<![CDATA[Jezebel: purses]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: purses]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/purses http://jezebel.com/tag/purses <![CDATA[Insert "Don't Judge A Book" Joke]]> Olympia Le-Tan makes amazing clutch purses based on the jackets of first editions. As she says, they're "mainly classics, as unfortunately the covers of books nowadays are not as nice as they used to be." [DazedDigital]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5396926&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What's Shaped Like A Vagina And Can Hold Tampons?]]> This bag. [FailBlog]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5331413&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Snap Into A Chanel]]> If you're anything like us, the first thing you'll think when you see this uncanny beef jerky "Chanel" bag is, Beware of Dog! The purse was made by design student Nancy Wu at the Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, CA; we'd really like to hear what Kaiser Karl would have to say about this one. (And yes, we do know that Slim Jim is actually spiced beef.) [Gigglesugar]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5111724&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[SOS]]> We know Rihanna and Gucci's tattoo heart campaign is to benefit UNICEF, and it's obviously a good cause, so should we not admit that we find the new ad to be simultaneously the most boring and hilarious thing we've ever seen? For those of you who can't have the pleasure of immediate gratification: it's basically just Rihanna and this purse posturing in front of a camera making significant faces while some weird smooth jam plays. Sometimes she and/or the purse (which is ugly) are kind of suspended in space. It's awesome. [Just Jared]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5093346&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Huge Bags: Hot. Chiropractor Bills: Not]]> Large bags were a ubiquitous fashion trend in 2007, and the trend for 2008? Bigger bags. Are we just getting used to carrying a ton of stuff? Poor Andy Rooney, who noticed this trend back in November, is going to be apoplectic. According to the Wall Street Journal, doctors say the recommended weight of a handbag should be no more than 1 or 2 pounds. With a wallet, keys, cell phone, camera, lip gloss, gum, notebook and business card holder, it's hard to carry a clutch that weighs less than a pound these days. Add a laptop, some magazines and bottled water and you're lugging a load. But the oversized purses keep coming: Michael Kors' Beverly bag is over 13 inches high and 17 inches wide; the YSL downtown bag is 17 inches high and 11 inches wide. And the Louis Vuitton bag pictured could easily transport a newborn child.



Notes Vanessa O'Connell of the WSJ, blogger Kelly Cook of Bagsnob.com has the YSL bag, which weighs 17 pounds when full. Ms. Cook suffers from chronic back pain.We've already talked about what it is we carry; the question is why do we need to carry so much? Why are bags so big? It would be one thing if designers produced huge purses and no one bought them  but giant bags are a hit. In a world where gadgets are getting smaller and on-trend celebrities getting thinner  what's with the wrist-snapping bags? (One thought: Maybe since the price of one of these bags could feed a third-world family for a month or two, a pinched nerve is penance?)

Extreme Baggage [Wall Street Journal]
Earlier: What's In Your Bag?
Does The Average Woman Really Have 21 Handbags?
My Week With A $4000 Snakeskin Handbag

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341605&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Body Bags]]> Why wear your heart on your sleeve when you can wear a uterus on your purse? Made of wool felt and leather, it'll set you back $90. [Peel Out via Sexblo.gs]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324598&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Do You Rationalize A Luxury Purchase?]]> Today's Financial Times reports that French luxury goods group LVMH had strong third-quarter sales, thanks in part to the Louis Vuitton "Neverfull" handbag, pictured. Additionally, Burberry also had revenue growth thanks to its line of handbags. In a video posted on the NY Times' website on Sunday, controversial Times columnist Deborah Solomon hits the streets of Manhattan and tries to figure out why purses these days cost so much. Well, not why they cost so much, but why people are willing to spend so much.

Solomon begins at Chanel, highlighting the venerable French brand's classic handbag ($3,150). A passerby admits that she is going to score one by simply asking her mom to buy it for her. (Gotta love spoiled New York bachelorettes!) Some Swedish tourists explain that they're shopping at Chanel because it's cheaper here than in Sweden (damn dollar!) Solomon goes on to point out that unlike a house in the Hamptons or a painting, you can take a bag with you where ever you go  so everyone can see your status symbol. Wielding a $1,700 patent purse at Prada, she asks, "when did bags start to cost as much as cars?" Actually, Ms. Solomon, it's been a while, at least since 1998, when the Fendi baguette spiked in popularity thanks to Sex And The City.


But for us, the moment of clarity comes when unnamed guy says, "You reach a level. You have a house. If you got any brains you have the house first, and then you get the Prada. But getting the Prada while you're in a small apartment? You've got the priorities wrong." Those words stung. Even though ours is Dior and not Prada. We're totally guilty of buying into the luxury brand brainwashing even though we know it's evil. We're not Carrie Bradshaw, with $40,000 worth of shoes and no savings account, but we have made some absurd purchases that made perfect sense. And what that guy doesn't understand is that we're living in a world in which we're constantly being judged. No one can see your wit from across the room. The basis of who we are begins with what we wear. And that can include a well-chosen, well-made, tasteful handbag that just happens to be expensive. Also, some of us have a bag problem. We're working on it, okay? (And by that we mean thinking about buying another bag.) Anyway, here are the top 5 rationales we use when considering expensive shit:

  • 1. It's classic. (For the next 6 months, anyway!)
  • 2. It's so me. (Not taking my credit limit into account!)
  • 3. I'll use it forever. (Or at least until it falls apart, gets lost or I fall in love with something else!)
  • 4. You can't get it anywhere else. (eBay be damned!)
  • 5. It makes me happy. (Momentarily!)

Handbag Sales Boost LVMH [Financial Times]
Handbag Sales Boost Burberry Revenues [Financial Times]
The Power Of The Purse [NY Times]
Earlier: Does The Average Woman Really Have 21 Handbags?

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310999&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Life's too short to eat.]]> If you really like purses, and we mean really really REALLY like purses, then head on over to The Purse Blog, which declares frighteningly accurately that 'Shallow Obssessing [is] Strongly Encouraged'.

Still, they certainly know their way around a purse, this lot, they're packed full with shopping advice, links and there's a forum, where you can boast about your couture bargains which is a good thing because now you don't have any money left to go out or eat or whatever, so you can just sit at your keyboard and type your twisted quilted leather love. There appears to be some kind of priviledged access bit in the forum where you can sell each other yesterday's cool purse, but you have to be an 'invited' member. We don't know what that involves, but it's probably some ritual where you eat a preserved relic of Coco Chanel's turd.

And lastly, there's Bag Deals, featuring 'special offers' (and we use the term loosely here) like this:

A Luella Missy Quilte Tote, down from $995 to just $597.

A snip, indeed.

[Purses galore!]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=235295&view=rss&microfeed=true