Enter your username and password.
New York, 6:10 AM
Thu Dec 10
65 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
| Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
| Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
| Twitter
Sadie Stein
| Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
| Twitter
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
| Twitter
Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Latoya Peterson
Email
Jenna Sauers
Lizzie Skurnick
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
| Twitter
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
Dog, it's time to get to work.
12/07/09
I get what you're saying, but this is kind of a silly statement. Not one of the jurors in the case has ever "met" Amanda Knox. If they had, they wouldn't have been allowed on the jury for partiality reasons. If that's our line of thinking, then it makes no sense for people to point out the classism and racism that exists in the American justice system if they've never "met" any of the defendants.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
Celebuvict? Crimibrity?
12/07/09
Women that like sex and vibrators are scheming whores!
Little girls must love the sex because I want to put it in them, every one does!
12/07/09
12/07/09
Or little boys that love it because they have one too ?
Yes, you remind me that sexism is still an issue and it goes both ways. Don't forget to vilify the other side while fighting for your rights, that will solve things.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
hmmm....I wonder if this version of "making love" involved force and quaaludes?
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
You may not be able to specifically define justice, but you can identify what does and does not comport with it if you try.
12/07/09
@LegalCookie: Well, sort of. I guess I am not so much talking about justice as fairness here as I am talking about it as an aspiration to a better world.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
Both getting a lot of attention? Yes. Both cases causing us to examine the extent to which unrelated issues come into play in the courtroom? Sure. Striking parallels. I don't see 'em.
12/07/09
1. The cases deal with sex
2. ...and with Americans abroad.
12/07/09
12/07/09
Judging by the volume of Hollywood-types who came out in support of him, I'd say (some) Americans consider him one of their own.
It's a reach, but that's how it sits in my head.
12/04/09
12/04/09