by insisting that the Monster was involved in a Satanic cult instead of actually looking at you know, evidence and facts, and forensics and such. It's frightening how it seems like there is so much make-believe happening in the police work.
@Amber Helvey: Oh, thank you for recommending that to me! I have actually heard of the case, but had forgotten all about it. A few years ago, there was a television program about the Monster case and the Italian justice system, which I found riveting. I've studied the Italian judicial system a bit, because my studies focus on international law, but not in the depth that I would like. Once again, thank you for recommending that book to me; I will be adding it to my "must read" list. :-)
@Jack_Burton: There was a French movie starring the actress from Amelie that made this point exactly - half was told from her point of view where she was hanging out with her boyfriend and the other half was from his point of view where she was a crazy mental patient stalking him. Brilliant!
@mfnher: I think I read on the BBC at the weekend that this is the last week of the trial.
Of course I can't find the link now so I'm not sure. It really is endless...how can the jury retain so much information over so long? It sounds like a recipe for a quick deliberation by the jury and a possible miscarriage of justice just to get the whole thing over. Not good.
@winner: I took a course in European Legal Systems outside of Florence 2 years ago, and you're right - the professor seemed quite ashamed of the molasses-pace of their courts.
@voteforpedro: Notice smama said "European Legal SystemS," implying that the class probably included information about many countries within Europe...Italy was probably one of those countries, because Italy is notorious for its...interesting legal system.
@winner: Italy itself isn't exactly a model of efficiency. Love the place, but it's way more relaxed than what Americans are used to. It gets frustrating, but it's a different culture & different way of life.
@onestrawplz: @voteforpedro Yes, onestraw has it right. We looked at Italy, France, Germany, Spain, the UK, and also pulled in some Australian law and Canadian, since that's where we students were normally studying. It was officially titled Comparative European Legal Systems, but it didn't occur to me that it was important to be highly specific on that..
@smama: I took a similar course two years ago, and what I found fascinating about Italy was: a. the inefficiency, especially when compared to the United States and other European nations, and b. the sheer magnitude of corruption. Granted, the corruption issue is not as bad today as it was prior to the late '90s, but still, it's incredible.
Also interesting is that in Russian trials, there are three sides: prosecution, defense, and the victims' families. From a legal standpoint, I find that fascinating because it completely alters the balance and mood of the trial. Sorry to nerd-out there, I couldn't resist!
@Tchotchke: I agree! I also liked how a bit of historical perspective added to my understanding of a particular nation's structure - like, states where dictators in the past had judges in their pocket tend not to have systems where constitutional issues are handled by the judges at all in the modern era. Seeing how other places set up their checks and balances gave me greater insight into why we have certain processes in Canada and made me less likely to just accept a structure or system as 'how the law works' in general. Nerds 4eva!
@smama: Oh, in that case I'm sorry. I thought the "professor was ashamed of" bit refered back to the European Legal Systems bit, and not only to the Italian legal system.
Have they ever actually given any details (or theories) on what these supposed "sex games" entailed? That explanation just seems like this very general buzz word/phrase that makes people who already want to see her as some evil American whore nod their heads furiously and forget that it doesn't actually mean anything.
The defense lawyer's quote doesn't really contradict the prosecution's case, or at least doesn't provide much of a defense. I mean, according to Heavenly Creatures, living in a fantasy world 60% of the time makes it seem perfectly reasonable to murder your mother with a rock in a sock, so why would being "60% imagination" get in the way of murdering your roommate? I think it would make it that much easier.
I'm sorry, I really fail to understand why she should have to apologise for talking about her vibrator (~which was brought up by the prosecution to taint her character). I mean, come on.
@DexterHaven: Or, for that matter, why she should need to apologize for buying underwear from a department store when she is unable to get into her apartment (which the prosecution called "lingerie shopping").
@DexterHaven: I don't think the vibrator discussion occured only to tarnish her character. The entire premise of the victim's death revolves around a sex game gone array. In this context, it is relevant evidence.
@sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell: It's not even a little bit relevant. They're not charging that it was used in any way during the murder. The entire point of bringing it up is to make Amanda Knox look slutty, which apparently makes it likely that she commited a murder during a satanic orgy.
@sydbarrettsaves, emissary of hell: All reports of the trial concur that the sex toy was only brought up by the prosecution to support their allegation that she was overly sexually active. The 'sex game' theory has no evidence backing it up, it is pure speculation.
is anyone else becoming obsessed with this story?? the more information i get about this case the more i become determined to figure it the whole thing out, like some kind of internet-nancy drew. i just spent 4 hours trolling the net for more info about this media freakshow case....while i was supposed to be working, no less! this can't be healthy.
@mommymash: Oh I totally am, but its confusing because depending on which source you use the information's very different. Although I wil admit no matter what the focus on irrelevant details (leaking of her past partners, focus on idea of orgy) and the prosecutor's past make me very wary about the whole thing.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/02/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
Of course I can't find the link now so I'm not sure. It really is endless...how can the jury retain so much information over so long? It sounds like a recipe for a quick deliberation by the jury and a possible miscarriage of justice just to get the whole thing over. Not good.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
Also interesting is that in Russian trials, there are three sides: prosecution, defense, and the victims' families. From a legal standpoint, I find that fascinating because it completely alters the balance and mood of the trial. Sorry to nerd-out there, I couldn't resist!
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
Naked?
12/01/09
Just me?
12/01/09
(But that could be just me.)
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
Not how I would want my mental state described if I were on trial. Yikes.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
10/29/08
10/29/08
10/29/08