<![CDATA[Jezebel: rory kennedy]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: rory kennedy]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/rorykennedy http://jezebel.com/tag/rorykennedy <![CDATA[Flattery Will Get You Nowhere With Veteran Reporter Helen Thomas]]> Rory Kennedy's documentary about longtime White House correspondent Helen Thomas, Thank You, Mr. President, premiered last night on HBO, and Thomas glowed as the thoughtful, intelligent woman she's widely known to be. Here, she's discussing an interaction with President Richard Nixon during a press conference in the thick of the Watergate controversy. At the beginning of the conference, Nixon congratulates Thomas on becoming the first woman to head UPI's Washington bureau. Thomas was planning on asking Nixon a hardball question, but briefly reconsidered since Nixon had so publicly complimented her. "What would America think?" Helen asked herself. But then she asked herself a more important question: "What are my peers going to think? That flattery will get you everywhere!" Clip above. (Full schedule of other showings here.)

Earlier: "Excuse Me For A Second," But, Helen Thomas Is An American Patriot
Longtime White House Reporter Helen Thomas Is Critical Of Even Her Own Behavior

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038794&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Longtime White House Reporter Helen Thomas Is Critical Of Even Her Own Behavior]]> Helen Thomas is considered the Grand Dame of the White House Press Corps, a distinction she earned by covering every President since JFK. Thomas worked for the UPI wire service at the White House from 1961 (when Kennedy took office) until 2000, when she resigned after the Moonies bought it out (she went to work as a columnist for Hearst). Traditionally, she was allotted the first question at every press conference and ended them by thanking the President — shortly after Bush took office, she was moved to the back of the room for most press events and rarely called. They said it was because she went to work as a columnist; she says it's because of her outspoken criticism of Iraq. Either way, Thomas has been sidelined by illness much of the year, but an HBO documentary on her life and career premieres tonight.

The documentary was made by Rory Kennedy, one of Robert Kennedy's daughters, and filmed over a weekend at her mother's estate. It intercuts footage and photographs of Thomas's most famous moments — from the start of her catchphrase "Thank you, Mr. President" in the Kennedy Administration to her grilling Bush about his motivations for getting into Iraq — with footage of Thomas speaking about her work. However, most of the reviews agree that Rory Kennedy doesn't subject Thomas to the same kind of grilling for which Thomas is famous, seemingly content to be as much a fan as a rigorous documentary filmmaker.

The biggest flaw, by many reviewers' standards, is how little Kennedy touches on the difficulties of being too friendly with the people you cover. Thomas says it was difficult to ask Nixon a tough question about lying moments after he congratulated her for being the first woman to head UPI's Washington bureau but that she did it anyway. When looking at footage of herself palling around with the people she covered, she worries aloud, "Obviously I’m a fraud." Thomas is far from it, but as anyone in D.C. will tell you, everyone here is a "friend," even if you've only met twice and hate each other's guts. That D.C. subculture where everyone argues at work and goes and drinks afterwards would have been worth a more thorough exploration with someone who took advantage of it but tried hard never to get caught up in it.

In a more light-hearted moment, Kennedy asks her subject if she ever played up her sexuality to get more access, a thought at which Thomas laughs uproariously and says "I never had the potential … nobody made a pass at me, darn it!" I don't know how that's possible in a male-dominated environment, but it's not an unwelcome revelation, either, for someone trying to make a go of a quasi-journalistic career in Washington herself.

That said, I think an overly laudatory documentary about Helen Thomas doesn't do Thomas or Kennedy a great service. Helen Thomas was a great, dogged reporter whose more recent forays into opinion journalism have brought her no small measure of opprobrium from many Washington insiders who have called her earlier work into question. Seeing her come out forcefully in defense of her journalistic objectivity and to defend her opinions against the kind of stern questioning that she brought to the White House would've been more interesting to watch than a film that might appropriately air at a future memorial service. I don't need my heroes on pedestals, especially when they've spent their laudatory careers doing a much-needed raking of the mud.

Review: 'Thank You, Mr. President: Helen Thomas at the White House' on HBO [LA Times]
'Thank You, Mr. President' [Newsweek]
Rory Kennedy Discusses Helen Thomas Film — Coming to HBO Tonight [Editor & Publisher]
Just a Few More Questions, Ms. Thomas [NY Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038313&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Glamour Writes A Misguided Love Letter To "Bobby's Girls"]]> To commemorate the 40th anniversary of RFK's assassination, Glamour commissioned a several page article about Kennedy's daughters and granddaughters entitled "Bobby's Girls." We got a press release about it this morning and my initial reaction was: What? Let's start with the title. It's obvious from the get-go that these women are only being featured because of their kinship with an ultra-powerful patriarch. But calling them Bobby's Girls? Patronizing much? Which is not to say that these women haven't done impressive things in their own right (Kathleen is a former lieutenant governor of Maryland; Rory directed The Ghosts of Abu Ghraib), but to feature them only within the context of their deceased father is an odd and somewhat infantilizing choice. Then there is the question of why. Why, of all magazines, is Glamour celebrating RFK's legacy? Last time I checked, Glamour's "serious" articles are generally Marianne Pearl's international beat: stories of hope about far-flung female heroines. The rest of Glamour is dedicated to the usual lady-mag detritus. So I'm wondering if it's because Glamour employs one Carole Radziwill.

For those of you unfamiliar with the Kennedy family tree, Carole is the daughter-in-law of Jackie Kennedy's sister, Lee Radziwill. Perhaps the story was written simply because it could be; because they had access. Or perhaps it's just a further extension of the Vanity Fair JFK-love, showing a rosy, scandal-free portrait of what was, by all accounts, a somewhat troubled family.

I guess what irked the most about the article was the implication that the Kennedys are an every-family. Kathleen's daughter, Maeve, told this story:

People think, because I'm a Kennedy, I'm extremely wealthy and don't flaunt it. Ha! I have a great name, but by the time you get to the fourth generation, the money's run out. We're fortunate compared to the average American, but to think I'm a trust fund kid—so not true! Though my parents paid my tuition, I worked through Boston College at Bruegger's Bagels and Dunkin' Donuts.

Yeah. Do you want a medal? To not truly acknowledge the ridiculous amount of privilege implicit with a family name like Kennedy (hello, that's why you're being interviewed for this article in the first place), is disingenuous. No disrespect for Maeve, Kathleen or any of the Kennedy women, who all seem like genuinely fine human beings, but I ask again: WTF, Glamour??

Bobby's Girls [Glamour]

Earlier: Jackie O's Perfectly Designed Camelot Was Also Full Of Uppers

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5013552&view=rss&microfeed=true