God, reading over this reminds me of how, in every First Amendment case I've ever read, the person involved was almost always a Class-A douchebag - Larry Flynt, the KKK dude, the hitman-catalog people, and so on. I guess this would be another example of "hard cases make bad law." I can see the argument he's making and the space that allows for his legal innocence, but he's such a douchebag I almost want to see him punished anyway.
And yet that is the entire point of the law - to keep people like me from punishing douchebags solely because he is a douchebag.
Man, this is why I like ethics so much more. The standard for behavior is so much higher. Even though an argument could be made that he was within his legal rights, very few would say what he did was ethical. #onlinepredators
Not saying he's guilty or innocent, but assuming he was just really, really stupid and actually did only want to have sex with her and then bail, you've got to admit that this is just ridiculously cringeworthy:
Deery said, "You brought three condoms, one for me and one for each of the girls."
"They come in packs of three," he told her. "You can’t buy just one."
I mean, I could imagine just screaming "Fuck fuck fuck." over in your head when you realized how that would be seen by everybody. #onlinepredators
I used to be a kid who talked to older men in chatrooms growing up. The internet was just taking off and yahoo and AIM chatrooms were my playground. I was a 12, 13, and 14 year old talking to men who were in their 20's, 30's, and im sure some were in their 40's. I never ONCE met up with any of the men I talked to. The men were probably perverts, they were probably sick, but I was smart enough to know that what happened in the cyber world was not the same as what happens in the real world. I stayed a virgin until the age of 18 when I entered college. I guess what I am trying to say that part of growing up is the idea that you can do naughty things. I know I couldn't have been the only 12-14 year old hanging out in chatrooms talking to older guys. Sometimes for fun and sometimes because I liked the images they sent to me. It was part of a coming of age for me. Like finding adult porn sites or viewing adult porn. I realize they were adults and I was a youngster but I still enjoyed what I saw. I just think this entire issue is a lot more nuanced than we give it credit for. I don't think people should necessarily be locked up for YEARS for talking about a sex act with someone underage, and the to catch a predator public mob of justice just gives me a bad taste. #onlinepredators
@History Major: I'm glad you commented on this, because I was debating writing my own similar one.
I briefly got pretty much addicted to Internet porn when I was in junior high school (whole 'nother can of worms), and while I never was much one for the online chatting, I did it once in a while, and I remember vividly talking to a guy once where I got it into my head to pretend to be ten years old. Lord knows why- maybe he had said he was into younger girls, and I wanted to push that idea even further?- but I recall his discomfort with it (and probably curiosity at the incongruity of a 10-year old girl with a way too advanced vocabulary, spelling w/o a trace of chat-style shorthand, and supremely fast typing). I'm sure now he probably thought I was an undercover cop. But I definitely found it exciting/taboo/thrilling, and now, as an adult, I still occasionally entertain ageplay fantasies.
I don't think I really have a point with this story except that . . . yeah. Kids can have some pretty crazy sexual things going on in their minds, and in any online chatting I did, I always realized that it was meant to stay online and never cross into reality. #onlinepredators
@History Major: I did too. Not in a sexual way, well, once, but mostly about Star Trek. The internet was tiny then, there wasn't a kid's table like now. I gaave my number to one guy (dumb dumb dumb I was 12) and he called me and it was so awkward h never emailed me again. Another guy did email me to proposition me,, thinking I was his age, but whne I told him the truth, he didn't email back. is it more dangerous now? Hard to say. Fewer people then, but you had to be comitted to computers and far more socially awkward. this was when only nerds used email. I really don't think the internet was muchsafter then, and I do think To Catch a Predator tactics are often entrapment. #onlinepredators
@BytheSea: The main difference these days is webcams. From a few amusing hours a week spent at Encyclopedia Dramatica and 4chan, as best I can tell the following is true:
1. There are very nearly a bajillion girls who are willing to go on webcam and do sexual things, though their limits for what they'll do vary.
2. Most of this is on public sites where they're getting instant feedback from guys as they go. The rest are of the "Well I just sent it to my boyfriend who says he'll love me forever because he's my Edward and I'm his Bella" variety. Sigh.
3. Nearly all of these videos are recorded by the collective denizens of the internet, with many of them finding their way onto 'mainstream' video clip sites that mix soft porn with your usual CollegeHumor antics.
4. Unless the girls themselves say so, there's basically no way to know the ages of the girls involved, except with one's own best judgment (of a blurry webcam photo). Given that there's no identifying information tacked onto these videos or a means of contacting the girl in question, I imagine a girl would have to look significantly under 18 before a video moderator on one of those video clip sites would proactively pull it. From what I've read about how those sites operate, they're not super-geniuses, just people with massive workloads doing a five-second 'rule of thumb' glance at each video to see if it's obviously bad.
For all the easy controversy whipped up over teen 'sexting', the direction of webcam technology is what parents should really fret about. Sexting at least carries with it a trail of numbers, an 'outbreak' that can potentially be contained; Thanks to 4chan, the lowest common denominator of the internet, once a video's out there on the web, it's basically going to exist forever.
If I ever have kids, my future computer will include a mic if they want to use skype, but definitely no webcam. I fully accept that my future kids will feel the need to make their own stupid teenage mistakes, but I'd like to keep them from making one that'll stick around on the internet forever.
But hey, actual, legitimate fears of what your dumb kid will do on the internet that have a simple solution (ditch the webcam) don't make Chris Hansen rich off of America's prurient interests. #onlinepredators
@CrapCommentFromADude: Totally agreed on the webcam thing. I see no reason for a kid to have access to one. The exception might be faraway friends or family, but in that case, it's more of a "bring it out for specified use when I'm around to supervise" thing.
@clevernamehere: No, you can get locked up for talking about it:
On-line solicitation of a minor for a sexual purpose, that is, with intent to commit a sexual activity with that minor, is one of the most investigated and targeted activities by both federal and state law enforcement in this day and age. The "on-line solicitation" as it is known as, is usually in the form of contact by electronic mail (e-mail), instant messaging, or other use of the Internet.
The contact with a minor (underage person), often a male contacting an underage female, becomes a violation of state and federal law when the conversation turns to content of a sexual nature to the extent that it appears that the contacting person is communicating in a sexually explicit manner with the contacted person....
However, the person making the on-line communication may be prosecuted even if he does not follow through with contact with the minor, but rather merely communicates in a sexually explicit manner. Also, persons can be prosecuted here if they forward sexually explicit material to the minor.
@History Major: I was hanging out with you--we're probably around the same age. I always panicked when they tried to send pictures, or request them, but I was not opposed to chatting. When I was 13 I had a boy try to be my online boyfriend and talk about sex (he claimed to be 18 and I have no sense if it was the truth or not). He wanted to meet up and date for real. I told him no. #onlinepredators
Sorry, no sympathy for this jerk. In this age of moral relativism, child molestation is separate.
A responsible and healthy human being, upon hearing someone's fantasies that include child molestation, has a responsibility to seek help for an obviously disturbed individual.
At the very least, the human being should have some guts and tell the mentally sick individual that such fantasies are disturbing and the person should seek mental help.
@tggrr7: Seriously. Why the hell would you want to have sex with a woman who wants you to rape her kids? There's no way that would lead to good things. #onlinepredators
@Anne is Spiderman: The legal part of my brain says he was entrapped but every other part of my brain says, So what? Dude was agreeing - however reluctantly - to fuck two little girls so he could get some. A reasonable, healthy person would have cut that line of communication off and found someone else. I mean, it's the internet for god's sake. It practically exists for the purpose of helping people hook up.
These stings bother me because the "victims" are almost always imaginary. Can one commit crimes against imaginary people? No. But evidently you can intend to commit crimes against pretend people and be sent to prison.
Clearly these men have problems, but I'm not sure the practice of netting them is on the up-and-up. #onlinepredators
@Gumbina80: This is exactly how I feel about the virtual child porn debate. I headdesk'd over and over again when I heard about the guy in Australia (or New Zealand?) who was convicted of possession of child porn because he had drawings of Bart and Lisa doing sexual things.
It's one of those clarifying moments- thank God we jailed him up. Because if we hadn't, he might have gone out and molested Bart and Lisa, or other yellow cartoon children with four fingers! Our cartoons are finally safe from being exploited in this detestable way.
There are so many real children being horribly exploited who need help. Not the Simpsons. #onlinepredators
@cand86: Creepy, perverted thoughts aren't (and can't or shouldn't be) illegal. But laws regarding child pornography or soliciting minors online have turned into ways to criminalize creepy thoughts. Child pornography is (IIRC) defined as anything that could be reasonably construed as involving underage persons. Well...if it's two young-looking 18-year-olds, whats the crime? Appearance of creepiness? Providing fodder for pedo pervs?
If there are real dangers and real minors that's one thing. These arrests because a guy was thinking about having sex with an imaginary person who was described as a minor are problematic. #onlinepredators
@Gumbina80: I think the idea is that it's better they try to solicit an imaginary child who had the power to arrest their ass, than to solicit a real one who has no power at all. #onlinepredators
I don't know if the number is really that low. Back when I still had an AOL account, the age was set to something underage. I remember through college getting random PMs that didn't seem like they were from teens. #onlinepredators
@clevernamehere: I used to go on ICQ or whatever it was called with a friend for kicks. We said we were 15 or 16. Those were not naked pics and come ons from teenagers we were getting. #onlinepredators
@clevernamehere: I remember being on Prodigy when I was 12 and running into dudes who were trying to hook up. PRODIGY, people. This is like the Middle Ages of the Internet.
I used to hang out in chat rooms when I was 14 or so and I got propositioned a bunch. I actually tried to cyber with a dude in his 20s, but I didn't really understand it, so I was just typing really lame sexual shit into the keyboard and waiting to see what he typed back. Yeah, I was a smart one. #onlinepredators
I always thought that 1 in 5 number seemed off, or at least overly alarmist. (When we first got AOL back in the dark ages, I remember getting a couple of weird comments, but I didn't feel threatened or even really grossed out--I usually sent them to a friend and we laughed about them. I mean, not that it makes it A-OK, but not every "solicitation" is a dangerous warning sign.) I just always wondered how much of that was teen-to-teen, or just online silliness.
The whole Chris Hansen/Perverted Justice operation makes me kind of queasy--partly just because of the weird, exploitative "entertainment" value (both of the show in general and on the part of some of the decoys), but I do wonder about the real good. It's interesting to me that Julie Posey has criticized it (and been abused for her efforts.) #onlinepredators
@alula: It freaks me out to no end how much my dad loves/loved "To Catch A Predator"- laughing uproariously at the guys on it and yelling "You're an idiot!" at the screen.
I've just never understood why anybody would need to watch more than a few episodes of it . . .
I think people were shocked by the tastelessness of the "Pedophile Gladiator" spoof:
But to me, that's pretty much how I view "To Catch A Predator"- turning something horrendous into entertainment, albeit in a format that allows viewers to feel good about watching. (Mind, I'm not dissing Perverted Justice itself, just the televising of it).
I dunno. Something about it always feels "off". We don't have the public punishments anymore, so you flip on the TV and watch Chris Hansen grill a dude and get to feel righteous. #onlinepredators
There was something on MPR's morning edition over the summer about a study that looked at the impact of online sexual predators on children vs. online bullying. Basically bullying is MUCH more likely to happen to a child than for them to be taken in by a sexual predator.
That being said when I was young I was harassed online by a sexual predator, I didn't tell anyone and nothing happened other than he wrote some obscene stuff and I messed with him out of boredom but he eventually got caught by the cops who called my parents since I was in his chat logs. So THAT was fun.
Why do the police do stings where they have a person pretend to be a grown up? That seems idiotic. If a person wants to have sex with a child PRETEND TO BE A F-ING CHILD, don't pretend to be a mom willing to pimp her kids. #onlinepredators
cand86 promoted this comment
Lizard in the Wires - Please, call it hamburger time. was starred
Lizard in the Wires - Please, call it hamburger time. was unstarred
@Lizard in the Wires now with even MORE metal in the face!: If anything good can come out of this fiasco, I really hope the police learn to not complicate their stings like this. It just makes no sense to make it between two adults with a shared fantasy of having their way with children, as it inevitably muddies the question of intent in a way that's impossible to do when you have instead a guy coming to meet [what he thinks is] an underage child.
Also? The police are pretty damn disturbing. Let's not forget who proposed this "Have sex with my kids!" concept . . . #onlinepredators
@cand86: It probably won't get through to anyone that what they're doing is stupid until two police stings attempt to capture each other. One for child molestation and the other for child prostitution. It's like the Keystone Cops byway of the Coen Brothers. #onlinepredators
This is slightly off-topic....but this has been bugging me lately. I know a lot of parents over-estimate the risk of child molesters and are ridiculously over-protective, thanks to these Dateline specials and sensational news stories. But if I were a parent, there's one (maybe slightly overprotective) thing I would never do, and that's put those little cartoon figures of my family on the car that lists the kids' names. I'm always shocked when I see those. To me that's like a guidebook for pedophiles. #onlinepredators
@kansasgirl: I'm with you. I am aware that my future kids are more likely to be fiddled with by someone they know, but even so I'd rather perfect strangers didn't know the names and hobbies and schools of my children. #onlinepredators
This may not be popular, but I've thought for awhile that we have such messed up guilt associations with all things sexual (largely because of religion), and as a result American devotes disproportionately excessive time, energy and resources to sex crimes. Along these lines, I've never really agreed with "Megan's Law" that gives the public access to information about sex offenders. It places too much emphasis on sex -- for example, there's no corresponding law that lets me know if a convicted murder or violent assaulter lives next door. And it gives a false sense of security: If there are no sex offenders on the website in your zip code, you may erroneously think that you don't need to be as vigilant about your kids playing outside. And in this case, sex offender laws seem to allow for convictions for a much fuzzier display of "intent" than other crimes do. #onlinepredators
@heliotrollop: American devotes disproportionately excessive time, energy and resources to sex crimes
Unless it's the rape of a woman. #onlinepredators
@femme-bot: See, I'd say that I should have excluded acquaintance rapes, partner/spouse rapes, and rapes of women under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Those are ignored. But it seems there are plenty of Scary! Warnings! about the ski-masked stranger lurking in the parking lot with the evil intent of raping the poor, innocent woman. And, of course, rape by a complete stranger in ordinary (e.g., parking lot) circumstances is actually quite rare.
@heliotrollop: Checking those sex offender registries is useless. First off, you've got the 19-year-old who slept with his 16-year-old girlfriend and her parents pressed charges. That person shouldn't be lumped in with someone who rapes a woman or child.
Also, they only show the people who got caught. Plenty of scary individuals haven't been. #onlinepredators
That just boggles my mind how people can instantly turn off sympathy for a woman the moment she turns 18. I don't think there's a point in our development when we become mature enough to not be affected by sexual assault. But that's exactly how society treats women. People are only outraged and shouting for action when assaults are especially gruesome, but the thousands of women who are raped each day gain no sympathy and sentences for offenders are pathetic. But how often do you see religious and family values groups shouting for tougher sentences for people who assault grown women. #onlinepredators
@heliotrollop: That's a really good point, about not knowing about non-sexual violent criminals.
Sentencing is curious, too. Here in my state we had a recent manslaughter case where the guy who shot someone got 9 months in prison. And I know personally of someone who did something inappropriate with an underage girl (I don't know what, but I know it was not forced), and he's in prison for four years. Both things were wrong, but that's quite a difference in sentencing. #onlinepredators
@Glaven: We don't think that murderers go around killing just anyone; even in slasher movies, we call bulshit if the masked psycho doesn't have a motive. Yet we think everyone in the sex offender registry is equally likely to grab a child off the street.
@heliotrollop: as a result American devotes disproportionately excessive time, energy and resources to sex crimes
Me and every other person whose sexual abuser has gotten off without punishment disagrees. Would you believe the judge actually tossed my rapist's case out? #onlinepredators
@whynotshesaid: I completely understand and agree with you. As I though about it more, I realized I was wrong -- the crimes themselves, especially when an adult woman is a victim, are not pursued and prosecuted as they should be.
But I still think that detectives trolling chat rooms and posing as underage girls is probably not the best use of resources. #onlinepredators
@heliotrollop: I hear you on the last part. Honestly, I don't know what I think but I do know that there is a lot of room for debate on the matter. #onlinepredators
@Penny: Yeah, I was like "well, I don't know.." until I got the part where he BOUGHT THE CONDOMS AND SEX TOYS AND DROVE TO THE MEETING PLACE. Like, cry me a fucking river dude, you "played" a very dangerous, very real "game" that had legal repercussions and you lost. You can appeal your sentence from jail. People who are raped can't appeal their rape. #onlinepredators
It's really difficult. On the one hand, we want to demonize rape and rapists as the awful, horrible thing it is. But on the other, overzealousness really can hurt people, and preemptive strikes are fraught with error.
It's such a difficult line to draw - where does it go, and how hard is it? When do we try to preemptively remove a dangerous person from society? When is it infringing on rights? No one wants to think someone is a child molester and then have it confirmed, but you don't want to lock up anyone who hasn't actually done something.
@boxspelunker: I've been rereading the comments on this thread and stopped on your question. Its such a difficult line to watch. How frequently do good intentions cross over into zealotry? Who do we protect when we're willing to ruin people's lives on a just in case?
The discussions here remind me so strongly of the McMartin Preschool scandal and the satanic ritual abuse hysteria. People meant well there to and were trying to protect children from being abused, but they ruined the lives of truly innocent individuals for nothing, for chasing after ghosts in the darkness. This guy is obviously a creep and an asshole and a pervert, but is he a child molester?
Regardless - he participated in a discussion/sexual fantasy involving children - that is reprehensible and completely wrong. He's so interested in being with the woman that he'd tolerate and encourage her discussion of him molesting her children? Wrong on every level, and criminal too.
@tggrr7: I try not to pipe up on the legal system, because I don't know what the fuck I am talking about most of the time. But, are you certain a "discussion" of a sexual fantasy is illegal? Even if the act is illegal?
This is why I love Vanity Fair. Not their ____ is the new James Dean or bizarre Kate Gosselin profiles. The meat of the mag is probably the best I've ever read, when they're not stooping way too low into the celebrity fare or making you feel entirely too poor. Articles like this suck you in and won't let go. #onlinepredators
@annebreal: That's actually why I love the New Yorker, too! So now you are saying I have another uber-pretentious smarty-pants magazine I need to read... #onlinepredators
I find this whole thing disturbing. It makes me think of "Minority Report" - jailing people for crimes they have yet to commit. It's not foolproof enough to be right. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
And yet that is the entire point of the law - to keep people like me from punishing douchebags solely because he is a douchebag.
Man, this is why I like ethics so much more. The standard for behavior is so much higher. Even though an argument could be made that he was within his legal rights, very few would say what he did was ethical. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
Deery said, "You brought three condoms, one for me and one for each of the girls."
"They come in packs of three," he told her. "You can’t buy just one."
I mean, I could imagine just screaming "Fuck fuck fuck." over in your head when you realized how that would be seen by everybody. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
I briefly got pretty much addicted to Internet porn when I was in junior high school (whole 'nother can of worms), and while I never was much one for the online chatting, I did it once in a while, and I remember vividly talking to a guy once where I got it into my head to pretend to be ten years old. Lord knows why- maybe he had said he was into younger girls, and I wanted to push that idea even further?- but I recall his discomfort with it (and probably curiosity at the incongruity of a 10-year old girl with a way too advanced vocabulary, spelling w/o a trace of chat-style shorthand, and supremely fast typing). I'm sure now he probably thought I was an undercover cop. But I definitely found it exciting/taboo/thrilling, and now, as an adult, I still occasionally entertain ageplay fantasies.
I don't think I really have a point with this story except that . . . yeah. Kids can have some pretty crazy sexual things going on in their minds, and in any online chatting I did, I always realized that it was meant to stay online and never cross into reality. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
1. There are very nearly a bajillion girls who are willing to go on webcam and do sexual things, though their limits for what they'll do vary.
2. Most of this is on public sites where they're getting instant feedback from guys as they go. The rest are of the "Well I just sent it to my boyfriend who says he'll love me forever because he's my Edward and I'm his Bella" variety. Sigh.
3. Nearly all of these videos are recorded by the collective denizens of the internet, with many of them finding their way onto 'mainstream' video clip sites that mix soft porn with your usual CollegeHumor antics.
4. Unless the girls themselves say so, there's basically no way to know the ages of the girls involved, except with one's own best judgment (of a blurry webcam photo). Given that there's no identifying information tacked onto these videos or a means of contacting the girl in question, I imagine a girl would have to look significantly under 18 before a video moderator on one of those video clip sites would proactively pull it. From what I've read about how those sites operate, they're not super-geniuses, just people with massive workloads doing a five-second 'rule of thumb' glance at each video to see if it's obviously bad.
For all the easy controversy whipped up over teen 'sexting', the direction of webcam technology is what parents should really fret about. Sexting at least carries with it a trail of numbers, an 'outbreak' that can potentially be contained; Thanks to 4chan, the lowest common denominator of the internet, once a video's out there on the web, it's basically going to exist forever.
If I ever have kids, my future computer will include a mic if they want to use skype, but definitely no webcam. I fully accept that my future kids will feel the need to make their own stupid teenage mistakes, but I'd like to keep them from making one that'll stick around on the internet forever.
But hey, actual, legitimate fears of what your dumb kid will do on the internet that have a simple solution (ditch the webcam) don't make Chris Hansen rich off of America's prurient interests. #onlinepredators
11/05/09
Otherwise, nope, nope, nope. #onlinepredators
11/05/09
On-line solicitation of a minor for a sexual purpose, that is, with intent to commit a sexual activity with that minor, is one of the most investigated and targeted activities by both federal and state law enforcement in this day and age. The "on-line solicitation" as it is known as, is usually in the form of contact by electronic mail (e-mail), instant messaging, or other use of the Internet.
The contact with a minor (underage person), often a male contacting an underage female, becomes a violation of state and federal law when the conversation turns to content of a sexual nature to the extent that it appears that the contacting person is communicating in a sexually explicit manner with the contacted person....
However, the person making the on-line communication may be prosecuted even if he does not follow through with contact with the minor, but rather merely communicates in a sexually explicit manner. Also, persons can be prosecuted here if they forward sexually explicit material to the minor.
[www.teakelllaw.com] #onlinepredators
11/05/09
11/04/09
A responsible and healthy human being, upon hearing someone's fantasies that include child molestation, has a responsibility to seek help for an obviously disturbed individual.
At the very least, the human being should have some guts and tell the mentally sick individual that such fantasies are disturbing and the person should seek mental help.
11/04/09
11/04/09
No sympathy. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
Clearly these men have problems, but I'm not sure the practice of netting them is on the up-and-up. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
It's one of those clarifying moments- thank God we jailed him up. Because if we hadn't, he might have gone out and molested Bart and Lisa, or other yellow cartoon children with four fingers! Our cartoons are finally safe from being exploited in this detestable way.
There are so many real children being horribly exploited who need help. Not the Simpsons. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
If there are real dangers and real minors that's one thing. These arrests because a guy was thinking about having sex with an imaginary person who was described as a minor are problematic. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
I used to hang out in chat rooms when I was 14 or so and I got propositioned a bunch. I actually tried to cyber with a dude in his 20s, but I didn't really understand it, so I was just typing really lame sexual shit into the keyboard and waiting to see what he typed back. Yeah, I was a smart one. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
The whole Chris Hansen/Perverted Justice operation makes me kind of queasy--partly just because of the weird, exploitative "entertainment" value (both of the show in general and on the part of some of the decoys), but I do wonder about the real good. It's interesting to me that Julie Posey has criticized it (and been abused for her efforts.) #onlinepredators
11/04/09
I've just never understood why anybody would need to watch more than a few episodes of it . . .
I think people were shocked by the tastelessness of the "Pedophile Gladiator" spoof:
[www.bestweekever.tv]
But to me, that's pretty much how I view "To Catch A Predator"- turning something horrendous into entertainment, albeit in a format that allows viewers to feel good about watching. (Mind, I'm not dissing Perverted Justice itself, just the televising of it).
I dunno. Something about it always feels "off". We don't have the public punishments anymore, so you flip on the TV and watch Chris Hansen grill a dude and get to feel righteous. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
That being said when I was young I was harassed online by a sexual predator, I didn't tell anyone and nothing happened other than he wrote some obscene stuff and I messed with him out of boredom but he eventually got caught by the cops who called my parents since I was in his chat logs. So THAT was fun.
Why do the police do stings where they have a person pretend to be a grown up? That seems idiotic. If a person wants to have sex with a child PRETEND TO BE A F-ING CHILD, don't pretend to be a mom willing to pimp her kids. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
Also? The police are pretty damn disturbing. Let's not forget who proposed this "Have sex with my kids!" concept . . . #onlinepredators
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Unless it's the rape of a woman. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
Obviously I need to think about this more. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
Also, they only show the people who got caught. Plenty of scary individuals haven't been. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
That just boggles my mind how people can instantly turn off sympathy for a woman the moment she turns 18. I don't think there's a point in our development when we become mature enough to not be affected by sexual assault. But that's exactly how society treats women. People are only outraged and shouting for action when assaults are especially gruesome, but the thousands of women who are raped each day gain no sympathy and sentences for offenders are pathetic. But how often do you see religious and family values groups shouting for tougher sentences for people who assault grown women. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
Sentencing is curious, too. Here in my state we had a recent manslaughter case where the guy who shot someone got 9 months in prison. And I know personally of someone who did something inappropriate with an underage girl (I don't know what, but I know it was not forced), and he's in prison for four years. Both things were wrong, but that's quite a difference in sentencing. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
11/04/09
Me and every other person whose sexual abuser has gotten off without punishment disagrees. Would you believe the judge actually tossed my rapist's case out? #onlinepredators
11/05/09
But I still think that detectives trolling chat rooms and posing as underage girls is probably not the best use of resources. #onlinepredators
11/05/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
And yes, like others said, the guy was not exactly just saying shit. He was doing shit, too. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
It's such a difficult line to draw - where does it go, and how hard is it? When do we try to preemptively remove a dangerous person from society? When is it infringing on rights? No one wants to think someone is a child molester and then have it confirmed, but you don't want to lock up anyone who hasn't actually done something.
I don't really know what to think. :/ #onlinepredators
11/04/09
The discussions here remind me so strongly of the McMartin Preschool scandal and the satanic ritual abuse hysteria. People meant well there to and were trying to protect children from being abused, but they ruined the lives of truly innocent individuals for nothing, for chasing after ghosts in the darkness. This guy is obviously a creep and an asshole and a pervert, but is he a child molester?
I don't know either. #onlinepredators
11/04/09
11/04/09
I do not believe it is.
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09