fuck this documentary: I can't wait for the documentary that comes 10 years ago where these kids and the Gosselin children get to give their point of view on all of this. I'm sure they'll all be remarkably comfortable in front a camera.
Why should the state indulge a woman whose children could probably benefit from the presence (if not serious intervention/removal from the home) of child services anyway?
@maude_flanders: i wish people would think a little harder before throwing that out there. do you know what happens after "removal from the home"? they aren't dropped into a pile of rainbows and cupcakes. they're sent to foster homes, with strange adults, strange kids, and strange social workers who are then trusted to take care of them. A huge number of these kids are being abused in care by other kids and by foster parents. Even the foster parents who aren't abusing them are usually overworked, most of them are overcrowded and can't possibly support and supervise the amount of kids in care. Imagine Octomom without any love or familiarity or family.
i'm not saying she isn't crazy. and i'm not saying it isn't warranted sometimes. but there's a serious, lonely, and sometimes deadly set of problems that occur after "removal from the home" that all of us well-loved morally outraged people ignore so we can feel the parents are being sufficiently punished for their inadequacy or negligence.
do you really think it costs less or is more helpful to sever all connections a child has (including the familiarity and comfort of other friends, family, teachers, neighbors) than to provide genuine and extensive support and education to the parents?
Every single one her octuplets has the middle name "Angel," as though they're special little miracles from the heavens. They're the result of expensive medical technology! Their middle names should be "Science." [en.wikipedia.org]
you, again, missed the fucking point. it's not murder, it's ETHICS..a word that you might need to look up in the first place since you clearly don't know what it means.
@rednrowdy: thanks be to jeebus for saying something, rednrowdy! i hate that when people call it murder and then refer to the child by the name that was given them AFTER the birth.
@kellybones: her whole scenario highlights why there needs to be a legal limit on how many embryos can be implanted at one time. three, for example, might be a good number to start with.
@rednrowdy: The overwhelming majority of docs only transfer 2 embryos at the most. I've heard of 3 in a few cases, but that's rare. Her doc was just as crazy as she is.
@Kali Mama: I'm glad that I'm not the only one that noticed that. Is there contraband in the kid's diaper that she's afraid of becoming dislodged or does she just think the interviewer has cooties?
@BabyJane: She may have been saving the baby from fear--lots of babies are terrified of being held by strangers and will scream bloody murder if you hand them over to someone else.
She's batshit, but those kids are damned cute. It frightens me to realize that she has more kids in her home than exist on my block. Like, nearly twice as many. She has more kids than came trick-or-treating to my house this year!
I read that headline and then saw the kid's face in the screengrab and died. It was like he was horrified at the prospect and was trying to speak to her: "DON'T DO IT, MOM!"
Is one of these kids named Isaac? Cause that would have made her decision a lot easier. Granted if Abraham didn't have the balls to go through with it, I doubt she would either.
You know if you had a decent social safety net in this country all of these children would be adequately cared and provided for without regard to how nutso/camera-ready/tabloid-friendly their mom is.
@PilgrimSoul: I think she would be a freakshow in any land, even Scandinavia. She was the first person to ever deliver eight live children at one time, right? The money part gives people a reason to condemn her for being a nutjob.
@LilSpitfire: well actually, the right to procreate is a fundamental right under the 14th amendment (Skinner v. Oklahoma), just like the right NOT to procreate (Roe).
But right to procreate doesn't mean that everyone should do it. Unfortunately and fortunately, procreation is a free-market system right now - anyone can do it, and IVF/ART is successful because of market demands.
I think people forget the responsibility part which is why we have so many abused, neglected, sexually assaulted, improvised children left to the system.
@LilSpitfire: oh absolutely. It's really awful, but its not really something the state can do for someone.
All we can do is shame these parents into submission. The standard of neglect/abuse is pretty high, so these types of parents are (and probably should not be) criminal /athough i'm not sure if the public shaming tactic is working because even though Nadia/Duggars/etc. are publicly mocked, they love the attention too much to care.
@all: Man, y'all. You guys are kinda harsh. I am not looking to be having fourteen kids anytime soon, but for chrissakes, the woman is likely mentally ill, and "shaming" doesn't work because this is not something rational people do. I don't like her, but on the other hand, I have no idea how one pays the astronomical cost of medical care or child care in this country without making a freak show of oneself anyway.
What I am saying is that this is why social safety nets are important, because even if she makes some money out of this, her kids are gonna suffer one way or the other, and it would sure be nice to live in a society where people weren't spitting fire at her. Me, I shrug my shoulders, and think of the kids. Seriously, that's the only decent thing to do. #tips
@Ms.RantyPants: I don't think shaming is the way to go either.
Legally you cannot force a person not to have children but there needs to be LARGE ethical guild lines in regards to who you implant 8 embryos into when said person has no job, no income to speak of, and 6 young children already.
@PilgrimSoul: I'm aware of how problematic it is to think this way, but Suleman is about the last person to demonstrate the importance of social safety nets--it's criminal the way so many people are condemned for making "bad choices" that lead to poverty, but for someone to behave SO irresponsibly when people are suffering with just one or two kids makes it impossible for you to empathize with her.
If we lived in the kind of society where people wouldn't spit fire at her, she wouldn't be famous, don't you think? Also, if we lived in this ladida perfect society she might have gotten decent mental health care somewhere along the line. I sincerely cannot understand how anyone could see Suleman as an object lesson in anything but scientific hubris.
@PilgrimSoul: Ah, I didn't mean to come off as 'shaming-is-good' - I just meant that it is the only real way that we can discourage this unethical behavior - and yes it is unethical (on the mother's part). I guess my point fits into your larger point - if we had a larger social safety net, we wouldn't be as worried for the kids as we are
@LilSpitfire: True, we do need more strigent ethical standards.
Here's my problem with ethical standards - they don't really provide any remedies and if any remedies are available, it's after the deed has been done. For example, that idiot doctor was kicked out of the AMA or had his license revoked (maybe both?) - but that doesn't really help the kids or the mother.
Also, there are gonna be unethical/crappy docs out there. Unless ALL of them refuse to implant 8 embryos at once, a determined octomom will find one who will do it. Never stand in the way of a determined gal, I guess.
Eh, I'm just one big critic - it's my lawyer nature.
It wasn't as if she went "oops the condom broke, or oops I was drunk, or oops my BC failed". This was
1. seek out doctor
2. Secure funding
3.Go for consultation
4. Prepare embryos
5. Prepare for procedure
6. Have procedure
etc etc
This was planned at every step.
Which is why it makes it that much more crazy.
I know there is a big social taboo to call mothers shitty but this women is a shitty fucking mother.
Please Jezebel, stop posting on this woman and feeding the beast. this is exactly the attention she craves, keeping her name in the news. she doesn't deserve it, and i for one and sick of not being able to avoid her on tv, in the news, on the radio, and the internets
@suth: Wait, how is this Suleman's fault? She forced over 20 employees to access her medical records in violation of federal law so she could get a post on Jezebel? That's a kind of crazy conspiracy theory.
Oh by the way, there is this thing on Jezebel where if you don't care about a particular issue/person/post, you aren't forced to view it or comment on it. You can keep scrolling, you should have a scroll bar on the right of your browser window with "up" and "down" arrows that allows you to scroll past the posts you don't care about.
11/24/09
11/24/09
Just had to make fun of the typo.
11/24/09
Why should the state indulge a woman whose children could probably benefit from the presence (if not serious intervention/removal from the home) of child services anyway?
11/24/09
i'm not saying she isn't crazy. and i'm not saying it isn't warranted sometimes. but there's a serious, lonely, and sometimes deadly set of problems that occur after "removal from the home" that all of us well-loved morally outraged people ignore so we can feel the parents are being sufficiently punished for their inadequacy or negligence.
do you really think it costs less or is more helpful to sever all connections a child has (including the familiarity and comfort of other friends, family, teachers, neighbors) than to provide genuine and extensive support and education to the parents?
11/24/09
11/24/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
11/24/09
you, again, missed the fucking point. it's not murder, it's ETHICS..a word that you might need to look up in the first place since you clearly don't know what it means.
you need prayer,
rednrowdy
11/24/09
11/24/09
#tips
11/24/09
11/24/09
You have FOURTEEN kids woman, don't Bogard the cuddles.
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
Just a thought.
11/24/09
11/24/09
When you have children to fill a need this isn't parenting...it's an addiction and the people who suffer the most are the kids.
Sometimes being the best parent you can be is having the wisdom to realize you shouldn't be one.
11/24/09
11/24/09
But right to procreate doesn't mean that everyone should do it. Unfortunately and fortunately, procreation is a free-market system right now - anyone can do it, and IVF/ART is successful because of market demands.
11/24/09
I think people forget the responsibility part which is why we have so many abused, neglected, sexually assaulted, improvised children left to the system.
#tips
11/24/09
All we can do is shame these parents into submission. The standard of neglect/abuse is pretty high, so these types of parents are (and probably should not be) criminal /athough i'm not sure if the public shaming tactic is working because even though Nadia/Duggars/etc. are publicly mocked, they love the attention too much to care.
#tips
11/24/09
What I am saying is that this is why social safety nets are important, because even if she makes some money out of this, her kids are gonna suffer one way or the other, and it would sure be nice to live in a society where people weren't spitting fire at her. Me, I shrug my shoulders, and think of the kids. Seriously, that's the only decent thing to do. #tips
11/24/09
Legally you cannot force a person not to have children but there needs to be LARGE ethical guild lines in regards to who you implant 8 embryos into when said person has no job, no income to speak of, and 6 young children already.
I am so mad at this doctor. Major fail.
11/24/09
If we lived in the kind of society where people wouldn't spit fire at her, she wouldn't be famous, don't you think? Also, if we lived in this ladida perfect society she might have gotten decent mental health care somewhere along the line. I sincerely cannot understand how anyone could see Suleman as an object lesson in anything but scientific hubris.
11/24/09
#tips
11/24/09
Here's my problem with ethical standards - they don't really provide any remedies and if any remedies are available, it's after the deed has been done. For example, that idiot doctor was kicked out of the AMA or had his license revoked (maybe both?) - but that doesn't really help the kids or the mother.
Also, there are gonna be unethical/crappy docs out there. Unless ALL of them refuse to implant 8 embryos at once, a determined octomom will find one who will do it. Never stand in the way of a determined gal, I guess.
Eh, I'm just one big critic - it's my lawyer nature.
#tips
11/24/09
It wasn't as if she went "oops the condom broke, or oops I was drunk, or oops my BC failed". This was
1. seek out doctor
2. Secure funding
3.Go for consultation
4. Prepare embryos
5. Prepare for procedure
6. Have procedure
etc etc
This was planned at every step.
Which is why it makes it that much more crazy.
I know there is a big social taboo to call mothers shitty but this women is a shitty fucking mother.
#tips
03/31/09
hmm whenever i see 'discipline' i think dirty thoughts. they could have used reprimanded.
03/31/09
03/31/09
Oh by the way, there is this thing on Jezebel where if you don't care about a particular issue/person/post, you aren't forced to view it or comment on it. You can keep scrolling, you should have a scroll bar on the right of your browser window with "up" and "down" arrows that allows you to scroll past the posts you don't care about.