the thing that i dont understand about orly is that she herself is an immigrant to the united states. is she trying to prove her authenticity as an american by attempting to discredit someone elses? is it the whole converts are the biggest fanatics phenomenon at play here? residual fear/hatred of "socialism" (cough cough) from being born in a former soviet state? or just straight up, unadulterated lunacy?
@KATE!: See also; Michelle Malkin vs. so called anchor babies. Which she was one. Oh, yeah, and she's a supporter of internment camps. It's called cultural hegemony. The "man" doesn't have to fuck you over if you do it to yourselves.
Why is it that recent immigrants are always the most racist? My great-grandfather practically got right off the boat, turned around, and yelled, "Go back to where you came from, you damn foreigners!"
Those stats on who is seen as "American" are just so bizarre! We're a mutt society, that's why we have all this good food and excuses for parties.
How were these people not sold on the "melting pot" concept? I always feel like I'm missing something fundamental, when I can't explain this to these wackos.
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: the term just relates to an extensive cognition study done by Harvard. it's applied to race, gender, disability, age... it's not excusing anything, it's just the science-y term for the phenomenon.
To me, the term "implicit social cognition" is a neutral definition. When evaluating "racist idiots" the term removes our own implicit social cognition so that we can go beyond merely labeling Taitz et al as "racist idiots" so that we may perhaps learn how to modify our own approach in dealing with them. Racism is only part of the problem here. The other part is figuring out not only how to stop it, but how to so in a way that might cause existing racists to reconsider their prejudice.
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: Well, it is a legitimate phenomenon. In the sense that it is a thing that exists, and therefore we ought to be able to describe it from a cognitive perspective.
@thatgirlinnewyork: Apparently, she's now complaining that the federal judge in Georgia who most recently shot her down is biased and lacks the standing to impose sanctions:
She will get her comeuppance, that you can take to the bank. It will take the State Bar of California a while to catch up with the blizzard of evidence that she deserves to lose her bar ticket, but her days as a lawyer are numbered.
I can't look at that woman's face without filling with rage. I want to invite her to some public event just to humiliate her and hopefully make her cry/sue me.
I'm sorry, but how the FUCK does a country built on such a diverse history of immigration end up with such a "white" view of what it is to be an American? And, not to put too fine a point on it, but slavery is one of the reasons for that. It's not like we only started having a racially diverse country with Ellis Island.
I wonder if there's any different in where you were born/grew up. I'm from the NYC area and I'm used to diversity. If there are only white people in a place I get creeped out.
@tiredfairy: I think it's because we don't teach that history of immigration in our schools. As a 2nd gen Asian American/lifelong East Coaster, I didn't even know that there was a 150+ year long history of Asian Americans in this country until high school. I thought Chinatowns were anomalies. (Mind you, I grew up outside of DC and their Chinatown was decimated by the riots.) I won't even get into my relative lack of knowledge of Latino history in this country pre-college. And yes, I took AP US History and I did pretty well on it, thank you.
I didn't learn that it was only until 1952 that non-whites could even become naturalized in this country until I went to college. (Ha, how often do we talk about that as we pat ourselves on the back for being a constant "nation of immigrants?")
@banh mi: Ugh, I know. People seem to forget that we've had non-European immigrants in this country for a long time. I live on the West Coast now and a lot of how the west was built was on the backs of Chinese immigrants. Or how during WW2 we had internment camps right here in the grand old US of A for Japanese Americans, who we also stripped of property and due process. Yay?
History is one of those really important subjects a lot of people get bored by...and then everyone acts surprised when we don't learn from it and crazypants people start screaming about things that make no sense.
@banh mi: The history of immigration as taught until very recently was more focused on the assimilation of Southern and Eastern Europeans into what began as a union of white (many free blacks of the Revolutionary era were Loyalist) Anglo-Saxon-Scottish (New York and Pennsylvania excepted) Protestant (Maryland excepted) colonies.
If you recall from Gangs of New York the Irish weren't really considered white until the Civil War (and in Boston it took a while longer); even then it was only because they were a convenient source of cannon fodder.
@tiredfairy: I know what you meant -- I'm from a city where less than 50% of the population is white, so if I'm somewhere and everyone is white, it feels weird and wrong, just because it's not what I'm used to.
We've had black people since before the U.S. was the U.S. and non-white immigrants for nearly a couple centuries, but these people weren't, until recently, treated as full people by the U.S. government. The attitude, apparently, has persisted in society far longer than it has in law.
@tiredfairy: There were interment camps for German Americans and Italian Americans, too; admittedly, in those instances, internment was done on a specific basis (for pro-Axis activity) rather than a wholesale cleanout as was the case with the Japanese Americans (some of whom did in fact qualify as enemy aliens, if only because they couldn't become naturalized citizens).
One thing that surprised me after 9/11 was that in all of the hysteria, there was never a serious push to start rounding up Arab Americans in such a fashion. Maybe we have grown as a society, after all. Then again, it's more likely that it happened that way because the attacks were executed by (mostly) Saudi Arabians, instead of the armed forces of Saudi Arabia.
@banh mi: I think you're right. I'm 2nd gen. on one side, 3rd on the other, and the whole "immigrant experience" has always been a big part of the family folklore, so I thought I was pretty well versed...but I really only know about my own heritage (mostly European). I just learned about the Chinese Exclusion Act a month ago. I am appalled that it existed, that it was never taught in school, and that I never heard about it until now.
@tiredfairy: i got kicked out of 20th century history junior year of high school for disputing that they were only teaching about america and also specifically avoiding talking about all the bad stuff america did... because there were only 3 countries in the 20th century: america, allies, and enemies, and america was always right. it actually started innocently, with me asking about other things, but escalated.
i wanted to learn history, and tried to get it taught, but was punished instead. i'm a little bitter that despite 12 years of history and social studies classes, including 'world history' i still have no knowledge of any history not relating to the US. ok a lot bitter.
@tiredfairy: Yes! I learned about a lot of this by reading some of Ron Takaki's books on U.S. history--he's done a lot on not only the American experiences of East Asians, but also South Asians, Blacks, and Latinos.
@Cynical Media Bitch: Yes, that's exactly the kind of immigration history I learned in school. I thought Gangs of New York was very interesting because it really highlighted the immigrant/nativist tensions, actually showed some Asian people in NY (!), and really showed that the first major lynch mob was in NYC. But I digress.
I would also argue that the concept of "white people" as we know it now didn't really fully materialize until post-WW2 suburbanization (with Italians and Irish being the notable exceptions to the "euro but not 'white' "), but that is definitely a discussion for another time.
@Fatty Catty: Yeah, I think my family upbringing sort of prevented me from asking about other immigrant experiences too: my parents were refugees from SE Asia, so when I was growing up I just sort of assumed that all East and SE Asians were here in the US because they were fleeing communism, and ergo, they/we all just came over from the '60s - present.
@fjordtjie: If you find that your education was lacking, why didn't you do some research on your own? There are TONS of books available on a variety of historical topics....
Also, I don't know how old you are, but I was in high school ten years ago and we learned about the civilizations of China, Japan, India, the Middle East (cradle of civilization) in addition to what is commonly considered "Western" History-and that was during my freshman year of high school. I know this curriculum was common for all the schools in my area-and it still is in the school where I work.
Perhaps you were exaggerating for comic effect...I just found your bitterness a little extreme. I have taken numerous courses covering a wide variety of topics, from the history of Latin America, the history of Science, of Medicine and Women, to the history of film in China. I was motivated and the traditional concept of history as the story of powerful men fighting wars bored me. So if you had a problem with it, perhaps you should have taken some initiative instead of yelling and complaining at your teachers? And if you were in college, why didn't you choose to take courses that were more relevant to the areas of history that interested you?
@fjordtjie: Our US history classes, every year, started at the Boston Tea Party, got us up to WWII, and then the school year would be over. Every year. We never learned about Korea or Vietnam.
@banh mi: Growing up, in my head, everyone pretty much came over on the same boats at about the same times. But also fleeing Communists!
@banh mi: GONY (the movie, that is) isn't very good history. The riots in the movie depicted the reaction to the Union draft during the Civil War; nativist reaction to the "un-American" goes back a lot further than that. In the years before the Revolution, Benjamin Franklin said a few nasty things about German immigrants in Pennsylvania, for example.
I'm not certain what would qualify as the first major lynch mob, because you'd have to distinguish between politically inspired lynchers on one hand and ethno-religiously motivated lynchers on the other.
For some of the earliest political lynchings, I'd point to the Stamp Act riots of 1765. For an early lynch mob with religious motivations, I'll go with the Ursuline Convent riots of 1834, which took place in Charlestown, Mass. The years leading up to the Civil War were chock-full of anti-Catholic riots, most notably in places such as Philadelphia and Louisville.
I agree with you that today's concept of "white people" didn't emerge until after WWII; but by the 1880s, the Irish were "white" in most of America, as were Germans. Slavs, Italians and Greeks weren't considered truly "white" in many circles until the 1940s or '50s, even after two World Wars' worth of "Americanism."
@FattyCatty: I don't know where or when you went to school, but in late-1970s Flyover-land, the American Legion didn't want students to learn about wars that America didn't win. (There was an exception for the War of 1812, but it's kind of hard to explain the national anthem without bringing up that one.)
@Cynical Media Bitch: i am working on it. i'm in school finishing my undergrad, then onto grad school, so for the time being, i don't have a whole lot of free time to dedicate to studying something i don't have to. but i do watch history channel and talk to my history buff friends to learn more about history.
@the dodo, the cuckoo, and the nene: unfortunately, i was NOT exaggerating. i got kicked out of the class and my parents got a call--but they could not understand why i was being punished either and backed me up. i didn't yell at my teacher, but it was a volatile situation to ask questions about other countries or to question if america was always right--my district was not in an affluent area and mostly consisted of lower-class republican rednecks. i don't know what you think i should have done, but i shut the fuck up and got the hell out of there as soon as i could. now that i am in college, i've been able to take a wide variety of classes, and here 'world history' means the entire planet--who knew? i'm glad to have resources outside of school, but i am bitter that i was not taught what was promised. unfortunately, my major doesn't allow a lot of room for electives, so i will be able to focus more on subjects outside of my major when i get out of school.
@fjordtjie: Oh dear, watching the History Channel (or as I've called it, Hitler's Home Movies) probably isn't helping matters; it's not going to add much to what you were taught in HS. If you have any electives left, I'd suggest taking a couple of survey-level courses in the regions that interest you most.
@the dodo, the cuckoo, and the nene: also, i didn't have time to do research outside of school during high school (or really, now either) a job, coupled with a giant course load so i could graduate early, led to no free time.
i forgot to mention that the next town over is the second richest town in the state and has an excellent school system. my town is known for a high rate of dropping out, and my year (2004) had the highest percent of girls (including those who would have graduated 2004 but dropped out) with at least one kid by graduation (25 of 250). the school has more pressing issues than just avoiding teaching about the rest of the world...
@fjordtjie: Well, I'll give you credit for trying to undo the damage of your hometown schools. I'll also throw in some advice: soak up as much as you can in your areas of interest, and pay attention to the points where people disagree about what happened. After a while, you'll be able to figure out who's blowing smoke and who's closing in on the truth.
I wouldn't entirely avoid biographies, but they do tend to skew the story toward the role of the individual. Personalities are of course important, but go for the big picture first and pick out items for further attention as you go along. Good luck kid, I think you're going to need it.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/07/09
10/06/09
Why is it that recent immigrants are always the most racist? My great-grandfather practically got right off the boat, turned around, and yelled, "Go back to where you came from, you damn foreigners!"
10/06/09
How were these people not sold on the "melting pot" concept? I always feel like I'm missing something fundamental, when I can't explain this to these wackos.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
Mantra: "love each other love each other love each other love each other love each other..." AUGH
10/06/09
It makes prejudice sound legitimate.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
[tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com]
She will get her comeuppance, that you can take to the bank. It will take the State Bar of California a while to catch up with the blizzard of evidence that she deserves to lose her bar ticket, but her days as a lawyer are numbered.
10/06/09
10/06/09
"The study found that white Europeans are more "American" than are nonwhite Americans in most minds. [...]"
That's hilarious, in a forehead slapping shameful way.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
I wonder if there's any different in where you were born/grew up. I'm from the NYC area and I'm used to diversity. If there are only white people in a place I get creeped out.
10/06/09
I didn't learn that it was only until 1952 that non-whites could even become naturalized in this country until I went to college. (Ha, how often do we talk about that as we pat ourselves on the back for being a constant "nation of immigrants?")
10/06/09
History is one of those really important subjects a lot of people get bored by...and then everyone acts surprised when we don't learn from it and crazypants people start screaming about things that make no sense.
10/06/09
If you recall from Gangs of New York the Irish weren't really considered white until the Civil War (and in Boston it took a while longer); even then it was only because they were a convenient source of cannon fodder.
10/06/09
We've had black people since before the U.S. was the U.S. and non-white immigrants for nearly a couple centuries, but these people weren't, until recently, treated as full people by the U.S. government. The attitude, apparently, has persisted in society far longer than it has in law.
10/06/09
One thing that surprised me after 9/11 was that in all of the hysteria, there was never a serious push to start rounding up Arab Americans in such a fashion. Maybe we have grown as a society, after all. Then again, it's more likely that it happened that way because the attacks were executed by (mostly) Saudi Arabians, instead of the armed forces of Saudi Arabia.
10/06/09
PS - your name is delicious!
10/06/09
i wanted to learn history, and tried to get it taught, but was punished instead. i'm a little bitter that despite 12 years of history and social studies classes, including 'world history' i still have no knowledge of any history not relating to the US. ok a lot bitter.
10/06/09
10/06/09
@Cynical Media Bitch: Yes, that's exactly the kind of immigration history I learned in school. I thought Gangs of New York was very interesting because it really highlighted the immigrant/nativist tensions, actually showed some Asian people in NY (!), and really showed that the first major lynch mob was in NYC. But I digress.
I would also argue that the concept of "white people" as we know it now didn't really fully materialize until post-WW2 suburbanization (with Italians and Irish being the notable exceptions to the "euro but not 'white' "), but that is definitely a discussion for another time.
@Fatty Catty: Yeah, I think my family upbringing sort of prevented me from asking about other immigrant experiences too: my parents were refugees from SE Asia, so when I was growing up I just sort of assumed that all East and SE Asians were here in the US because they were fleeing communism, and ergo, they/we all just came over from the '60s - present.
10/06/09
Also, I don't know how old you are, but I was in high school ten years ago and we learned about the civilizations of China, Japan, India, the Middle East (cradle of civilization) in addition to what is commonly considered "Western" History-and that was during my freshman year of high school. I know this curriculum was common for all the schools in my area-and it still is in the school where I work.
Perhaps you were exaggerating for comic effect...I just found your bitterness a little extreme. I have taken numerous courses covering a wide variety of topics, from the history of Latin America, the history of Science, of Medicine and Women, to the history of film in China. I was motivated and the traditional concept of history as the story of powerful men fighting wars bored me. So if you had a problem with it, perhaps you should have taken some initiative instead of yelling and complaining at your teachers? And if you were in college, why didn't you choose to take courses that were more relevant to the areas of history that interested you?
10/06/09
@banh mi: Growing up, in my head, everyone pretty much came over on the same boats at about the same times. But also fleeing Communists!
10/06/09
I'm not certain what would qualify as the first major lynch mob, because you'd have to distinguish between politically inspired lynchers on one hand and ethno-religiously motivated lynchers on the other.
For some of the earliest political lynchings, I'd point to the Stamp Act riots of 1765. For an early lynch mob with religious motivations, I'll go with the Ursuline Convent riots of 1834, which took place in Charlestown, Mass. The years leading up to the Civil War were chock-full of anti-Catholic riots, most notably in places such as Philadelphia and Louisville.
I agree with you that today's concept of "white people" didn't emerge until after WWII; but by the 1880s, the Irish were "white" in most of America, as were Germans. Slavs, Italians and Greeks weren't considered truly "white" in many circles until the 1940s or '50s, even after two World Wars' worth of "Americanism."
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
i forgot to mention that the next town over is the second richest town in the state and has an excellent school system. my town is known for a high rate of dropping out, and my year (2004) had the highest percent of girls (including those who would have graduated 2004 but dropped out) with at least one kid by graduation (25 of 250). the school has more pressing issues than just avoiding teaching about the rest of the world...
10/06/09
I wouldn't entirely avoid biographies, but they do tend to skew the story toward the role of the individual. Personalities are of course important, but go for the big picture first and pick out items for further attention as you go along. Good luck kid, I think you're going to need it.
10/07/09
10/07/09