<![CDATA[Jezebel: pink ladies]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: pink ladies]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/pinkladies http://jezebel.com/tag/pinkladies <![CDATA[Sail Away]]> "Lonely is the word for a Friday night with nowhere to go, sitting at home feeling sorry for yourself...I feel like the luckiest girl in the world," wrote 16-year-old sailor Jessica Watson, now two months into her record-breaking journey. [SydneyMorningHerald]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5425831&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Fun/Smart Divide: Why Books Are Candy-Coated]]> It has been suggested that females prefer pink because of an evolutionary preference for reddish things like ripe fruits and healthy faces. We also prefer pink books. Or at least the publishing industry is so convinced of this that to cover their asses they're wantonly packaging any book written by a woman with a chick-litish cover in the desperate hopes that we'll buy it. Says The Guardian's Diane Shipley, "Having cottoned on to the fact that chick lit books sell like cupcakes, publishers are now adding chick lit-style covers to any book written by a woman whether it fits the genre definition or not."

This is, not surprisingly, becoming an issue with authors who regard their work as more than beach reads. But Shipley sites several authors who try to buck this trivializing trend and lose; having found a winning formula, the publishing industry, which everyone knows to be in shaky shape in the best of economic climates, is taking no chances.

Shipley concludes that, bored by the number of identical-looking choices, we're going to experience a backlash. Doubtful; homogeneity has never hurt genre fiction like Romance and SciFi, and people looking for fun escapism are unlikely to be repelled by an increasing number of options. They are, however, likely to be disappointed when they get to the beach and find that instead of some heartwarming bit of froth they've ended up with Serious Fiction full of incest and substance abuse.

Yes, I can see why a serious writer would be irritated by what is most definitely misrepresentation (and Shipley's at pains to point out that this kind of branding now extends even to the work of male writers whose stories involve female protagonists.) But in a sense, they should regard this commercial branding as a vote of confidence: to my layman's eye, it means a publisher thinks it might actually sell. It seems to me (and this owes way more to my time in bookstores and on Amazon than my foray into the publishing world) that there's a fairly clear divide between "serious" fiction, and that which actually sells, and unless you're Cormac McCarthy or Annie Proulx, never the twain shall meet. A few Iowa grads on the roster with serious covers might spell prestige, but that's not where anyone's bread is buttered. There seems to be a feeling in our society now that if something's fun — be it movie or novel — it isn't Serious. Serious things are punishment, full of lives of quiet desperation and family tragedies — albeit repressed, undramatic ones. If you're having too much fun, you're not being intellectual. Yes, I'm oversimplifying and there are certainly exceptions that prove rules, almost exclusively by men, who probably have an easier time being taken seriously as bon-vivant wits without sacrificing literary cred. But nowadays there are far fewer Laurie Colwins or Barbara Pyms — great writers who happen to use levity as a medium — and if there are, it's hard to know because they're hidden under pink covers with lounging, thoughtful women on them. Oh, well; if good books are medicine, and you can't blame people for preferring it Pepto-Bismol colored.
The Great Chick Lit Cover Up [The Guardian]
Related:

Brand-Obsessed Chick Lit Makes Us Lose Our Breakfast (At Tiffany's)

Blogging Towards Bethlehem

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amy Winehouse & Pink Jacket Go Together Like Rama Lama Lama Ka Dinga Da Dinga Dong]]>

[London, July 18. Image via Splash.]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026696&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Mary Kay Way To World Domination]]> For those who think of Mary Kay cosmetics as nothing more than a pink Cadillac full of mauve lipsticks, think again: when the company's handbook, The Mary Kay Way, came out 20 years ago, Mary Kay Ash's culty brand of get-rich-kinda-quick consumer marketing made it a bestseller. Or, as the blurb would have it, "it was Mary Kay’s goal in 1963 to build an organization that was guided by the Golden Rule and dedicated to giving women unlimited opportunities for success. She considered caring and kindness to be the building blocks of a highly motivated workforce—and the forty-five year success story that is Mary Kay Inc. has proven her right."

The book, which will hit shelves again this summer as a special anniversary edition, is full of 'success principle' chestnuts for the entrepreneur like, "Make people feel important. They are." and "Sandwich every bit of criticism between two heavy layers of praise." Like any kind of self-help, most of it's pretty common-sensical, and yet suddenly looks creepy and calculating when framed as didactic, capitalistic axioms. That said, Mary Kay herself is obviously completely badass — and clearly has confidence in her own products — an amazing success story at a time when that wasn't easy for a woman. Even if, yes, she did it with makeup, pink cars and "The Golden Rule." But hell, there must have been some serious steel there: if niceness bought Caddys, we wouldn't be riding a bike.
Life Lessons From Mary Kay [US News And World Report]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024339&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pink Lady Scientists Full Of Crap]]> Scientists at The University of Newcastle claim there may be an evolutionary reason why women "prefer" red and pink — while boys prefer blue, reports the Times of London. "The explanation might date back to humans' hunter-gatherer days, when women were the primary gatherers and would have benefited from an ability to home in on ripe, red fruits," said a researcher.

While blue was liked universally, this preference stood out among men, the study found. This, too, could have deep-seated natural roots: water that appears blue is more likely to be clean and the colour is also an indicator of fine weather.
We're not scientists, but we'd like to call bullshit on this "study." First: Only men are into good weather and clean drinking water? Second: The participants in this study were British students and Chinese students studying in Britain... students who were clearly socialized and steered toward liking certain colors from an early age.


Third:

The Chinese participants also showed a marked preference for red over their British counterparts. As red symbolises luck and happiness in China, this indicates that cultural norms are also involved.
No shit! Fourth: Dr. Ling, one of the leaders of the study, says her favorite color is "a very paleish pink." Biased much? Fifth: What is so annoying about this is that marketers will continue to create sickening Pepto-Bismol crap like Fly Pink, a women-only airline for shopping trips from Liverpool to Paris, and Pink Beach, a women-only resort on the Adriatic coast — both of which are mentioned in a "girls get richer" (shudder) article in the Daily Mail.

We did a "study" of our own and found that when we asked six chicks (including this writer) what their favorite color was, we got six answers: silver, green, mint green, orange, puce [Who picked puce? -Ed.] and blue. We're going to send our results to Dr. Ling, who, we hope, will turn a lovely shade of crimson.

Why Girls Really Do Prefer Pink [Times of London]
Related: As Girls Get Richer And Richer, Make Way For The New Pink Pound [Daily Mail]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291408&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pink Is The New Flog]]> Make it stop!!! The trend of marketers thinking that anything remotely 'masculine' — cars, airplanes, pro-baseball caps, guns — has to be pink in order to be attractive to female consumers, continues apace. Today's NY Times "Thursday Styles" reports that Taser International will be offering a more compact, female-friendly (women have such small hands!) version of its self-defense device later this month, which the company has named "C2". And, of course, it's colored pink!

The new C2, as the weapon is called, looks more like a large disposable razor than a gun, comes in a variety of colors and is $350, all of which Taser executives believe will persuade women to add the weapon to their checklist for the evening: lipstick, wallet, keys, Taser.
Sounds perfect for those roving gangs of killer lesbians!!!

Interestingly, however, it was a woman who, way back in the early '90s, inspired the creation of the Taser in the first place (they do say that behind every great man is a great woman).

Tom Smith, a founder of Taser International, said he and his brother heard their mother say that she worried about protecting herself. She tried a stun gun, Mr. Smith said over sandwiches in his desert office compound here, but it has to be pressed against its target. "She said, 'This isn't something I am comfortable with.' She had pepper spray, and she sprayed herself in the face. She ended up buying a Doberman.
Awesome: We hear those come in purse-sized versions too!

Feeling Secure With A Little Shocking Pink [NYTimes]
Related: Cease And Desist — The Pink Hats Have Got To Go [Batgirl]
Earlier: Girls Who Like Girls Who Like Guns
Real-Life Barbie Dolls Get Their Own Airline
How To Drive In High Heels

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280136&view=rss&microfeed=true