<![CDATA[Jezebel: pretty smart]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: pretty smart]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/prettysmart http://jezebel.com/tag/prettysmart <![CDATA[Pretty Smart]]> We've mentioned the awesome Hedy Lamarr before, but a new play, Frequency Hopping, has more details on the movie star who was also a "shrewd inventor." Lamarr's husband, a Austrian Fascist weapons manufacturer, dragged her to business meetings in an effort to derail her acting career. She walked away from the unhappy marriage, but ended up developing a way to make radio-guided weapons resilient to detection and jamming. She patented her technology, but the U.S. Navy didn't take her very seriously ("We won't be needing your services here in Washington," they allegedly said.) But "frequency hopping," as it is called, was used during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 and now, in wireless technologies like cell phones. Awesome: We're basically honoring Ms. Lamarr's memory every time we make a call on the go! [Scientific American]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012967&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Are There So Few Female Scientists?]]> Sylvia Ann Hewlett is an economist and founding president of the Center for Work-Life Policy in New York. She also heads the gender and policy program at Columbia University. On Sunday, a piece she penned was printed in the Financial Times; it concerned a study on which she is the co-author, and it deals with women in the science, engineering and technology fields. The study, which will be published next month by the Harvard Business Review , shows that 41% of highly qualified specialists on the lower rungs of corporate career ladders in these areas in the US are female. But! 52% of highly qualified women working for science, engineering and technology companies voluntarily leave their jobs, driven out by hostile work environments and extreme job pressures. A sexist culture drives more than half of qualified women away.

While feminist blog The F Word wonders if the study is a bit simplistic, Catherine Price writes on Salon: "Many U.S. science, engineering or technology companies are complaining about an overall lack of American talent — a situation that will only get worse if the Bureau of Labor Statistics is correct in its prediction that from 2006 to 2016 jobs in these fields will grow 'five times faster than other sectors.'" Are we regressing to a time where science and technology are fields solely for men? Do we need more women like award-winning neuroscientist Susan Greenfield, whose delightful profile in the Independent is worth taking a moment to read. ("Many people like downhill skiing, or dancing, or wine, or sex, or food," says Greenfield. "Up until now, [pleasure seeking] has always been part of our lives but a polar opposite to seeking meaning. I fear we are shifting too much in favour of the literal, the hedonistic, the here and now, and losing meaning, context and content in favor of process... There's no point of living life if it's not fun.")

But part of the problem could be the image that scientists have in our collective unconscious. Researchers have found that the stereotype of mathematicians as geeks discourages students from studying math. A study by the Institute for Policy Studies in Education at the London Metropolitan University discovered:

Nearly all participants, both math-friendly students and those who steer clear of equations, think of a mathematician as a white male with white hair, who is obsessed with the number-laden subject to the exclusion of any social life. For instance, participants labeled Albert Einstein and John Nash (portrayed in the movie "A Beautiful Mind") as lacking social skills and as weird or not normal.
So you already know what I'm going to ask you: If we're living in a culture where little girls think being called "sexy" is the ultimate compliment, where girls may have damaged mental health from advertising and media, where students of both genders don't want to study math because it is geeky, what does our future look like? As the rest of the world makes leaps and bounds in science, engineering and technology, we're perfecting a reality television. (Oh, and don't forget: The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Canada, France, Iceland, The Netherlands, Bangaldesh, Ireland, Poland, Liberia and Argentina have all had female presidents or prime ministers.)


Focus On The Female Talent In The Backyard [Financial Times]
Sexist culture drives Women Out Of Science [Times Of London]
Sexist culture drives Women Out Of Science [The F Word]
Where Are All The Women Going? [Salon]
Susan Greenfield: The Girl With All The Brains [Independent]
Mathematicians Still Seen as Einsteins [Live Science]

[That picture is not of Sylvia Ann Hewlett or Susan Greenfield. It's a Russian post doctoral student working with DNA samples. Finding an image of a female scientist was difficult. Google image "doctor" and you get tons of images of men in white coats and a few images of female porn stars dressed as nurses to "play" doctor. Go figure.]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can One Woman Make A Difference? Maybe, If She Works For A Global Beauty Company]]> When Najoh Tita Reid was 5 years old, according to Advertising Age, one of her white friends wouldn't let her white doll play with Ms. Reid's black doll, because the black doll was "ugly." (Where did we hear that before?) Ms. Reid is now the multicultural marketing director for the world's — and country's — biggest advertiser, Proctor & Gamble Co. She plans on launching a multibrand campaign called "My Black Is Beautiful." P&G research has found that 71% of black women feel they're portrayed worse than other women in media and advertising. Yet they spend, on average, three times more than the general market on beauty products.

P&G's competitor, Dove, has already attempted to reach out to the underrepresented woman with their "Campaign For Real Beauty." This could be seen as a copycat move by P&G, but many of their slogans can easily have meaning for black women, including Olay's "Love the Skin You're In," Pantene's "Shine" and CoverGirl's "Every Woman Is a Queen." We can probably all agree that this is a step in the right direction, but how long do you think it will be before that aforementioned 71% percent of women is a more acceptable less than zero?
'My Black Is Beautiful' [AdAge]
Related: A Girl Like Me [YouTube]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293745&view=rss&microfeed=true