I read the news release this story was based on. The writer of this piece is using the language used by the sheriff's office.
I wrote my story using "forced to have sex," but my headline used the word "rape." However, we generally stick to "sexually assaulted" or "sexually battered," because it's less salacious, and hence less likely to bring out the "but she asked for it!" crowd.
I'm going to guess that it has to do with the legal definition of rape in that area-- in some jurisdictions, it requires the victim to put up physical resistance, and if that wasn't the case here, it could be libel to say rape.
Rape laws in many places need severely revised.
Poorly written, but it’s no crime against womanity, imo. The writer has used the definition of the word rape in lieu of the word—it has nevertheless been spelled out and I’m okay with it. Perhaps s/he avoided the word "rape" since it hasn’t gone to trial yet.
@LaComtesse: I see two problems with it. First, rape is not "having sex" and I have a really hard time whenever anyone says that. It's like the Australian radio hosts pulling the "other than the time you were raped, have you ever had sex?" bullshit. Second, rape is an ugly action that has an equally ugly word attached to it. Not using the proper word makes it seem less serious, less important. I worry that people who start to think of it as "not rape" will start to think of rape as a non-serious societal issue.
@utensil42: I thought about that myself and I see the point, but "forced sex," while not as loaded a word as "rape" comes to the same basic point. I don't think you run the risk of associating "forced" sex with actual consentual sex in any meaningful way. Sort of like, would you associate "poison cupcake" with something good that you would want to eat just because "cupcake" is in the phrase?
@Jack_Burton: I would have still called it rape but just, you know, given the details the way reporters are supposed to. But I guess Fox doesn't really have reporters.
I for one haven't liked the terminology used for a long time. To say someone was sexually assaulted (not even going to bother with "forced her to have sex against her will") just doesn't have the same visceral reaction for me as saying they were raped. Some people might see it as not that important but to me it takes some of the power away from such a heinous and despicable act. I read one time that rape is basically emotional murder, I think that is the best description I ever saw for it and it has stuck with me permanently.
They've been taking lessons from that judge in -- where was it, Utah, Nebraska, Kansas? More than one occurrence of this lately, it seems -- who permitted photos submitted into evidence of the 17-y-o girl who'd been sexually assaulted because she and her assailants had been drinking, and he couldn't permit "such behavior" to go unrebuked.
Loooong sigh.
To thoroughly misquote Genesis, "We've got a long long way to go", but I feel a strange case of deja vu after reading my mother's 70s mags, with the Virginia Slims ads, and want to say, along with Veronica when Heather #3 told her she looked like hell, 'Yeah? I just got back."
/rant
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: Kansas. More evidence that there is something the matter with Kansas. Also, he didn't just show photos of her. He showed photos of her taken DURING the assault, to parents and kids. How that wasn't "distributing child pornography" is totally beyond me.
@utensil42: Probably b/c, as you said, it was Kansas.
But I really did read something about a similar case in Utah as well. I have to find it. This is far from an uncommon occurrence.
@BrutallyHonestBabes (aka Mrs....: Ha, you have no idea. We joke about Polk County in our newsroom - it's the armpit of Florida. And THAT is saying something.
@NefariousNewt: Also, he did not have sex with her. He raped her. That phrase is patently false doublespeak and the continued conflation of sex and rape is extremely damaging.
@slowpoke.r: I'd c&p'd that quote too - it seemed like such an oddly worded, disconnected way to say that he raped, or (euphemistically) sexually assaulted a woman. Instead, it somehow leaves the impression of having sex with an inanimate object, even with the addition of "despite her pleas for him to stop."
@labeled: You know, it really IS more salacious. The isolated area, pleas, all of the wording is exactly like a crime scene tech describing a case to Benson and Stabler. Except they would then give the guy a look and say, "So he RAPED her?" and walk away.
I know Fox news will never get this, but euphemisms do not make for good reporting.
Part of me wants to read the story, but the other part is split between not wanting to turn into lilhulkytables and the other part does not want to give Fox the pageview. Stupid Fox news.
I left "News" in lowercase as an ineffectual linguistic protest. Take that, Fox!
08/13/09
I wrote my story using "forced to have sex," but my headline used the word "rape." However, we generally stick to "sexually assaulted" or "sexually battered," because it's less salacious, and hence less likely to bring out the "but she asked for it!" crowd.
08/12/09
Rape laws in many places need severely revised.
08/12/09
/major sarcasm.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
[www.facebook.com]
[www.abcactionnews.com]
[www.theledger.com]
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
Loooong sigh.
To thoroughly misquote Genesis, "We've got a long long way to go", but I feel a strange case of deja vu after reading my mother's 70s mags, with the Virginia Slims ads, and want to say, along with Veronica when Heather #3 told her she looked like hell, 'Yeah? I just got back."
/rant
08/12/09
08/12/09
But I really did read something about a similar case in Utah as well. I have to find it. This is far from an uncommon occurrence.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/13/09
08/12/09
As opposed to: he lured that woman, also 19, to an isolated area and raped her.
That's nine words less; maybe Fox pays by the word?
ETA: Their typo/ poor grammar above, not mine. They're word rich but edit poor, apparently.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
Or, conversely, it is just a hair more salacious.
08/12/09
I know Fox news will never get this, but euphemisms do not make for good reporting.
08/12/09
I left "News" in lowercase as an ineffectual linguistic protest. Take that, Fox!