From the perspective of the benefit of the country as a whole, wouldn't it make more sense to give priority to younger men who have more years to reproduce and likely have younger, more fertile wives?
I love the disclaimer always associated with medicines/treatments for this sort of thing: "only use this product if you are healthy enough for sexual activity".
Um, if you're dick won't rise, you're not healthy enough for sexual activity. That's what that means, dude.
I know this is supposed to be just a joke article, but I have a serious question.
The implants they're talking about are for men with penile injuries / penile failure, right? This isn't about 'expansion'. Because, in fairness, loss of use of your penis would be as devastating and important as that of any other limb/organ.
And every doctor I've ever known in the history of man (yes, I'm immortal) has said that there is no surgical way to enhance your penis beyond half an inch, and you risk your boner by going under the knife. Men aren't stupid. If there was such a method, it would be a far bigger industry than breast implants. Guys are obsessed with their junk.
Currently, they just cut a ligament under the dick and reattach it so that more penis (more penis, does that sound right?) slides out from the body, making it look bigger. Some men aren't hiding much length, so it does nothing, sometimes the reattachment goes wrong and your cock can become hard but can't 'get up'.
So yeah, penis enlargement is bullshit but what they're offering here isn't.
I won't be satisfied until science has discovered a way to give men the ability to jizz in different colors. I'm tired of pearl necklaces. Throw me a string of emeralds or sapphires every now and then.
@TheFormerJuneBronson: You successfully did the explain-why-it's-funny-thing without making it not funny in the process! Congratulations, it's not an easy task. :)
Maybe if we add that to the covered procedures for the public option the republicans will vote for it. It's hard to imagine any of them bigger dicks than they already are, but I'm sure that won't keep them from trying.
Why don't they institute an abstinence-only program of AIDS prevention in Africa? It's worked wonders completely eliminating teen pregnancy in the United States. #circumcision
They've started 'circumcision clinics' here in South Africa in order to combat the rampant spread of HIV, too. With 1,000 dying per day in this country, it's about time they started doing something about it.
However, my partner isn't circumcised, and I find myself getting defensive over the idea the circumcision is the only way to go, or a cure-all for STDs, as it's often seen here. Scientists have a point, of course - as scientists tend to do - but basic HIV education would do a lot of good, too, and that's still largely lacking. We've got a president (Zuma) who said (during his rape trial, natch) that he thought he could shower to avoid contracting HIV. Circumcision won't help much if there's not a general understanding of STDs. #circumcision
@SleepsWithButterflies: I've written about this online a few times, and I've always been surprised at what an emotional issue it is. Personally, HIV and AIDS are so incredibly destructive in sub-Saharan Africa that I'm thrilled that we've discovered that a simple and safe procedure can significantly lower the risk. But circumcision isn't a panacea, and even if every male in that part of the world were circumcised, there would still be a need for contraception, education and a huge effort to combat the disease.
When I weigh in on it, though, I tend to get dragged into the circumcision wars. I find the medical case for circumcision in the developed world to be almost entirely baseless, and I've argued so; but the anti-circumcision crowd gets on me because I support the use of circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa, or in religious or cultural practice, which is frankly none of my business. I guess it's just one of those issues that is hard to argue about dispassionately. #circumcision
@Freddie DeBoer: I totally get what you mean about the tendency to be passionate about circumcision. I didn't mean to say I'm passionate about it - I don't have a penis and I'm not connected to any religious or cultural group in which circumcision is meaningful - I meant to more insinuate my reaction to people who are passionately pro-circumcision, as if there's nothing else.
I'm new to this discussion, relatively, and I'm still surprised by how passionate people are about it. #circumcision
Education and funding for the use of circumcision to help slow the spread of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa is something I support entirely. It's worth saying, however, that HIV and AIDS epidemiology in sub-Saharan Africa is entirely different from that of the rest of the world, because of certain realities in sub-Saharan Africa. (Namely, cultural sexual practices that greatly increase the risk of blood-to-blood contact through sexual intercourse, and the prevalence and social acceptance of ulcerative genital sores caused by other STIs.)
Circumcision doesn't help outside of sub-Saharan Africa, though, because those unique factors aren't found in other parts of the world. More importantly, circumcision has no effect on the spread of HIV in what are (still) the vast majority of transmissions: male-to-male sexual intercourse and the use of intravenous drugs. Circumcision further does not lessen the risk of male-to-female infection, only female-to-male. The procedure doesn't protect the people who are at risk in the developed world, and very likely protects the people in sub-Saharan Africa because of cultural and medical realities there that are not found anywhere else in the world. #circumcision
@Freddie DeBoer: "More importantly, circumcision has no effect on the spread of HIV in what are (still) the vast majority of transmissions: male-to-male sexual intercourse and the use of intravenous drugs. Circumcision further does not lessen the risk of male-to-female infection, only female-to-male."
Just wanted to highlight these points, because they are particularly important (esp. for Western readers) to understand! Thanks for your post.
@Kivrin: THANK YOU. Male circumcision for all is not the single bullet way to end AIDS in America, and there's a lot of 1st world guys who are pissed off that their parents took from them a healthy, living piece of their anatomy. #circumcision
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
Um, if you're dick won't rise, you're not healthy enough for sexual activity. That's what that means, dude.
11/23/09
Basically... all women, unless you're certified infertile, pre-pubescent, or post-menopausal MAYBE.
11/23/09
The implants they're talking about are for men with penile injuries / penile failure, right? This isn't about 'expansion'. Because, in fairness, loss of use of your penis would be as devastating and important as that of any other limb/organ.
And every doctor I've ever known in the history of man (yes, I'm immortal) has said that there is no surgical way to enhance your penis beyond half an inch, and you risk your boner by going under the knife. Men aren't stupid. If there was such a method, it would be a far bigger industry than breast implants. Guys are obsessed with their junk.
Currently, they just cut a ligament under the dick and reattach it so that more penis (more penis, does that sound right?) slides out from the body, making it look bigger. Some men aren't hiding much length, so it does nothing, sometimes the reattachment goes wrong and your cock can become hard but can't 'get up'.
So yeah, penis enlargement is bullshit but what they're offering here isn't.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
... On a more serious note, how do we not have free health care yet?
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
However, my partner isn't circumcised, and I find myself getting defensive over the idea the circumcision is the only way to go, or a cure-all for STDs, as it's often seen here. Scientists have a point, of course - as scientists tend to do - but basic HIV education would do a lot of good, too, and that's still largely lacking. We've got a president (Zuma) who said (during his rape trial, natch) that he thought he could shower to avoid contracting HIV. Circumcision won't help much if there's not a general understanding of STDs. #circumcision
10/29/09
When I weigh in on it, though, I tend to get dragged into the circumcision wars. I find the medical case for circumcision in the developed world to be almost entirely baseless, and I've argued so; but the anti-circumcision crowd gets on me because I support the use of circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa, or in religious or cultural practice, which is frankly none of my business. I guess it's just one of those issues that is hard to argue about dispassionately. #circumcision
10/29/09
I'm new to this discussion, relatively, and I'm still surprised by how passionate people are about it. #circumcision
10/29/09
Circumcision doesn't help outside of sub-Saharan Africa, though, because those unique factors aren't found in other parts of the world. More importantly, circumcision has no effect on the spread of HIV in what are (still) the vast majority of transmissions: male-to-male sexual intercourse and the use of intravenous drugs. Circumcision further does not lessen the risk of male-to-female infection, only female-to-male. The procedure doesn't protect the people who are at risk in the developed world, and very likely protects the people in sub-Saharan Africa because of cultural and medical realities there that are not found anywhere else in the world. #circumcision
10/29/09
10/29/09
Just wanted to highlight these points, because they are particularly important (esp. for Western readers) to understand! Thanks for your post.
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/30/09