<![CDATA[Jezebel: norman mailer]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: norman mailer]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/normanmailer http://jezebel.com/tag/normanmailer <![CDATA[New York Times Notable Deaths: Light On The Ladies, Heavy On The Mascara]]> Today's NY Times includes a list of the most
notable deaths from the past year, and while women only constitute about 17% of the list, what they lack in numbers the ladies mentioned make up for in spunk and glitter. The Jezeverse is considerably less festive now that Slut Machine's favorite televised trainwreck, Anna Nicole, is up in heaven, flashing her tits to angels. And she's not the only "personality" to pass this year: sweet and campy Tammy Faye Messner is now at the great makeup counter in the sky, while the Queen of Mean, Leona Helmsley also died and left $12 million to her bitchy Maltese (but $0 to half her grandchildren).



The literary world also lost several bright lights, including the inimitable short story writer and poet Grace Paley. A Wrinkle in Time author Madeline L'Engle died in September, New York Review of Books co-founder Elizabeth Hardwick passed earlier this month, and columnist Molly Ivins died, at the too-early age of 62, in January, and to Jennifer's everlasting chagrin, fashion guru Liz Claiborne died in June and actress Deborah Kerr went from Here to Eternity in October. Wonder if the paper's editors will add recently (and reportedly) dead Benazir Bhutto to the list?

Notable Deaths of 2007 [NY Times]

Earlier:
Anna Nicole Smith Knew How To Throw A Damn Christmas Party
God Bless Tammy Faye
The Queen of Mean Is Dead
Madeline L'Engle, Beloved Author Of Fifth Grade Erotica Dies
Literary Lioness: Elizabeth Hardwick
Liz Claiborne: From Little House To House Of Style
...to Eternity: Deborah Kerr

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338002&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our favorite canonized misogynist, Norman...]]> Our favorite canonized misogynist, Norman Mailer, has been posthumously awarded the Bad Sex in Fiction prize from Literary Review magazine for the following passage: "His mouth lathered with her sap, he turned around and embraced her face with all the passion of his own lips and face, ready at last to grind into her with the Hound, drive it into her piety." Uh, we definitely don't want some dude's hound anywhere NEAR our piety. [BBC News]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=327343&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Norman Mailer's Wife: Mailer "Loved Women"]]> The New York Post has an exclusive interview with Norman Mailer's widow, sixth wife Norris Church Mailer, in which she says Mailer "...was a man who loved women, and respected them... He had five daughters, three daughters-in-law and six granddaughters who all adored him." This statement reeks of the "but some of my best friends are women!" defense, and what's worse, Norris goes on to say, "Most people who said he was a male chauvinist didn't know him and didn't read his work." Well Norris, we have read his work, and we still think he's a misogynist. In fact, we have his novel, An American Dream, in our little paws right now, and we're pretty sure his portrayal of women is entirely full of bile.

Dream tells the story of former Congressman Stephen Rojack, who, within the first three chapters, murders his wealthy wife, fucks his dead wife's maid, and entertains a "blonde devil" of a night club singer named Cherry.

Not convinced yet that Mailer was no fan of women? Here's an excerpt from the novel that might prove otherwise. It's a description of Rojack's wife, Deborah. Rojack admits that he married Deborah in part because of her wealth and elevated social standing, though he did deeply love her in his messed up way.

She was a great bitch, Deborah, a lioness of the species: unconditional surrender was her only raw meat. A Great Bitch has losses to calculate after all if the gent gets away. For ideally a Great Bitch delivers extermination to any bucko brake enough to take carnal knowledge of her. She somehow fails in her role (as psychoanalysts, those frustrated stage directors, might say) if the lover escapes without being maimed to the nines or nailed to the mast. And Deborah had gotten her hooks into me, eight years ago she had clinched the hooks and they had given birth to other hooks. Living with her I was murderous; attempting to separate, suicide came into me.
To recap, any "lioness of the species," (read: strong woman) will destroy any man fool enough to get involved with her and the "hooks" she has begotten. Still not convinced? Well how about this description of Ruta, Deborah's maid, as Rojack is having sex with her after he's murdered Deborah. Ruta has a "monomaniacal determination to get along in the world...that was replaced by something tender as the flesh but not at all clean, something sneaky, full of fear, but young, a child in soiled pants." Then he calls her a Nazi.

The only woman who escapes Mailer's acid pen is Deborah's daughter, Deirdre, who is too young and innocent to be evil. "A delicate haunted girl with eyes which contained a promise she would learn everything about you if she looked too long, and so chose not to look."

Hmmm, so Mailer's surrogate, Rojack, hates all women except for his children. And Mailer, the man, had five daughters and six granddaughters "who adored him"? Perhaps Norman thought of his progeny as separate from the vast, unwashed womanhood out there. Certainly his second wife, Adele, whom Mailer stabbed with a penknife, supports the view of Norman as someone who was not so kind to women. In an interview with Adele, who is living in near-poverty despite the wealth of the Mailer estate, she said of the stabbing, "In one minute he destroyed my life, and it took me years to make it back."

We never met Norman Mailer and have no idea as to how he treated the women in his personal life besides Adele, but we think we can say without a doubt that the way he treated his literary women was pretty fucking shabby.

Widow Defends Mailer, Says He 'Loved Women' [New York Post]
The Woman in the Shadow [New York Times]

Earlier: The He-Man Woman-Haters Writing Club

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Camille Paglia Hates Hillary, Loves Mailer, Is Miffed At Madonna]]> Self-proclaimed feminist bisexual egomaniac and general blowhard Camille Paglia tries to dismantle Hillary Clinton in her Salon column today and mostly ends up contradicting herself. She disses Hillary's media persona, calling her debate tone a "tight-wound, self-righteous attack voice," but then also criticizes Hillary for not being strong enough. "Women had better toughen up if they aspire to be commander in chief," Camille writes. So which is it? Is Hillary too wussy, or is she too aggressive? It seems that Camille thinks Hillary should be more like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who she describes as "simple, centered and warm." Or maybe more like Hillary's top aide, Huma Abedin, who gets praise from Paglia for being "stylish" and wielding a designer handbag. (Didn't Camille hear? That handbag is a fake!)

California Senator Dianne Feinstein also gets some Paglia love for having "true gravitas — a rare quality in women." Then Camille opines that Dianne Feinstein should have been the first female nominee for president. (Because even though America might not vote for a woman, they'll jump at the chance to vote for a Jewish woman) Further on, Camille admits that Madonna didn't want to meet her after that Madonna — Finally, a Real Feminist story in the 90s, perhaps because the pop star was intimidated by her intellectuality. "I attributed Madonna's skittishness at the time to her uncertainties about her education (she had dropped out of college after one semester to seek fame in New York)."

So to recap! Women rarely have true gravitas, should be stylish and warm but not too aggressive or shrill, and Camille Paglia is smarter than Madonna. (Paglia also defends Norman Mailer's place in the sexual dialog of the 70s and calls him "pussy whipped.") I'd foment some righteous indignation about it but I'm too exhausted from the anger aroused by the rest of her column to deal with it.

Queen Hillary's disruptive court [Salon]
Madonna — Finally, a Real Feminist [New York Times]
Earlier: Gorgeous Star-Fucking Hillary Clinton Aide Buys Fake Handbag And Other Stuff Vogue Left Out

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322609&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The He-Man Woman-Haters Writing Club]]> A bunch of you wrote in yesterday, wondering why we hadn't covered the death of one of America's most infamous misogynists, Norman Mailer. I for one, was reticent to write about him because I didn't feel like speaking ill of the dead. But I changed my mind. To honor of the death of a man who stabbed his second wife with a penknife at a party and called the women's movement "dykily psychotic, crippled, creepish, fashionable, frigid," here's a quick list of the 20th century lady-hating writer hall of shame. One caveat: just because these writers are unfortunate in their portrayal of women, doesn't mean they shouldn't be read and heralded. Philip Roth, for instance, is one of greatest contemporary American writers, but that doesn't mean he's not a complete asshole.

Philip Roth: So the aforementioned Roth! Ol' Phil made his name writing about self-involved, Oedipally-complected Jewish men who fucked nearly-illiterate but gorgeous shiksas and then denigrated them later. Example: Portnoy's Complant where he dehumanizes his object of affection by calling her "the Monkey" and fixating on her physical attributes to the point of fetishization.
Ernest Hemingway: Zelda Fitzgerald once said that The Sun Also Rises was about "Bullfighting, bullslinging, and bullshit," and our girl Z was pretty much on the mark. Lady Brett Ashley, who is the pants-wearing, sexually-emancipated object of affection in the novel, causes only trouble for the men she comes in contact with. Because any woman who acts and dresses "like a man" is a threat to real men and appropriate notions of masculinity.

Charles Bukowski: Attacking Bukowski for misogyny sort of seems like kicking someone when they're down, since Bukowski was such an alcoholic mess most of the time. Sort of! The women in all of Bukowski's stories are one-dimensional cyphers if not actual prostitutes, but one particular story comes to mind in terms of its dastardly portrayal of a woman. It's called "Six Inches." Henry Chinaski, who is Bukowski's alter-ego, marries a woman named Sarah, who boasts a voracious sexual appetite. As the months wear on, Henry starts shrinking, and doesn't stop shrinking until he's 6 inches tall. At that point, Sarah calls him her little pet and puts Henry into her vagina. He describes the experience:

Sarah picked me up and placed me down between her legs, which she spread open just a bit. Then I was facing a forest of hair. I hardened my back and neck muscles, sensing what was to come. I was jammed into darkness and stench. I heard Sarah moan. Then Sarah began to move me slowly back and forth. As I said, the stench was unbearable, and it was difficult to breathe...Suddenly, I was ripped out of that terrible tunnel..."O, my darling! o, my precious little cock! I love you!"
That's right! Watch out for the vagina dentata, boys!

So there's a case to be made for Mailer, Roth, Hemingway, and Bukowski. Who else so you nominate for this literary hall of shame?

Norman Mailer, Towering Writer With Matching Ego, Dies at 84 [New York Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322037&view=rss&microfeed=true