I found this really interesting and want to read the book now!
It's funny though, as a product of lifelong Catholic education, I took solace in the abstinence thing during adolescence. Partially because I believed there was some value in that kind of "purity" but also, maybe on a subconscious level, because it meant I didn't have to buy into what seemed like the only other option at that age, the super sexualized existence. At the same time though, it was a source of embarrassment to be someone who hadn't had sex. Those "never have I ever" games would make me sweat profusely at a time that I hadn't done ANYTHING to be spoken of. It's like there was shaming on both ends of the spectrum.
Now, I consider myself a well-adjusted, sexually active, sexually communicative, and sexually satisfied young woman. And I'm totally fornicating outside the structure of marriage. But I think I have to credit the abstinence-only education I received for being like "Don't do this when you are 15."
Funny how that works. But, is there some balance to strike here? I always think about this when I imagine how I'll raise my own children at that age. And I'm torn.
@nacho_supreme: I definitely think that any feminist upbringing would teach kids that it is ok to wait as long as you want or to never have sex if you don't like, to teach them about consent and date rape and about how sex should feel good and be fun and if it's not they should stop it, in addition to de-shaming sex. It should be about empowerment and information, and the rules should apply equally to boys and to girls.
Having just written a paper partly about FGM, I'd like to point out that this topic gets increasingly pervasive and dangerous (not to mention fatal) in some societies. When people are obsessed with "honor", and "honor" is partly defined by the condition of their daughters' hymens ...... anyway, the international implications are huge.
And what is with viewing the father as a temporary husband/guardian of the hymen figure? If that ain't patriarchy, I don't know what is. Moms are never asked to safeguard their sons' penii.
So, I am going to say something inflammatory here, but I can't help myself because I'm pissed.
For all those who wonder why there's so much anti-religious and specifically anti-Christian talk on this site: this is why (or at least one reason). The way these girls are treated is despicable. They are their fathers' property. Their virginity equals their value. Boys are not given any responsibility here-- it's all about girls and their daddies (which is disgusting, by the way). How can a girl grow up to be strong and independent if she is married off by 19 because she just can't wait to have sex any longer? And that is exactly the outcome they want. Because we are easier to control if we are undereducated and dependent. This entire movement is inherently anti-feminist, and it grows directly out of faith.
I know this doesn't apply to all Christians. I was raised by some liberal Christians who, I'm sure, are just as disgusted by this as I am. But the virgin/whore complex is built right into the founding myths of that religion. I also know that these same criticisms can be applied to other major religions, but Christianity is the one that comes up around here most often.
If you are one of the liberal-type Christians like many I know and love, I hope I haven't offended you. If you are one of the crazy, anti-feminist, girls are property, female sexuality is inherently evil type, I don't really care if I have.
I went to a wedding last summer during which the presiding clergyman announced to the entire congregation that the couple had "kept their relationship pure." I'm sure I was supposed to think lovely things about how happy their marriage would be, but honestly all I was thinking was "So does this mean they didn't even do oral sex? Has one or both of them had sex, just not with each other? I need to know!". I think it was the perfect example of reducing people to sexual objects by placing a huge emphasis on virginity. Also, it made me think dirty thoughts in church.
@Flackette Goes Retro: Same here. I was just in a wedding for one of my college friends and the same thing was said, so of course, my head goes to "but... so they've made out, yes? Which base are we talking here?"
I stayed a virgin way longer (25) than any of my friends, so I may have a skewed vision of the importance of purity.
I mostly chose not to have random hook-up sex because I wanted it to be special, with someone I was in love with. And I saw too many of my friends enter into sexual relationships at a young age and a.) not enjoy it and be too scared to tell their partner why and b.) friends enjoy it but also be ashamed to enjoy it and their bodies.
I waited till I was engaged to have sex, when I was mature enough to handle any consequences and physically and emotionally prepared to handle the pain of sex. And now I feel really positively about my body and my sex life, so I think it was the right choice for me.
Still, it feels weird that after this long I catch myself and say, "Oh that's right, I'm not a virgin anymore" and feel just a little diminished because it was one of my defining characteristics for so long.
@jurisenpai: I'm right there with you. I was also 25, and while it later turned out that the partner I first had sex with was a horrible human being, I didn't know that at the time and I did the best I could to try to have sex within a caring relationship the first time (my personal preference). Now at 29 I am with just my third partner, but we have a wonderful and awesome relationship. I still mentally identify with the "virgin" label sometimes though, just because it was applied with such gusto to me for so long.
A rather disturbing note on the women of color as virgins topic: my mom told me that when she was growing up (as a very white girl in a very segregated town in the 1950s), in my grandmother's immortal words, "maybe there are black people on the bad side of town whooping and hollering and living it up, but YOU are not going to behave like that, young lady!" It was almost as if being white was the first element in being "ladylike" or "pure".
I got a similar lecture on the putative subject of hip-hop music when I was about 14.
@la.donna.pietra: Oh wow. I'm really interested in hearing how you responded to that.
As "the token, acceptable black friend" to quite a few white kids growing up, I can only recall that a couple turned out ok in the "how I think about race" department. The others? It makes me sad - especially the one who's parents and sister called her a "n****r lover"...while I was in the living room.
@shorty63136: Well, by age 14, I had already figured out that my parents were not exactly the most progressive people in terms of either race or sex, and my grandparents were REALLY behind the curve. I suspect I mostly just rolled my eyes.
Somewhere along the line I decided that if being ladylike or pure also involved being an uptight racist, it was probably highly overrated. It certainly seems to have been that way. I'm not certain if I turned out okay in the "how I think about race" department--Sista Toldja would probably tell you no--but I've spent a lot thinking about it nevertheless.
I knew a guy once who was a virgin until marriage. He literally could not wait to get married. Finally did so in his early 20's. I have no idea how the relationship went/goes.
One of my friends in high school was given a purity ring on her 16th birthday, to be worn on her wedding finger until replaced with an engagement ring. Her older sister also got one when she turned 16. Her younger brother? Of course not.
I actually know quite a few virgins (like chosen virgins, political virgins if you will) in their late twenties who are women of color. A few men of color. But it is interesting that that is not the face of the movement that you see represented.
The whole "waiting til marriage" thing has always struck me as another way of putting a price on virginity. Sure, as a loose concept (wait til you find someone you love and are committed to) it's hard to disagree with.
But at this point (mid-20s) when I'm encountering girls who have fiancees or serious adult relationships that will probably become marriages, and those girls are still a virgin, it seems as if they are literally just wanting to exchange their virginity for a ring and whatever else financial security comes with it.
I can see no other reason for a woman to be a virgin bride. Wouldn't you want to know if you were sexually compatible with the man you're committing to for the rest of your life?
@sumerfish: Exactly dear. And let me add that these same women who are still virgins are going to wake up one day in their mid- to late 30s and go "Oh crap. I don't want this life and I don't like this man. I'm outta here." Or the man will. It is a pretty common phenomenon.
@sumerfish: I do know a few people who are firmly convinced that having sex with one guy only after marriage will save them a lot of heartache and misery, not to mention a lot of impracticality. They have a great deal invested in the notion that if you give up something, you'll get something in return.
And in all honesty, there are a bunch of notches on my headboard that I would be quite happy never having had (or the frustration, bad sex, and drama that went with them). I wouldn't give up what I've learned from them, though.
"One last thing. Am I sick for giggling maniacally and thinking "impure" thoughts after reading the passage on page 68 from a purity ball promotional item in which the young girl, Katie, goes on a "date" with her dad and says, in response to what flavor of ice cream she would like, says, "I'll have chocolate, Daddy"?"
You two ladies were just talking about how blacks are considered hyper-sexualized in our society and then giggle at a innocent outing between father and daughter. In other words the innocent white girl wants the big black mandingo.
I guess it just goes to show that even self proclaimed feminists are victims of the same culture they try rail against.
@checkyaself: I'm guessing that Anna was laughing more at how horrified the father would (likely) be if his pure, white daughter were to date a "chocolate" man -- not giggling at the daughter for wanting something chocolate! But your point is definitely valid.
05/13/09
05/12/09
It's funny though, as a product of lifelong Catholic education, I took solace in the abstinence thing during adolescence. Partially because I believed there was some value in that kind of "purity" but also, maybe on a subconscious level, because it meant I didn't have to buy into what seemed like the only other option at that age, the super sexualized existence. At the same time though, it was a source of embarrassment to be someone who hadn't had sex. Those "never have I ever" games would make me sweat profusely at a time that I hadn't done ANYTHING to be spoken of. It's like there was shaming on both ends of the spectrum.
Now, I consider myself a well-adjusted, sexually active, sexually communicative, and sexually satisfied young woman. And I'm totally fornicating outside the structure of marriage. But I think I have to credit the abstinence-only education I received for being like "Don't do this when you are 15."
Funny how that works. But, is there some balance to strike here? I always think about this when I imagine how I'll raise my own children at that age. And I'm torn.
Just curious what people's thoughts are.
05/12/09
05/12/09
anyway, the international implications are huge.
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
For all those who wonder why there's so much anti-religious and specifically anti-Christian talk on this site: this is why (or at least one reason). The way these girls are treated is despicable. They are their fathers' property. Their virginity equals their value. Boys are not given any responsibility here-- it's all about girls and their daddies (which is disgusting, by the way). How can a girl grow up to be strong and independent if she is married off by 19 because she just can't wait to have sex any longer? And that is exactly the outcome they want. Because we are easier to control if we are undereducated and dependent. This entire movement is inherently anti-feminist, and it grows directly out of faith.
I know this doesn't apply to all Christians. I was raised by some liberal Christians who, I'm sure, are just as disgusted by this as I am. But the virgin/whore complex is built right into the founding myths of that religion. I also know that these same criticisms can be applied to other major religions, but Christianity is the one that comes up around here most often.
If you are one of the liberal-type Christians like many I know and love, I hope I haven't offended you. If you are one of the crazy, anti-feminist, girls are property, female sexuality is inherently evil type, I don't really care if I have.
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
I mostly chose not to have random hook-up sex because I wanted it to be special, with someone I was in love with. And I saw too many of my friends enter into sexual relationships at a young age and a.) not enjoy it and be too scared to tell their partner why and b.) friends enjoy it but also be ashamed to enjoy it and their bodies.
I waited till I was engaged to have sex, when I was mature enough to handle any consequences and physically and emotionally prepared to handle the pain of sex. And now I feel really positively about my body and my sex life, so I think it was the right choice for me.
Still, it feels weird that after this long I catch myself and say, "Oh that's right, I'm not a virgin anymore" and feel just a little diminished because it was one of my defining characteristics for so long.
05/12/09
05/12/09
I got a similar lecture on the putative subject of hip-hop music when I was about 14.
05/12/09
As "the token, acceptable black friend" to quite a few white kids growing up, I can only recall that a couple turned out ok in the "how I think about race" department. The others? It makes me sad - especially the one who's parents and sister called her a "n****r lover"...while I was in the living room.
05/12/09
Somewhere along the line I decided that if being ladylike or pure also involved being an uptight racist, it was probably highly overrated. It certainly seems to have been that way. I'm not certain if I turned out okay in the "how I think about race" department--Sista Toldja would probably tell you no--but I've spent a lot thinking about it nevertheless.
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
Consider the opposite alternative: buying a charm bracelet and adding a new bauble every time you land a new partner.
05/12/09
05/12/09
But at this point (mid-20s) when I'm encountering girls who have fiancees or serious adult relationships that will probably become marriages, and those girls are still a virgin, it seems as if they are literally just wanting to exchange their virginity for a ring and whatever else financial security comes with it.
I can see no other reason for a woman to be a virgin bride. Wouldn't you want to know if you were sexually compatible with the man you're committing to for the rest of your life?
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
And in all honesty, there are a bunch of notches on my headboard that I would be quite happy never having had (or the frustration, bad sex, and drama that went with them). I wouldn't give up what I've learned from them, though.
05/12/09
05/12/09
"One last thing. Am I sick for giggling maniacally and thinking "impure" thoughts after reading the passage on page 68 from a purity ball promotional item in which the young girl, Katie, goes on a "date" with her dad and says, in response to what flavor of ice cream she would like, says, "I'll have chocolate, Daddy"?"
You two ladies were just talking about how blacks are considered hyper-sexualized in our society and then giggle at a innocent outing between father and daughter. In other words the innocent white girl wants the big black mandingo.
I guess it just goes to show that even self proclaimed feminists are victims of the same culture they try rail against.
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09
05/12/09