I think part of the reason she's gotten so much shit over this is not just that she posted about her miscarriage, but that she posted about her miscarriage as a relief.
If the tweet had been along the lines of "Having miscarriage, but had to come into office for this meeting. Don't know if I can make it through" or something else that made it sound like she was grieving and balancing that with work, the discussion would be totally different if it even got picked up.
Yeah, she overshared, but she is so not the first or last person to overshare at work. She is, however, a woman who publicly did not regret losing a pregnancy and I think that, more than the appropriate or not debate, is why she's catching so much flack.
Hiroine Protagonist promoted this comment
Edited by Angua van der Woodsen at 11/06/09 10:16 PM
Angua van der Woodsen was starred
Angua van der Woodsen was unstarred
I don't think expressing a miscarriage to the public is necessarily equal to TMI. Yes, the baby was not wanted by Penelope, but her blog and personal politics deal with women in the workplace. If she is someone who sees the personal as political, she may be well aware that other women who do want the pregnancies they miscarry and may have already disclosed their pregnancy, making it necessary to tell nosey parties that they lost the baby, which is a taboo thing to do despite the fact that people will be asking. Based on the article and her writings, I feel she shared her experience to lighten the burden for others.
Furthermore, a miscarriage can be a serious medical problem sometimes. While I don't want to hear every gory detail, I don't mind being informed that a coworker is having a medical issue whether it's a heartbreaking one or a relief. I would not be very upset to be told someone missed a meeting for a stomach flu, a miscarriage shouldn't be any more stigmatized. #twitter
Sex isn't dirty or shameful either, that doesn't mean I want to hear about it at work.
If a woman experiences a miscarriage as a death, I understand bringing it up at work. She may need some time off or a little understanding about her lack of focus.
But Truck was psyched about her miscarriage, which makes it an over share. She tweeted about it on her professional account for the scandal and really can't complain when people get annoyed. #twitter
Nothing that is a biological function should be shameful. But as one who has been the moral support of a spouse who has gone though miscarriage 3 times, I can say with authority that it can be an extremely painful and private matter. The author was fortunate to already have two children, but to people who have been unable to conceive, and who have endured the emotional scarring of miscarriages, there is nothing light, or, in the author's case humorously utilitarian, about miscarriage. Had my wife read this tweet I know she would have been confronted with terrible feelings of inadequacy - imagine the feelings of isolation and insecurity a childless woman might feel if she's made to feel that her pain and suffering is nothing more than a casual joke to those who are able to have children. The author has a right to say what she wants - I personally though it was pretty clever, and a fitting sting to the right to life group, but knowing what I know about the emotional pain a miscarriage can cause, the comment should have been saved for private conversation between people who have not suffered because of miscarriage - otherwise it was extremely insensitive. #twitter
It's sort a misleading quote, where Trunk asks why a miscarriage is too private to discuss at work. It seems as if a lot of people didn't read the article and are basing their comments entirely off of the teaser quote. It's a question worth asking, but she didn't actually bring her miscarriage up at work, rather she tweeted it to people who choose to subscribe to her feed.
Here I'm wondering if the question even really is worth asking because in the end it depends: on you, on your workplace, on the circumstances... I shared more personal stuff with my co-workers at the small non-profit I used to work for than I would as a data entry technician for JPMorgan.
I personally would be much more interested in following up on the other question Trunk asked, which is: why is everyone so goldurned het up about a miscarriage, when the truly outrageous part of her tweet is the 3-week waiting period imposed on women seeking abortions in Wisconsin?
@Valkyrie607: I think it was clarified that there isn't actually a 3 week waiting period, but that it took three weeks for her to get an appointment. Still awful, but not as awful as a mandatory waiting period of almost would be.
@NellMood: True, true, I didn't mean to imply that it was The Law imposing the wait. Only circumstances, which can be even less forgiving than the law... #twitter
@Valkyrie607: Eh, but her twitter essentially IS her work. A huge portion of her job is social networking, and a lot of what she writes about is how to use the internet in conjunction with your job. Most of the people following her on twitter are doing so for professional reasons, not personal ones. If it were a personal blog rather than a professional one, the fallout would, of course, been much smaller. #twitter
I think a lot of the debate here stems from the fact that the Tweet sounds very flip, whether she meant it to or not. Like - "In a board meeting. Had some bad coffee this morning. Can't wait to get out of here." If she wasn't enthusiastic about this pregnancy, then that's her business, but the language chosen and choice of time to discuss her miscarriage is a bit more uncommon. #twitter
@TheExperience: I have read that she has Aspergers. I imagine that it affects how she expresses things and how she reads other people. When I read that Tweet I thought "Classic autistic spectrum, she is not understanding how people will socially react to this." #twitter
Something that I am not seeing discussed regarding this story is the fact that Trunk has publically said in the past that she has Apergers and that has trouble navigating social "niceties".
My first thought was that maybe she genuinely doesn't realise how other people are going to react to the things she does and maybe doesn't process things in the way others do. #twitter
@ihateyourescalade: Are you really saying that people with Asperger's should not be allowed to speak publicly? Please tell me that you are not. #twitter
@Cerridwen: I'm not. I do, however, think too many people who have trouble navigating social niceties (because of Asperger's or more likely just plan old boorishness) have public forums these days. I prefer listening to people who are adept at navigating the social niceties.
@ihateyourescalade: I'm still finding your comment troubling, even with the qualification. I don't think you can fairly compare Asperger's with "boorishness." #twitter
@ihateyourescalade: But it is different with someone who is willfully ignorant or a jerk being given an undeserved public platform. Someone with Asperger's didn't choose to be born that way and denying them a public voice because they struggle with social niceties is really not ok. #twitter
@ihateyourescalade: I have Asperger's and that comment really stung. I have a lot of interesting things to contribute; I'm lucky in that I'm good at social niceties, but a lot of people with relevant things to say don't. I'd hope that most people would be able to at least sympathize, if not empathize, and make allowance for the left-of-field expression. You're entitled of course to listen to whoever you want, but the implication I read in your comment was 'too many people with those symptoms of Asperger's have a chance to speak to an audience', which is pretty disgusting to my ears. Please do let me know if I've read it wrongly. #twitter
@Cerridwen: I would never deny someone with Asperger's, including the two people with Asperger's whom I know personally, a public voice. I specifically said that in my original response. If somehow I didn't communicate that well, though, apologies. #twitter
@NellMood: I did not intend to equate the two. I was only doing it in reference to the original comment, in which applejuice said that Trunk has described herself as having trouble with social niceties. I was really only lamenting that so many boors (and I do not include those with Asperger's in this category--just regular old people with no manners or tact) seem to get public attention these days. It was not at all meant to condemn anyone with Asperger's. So, I apologize.
@StephanieBoland: You have. I promise. Please see my other responses below. I have two friends with Asperger's and they are two of the most interesting and smartest people I know. In fact, I think they should have a public forum. #twitter
The grief of a miscarriage is often disenfranchised. Why are we squemish about this kind of loss? Maybe it's considered too private because it makes others uncomfortable and involves a uterus.
@jayne.willoughby: I think sometimes people who haven't been pregnant (or aren't trying to get pregnant), or who don't want children don't understand what the big deal is. It's too bad. Miscarriage can be terrible and affect women for years, or forever. #twitter
@jayne.willoughby: anything that is tied to women's reproductive systems makes people squeamish. And miscarriages happen in our dirty female parts so it falls into squeamish territory.
I think like most things - if we talked about them more - maybe they would not be as painful.
And the word "miscarriage" - I hate that word. It implies that someone did something wrong. I was supposed to carry a baby and I messed it up.
Or "lost the baby". I didn't lose the baby - I know where it is.
Or "spontaneous abortion", which is the technical term. Makes it sound like your body just randomly kills babies or something.
I'm actually having a miscarriage right now. It takes a few days. I've had a shit week, and wonder if it would be better if I could tell people what I was going through. I don't know the answer. But having it be a "private" matter does feel like it is something that I need to hide.
Maybe hide them from having to think about my lady parts. But also maybe hide them from having to think about my pain. #twitter
Of course it's not shameful! My menstrual cycle is not shameful either-- nor is my ear wax, but I don't discuss them in a professional setting. #twitter
Firstly, good for Trunk for talking about this so matter-of-factly. Frankly, I know people who felt this relieved and unemotional about their own abortions but they didn't stand up in front of a crowded room to talk about it, let alone go on national television to be interviewed by some sanctimonious, self-professed 'Catholic'.
Secondly, there's nothing about her tone and body language that is either teenage or bratty. Yes, she's slightly hostile but she's been put into a position where a slight air of hostility is actually warranted. If she'd acted coy or flirtatious, or - god forbid - humbled by that pompous ass, she would have looked like a silly bit of fluff who doesn't have the courage to stand by her actions.
Thirdly, I don't have Aspergers Syndrome so I don't claim to be an expert but using that to explain Trunk's attitude smacks to me of the myth that people with ASDs don't feel emotions 'properly'. Yes, perhaps having an ASD helps Trunk to retain her cool under fire in some way, but I feel like her reason for not caring about her miscarriage and who knew about it was that she JUST DIDN'T CARE. Again, I can't be sure, as I never had it medically checked but I feel that I had a miscarriage a year or so ago and I really don't give a shit. If anything I'm really super pleased. And me - or Trunk, or anyone, male, female, transgender, intersex, or otherwise - saying that does not in any way take away from the serious pain that unwanted miscarriages cause.
Finally, and most importantly: despite what I said above, I really didn't know much about miscarriages before watching that clip. I didn't know how long they can last (I just thought I was having an inordinately long period), I didn't know that they weren't invariably agonizing (except perhaps in the first month or so), and I have certainly never witnessed anyone discuss them on national news before, despite the fact that so many women experience miscarriage at least once in their lives (whether it's 25 or 75 percent, it's still a lot of women). It's not just men like Sanchez that are getting an education about this kind of thing, it's women like me, who think of themselves as educated and informed feminists. If me and my ilk don't know then clearly we DO need to talk about this kind of thing publicly.
It really makes my day to see a woman who is unashamed of wanting and actively seeking out an abortion. Women should not have to feel shamed for something which is not shameful. I love how she is not the sad, regretful abortion- seeking woman we normally see in the media. She shows that yes, there are some women who want an abortion and are unapologetic in wanting it. Good for you, Penelope.
I love this. I love that she was so honest, and was not flustered when that asshole was clearly trying to get her to have an emotional reaction--do you have no shame? really? how does that even approach an acceptable question?
I had never heard of her before; now I am a huge fan.
This clip does nothing to change my original opinion.
This woman's tone and body language are those of a bratty teenager. Is there a way to advocate for women's reproductive rights without sounding like a 16 year-old daring her parents to give her a curfew?
I agree there is plenty of benefit to be gained from women sharing their experiences with miscarriage and abortion in a no-nonsense manner, but that doesn't have to mean being crass and obnoxious.
Women seem to be able to talk about their breasts (mammograms, mastectomies, lactation...) without sounding like crude, huffy little twats. When I hear women argue in favor of public breastfeeding they don't seem to feel the need to use coarse language or belligerent tones. So what's the deal with some pro-choicers who feel the need to combat "hushed reverent tones" with "brazen" and childish outbursts?
@MizJenkins: What coarse language did she use? I didn't notice any. And I didn't think her tone was at all bratty.
In fact, after getting called "young lady," I thought she handled herself quite respectably. I mean, calling a woman "young lady" is as offensive as if he had said "fuck you, lady," in my opinion.
@MizJenkins: She didn't seem at all bratty to me. She seemed matter-of-fact and candid when she was asked questions. I didn't notice anything childish about her either, I think she was very mature and calm, especially given the condescending hostility of her interviewer. I also didn't notice any coarse language at all.
I admire Trunk's ability to speak openly about her experiences. I also think it's bizarre that all of a sudden, people are freaking out because "ZOMG TMI!!!11!1!" particularly in the TV new media.
First of all, we live in a society where the lines between the public and private sphere have been irreversibly blurred. As a consequence, there are people who are more comfortable sharing information that people wouldn't have shared in the past. whatever, i'm not following that stuff on twitter (i don't even have a twitter account, get off my lawn!) and i'm not posting it, but, as I said, whatever.
What gets my goat is this faux outrage from the info-tainment industry, (and yes, CNN is part of that, no matter how many times they want to call themselves a serious news organization. exception: Fareed Zakaria - serious business) these are same people who deemed that "ZOMG Tori Spelling was admitted to the hospital with stomach pain!" somehow qualifies as news. Or that the sister of a girl who is famous because of a sex tape (talk about your TMi!) is getting married. Or that the top 800 meter runner is transgendered. how is this any of my business? someone in the news decided it was, because this shit is all over the TV.
And now, they want to turn around and tell a woman who is talking about her own personal life that "young lady, we just don't discuss these things in civilized company." Give me a frakking break. this is an industry that thrives on oversharing and spreading it around.
And all Trunk has done was use this environment of oversharing to steer the conversation to a topic that she feels is important (and frankly, I agree). and if that was truly her intent, well, good on her.
11/06/09
If the tweet had been along the lines of "Having miscarriage, but had to come into office for this meeting. Don't know if I can make it through" or something else that made it sound like she was grieving and balancing that with work, the discussion would be totally different if it even got picked up.
Yeah, she overshared, but she is so not the first or last person to overshare at work. She is, however, a woman who publicly did not regret losing a pregnancy and I think that, more than the appropriate or not debate, is why she's catching so much flack.
11/06/09
Furthermore, a miscarriage can be a serious medical problem sometimes. While I don't want to hear every gory detail, I don't mind being informed that a coworker is having a medical issue whether it's a heartbreaking one or a relief. I would not be very upset to be told someone missed a meeting for a stomach flu, a miscarriage shouldn't be any more stigmatized. #twitter
11/06/09
If a woman experiences a miscarriage as a death, I understand bringing it up at work. She may need some time off or a little understanding about her lack of focus.
But Truck was psyched about her miscarriage, which makes it an over share. She tweeted about it on her professional account for the scandal and really can't complain when people get annoyed. #twitter
11/06/09
11/06/09
Here I'm wondering if the question even really is worth asking because in the end it depends: on you, on your workplace, on the circumstances... I shared more personal stuff with my co-workers at the small non-profit I used to work for than I would as a data entry technician for JPMorgan.
I personally would be much more interested in following up on the other question Trunk asked, which is: why is everyone so goldurned het up about a miscarriage, when the truly outrageous part of her tweet is the 3-week waiting period imposed on women seeking abortions in Wisconsin?
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
My first thought was that maybe she genuinely doesn't realise how other people are going to react to the things she does and maybe doesn't process things in the way others do. #twitter
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/07/09
I think like most things - if we talked about them more - maybe they would not be as painful.
And the word "miscarriage" - I hate that word. It implies that someone did something wrong. I was supposed to carry a baby and I messed it up.
Or "lost the baby". I didn't lose the baby - I know where it is.
Or "spontaneous abortion", which is the technical term. Makes it sound like your body just randomly kills babies or something.
I'm actually having a miscarriage right now. It takes a few days. I've had a shit week, and wonder if it would be better if I could tell people what I was going through. I don't know the answer. But having it be a "private" matter does feel like it is something that I need to hide.
Maybe hide them from having to think about my lady parts. But also maybe hide them from having to think about my pain. #twitter
11/06/09
11/06/09
10/03/09
Secondly, there's nothing about her tone and body language that is either teenage or bratty. Yes, she's slightly hostile but she's been put into a position where a slight air of hostility is actually warranted. If she'd acted coy or flirtatious, or - god forbid - humbled by that pompous ass, she would have looked like a silly bit of fluff who doesn't have the courage to stand by her actions.
Thirdly, I don't have Aspergers Syndrome so I don't claim to be an expert but using that to explain Trunk's attitude smacks to me of the myth that people with ASDs don't feel emotions 'properly'. Yes, perhaps having an ASD helps Trunk to retain her cool under fire in some way, but I feel like her reason for not caring about her miscarriage and who knew about it was that she JUST DIDN'T CARE. Again, I can't be sure, as I never had it medically checked but I feel that I had a miscarriage a year or so ago and I really don't give a shit. If anything I'm really super pleased. And me - or Trunk, or anyone, male, female, transgender, intersex, or otherwise - saying that does not in any way take away from the serious pain that unwanted miscarriages cause.
Finally, and most importantly: despite what I said above, I really didn't know much about miscarriages before watching that clip. I didn't know how long they can last (I just thought I was having an inordinately long period), I didn't know that they weren't invariably agonizing (except perhaps in the first month or so), and I have certainly never witnessed anyone discuss them on national news before, despite the fact that so many women experience miscarriage at least once in their lives (whether it's 25 or 75 percent, it's still a lot of women). It's not just men like Sanchez that are getting an education about this kind of thing, it's women like me, who think of themselves as educated and informed feminists. If me and my ilk don't know then clearly we DO need to talk about this kind of thing publicly.
10/01/09
10/01/09
I had never heard of her before; now I am a huge fan.
10/01/09
This woman's tone and body language are those of a bratty teenager. Is there a way to advocate for women's reproductive rights without sounding like a 16 year-old daring her parents to give her a curfew?
I agree there is plenty of benefit to be gained from women sharing their experiences with miscarriage and abortion in a no-nonsense manner, but that doesn't have to mean being crass and obnoxious.
Women seem to be able to talk about their breasts (mammograms, mastectomies, lactation...) without sounding like crude, huffy little twats. When I hear women argue in favor of public breastfeeding they don't seem to feel the need to use coarse language or belligerent tones. So what's the deal with some pro-choicers who feel the need to combat "hushed reverent tones" with "brazen" and childish outbursts?
10/01/09
In fact, after getting called "young lady," I thought she handled herself quite respectably. I mean, calling a woman "young lady" is as offensive as if he had said "fuck you, lady," in my opinion.
10/02/09
10/01/09
First of all, we live in a society where the lines between the public and private sphere have been irreversibly blurred. As a consequence, there are people who are more comfortable sharing information that people wouldn't have shared in the past. whatever, i'm not following that stuff on twitter (i don't even have a twitter account, get off my lawn!) and i'm not posting it, but, as I said, whatever.
What gets my goat is this faux outrage from the info-tainment industry, (and yes, CNN is part of that, no matter how many times they want to call themselves a serious news organization. exception: Fareed Zakaria - serious business) these are same people who deemed that "ZOMG Tori Spelling was admitted to the hospital with stomach pain!" somehow qualifies as news. Or that the sister of a girl who is famous because of a sex tape (talk about your TMi!) is getting married. Or that the top 800 meter runner is transgendered. how is this any of my business? someone in the news decided it was, because this shit is all over the TV.
And now, they want to turn around and tell a woman who is talking about her own personal life that "young lady, we just don't discuss these things in civilized company." Give me a frakking break. this is an industry that thrives on oversharing and spreading it around.
And all Trunk has done was use this environment of oversharing to steer the conversation to a topic that she feels is important (and frankly, I agree). and if that was truly her intent, well, good on her.
10/03/09