Um, question - can't they do both? By which I mean issue scathing PR statements about big news stories like the Polanski or Letterman cases AND also work on more prosaic but wider reaching issues?
I mean honestly, it doesn't take that long to write and issue a PR statement, so this sort of feels like a false dichotomy. Why assume it's one or the other? #now
While I think it is fine for them to speak out about this kind of stuff, they have to be careful because they risk turning into feminist "ambulance chasers." Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have both lost a great deal of their credibility because they are perceived to go where the publicity is. Gloria Allred is the same way. These three used to have a lot of influence, but they have squandered it and are now sometimes seen as a liability for a cause. This is the risk for NOW if they constantly make the news for just the big publicity stuff. #now
Oh come ON Anna, these NOW statements only 'made the headlines' because shallow news agencies pick up on them, while ignoring other, more structurally and institutionally substantial campaigns NOW might be waging. A simple glance at their website shows that they also have a lot to say on abstinence-only education and the healthcare bill debate. But of course, these issues aren't as sensationalist and celebrity-oriented, and therefore don't get reported on. This post strikes me as unfair and a little too quickly written. #now
When feminist groups speak out, they get criticized for doing so. When they don't speak out, they get criticized for doing so. Sometimes by Fox News and sometimes by other feminists. It's a really difficult dance, and I want to say how much I appreciate the way Anna acknowledges that these issues are legitimate, even as she questions whether NOW is the right organization to tackle them. It's heartening to see that we can talk about how to set feminist priorities on our own terms without having to denigrate any set of concerns as "less important." (I'm looking at you, anti-feminists who tell American women to quit whining because women in Afghanistan have it so much worse.)
I agree that NOW has been most effective as a liberal feminist political player in Washington. Not all of us can lobby congress, whereas plenty of us can speak out against unrealistic beauty ideals. For what it's worth, here's what I think is going on. The feminist movement in the US has frequently been criticized for focusing on symbolic issues like changing names upon marriage, calling adult women "girls," shaving legs (or waxing labia, as the case may be), pop culture representations of women, etc. It has never been true that advocates for women's rights have focused on these questions to the exclusion of advocating for policy changes, but these are the questions that tend to get debated most often. My theory is that these symbolic issues feel like things that we can change more quickly than structural, systemic sexism. It's much easier to fix our vocabulary than our economic structures, and it's a lot less daunting to take on problems that involve individuals behaving badly than to advocate for overhauling the social infrastructure. I think maybe all of us are feeling a little bit of fatigue right now with all of huge issues that need to be addressed. It's no wonder airbrushing makes NOW's VP want to cry. I mean, we've been fighting that battle forever, and if we can't get the basics down, it can make it feel like we aren't equipped to take on the bigger challenges. #now
I think I might like NOW putting themselves out in front more. I hardly hear about them until there's an election going on. Maybe they should be sweating some more of the smaller stuff if for nothing else but to make themselves more visible and remind everybody that there's still a fight on for women's equality. Because people seem to forget oftentimes.
Non-NOW-related example: The DUI charges against Mel Gibson were dropped recently and his arrest was mentioned in the news again. Usually, news reports refer to Gibson's "antisemitic rant," but in this one report I happened to catch, they said his rant was against "jews and women," which nearly knocked me on my ass because no one ever mentions the 'and women' part. The fact that somebody finally recognized that sexually degrading a police officer for being female isn't any less of a problem than saying Jews run the media was probably the result of a lot of organizing and phone calls and letter-writing. That's the kind of thing I want NOW to make happen. I want sexism to be taken as seriously in the media as racism and antisemitism and homophobia.
I also want pro-women awards ceremonies, like the NAACP Image Awards. Why don't we have something like that? #now
I think I might like NOW putting themselves out in front more. I hardly hear about them until there's an election going on. Maybe they should be sweating some more of the smaller stuff if for nothing else but to make themselves more visible and remind everybody that there's still a fight on for women's equality. Because people seem to forget oftentimes.
Non-NOW-related example: The DUI charges against Mel Gibson were dropped recently and his arrest was mentioned in the news again. Usually, news reports refer to Gibson's "antisemitic rant," but in this one report I happened to catch, they said his rant was against "jews and women," which nearly knocked me on my ass because no one ever mentions the 'and women' part. The fact that somebody finally recognized that sexually degrading a police officer for being female isn't any less of a problem than saying Jews run the media was probably the result of a lot of organizing and phone calls and letter-writing. That's the kind of thing I want NOW to make happen. I want sexism to be taken as seriously in the media as racism and antisemitism and homophobia.
I also want pro-women awards ceremonies, like the NAACP Image Awards. Why don't we have something like that? #now
NOW has been struggling with its fuddy-duddy image since I was a youngster in the 90s, when activist groups like WHAM and WAC were attracting away the next generation. I and a few friends tried to get active in NOW but we felt they were totally out of touch and disconnected from intergenerational feminism. As in, they kept trying to teach us about stuff we already knew and made a lot of annoying assumptions that we were patriarchy's victims because we didn't fit their "good feminist" model - we were exploring new ways to be femme and strong, to reclaim a radical sexuality that didn't see women as vicitims, bisexual validation, etc. - all this stuff the women at our local NOW chapter saw as misguided, youthful mistakes. Mind you, it could have just been my local chapter. But it gave me the impression that NOW has made itself unappealing to anyone interesting and independent and now they just don't have the fresh blood to be relevant. I'll admit - most of the time they get media attention, I end up cringing. At the very least, they need some kick-ass new PR people. #now
"Men behaving badly is exactly the problem in this country. It's not a diversion - it's at the core of why women are unequal, why they are kept in second-class citizenship."
I think this is so true. We all have to deal with men behaving badly in our private & professional lives on a daily basis. I think they are right in addressing these issues. #now
Hmm... like you, I was of two minds about this, but like you, I finally come down against. There is certainly value to NOW in keeping its name in the news. But surely there are bigger, more substantial foes it could pick a fight with, with more to gain than a mouthed apology and a couple of news cycles. #now
Can we not get to the point where whether or not a woman is beautiful is IRRELEVANT? I don't want this stupid apology that this woman is calling for, that women of all shapes and sizes are beautiful. Who gives a shit what Ralph Lauren thinks?
Maybe instead NOW should tackle the cult of beauty as the be-all and end-all of what any of us women have to strive for. Maybe that would be worth doing. This? Is publicity. #ralphlauren
This issue is so beyond this issue. This just puts into sharp focus what is happening in this industry across the board, in perhaps a slightly less over-the-top way. And we can get all up in arms about this one incident or we as consumers, artists, and designers can realize this is ubiquitous and harmful and stop being shocked and start being proactive about making changes.
My (very anti-fashion) mother and I had a long discussion about my extremely ambivalent feelings on the industry that I have yet to reconcile. On one hand, you have designers like Alexander McQueen creating what I think is some of the world’s greatest contemporary art (in both his clothing designs and his runway shows), but on the other hand, his models are as skinny as anyone else’s. It’s easy to be dismissive of an individual designer if they’re outlandish and you don’t even love their designs anyway (ie: Christian Louboutin saying Barbie’s ankles are too fat), but when you have incredible designers who are tacitly (McQueen) or vocally (Lagerfeld) going on about women over 110 pounds being "fat" it’s difficult to decide what to do as a consumer/artist appreciating art.
This all reminds me of a sketch from "The State" wherein Ben Garant is a fashion designer who accuses a myriad of skinny models of being cows. Finally, Kerri Kenney brings him a "model" who is finally skinny enough: she’s invisible. Eventually, even she becomes too chunky for Garant’s liking. Fucking brilliant sketch. #ralphlauren
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/17/09
I mean honestly, it doesn't take that long to write and issue a PR statement, so this sort of feels like a false dichotomy. Why assume it's one or the other?
#now
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/16/09
I agree that NOW has been most effective as a liberal feminist political player in Washington. Not all of us can lobby congress, whereas plenty of us can speak out against unrealistic beauty ideals. For what it's worth, here's what I think is going on. The feminist movement in the US has frequently been criticized for focusing on symbolic issues like changing names upon marriage, calling adult women "girls," shaving legs (or waxing labia, as the case may be), pop culture representations of women, etc. It has never been true that advocates for women's rights have focused on these questions to the exclusion of advocating for policy changes, but these are the questions that tend to get debated most often. My theory is that these symbolic issues feel like things that we can change more quickly than structural, systemic sexism. It's much easier to fix our vocabulary than our economic structures, and it's a lot less daunting to take on problems that involve individuals behaving badly than to advocate for overhauling the social infrastructure. I think maybe all of us are feeling a little bit of fatigue right now with all of huge issues that need to be addressed. It's no wonder airbrushing makes NOW's VP want to cry. I mean, we've been fighting that battle forever, and if we can't get the basics down, it can make it feel like we aren't equipped to take on the bigger challenges. #now
10/16/09
Non-NOW-related example: The DUI charges against Mel Gibson were dropped recently and his arrest was mentioned in the news again. Usually, news reports refer to Gibson's "antisemitic rant," but in this one report I happened to catch, they said his rant was against "jews and women," which nearly knocked me on my ass because no one ever mentions the 'and women' part. The fact that somebody finally recognized that sexually degrading a police officer for being female isn't any less of a problem than saying Jews run the media was probably the result of a lot of organizing and phone calls and letter-writing. That's the kind of thing I want NOW to make happen. I want sexism to be taken as seriously in the media as racism and antisemitism and homophobia.
I also want pro-women awards ceremonies, like the NAACP Image Awards. Why don't we have something like that? #now
10/16/09
Non-NOW-related example: The DUI charges against Mel Gibson were dropped recently and his arrest was mentioned in the news again. Usually, news reports refer to Gibson's "antisemitic rant," but in this one report I happened to catch, they said his rant was against "jews and women," which nearly knocked me on my ass because no one ever mentions the 'and women' part. The fact that somebody finally recognized that sexually degrading a police officer for being female isn't any less of a problem than saying Jews run the media was probably the result of a lot of organizing and phone calls and letter-writing. That's the kind of thing I want NOW to make happen. I want sexism to be taken as seriously in the media as racism and antisemitism and homophobia.
I also want pro-women awards ceremonies, like the NAACP Image Awards. Why don't we have something like that? #now
10/16/09
10/16/09
I think this is so true. We all have to deal with men behaving badly in our private & professional lives on a daily basis. I think they are right in addressing these issues. #now
10/16/09
10/16/09
Maybe instead NOW should tackle the cult of beauty as the be-all and end-all of what any of us women have to strive for. Maybe that would be worth doing. This? Is publicity. #ralphlauren
10/16/09
My (very anti-fashion) mother and I had a long discussion about my extremely ambivalent feelings on the industry that I have yet to reconcile. On one hand, you have designers like Alexander McQueen creating what I think is some of the world’s greatest contemporary art (in both his clothing designs and his runway shows), but on the other hand, his models are as skinny as anyone else’s. It’s easy to be dismissive of an individual designer if they’re outlandish and you don’t even love their designs anyway (ie: Christian Louboutin saying Barbie’s ankles are too fat), but when you have incredible designers who are tacitly (McQueen) or vocally (Lagerfeld) going on about women over 110 pounds being "fat" it’s difficult to decide what to do as a consumer/artist appreciating art.
This all reminds me of a sketch from "The State" wherein Ben Garant is a fashion designer who accuses a myriad of skinny models of being cows. Finally, Kerri Kenney brings him a "model" who is finally skinny enough: she’s invisible. Eventually, even she becomes too chunky for Garant’s liking. Fucking brilliant sketch. #ralphlauren
10/16/09
I say BOYCOTT!
I don't need some flack at RL to disingenuously tell me I'm beautiful. I know I am. Photoshop that, bish. #ralphlauren