I think some of you are misunderstanding what most ghostwriting assignments entail.
The ghostwriter doesn't just get hired and then have to sit down and create an entire book out of thin air and then not get credit for it. The author writes extremely detailed outlines and the ghostwriter just puts it all together, and is always included in the aknowls page. It's pretty fascinating, and a LOT of people make a living that way.
Politicians don't write most of their speeches. Newscasters don't write much of what they read out. Musicians don't necessarily write what they play. Designers don't personally do half of the work on a collection that bears their name (it would be physically impossible). It's just that the author-function works differently to many other labels.
We assume it relates directly to the creative process in a way that other labels don't, but this is all part, really, of the creation of the modern (and relatively recent) concept of author. The idea of the creative individual expressing their thoughts directly to the reader via the means of language has surely been undermined for like, a billion years. Come on people! At the end of the day the way we look at the world at the moment always favours the performer, and not the creator. Politicians are personal brands for ideologies much bigger than they are. Columnists in newspapers represent editorial choices far and beyond their own thoughts and word choices. This is why actors can become huge stars while the people that write the screenplays and scripts are mostly unknown to the public. I don't condone the sidelining of ghost writers - they deserve credit for the work they do - but to act as though this is a particularly duplicitous industry is simply untrue... it happens in many forms everywhere.
As others have said, ghostwriters aren't psychics. Someone has to write/dictate the notes for the raw materials. I'd hope that the public realized a professional organized and polished the materials, but at some point Palin did have to chip in the basis for the content. Of course, if she's being lauded for her great writing style, then yes, that's a bit obnoxious. But it's par for the course for many of the celebrity memoirs and novels that "they" wrote.
Someone recently asked me to ghostwrite a brief memoir/essay on his addiction and recovery - and was pissed when I said I would need him to supply details about both. He seemed to think I would just pull them right out of my ass and he wouldn't have to do any work at all. But I'm guessing Palin, being so in love with herself, was just the opposite and contributed a ton of material, most of it unuseable, for her poor writer to sort out.
This strikes me as being perhaps too uncharitable towards ghost writing. There are many people who have a lot of interesting things to share-- whether they are amazing life stories, knowledge about particular fields, etc.-- who don't have the ability to organize and write a full-length book. That doesn't mean that they have nothing valid to say. Depending on what the process is, some books that have used ghost writers can really legitimately be in the words of the "author".The amount of work put in by the ghost writer can vary a lot. Of course, in Sarah Palin's case she not only can't write, but also doesn't have expertise in anything or an interesting life story. She ought not have a book deal, but I don't think that no one who's used a ghost should.
@ShinyMcShine: As far as I'm concerned, that's a non-fiction book about someone, not a book BY someone. Unless you write 97% of the text, you should be considered a SOURCE, not an author. At best, a co-writer.
Writers don't get much love in any part of the entertainment world. How many times do you see interviewers droolingly ask actors if they improvised their scene? No... it felt natural because it was well written. But that's boring, isn't it? Ghost writer or not, at least somewhere a writer is employed, and someone's going to go to the store and buy her work. I can't ask for much more than that.
Funny about pop stars getting songwriter credit. Before the singer-songwriter movement of the 60s and 70s, there were singers and there were songwriters. (Carole King, anyone?) Now people scoff at singers who don't write their own material (ugh, Britney didn't even write it!), so much so that their handlers shoehorn the star's name into the writing credits so that they will be taken seriously. There have been plenty of reports of current songwriters bitching about their works' performers claiming that they wrote it alone.
@rodmanstreet: On your first point, as a writer, I'm always jealous of ghostwriters. I want some of that uncredited action! I'm sure the paycheque beats most anything I could write under my own byline.
@Elizabooth: Oh, dear girl, do not envy the ghostwriter. It is the crappiest, most demoralizing, most thankless writing job there is. You're at the whim of your crazy celebrity, the pay is not that good, and you can't even tell people you did it.
On behalf of copy/production editors everywhere, I am expressing deep gratitude that "authors" such as Ms. Palin don't write the manuscripts themselves.
Thank you, ghostwriters and coauthors -- without you I'd be reformatting 400+ pages of all-caps text (in twenty different colors/fonts) on a daily basis ... even before the atrocious grammar, "creative" spelling, and plagiarized material from Wikipedia gave me a nervous breakdown.
You know, when an actor or musician uses a ghostwriter, I'm not offended. But shouldn't politicians -- people deciding public policy and writing laws -- be made responsible to pen their own memoirs? If you can't write down your life story, how are you going to write my health care bill? (okay, I know Palin isn't going to write my health care bill -- or hopefully no other bill ever -- but you know what I mean).
Did Obama write his own books? I'm honestly asking because I don't know.
@Elizabooth: I'm quite certain he did, if only because I've never heard anyone on the right claiming he didn't. If there was the slightest possibility he hadn't, they'd be all over that too.
I'm a ghostwriter (or at least, it's part of what I do).
There are many degrees of ghostwriting. Some ghosts write everything – the whole book from scratch.
Personally, the way I've worked it to have SCADS of material, either written or spoken (interviews) from the "co-writer" and then worked that into a book.
In this case, ghost writing is a feat of organisation, and yes, of writing, but it is definitely not done using material I generated myself. They're not "my" books – the views expressed, the experiences are not my own.
Some people have stories to tell but can't write – that's where ghostwriters come in. I don't believe that book contracts are necessarily a "reward" that can only go to those who can write – they are also given to those who have an incredible life story to tell, and to those who will make a lot of money for the publishing company. (Never forget that publishing is a commercial, not a meritocratic venture.) If books were only written by people who could write, we would miss out on a hell of a lot.
Many of your favourite books were probably perfected by an editor, or benefitted from a team of researchers. Winston Churchill had a ghostwriter, and he won the Nobel Prize for Literature.
@Lymed: I usually do, in the acknowledgments. But I can see your point. Sometimes it would be nice to have the "with" credit on the front, sometimes I'm happy to go incognito.
Blogger Mark Barrett wonders why, amid all the coverage of Sarah Palin's book, nobody's really talking about the fact that she didn't actually write it.
Because one doesn't look a gift horse in the mouth?
10/03/09
10/03/09
The ghostwriter doesn't just get hired and then have to sit down and create an entire book out of thin air and then not get credit for it. The author writes extremely detailed outlines and the ghostwriter just puts it all together, and is always included in the aknowls page. It's pretty fascinating, and a LOT of people make a living that way.
10/03/09
We assume it relates directly to the creative process in a way that other labels don't, but this is all part, really, of the creation of the modern (and relatively recent) concept of author. The idea of the creative individual expressing their thoughts directly to the reader via the means of language has surely been undermined for like, a billion years. Come on people! At the end of the day the way we look at the world at the moment always favours the performer, and not the creator. Politicians are personal brands for ideologies much bigger than they are. Columnists in newspapers represent editorial choices far and beyond their own thoughts and word choices. This is why actors can become huge stars while the people that write the screenplays and scripts are mostly unknown to the public. I don't condone the sidelining of ghost writers - they deserve credit for the work they do - but to act as though this is a particularly duplicitous industry is simply untrue... it happens in many forms everywhere.
10/03/09
Untrue. See: Knowles, Beyonce or Lohan, Lindsay.
10/03/09
Some scary shit there.
10/02/09
The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley, comes to mind.
10/02/09
Someone recently asked me to ghostwrite a brief memoir/essay on his addiction and recovery - and was pissed when I said I would need him to supply details about both. He seemed to think I would just pull them right out of my ass and he wouldn't have to do any work at all. But I'm guessing Palin, being so in love with herself, was just the opposite and contributed a ton of material, most of it unuseable, for her poor writer to sort out.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/04/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
Funny about pop stars getting songwriter credit. Before the singer-songwriter movement of the 60s and 70s, there were singers and there were songwriters. (Carole King, anyone?) Now people scoff at singers who don't write their own material (ugh, Britney didn't even write it!), so much so that their handlers shoehorn the star's name into the writing credits so that they will be taken seriously. There have been plenty of reports of current songwriters bitching about their works' performers claiming that they wrote it alone.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
Thank you, ghostwriters and coauthors -- without you I'd be reformatting 400+ pages of all-caps text (in twenty different colors/fonts) on a daily basis ... even before the atrocious grammar, "creative" spelling, and plagiarized material from Wikipedia gave me a nervous breakdown.
10/02/09
10/02/09
Did Obama write his own books? I'm honestly asking because I don't know.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/03/09
10/02/09
There are many degrees of ghostwriting. Some ghosts write everything – the whole book from scratch.
Personally, the way I've worked it to have SCADS of material, either written or spoken (interviews) from the "co-writer" and then worked that into a book.
In this case, ghost writing is a feat of organisation, and yes, of writing, but it is definitely not done using material I generated myself. They're not "my" books – the views expressed, the experiences are not my own.
Some people have stories to tell but can't write – that's where ghostwriters come in. I don't believe that book contracts are necessarily a "reward" that can only go to those who can write – they are also given to those who have an incredible life story to tell, and to those who will make a lot of money for the publishing company. (Never forget that publishing is a commercial, not a meritocratic venture.) If books were only written by people who could write, we would miss out on a hell of a lot.
Many of your favourite books were probably perfected by an editor, or benefitted from a team of researchers. Winston Churchill had a ghostwriter, and he won the Nobel Prize for Literature.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
Because one doesn't look a gift horse in the mouth?
10/02/09
"President Bartlet, what do you think of Gov. Richie's book?" "I'll read it when he does."